Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:59:31.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - Kinship and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Middle Eastern Comparison

from Part V - Technological Conceptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2019

By
Marcia C. Inhorn ,
Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli ,
Soraya Tremayne  and
Zeynep B. Gürtin
Edited by
Sandra Bamford
Sandra Bamford
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship , pp. 507 - 530
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbasi-Shavazi, J. M., McDonald, P and Hosseini-Chavoshi, M. 2008. “Modernization or Cultural Maintenance: The Practice of Consanguineous Marriage in Iran.” Journal of Biosocial Science 40(6): 911–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Torki, S. 1980. “Milk Kinship in Arabic Society: An Unexplored Problem in the Ethnography of Marriage.” Ethnology 19(2): 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arda, B. 2007. “The Importance of Secularism in Medical Ethics: The Turkish Example.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 14(Suppl. 1): 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargach, J. 2002. Orphans of Islam: Family, Abandonment and Secret Adoption in Morocco. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Baykal, B., Korkmaz, C, Ceyhan, S. T, Goktolga, U and Baser, I. 2008. “Opinions of Infertile Turkish Women on Gamete Donation and Gestational Surrogacy.” Fertility and Sterility 89: 817–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. 1997. “Pioneering Procreation: Israel’s First Test-Tube Baby.” Science As Culture 6: 525–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. 2004. “‘Cheaper Than a Newcomer’: On the Political Economy of IVF in Israel.” The Sociology of Health and Illness 26(7): 897–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., Carmeli, Y. S and Cohen, R. 2000. “‘Our First IVF Baby’: Israel’s and Canada’s Press Coverage of Procreative Technology.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 20(7): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., Carmeli, Y. S and Yavetz, H. 2000. “Secrecy among Israeli Recipients of Donor Insemination.” Politics and the Life Sciences 19(1): 69–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., Diamand, Y and Abu Yaman, M. 2014. “On Fatherhood in a Conflict Zone: Gaza Fathers and Their Children’s Cancer Treatments.” In Globalized Fatherhood, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C, Chavkin, Wendy and Navarro, Jose-Alberto, 243–263. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Boivin, J., Bunting, I, Collins, J. A and Nygren, K. G. 2007. “International Estimates of Infertility Prevalence and Treatment-Seeking: Potential Need and Demand for Infertility Medical Care.” Human Reproduction 22: 1506–1512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carmeli, Y. S. and Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. 2000. “Ritualizing the ‘Natural Family’: Secrecy in Israeli Donor Insemination.” Science As Culture 9(3): 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmeli, Y. S., Birenbaum-Carmeli, D, Madgar, I and Weissenberg, R. 2001. “Donor Insemination in Israel: Recipients’ Choices of Donors.” The Journal of Reproductive Medicine 46(8): 757–763.Google Scholar
Charrad, M. 2001. States and Women’s Rights: The Making of Postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. 2006. “Shi’ite Perspectives on Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies.” ISIM Newsletter 17: 26–27.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. 2009. Islam and New Kinship: Reproductive Technology and the Shariah in Lebanon. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Collins, J. A. 2002. “An International Survey of the Health Economics of IVF and ICSI.” Human Reproductive Update 8: 265–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Geyter, C. 2018. “More Than 8 Million Babies Born from IVF since the World’s First in 1978.” European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Press Release. www.eshre.eu/ESHRE2018/Media/ESHRE-2018-Press-releases/De-Geyter.aspx, accessed October 26, 2018.Google Scholar
Eberstadt, N. and Shah, A. 2012. “Fertility Decline in the Muslim World.” Policy Review 173: 29–44.Google Scholar
Farber, A. R. 2014. Surrogacy and Fatherhood among Homosexual Couples in Israel. MA Thesis, University of Haifa.Google Scholar
