Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:01:40.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part VI - Kinship and the Nation-State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2019

Edited by
Sandra Bamford
Sandra Bamford
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship , pp. 603 - 728
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Alidina, Rizwan and Walji, Mohamed. 17 Sept. 2010. “Cousin Marriages: A Question of Understanding.” The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/sep/17/cousin-marriages-understanding-health-risks, accessed August 7, 2015.Google Scholar
Beckford, Martin. 23 Mar. 2010. “Baroness Deech: Risks of Cousin Marriage Not Discussed for Fear of Offending Muslims.” The Telegraph. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/7497906/Baroness-Deech-Risks-of-cousin-marriage-not-discussed-for-fear-of-offending-Muslims.html, accessed August 7, 2015.Google Scholar
Bemiss, Samuel Merrifield. 1857. “On Marriages of Consanguinity.” Journal of Psychological Medicine and Mental Pathology 10: 369–379.Google ScholarPubMed
Bemiss, Samuel Merrifield. 1858. “Report on the Influence of Marriages of Consanguinity upon Offspring.” Transactions of the American Medical Association 11: 319–425.Google Scholar
Bennett, Robin L, Motulsky, Arno G., Bittles, Alan, Hudgins, Louanne, et al. 2002. “Genetic Couselling and Screening of Consanguineous Couples and Their Offspring: Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.” Journal of Genetic Counseling 11(2): 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredbenner, Candice Lewis. 1998. A Nationality of Her Own: Women, Marriage, and the Law of Citizenship. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Charles, Rev. 1856. “Laws of Reproduction, Considered with Particular Reference to the Intermarriage of First-Cousins.” Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 236–246.Google Scholar
Butt, Riazat. 15 Nov. 2005. “British Pakistanis Should Stop Marrying Cousins, Says MP.” The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/politics/2005/nov/16/immigrationpolicy.politics, accessed August 7, 2015.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Charles. 1834. Thoughts on Physical Education: Being a Discourse Delivered to a Convention of Teachers in Lexington, KY., on the 6th and 7th of Nov., 1833. Boston, MA: Marsh, Capen and Lyon.Google Scholar
Cooke, Miriam. 2014. Tribal Modern: Branding New Nations in the Arab Gulf. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cott, Nancy F. 2000. Public Vows: A History of Marriage and the Nation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cross, Whitney R. 1950. The Burned-Over District: The Social and Intellectual History of Enthusiastic Religion in Western New York, 1800–1850. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Crossman, Edward. 1861. “On Intermarriage of Relations As a Cause of Degeneracy of Offspring.” British Medical Journal 1: 401–402.Google Scholar
Delaney, Carol. 1995. “Father State, Motherland, and the Birth of Modern Turkey.” In Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis, ed. Yanagisako, Sylvia and Delaney, Carol, 177–200. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dolgin, Janet L. 1997. Defining the Family: Law, Technology, and Reproduction in an Uneasy Age. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Driscoll, Margarette. 17 Feb. 2008. “It’s Tradition, Not Religion, That Wrecks So Many Lives.” The Sunday Times. www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1972391/posts, accessed August 8, 2015.Google Scholar
Fabian, Johannes. 1983. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, Lawrence. 1991. Women, Family, and Utopia: Communal Experiments of the Shakers, the Oneida Community, and the Mormons. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Gadher, Dipesh, Morgan, Christopher and Oliver, Jonathan. 10 Feb. 2008. “Minister Warns of ‘Inbred’ Muslims.” The Sunday Times. www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/Test/politics/article80421.ece, accessed August 7, 2015.Google Scholar
Gibb, Frances. 20 Mar. 2010. “Rise in Marriages between Cousins ‘Is Putting Children’s Health at Risk.’” The Times. www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article7069255.ece, accessed February 13, 2011.Google Scholar
Gordon, Sarah Barringer. 2002. The Mormon Question: Polygamy and Constitutional Conflict in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Grossberg, Michael. 1985. Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Richard. 1988. Nationalism and the Politics of Culture in Quebec. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Heng, Geraldine and Devan, Janadas. 1992. “State Fatherhood: The Politics of Nationalism, Sexuality, and Race in Singapore.” In Nationalisms and Sexualities, ed. Parker, Andres, Russo, Mary, Sommer, Doris and Yaeger, Patricia, 343–364. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herb, Michael. 1999. All in the Family: Absolutism, Revolution, and Democracy in the Middle Eastern Monarchies. Albany, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Kuper, Adam. 2001. “Fraternity and Endogamy: The House of Rothschild.” Social Anthropology 9(3): 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuper, Adam. 2002. “Incest, Cousin Marriage, and the Origin of the Human Sciences in Nineteenth-Century England.” Past and Present 174: 158–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuper, Adam. 2009. Incest and Influence: The Private Life of Bourgeois England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McClintock, Anne. 1993. “Family Feuds: Gender, Nationalism and the Family.” Feminist Review 44: 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, Susan. 