Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T22:18:43.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

God

from ENTRIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2016

Nicholas Jolley
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Lawrence Nolan
Affiliation:
California State University, Long Beach
Get access

Summary

Descartes is traditionally described as the father of modern philosophy, but in one way this description is potentially misleading. Since the Enlightenment at least, one of the dominant characteristics of modern philosophy has been its secular tendency; in the philosophy of Hume and his French contemporaries, for instance, God is conspicuous by his absence except as a target of criticism. But Descartes cannot be said to have inaugurated this turn toward secularization; God plays an absolutely central role in his philosophy (Cottingham 2008, 289; cf. Williams 1978, 162). Unlike Spinoza, Descartes may not be a “God-intoxicated man,” but he goes further than most philosophers in exploring the wide-ranging implications of the divine attributes for first philosophy and the natural sciences. It is by an appeal to the divine attributes or perfections that Descartes not only bridges troublesome gaps in his epistemology but also lays the foundations for his mechanistic physics.

To say that Descartes accords divine attributes a principal place in his philosophy is to say that his God is very much the God of the philosophers deriving from the Greek tradition; in Pascal's words, he is not the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Descartes’ God is indeed a being whose essence and existence can be known by the unaided light of nature. The point might seem too obvious to be worth stressing, were it not for the fact that Descartes’ most prominent disciple, Malebranche, regularly invokes properties of God that can be known only through revelation; thus, even in philosophical contexts Malebranche appeals to the Word or Second Person of the Trinity. In the Principles of Philosophy I.25, Descartes asserts that we ought to assent to the doctrines of revealed theology, such as the Trinity and Incarnation (AT VIIIA 14, CSM I 201), but when practicing first philosophy, he does not avail himself of such doctrines. Although Descartes is prepared to offer an account of transubstantiation on his principles, it is more characteristic of him to leave (revealed) theology to the theologians.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1875–90. Die Philosophischen Schriften von G. W. Leibniz, 7 vols., ed. Gerhardt, C. I.. Berlin: Weidmann (reprint, Hildesheim: Olms, 1960).Google Scholar
Cottingham, John. 2008. “The Role of God in Descartes's Philosophy,” in A Companion to Descartes, ed. Broughton, J. and Carriero, J.. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 288–301.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 1984. “Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths,” Philosophical Review 93: 569–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 1978. Descartes against the Skeptics.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 1977. “Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths,” Philosophical Review 86: 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. 1986. “The Essential Incoherence of Descartes’ Definition of Divinity,” in Essays on Descartes’ Meditations, ed. Rorty, A. O.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 297–338.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven. 2011. “Conceptions of God,” in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe, ed. Clarke, D. M. and Wilson, C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 525–47.Google Scholar
Nelson, Alan, and Cunning, David. 1999. “Cognition and Modality in Descartes,” Acta Philosophica Fennica, 64: 137–53.Google Scholar
Newman, Lex, and Nelson, Alan. 1999. “Circumventing Cartesian Circles,” Noûs 33: 370–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, Lawrence. 2005. “The Ontological Argument as an Exercise in Cartesian Therapy,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35: 521–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walski, Gregory. 2004. “The Cartesian God and the Eternal Truths,” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 1: 23–44.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1978. Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry.Hassocks: Harvester.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • God
  • Edited by Lawrence Nolan, California State University, Long Beach
  • Book: The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 January 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894695.121
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • God
  • Edited by Lawrence Nolan, California State University, Long Beach
  • Book: The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 January 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894695.121
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • God
  • Edited by Lawrence Nolan, California State University, Long Beach
  • Book: The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 January 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894695.121
Available formats
×