Farhi, J. and Ben Haroush, A.. 2011. “Distribution of Causes of Infertility in Patients Attending Primary Fertility Clinics in Israel.” Israel Medical Association Journal 13(1): 51–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Franklin, S. B. 2012. “Five Million Miracle Babies Later.” In Reproductive Technologies As Global Form: Ethnographies of Knowledge, Practices, and Transnational Encounters, ed. Knecht, Michi, Klotz, Maren and Beck, Stefan, 27–60. Berlin: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Garmaroudi Naef, S. 2012. “Gestational Surrogacy in Iran: Uterine Kinship in Shia Thought and Practice.” In Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C and Tremayne, Soraya, 157–193. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Gnoth, C., Maxrath, B, Skonieczny, T, Friol, K, Godehardt, C and Tigges, J. 2011. “Final ART Success Rates: A 10 Years Survey.” Human Reproduction 26(8): 2239–2246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gürtin, Z. B. 2011. “Banning Reproductive Travel? Turkey’s ART Legislation and Third-Party Assisted Reproduction.” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 23: 555–565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gürtin, Z. B. 2012. “Assisted Reproduction in Secular Turkey: Regulation, Rhetoric, and the Role of Religion.” In Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C and Tremayne, Soraya, 285–311. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Gürtin, Z. B. 2014. “Assumed, Promised, Forbidden: Infertility, IVF and Fatherhood in Turkey.” In Globalized Fatherhood, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C, Chavkin, Wendy and Navarro, Jose-Alberto, 223–242. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Gürtin, Zeynep, Inhorn, Marcia C. and Tremayne, Soraya. 2015. “Islam and Assisted Reproduction in the Middle East: Comparing ‘Secular’ Turkey, Shia Iran, and the Sunni Arab World.” In The Changing World Religion Map: Sacred Places, Identities, Practices and Politics, ed. Brunn, Stanley D., 3137–3153. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeri, S. 1989. Law of Desire: Temporary Marriage in Shi’i Iran. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Hashiloni-Dolev, Y., Hirsh-Yechzkel, G, Boyko, V, Wainstock, T, Schiff, E and Lerner-Geva, L. 2010. “Attitudes toward Sex Selection: A Survey among Potential Users in Israel.” Prenatal Diagnosis 30(11): 1019–1025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inhorn, M. C. 1996. Infertility and Patriarchy: The Cultural Politics of Gender and Family Life in Egypt. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 2003. Local Babies, Global Science: Gender, Religion, and In Vitro Fertilization in Egypt. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 2006. “Making Muslim Babies: IVF and Gamete Donation in Sunni and Shi’a Islam.” Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 30(4): 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 2012. The New Arab Man: Emergent Masculinities, Technologies, and Islam in the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 2014. “New Arab Fatherhood: Emergent Masculinities, Male Infertility, and Assisted Reproduction.” In Globalized Fatherhood, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C, Chavkin, Wendy and Navarro, Jose-Alberto, 243–263. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 2015. Cosmopolitan Conceptions: IVF Sojourns in Global Dubai. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. 2018. “Fertility, Demography, and Masculinities in Arab Families: From 1950 to 2015 and Beyond.” In Arab Family Studies: Critical Reviews, ed. Joseph, Suad, 449–466. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inhorn, M. C. and Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. 2008. “Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Culture Change.” Annual Review of Anthropology 37: 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inhorn, M. C., Kobeissi, L, Nassar, Z, Lakkis, D and Fakih, M. H. 2009. “Consanguinity and Family Clustering of Male Infertility in Lebanon.” Fertility and Sterility 91(4): 1104–1109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inhorn, M. C. and Patrizio, P. 2015. “Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Gender, Reproductive Technologies, and Global Movements in the 21st Century.” Human Reproduction Update 21(4): 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inhorn, M. C., Patrizio, P and Serour, G. I. 2010. “Third-party Reproductive Assistance around the Mediterranean: Comparing Sunni Egypt, Catholic Italy and Multisectarian Lebanon.” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 21(7): 848–853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inhorn, M. C. and Tremayne, S., eds. 2012. Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Isikoglu, M., Senol, Y., Berkkanoglu, M, Ozgur, K, Donmez, L and Stones-Abbasi, A. 2006. “Public Opinion Regarding Oocyte Donation in Turkey: First Data from a Secular Population among the Islamic World.” Human Reproduction 21: 318–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Israel Ministry of Health. 2013. “In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Treatments: Absolute Numbers, Percentages, Rates.” www.health.gov.il/PublicationsFiles/IVF1986_2012.pdf, accessed October 22, 2018.Google Scholar
Jones, H. W., Cooke, I, Kempers, R, Brinsden, P and Saunders, D. 2010. “International Federation of Fertility Societies: Surveillance 2010.” www.iffs-reproduction.org/documents/IFFS_Surveillance_2010.pdf, accessed October 26, 2018.Google Scholar
