Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:04:25.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction

from Part one - Brief overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

David H. Benzing
Affiliation:
Oberlin College, Ohio
Get access

Summary

Lower and middle Cretaceous Magnoliophyta remain too poorly known to warrant definitive statements about many aspects of early angiosperm radiation (Taylor and Hickey 1992). Discovery of a compressed infructescence purportedly from the Late Jurassic of east central Asia has recently expanded its confirmed record (Sun et al. 1998), and raises the specter of more fossils and better resolution ahead. Nevertheless, until this promise is realized, answers to questions as fundamental as the habits (woody vs. herbaceous) of ancestors and the homologies of diagnostic organs (e.g., the gynoecium) will remain speculative. One point germane to bromeliad history is less equivocal: characteristic pollen and macrofossils indicate that Liliopsida had emerged by the middle Cretaceous. However, evidence from several quarters indicates that Bromeliaceae evolved later, and probably not before the Tertiary.

Phytogeography also accords with youth that denied Bromeliaceae opportunity to range beyond tropical America except for a single, probably recent dispersal to west Africa (Fig. 1.1). Members of the three subfamilies (sensu Smith and Downs 1974, 1977, 1979) and many of the larger genera (e.g., Neoregelia, Hechtia) further suggest either exceptionally low mobility (unlikely) or too little time to cross barriers breached by many other lineages. Nevertheless, most authorities (e.g., Cronquist 1981; Dahlgren et al. 1985) consider Bromeliaceae phylogenetically isolated among the extant monocots, and a growing body of information on the organization of several sequences of nucleotides within the chloroplast genome (e.g., Ranker et al. 1990; Terry et al. 1997a,b) supports this conclusion.

Type
Chapter
Information
Bromeliaceae
Profile of an Adaptive Radiation
, pp. 3 - 16
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×