2001. “The Economies of Kinship and the Paternity of Culture: Origin Stories in Kinship Theory.” In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, ed. Franklin, Sarah and McKinnon, Susan, 277–301. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, Susan. 2013. “Kinship within and beyond the ‘Movement of Progressive Societies.’” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 39–62. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella. 2013. “The Difference Kinship Makes.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 3–38. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1877. Ancient Society; or, Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery through Barbarism to Civilization. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Sabean, David Warren and Teuscher, Simon. 2007 “Kinship in Europe: A New Approach to Long-Term Development.” In Kinship in Europe: Approaches to Long-Term Development (1300–1900), ed. Sabean, David Warren, Teuscher, Simon and Mathieu, Jon, 1–32. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Santorum, Rick. 2005. It Takes a Family: Conservatism and the Common Good. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books.Google Scholar
Schatz, Edward. 2004. Modern Clan Politics: The Power of “Blood” in Kazakhstan and Beyond. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, David M. 1968. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Schneider, David M. 1969. “Kinship, Nationality and Religion in American Culture: Toward a Definition of Kinship.” In Forms of Symbolic Action (Proceedings of the 1969 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society), 116–125. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Alison. 2001. “Kinship, Cultural Preference and Immigration: Consanguineous Marriage among British Pakistanis.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7(2): 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Alison. 2006. “Rishtas: Adding Emotion to Strategy in Understanding British Pakistani Transnational Marriages.” Global Networks 6(4): 405–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Alison. 2009. Negotiating Risk: British Pakistani Experiences of Genetics. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Sparrow, Andrew. 11 Feb. 2008. “Backing for Minister over First-Cousin Marriage Comments.” The Guardian. www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/feb11/religion.medicalscience, accessed November 8, 2010.Google Scholar
Steger, F. E. H. 1855. “Hereditary Transmission of Disease.” Nashville Journal of Medicine and Surgery 8(3): 177–191.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, Sylvia and Delaney, Carol. 1995. “Naturalizing Power.” In Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis, ed. Yanagisako, Sylvia and Delaney, Carol, 1–22. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

References

Arias, Enrique Desmond and Rodrigues, Corinne Davis. 2006. “The Myth of Personal Security: Criminal Gangs, Dispute Resolution, and Identity in Rio de Janeiro’s Favelas.” Latin American Politics and Society 48(4): 53–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinks, Daniel. 2008. Police Violence in the Americas: The Judicial Response to Police Killings in Latin America: Inequality and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brooke, James. 29 Mar. 1991. “‘Honor’ Killing of Wives Is Outlawed in Brazil.” The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/1991/03/29/us/honor-killing-of-wives-is-outlawed-in-brazil.html, accessed June 1, 2018.Google Scholar
Carsten, Janet. 2013. “What Kinship Does – and How.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3(2): 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesnut, R. Andrew. 1997. Born Again in Brazil: The Pentecostal Boom and the Pathogens of Poverty. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Cunha, Manuela Ivone P. 2008. “Closed Circuits: Kinship, Neighbourhood and Incarceration in Urban Portugal.” Ethnography 9(3): 325–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Matta, Roberto. 1991. Carnivals, Rogues, and Heroes: An Interpretation of the Brazilian Dilemma. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Da Matta, Roberto. 1997. A casa e a rua: Espaço, cidadania, mulher e a morte no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Rocco.Google Scholar