Kahn, S. M. 2000. Reproducing Jews: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception in Israel. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Khatib-Chahidi, J. 1982. “Sexual Prohibitions, Shared Space and Fictive Marriages.” In Women and Space: Ground Rules and Social Maps, ed. Ardener, S., 112–134. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Khatib-Chahidi, J. 1992. “Milk Kinship in Shi’ite Islamic Iran.” In The Anthropology of Breastfeeding: Natural Law or Social Construct, ed. Maher, Vanessa, 109–132. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Kilic, S., Ucar, M, Yaren, H, Gulec, M, Atac, A, Demirel, F, Karabulut, C and Demirel, O. 2009. “Determination of the Attitudes of Turkish Infertile Women towards Surrogacy and Oocyte Donation.” Pakistan Journal of Medical Science 25: 36–40.Google Scholar
Mascarenhas, M. N., Flaxman, S. R, Boerma, T, Vanderpoel, S and Stevens, G. A. 2012. “National, Regional, and Global Trends in Infertility Prevalence since 1990: A Systematic Analysis of 277 Health Surveys.” PLOS Medicine 9: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moosa, E. 2003. “Human Cloning in Muslim Ethics.” Voices across Boundaries (Fall): 23–26.Google Scholar
Nahman, Michal. 2006. “Materializing Israeliness: Difference and Mixture in Transnational Ova Donation.” Science As Culture 15(3): 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nahman, Michal. 2011. “Reverse Traffic: Intersecting Inequalities in Human Egg Donation.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 23(5): 626–633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nahman, Michal. 2013. Extractions: An Ethnography of Reproductive Tourism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyboe Andersen, A., Goossens, V, Gianaroli, L, Felberbaum, R, de Mouzon, J and Nygren, K. G. 2007. “Assisted Reproductive Technology in Europe, 2003: Results Generated from European Registers by ESHRE.” Human Reproduction 22(6): 1513–1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presidency of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Turkey. 2006. “The Assessment of New Applications Discussed by Contemporary Medicine such as IVF and Stem Cell according to the Religion of Islam.” Presidency of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Turkey, Ankara. www.diyanet.gov.tr/turkish/dy/KurulDetay.aspx?ID=1162, accessed October 26, 2018.Google Scholar
Schenker, J. G. 2003. “Legal Aspects of ART Practice in Israel.” Journal of Assisted Reproduction Genetics 20(7): 250–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sella, T., Chodick, G., Luenfeld, E. and Shalev, V.. 2011. “Further Evidence on the High Prevalence of Male Factor Infertility Diagnosis in Israel.” The Israel Medical Association Journal 13(6): 386.Google ScholarPubMed
Serour, G. I. 2008. “Islamic Perspectives in Human Reproduction.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 17(Suppl. 3): 34–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singerman, D. 2007. The Economic Imperatives of Marriage: Emerging Practices and Identities among Youth in the Middle East. Working Paper 6. Washington DC/Dubai: Wolfensohn Centre for Development and Dubai School of Government.Google Scholar
Sonbol, A. el A. 1995. “Adoption in Islamic Society: A Historical Survey.” In Children in the Muslim Middle East, ed. Warnock, Fernea Elizabeth, 45–67. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teman, E. 2010. Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tremayne, S. 2006. “Not All Muslims Are Luddites.” Anthropology Today 22(93): 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremayne, S. 2009. “Law, Ethics, and Donor Technologies in Shia Iran.” In Assisting Reproduction, Testing Genes: Global Encounters with New Biotechnologies, ed. Birenbaum-Carmeli, Daphna and Inhorn, Marcia C, 144–163. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Tremayne, S. 2012. “The ‘Down Side’ of Gamete Donation: Challenging ‘Happy Family’ Rhetoric in Iran.” In Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C and Tremayne, Soraya, 130–156. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Tremayne, S. 2015. “Whither Kinship? Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Relatedness in the Islamic Republic of Iran.” In Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the Third Phase: Global Encounters and Emerging Moral Worlds, ed. Hampshire, Kate and Simpson, Bob, 69–82. New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremayne, S. and Inhorn, M. C. 2012. “Introduction: Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies.” In Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives, ed. Inhorn, Marcia C and Tremayne, Soraya, 1–21. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2013. World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Urman, B. and Yakin, K. 2010. “New Turkish Legislation on Assisted Reproductive Techniques and Centres: A Step in the Right Direction?” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 21: 729–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, J. B. 2002. Islamist Mobilization in Turkey: A Study in Vernacular Politics. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
White, J. B. 2014. Muslim Nationalism and the New Turks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×