Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The sixteenth century
- 3 Tudor aesthetics
- 4 Authorship and the material conditions of writing
- 5 Poetry, patronage, and the court
- 6 Religious writing
- 7 Dramatic experiments
- 8 Dramatic achievements
- 9 Lyric forms
- 10 Narrative, romance, and epic
- 11 The evolution of Tudor satire
- 12 Chronicles of private life
- 13 Popular culture in print
- 14 Rewriting the world, rewriting the body
- 15 Writing empire and nation
- Index
9 - Lyric forms
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 May 2006
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The sixteenth century
- 3 Tudor aesthetics
- 4 Authorship and the material conditions of writing
- 5 Poetry, patronage, and the court
- 6 Religious writing
- 7 Dramatic experiments
- 8 Dramatic achievements
- 9 Lyric forms
- 10 Narrative, romance, and epic
- 11 The evolution of Tudor satire
- 12 Chronicles of private life
- 13 Popular culture in print
- 14 Rewriting the world, rewriting the body
- 15 Writing empire and nation
- Index
Summary
Students with a keen sense of curiosity - or possibly merely a keen sense of mischief - could fruitfully exercise either predilection by asking their teachers for a brief definition of lyric. The complexities of responding to that demand, like the problems a similar query about tragedy would generate, demonstrate the complexities of the literary types in question. But despite the difficulty of defining lyric, exploring the forms it took during the English Renaissance can illuminate this mode as a whole, some of its most challenging and exciting texts, and the workings of the early modern era. Aristotle posits an apparently clear-cut division of all literature into lyric, epic, and drama, basing the distinctions on the mode of presentation: lyric is sung, epic recited, and drama staged. This division remains influential, lying behind the work of Northrop Frye and many other modern theorists.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to English Literature, 1500–1600 , pp. 178 - 199Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1999
- 2
- Cited by