Das, Veena. 1995. Critical Events: An Anthropological Perspective on Contemporary India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Das, Veena. 2012. “Ordinary Ethics.” In A Companion to Moral Anthropology, ed. Fassin, Didier, 133–149. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Jeanette and Strathern, Marilyn. 2000. “Including Our Own.” In Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship, ed. Carsten, Janet, 149–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fonseca, Claudia. 1986. “Orphanages, Foundlings, and Foster Mothers: The System of Child Circulation in a Brazilian Squatter Settlement.” Anthropological Quarterly 59(1): 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonseca, Claudia. 2006. “Da circulação de crianças à adoção internacional: questões de pertencimento e posse.” Cadernos Pagu 26: 11–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Donna M. 2013 [2003]. Laughter Out of Place: Race, Class, Violence, and Sexuality in a Rio Shantytown. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Han, Clara. 2011. “Symptoms of Another Life: Time, Possibility, and Domestic Relations in Chile’s Credit Economy.” Cultural Anthropology 26(1): 7–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hautzinger, Sarah. 2007. Violence in the City of Women: Police and Batterers in Bahia, Brazil. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hita, Maria Gabriela. 2008. “Ownership, Appropriation and the Reproduction Cycle of Afro-Descendent Houses in Salvador, Bahia.” Ownership and Appropriation Conference, Association of Social Anthropologists of the UK and the Commonwealth Conference, University of Auckland, 2008.Google Scholar
Lambek, Michael. 2011. “Kinship As Gift and Theft: Acts of Succession in Mayotte and Ancient Israel.” American Ethnologist 38(1): 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linger, Daniel Touro. 1992. Dangerous Encounters: Meanings of Violence in a Brazilian City. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCallum, Cecilia. 1999. “Restraining Women: Gender, Sexuality and Modernity in Salvador da Bahia.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 18(3): 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcellin, Louis Herns. 1999. “A linguagem da casa entre os negros no recôncavo baiano.” Mana 5(2): 31–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayblin, Maya. 2010. Gender, Catholicism, and Morality in Brazil: Virtuous Husbands, Powerful Wives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, Kathleen M. 2014. “The Precarious Present: Wageless Labor and Disrupted Life in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.” Cultural Anthropology 29(1): 32–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Hollis. 2017. Imprisonment and (Un)Relatedness in Northeast Brazil. PhD Dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
O Correio. 7 Feb. 2011. “Violència registrada em Salvador é destaque no Jornal Nacional.” O Correio. www.correio24horas.com.br/noticia/nid/violencia-registrada-em-salvador-e-destaque-no-jornal-nacional/, accessed November 1, 2018.Google Scholar
Page, Joseph A. 1996. The Brazilians. Boston, MA: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Peletz, Michael. 2000. “Ambivalence in Kinship since the 1940s.” In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, ed. Franklin, Sarah and McKinnon, Susan, 413–444. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Penglase, Ben. 2009. “States of Insecurity: Everyday Emergencies, Public Secrets, and Drug Trafficker Power in a Brazilian Favela.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 32(1): 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebhun, L. A. 1999. The Heart Is Unknown Country: Love in the Changing Economy of Northeast Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Reece, Koreen. 2016. “A Familiar Crisis: Kinship and Intervention in Botswana’s Time of AIDS.” Paper delivered at AAA 2016 Annual Meeting for the Kinship and Crisis Panel.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 2013. What Kinship Is – and Is Not. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 2015. “Death Squads and Vigilante Politics in Democratic Northeast Brazil.” In Violence at the Urban Margins, ed. Auyero, Javier, Bourgois, Phillipe and Scheper-Hughes, Nancy, 266–304. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, David Murray. 1980. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuster, Caroline. 2015. Social Collateral: Women and Microfinance in Paraguay’s Smuggling Economy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 2014. “Reading Relations Backwards.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 20(1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, Thomas. 2016. “The Axiom of Enmity: A Papua New Guinea Example.” Paper delivered at AAA 2016 Annual Meeting for the Kinship and Crisis Panel.Google Scholar
Torres, Juan and Uchôa, Victor. 14 July 2011. “Policiais mataram 77 pessoas em Salvador e RMS de janeiro a junho.” O Correio. www.correio24horas.com.br/noticia/nid/policiais-mataram-77-pessoas-em-salvador-e-rms-de-janeiro-a-junho/, accessed November 1, 2018.Google Scholar
Torres, Juan and Uchôa, Victor. 5 Jan. 2012. “Salvador e RMS tiveram 2.037 mortos por homicídio no ano passado.” O Correio. www.correio24horas.com.br/noticia/nid/salvador-e-rms-tiveram-2037-mortos-por-homicidio-no-ano-passado/, accessed November 1, 2018.Google Scholar
Van Esterik, Penny. 2007. “Advocacy.” www.yorku.ca/esterik/advocacy.html, accessed June 1, 2018.Google Scholar
Viana, L. A. C., Costa, M. D. C. N., Paim, J. S. and Vieira-da-Silva, L. M.. 2011. “Social Inequalities and the Rise in Violent Deaths in Salvador, Bahia State, Brazil: 2000–2006.” Cadernos de saude publica, 27(supl. 2): s298–s308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldram, James. 2012. Hound Pound Narrative: Sexual Offender Habilitation and the Anthropology of Therapeutic Intervention. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wesely, Jennifer K. 2006. “Considering the Context of Women’s Violence: Gender, Lived Experiences, and Cumulative Victimization.” Feminist Criminology 1(4): 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Barnard, A. and Good, A.. 1984. Research Practices in the Study of Kinship. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. 1982. “On Value” (Radcliffe brown Lecture 1980). Proceedings of the British Academy 66: 207–241.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1940. The Nuer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fortes, M. and Evans-Pritchard, E. E., eds. 1940. African Political Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P., 87–104. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, T. and Sillander, K., eds. 2011. Anarchic Solidarity: Autonomy, Equality, and Fellowship in Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Howell, S. 1984. Society and Cosmos: Chewong of Peninsular Malaysia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (New paperback ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 1989.)Google Scholar
Howell, S. 1985. “Equality and Hierarchy in Chewong Classification.” In Context and Levels, ed. Barnes, R. H., De Coppet, D. and Parkin, R. J., 167–180. JASO Occasional Paper, 4. Oxford: JASO.Google Scholar
Howell, S. 1986. “Of Persons and Things: Exchange and Valuables among the Lio of Eastern Indonesia.” MAN (n.s.) 24: 419–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, S. 1995a. “Rethinking the Mother’s Brother.” Indonesia Circle. November.Google Scholar
Howell, S. 1995b. “The Lio House: Building, Category, Idea, Value.” In About the House: Levi-Strauss and Beyond, ed. Carsten, J. and Hugh-Jones, S., 149–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, S. 1996. “Many Contexts, Many Meanings? Gendered Values among the Lio of Indonesia.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (incorporating MAN) 2(2): 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, S. 2001. “Self-Conscious Kinship: Some Contested Values in Norwegian Transnational Adoption.” In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, ed. Franklin, S. and McKinnon, S., 203–223. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, S. 2003. “Kinning: The Creation of Life Trajectories in Transnational Adoptive Families.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (incorporating MAN) 9(3): 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, S. 2006. The Kinning of Foreigners: Transnational Adoption in a Global Perspective. Oxford/New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, S. 2009. “Accelerated Globalisation and the Conflicts of Values Seen through the Lens of Transnational Adoption: A Comparative Perspective.” In The Anthropology of Moralities, ed. Heintz, Monica, 81–101. Oxford/New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Howell, S. 2011. “Sources of Sociality in a Cosmological Frame: Chewong, Peninsular Malaysia.” In Anarchic Solidarity: Autonomy, Equality, and Fellowship in Southeast Asia, ed. Gibson, T. and Sillander, K., 40–61. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Howell, S. 2013. “Knowledge, Morality and Causality in a ‘Luckless’ Society.” Social Analysis 56(1): 133–147.Google Scholar
Howell, S. 2017. “Rules without Rulers?” HAU: Journal of Etnographic Theory 7(3): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuper, A. 1973. Anthropologists and Anthropology: The British School 1922–1972. London: Alan Lane.Google Scholar
Lansing, J. S. 2003. “The Cognitive Machinery of Paoer: Reflections on Valeri’s ‘The Forest of Taboos.’” American Ethnologist 30(3): 372–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, E. 1954. Political Systems of Highland Burma: A Study of Kachin Social Structure. London: Bell.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1969 [1949]. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Melhuus, M. 2012. Problems of Conception: Issues of Law, Biotechnology, Individuals and Kinship. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Melhuus, M. and Howell, S.. 2009. “Adoption and Assisted Conception: One Universe of Unnatural Procreation. An Examination of Norwegian Legislation.” In European Kinship in the Age of Biotechnology, ed. Edwards, Jeanette and Salazar, Carles, 144–161. Oxford/New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. 2013. What Kinship Is – and Is Not. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, M. 2017. “The Original Political Society.” HAU: Journal of Etnographic Theory 7(2): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, M. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, T and Alber, E., eds. 2017. Reconnecting State and Kinship. Philadelphia, PA: Penn Press.Google Scholar

References

Bierschenk, T. and de Sardan, J.-P. Olivier. 2014. States at Work: Dynamics of African Bureaucracies. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, J. 2013. “Ghosts, Commensality, and Scuba Diving: Tracing Kinship and Sociality in Clinical Pathology Labs and Blood Banks in Penang.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fennella, 109–130. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Durham, D. 2002. “Love and Jealousy in the Space of Death.” Ethnos 67(2): 155–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durham, D. and Klaits, F.. 2002. “Funerals and the Public Space of Sentiment in Botswana.” Journal of Southern African Studies 28(4): 773–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. and Fortes, M.. 1940. African Political Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fassin, D. 2012. Humanitarian Reason: A Moral History of the Present. Translated by R. Gomme. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fassin, D. 2013. “Children As Victims: The Moral Economy of Childhood in the Times of AIDS.” In When People Come First: Critical Studies in Global Health, ed. Biehl, J. and Petryna, A., 109–130. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. 1994. The Anti-Politics Machine: “Development,” Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Klaits, F. 2010. Death in a Church of Life: Moral Passion during Botswana’s Time of AIDS. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. 1975. “The Social Structure of the Sotho-Speaking Peoples of Southern Africa: Part I and Part II.” Journal of the International African Institute 45(1): 67–81, 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambek, M. 2013. “Kinship, Modernity, and the Immodern.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, S. and Cannell, F., 241–260. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
McKinnon, S. and Cannell, F.. 2013. “Introduction.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, S. and Cannell, F., 14–49. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Malkki, L. 1996. “Speechless Emissaries: Refugees, Humanitarianism, and Dehistoricisation.” Cultural Anthropology 11(3): 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosse, D. 2004. “Is Good Policy Unimplementable? Reflections on the Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice.” Development and Change 35(4): 639–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfield, P. 2012. “The Unbearable Lightness of Ex-pats: Double Binds of Humanitarian Mobility.” Cultural Anthropology 27(2): 358–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfield, P. and Bornstein, E.. 2011. “An Introduction to the Anthropology of Humanitarianism.” In Forces of Compassion: Humanitarianism between Ethics and Politics, ed. Redfield, P. and Bornstein, E., 3–30. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Reece, K. 2019. “‘We Are Seeing Things’: Recognition, Risk, and Reproducing Kinship in Botswana’s Time of AIDS. Africa 89(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schapera, I. 1940. Married Life in an African Tribe. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Schapera, I. 1970. Tribal Innovators: Tswana Chiefs and Social Change, 1795–1940. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Shever, E. 2013. “‘I Am a Petroleum Product’: Making Kinship Work on the Patagonian Frontier.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, S. and Cannell, F., 85–108. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Ticktin, M. 2011. Casualties of Care: Immigration and the Politics of Humanitarianism in France. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ticktin, M. 2014. “Transnational Humanitarianism.” Annual Review of Anthropology 43: 273–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ticktin, M. and Feldman, I.. 2010. In the Name of Humanity: The Government of Threat and Care. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Tsing, A. L. 2005. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USAID. 2010. AIDSTAR-One Case Study Series: The O Icheke Campaign, Botswana. https://aidsfree.usaid.gov/resources/o-icheke-campaign-botswana, accessed July 17, 2017.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, R. 2010. “Marriage, Commodification and the Romantic Ethic in Botswana.” In Markets of Well-Being: Navigating Health and Healing in Africa, ed. Dekker, M. and van Dijk, R., 282–306. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Asad, Talal. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asad, Talal. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Felice, Austin, Axman, Lani, Farrell, Heather, Allgood, Robyn and Ripley, Sheridan. 2012. The Gift of Giving Life: Rediscovering the Divine Nature of Pregnancy and Birth. Culver City, CA: Madison and West Publishing.Google Scholar
Bamford, Sandra and Leach, James, eds. 2009. Kinship and Beyond: The Genealogical Model Reconsidered. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Basu, Paul. 2007. Highland Homecomings: Genealogy and Heritage Tourism in the Scottish Diaspora. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bear, Laura. 2007. Lines of the Nation: Indian Railway Workers, Bureaucracy and the Intimate Historical Self. New York/Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bear, Laura. 2013. “‘This Body Is Our Body’: Vishwakarma Puja, the Social Debts of Kinship and Theologies of Materiality in a Neoliberal Shipyard.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 155–179. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Bear, Laura. 2015. Navigating Austerity: Currents of Debt along a South Asian River. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert. 1997. “Max Weber and World-Denying Love: A Look at the Historical Sociology of Religion.” Humanities Center and Burke Leadership on Religion and Society, University of California, San Diego, CA. October 30. www.robertbellah.com/articles_3.htm, accessed October 4, 2017.Google Scholar
Bennion, Janet. 2012. Polygamy in Primetime. Lebanon, NH: Brandeis University Press, an imprint of the University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Bodenhorn, Barbara. 2013. “On the Road Again: Movement, Marriage, Mestizaje and the Race of Kinship.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 131–154. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, Pascal. 2001. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Cannell, Fenella. 2005. “The Christianity of Anthropology.” Malinowski Memorial Lecture, May 20, 2005. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.) 11(2): 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, Fenella. 2006. The Anthropology of Christianity. Durham, NC/London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, Fenella. 2010. “The Anthropology of Secularism.” Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, Fenella. 2011. “English Ancestors: The Moral Possibilities of Popular Genealogy.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.) 17(3): 462–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, Fenella. 2013. “The Re-Enchantment of Kinship.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 217–240. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Cannell, Fenella. 2017a. “Forever Families: Christian Individualism, Mormonism and Collective Salvation.” In New Directions in Spiritual Kinship: Sacred Ties across the Abrahamic Religions, ed. Thomas, Todne, Malik, Asiya and Wellman, Rose, 151–169. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, Fenella. 2017b. “Mormonism and Anthropology: On Ways of Knowing.” In Mormon Studies Review 4(1): article 2. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr2/vol4/iss1/2, accessed November 13, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, Fenella. In preparation. Book of Life: Mormon Sacred Kinship in Modern America.Google Scholar
Carsten, Janet. 2000. Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carsten, Janet. 2013. “Ghosts, Commensality and Scuba Diving: Tracing Kinship and Sociality in Clinical Pathology.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 217–240. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Casanova, Jose. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 2011. Gospel Principles. www.lds.org/manual/gospel-principles/chapter-47-exaltation?lang=eng, accessed January 8, 2017.Google Scholar
Collier, Jane and Yanagisako, Sylvia Junko, eds. 1987. Gender and Kinship: Essays toward a Unified Analysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Das, Veena. 2006. “Secularism and the Argument from Nature.” In Powers of the Secular Modern: Talal Asad and His Interlocutors, ed. Scott, David and Hirschkind, Charles, 93–112. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Douglas. 2000. The Mormon Culture of Salvation. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Davies, Douglas. 2003. An Introduction to Mormonism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Douglas. 2010. Joseph Smith, Jesus and Satanic Opposition: Atonement, Evil and the Mormon Vision. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 2006 [1976]. The Selfish Gene, 30th anniversary ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feeley-Harnik, Gillian. 1999. “Communities of Blood”: The Natural History of Kinship in Nineteenth-Century America.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 41(2): 215–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley-Harnik, Gillian. 2001a. “The Ethnography of Creation: Lewis Henry Morgan and the American Beaver.” In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, ed. Franklin, S. and McKinnon, S., 54–84. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley-Harnik, Gillian. 2001b. “The Mystery of Life in All Its Forms: Religious Dimensions of Culture in Early American Anthropology.” In Religion and Cultural Studies, ed. Mizurchi, S., 140–191. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley-Harnik, Gillian. 2013. “Placing the Dead: Slavery, Kinship and Free Labor in Pre- and Post-Civil War America.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, S. and Cannell, F., 179–217. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Flake, Kathleen. 2003. The Politics of American Religious Identity: The Seating of Senato Reedr Smoot, Mormon Apostle. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah and McKinnon, Susan, eds. 2001. Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Givens, Terryl. 2004. Latter-Day Saint Experience in America. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Givens, Terryl. 2012. When Souls Had Wings: Pre-Mortal Existence in Western Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Givens, Terryl. 2014. Wrestling the Angel: The Foundations of Mormon Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Sarah Barringer. 2002. The Mormon Question: Polygamy and Constitutional Conflict in Nineteenth Century America. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Inhorn, Marcia. 2012. The New Arab Man: Emergent Masculinities, Technologies and Islam in the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb. 2007. Christian Moderns: Freedom and Fetish in the Mission Encounter. Berkeley/Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Klassen, Pamela. 2001. Blessed Events: Religion and Home Birth in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lambek, Michael. 2013. “Kinship, Modernity and the Immodern.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, S. and Cannell, F., 241–260. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno.1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leite, Naomi. 2017. Unorthodox Kin: Portuguese Marranos and the Global Search for Belonging. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberatore, Giulia. 2016. “Imagining an Ideal Husband: Marriage As a Site of Aspiration among Pious Somali Women in London.” Anthropological Quarterly 69(3): 781–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, Susan. 2013. “Kinship within and beyond the ‘Movement of Progressive Societies.’” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 39–62. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella. 2013. “The Difference Kinship Makes.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, S. and Cannell, F., 3–38. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Mody, Perveez. 2008. The Intimate State: Love-Marriage and the Law in Delhi. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orsi, Robert. 2005. Between Heaven and Earth: The Religious Worlds People Make and the Scholars Who Study Them. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Orsi, Robert. 2016. History and Presence. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Pool, Fernande. 2016. The Ethical life of Muslims in Secular India: Islamic Reformism in West Bengal. PhD Thesis, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Rapp, Rayna. 1999. Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roberts, Elizabeth. 2012. God’s Laboratory: Assisted Reproduction in the Andes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, Danilyn. 2013. “Kinship and Catastrophe: Global Warming and the Rhetoric of Descent.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 261–283. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 1996. “The Sadness of Sweetness: The Native Anthropology of Western Cosmology.” Current Anthropology 77(3): 395–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 2011a. “What Kinship Is” (Part 1). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17(1): 2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 2011b. “What Kinship Is” (Part 2). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17(2): 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, David. 1980 [1969]. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, David. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeman, Don. 2017. “Kinship As Ethical Relation: A Critique of the Spiritual Kinship Paradigm.” In New Directions in Spiritual Kinship: Sacred Ties Across the Abrahamic Religions, ed. Thomas, T., Malik, A. and Wellman, R., 85–108. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serjeant, Jill. 16 Dec. 2009. “‘Big Love’ Returns to TV with Provocative Gay Story.” Reuters. www.reuters.com/article/us-biglove/big-love-returns-to-tv-with-provocative-gay-story-idUSTRE5BF5O520091216, accessed November 3, 2018.Google Scholar
Shever, Elana. 2012. Resources for Reform: Oil and Neoliberalism in Argentina. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shever, Elana. 2013. “‘I Am a Petroleum Product”: Making Kinship Work on the Patagonian Frontier.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 85–109. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Shipps, Jan. 1987. Mormonism: The Story of a New Religious Tradition. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1980. “No Nature, No Culture: The Hagen Case.” In Nature, Culture and Gender, ed. MacCormack, C. and Strathern, M., 174–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1992. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Todne, Malik, Asiya and Wellman, Rose, eds. 2017. New Directions in Spiritual Kinship: Sacred Ties across the Abrahamic Religions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vivieros de Castro, Eduardo. 2009. “The Gift and the Given: Three Nano-Essays on Kinship and Magic.” In Kinship and Beyond: The Genealogical Model Reconsidered, ed. Bamford, S. and Leach, J., 237–268. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1991 [1915]. “Religious Rejections of the World and Their Directions.” (Zwischenbetrachtung). In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. Gerth, H. and Mills, C. Wright, 323–363. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1991. [c.1920]. “The Protestant Sects and the Spirit of Capitalism.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. Gerth, H. and Mills, C. Wright, 302–322. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1991. [1922]. “Science As a Vocation.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. Gerth, H. and Mills, C. Wright, 129–156. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 2001. [c.1930]. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by T. Parsons from a German original c.1904. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, Sylvia. 2002. Producing Culture and Capital: Family Firms in Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, Sylvia. 2013. “Transnational Family Capitalism: Producing ‘Made in Italy’ in China.” In Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship, ed. McKinnon, Susan and Cannell, Fenella, 63–84. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, Sylvia and Delaney, Carole, eds. 1995. Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×