Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T12:05:50.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - The Interdisciplinary Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2016

Edited by
Viktor J. Bruckman ,
Esin Apaydın Varol ,
Bașak B. Uzun  and
Jay Liu
Viktor J. Bruckman
Affiliation:
Austrian Academy of Sciences
Esin Apaydın Varol
Affiliation:
Anadolu University, Turkey
Bașak B. Uzun
Affiliation:
Anadolu University, Turkey
Jay Liu
Affiliation:
Pukyong National University, South Korea
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Biochar systems are designed to meet four related primary objectives: improve soils, manage waste, generate renewable energy, and mitigate climate change. Supply chain models provide a holistic framework for examining biochar systems with an emphasis on product life cycle and end use. Drawing on concepts in supply chain management and engineering, this chapter presents biochar as a manufactured product with a wide range of feedstocks, production technologies, and end use options. Supply chain segments are discussed in detail using diverse examples from agriculture, forestry and other sectors that cut across different scales of production and socioeconomic environments. Particular attention is focused on the environmental impacts of different production and logistics functions, and the relationship between supply chain management and life cycle assessment. The connections between biochar supply chains and those of various co-products, substitute products, and final products are examined from economic and environmental perspectives. For individuals, organizations, and broad associations connected by biochar supply and demand, achieving biochar’s potential benefits efficiently will hinge on understanding, organizing, and managing information, resources and materials across the supply chain, moving biochar from a nascent to an established industry.

Type
Chapter
Information
Biochar
A Regional Supply Chain Approach in View of Climate Change Mitigation
 , pp. 23 - 120
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Anderson, N., Chung, W., Loeffler, D. and Jones, J. G. (2012). A productivity and cost comparison of two systems for producing biomass fuel from roadside forest treatment residues. Forest Products Journal, 62, pp. 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N., Jones, J.G., Page-Dumroese, D., et al. (2013). A comparison of producer gas, biochar, and activated carbon from two distributed scale thermochemical conversion systems used to process forest biomass. Energies, 6, pp. 164–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariyadejwanich, P., Tanthapanichakoon, W., Nakagawa, K., Mukai, S. R. and Tamon, H. (2003). Preparation and characterization of mesoporous activated carbon from waste tires. Carbon, 41, pp. 57–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azargohar, R. and Dalai, A. K. (2006). Biochar as a precursor of activated carbon. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 129–132, pp. 762–773.Google ScholarPubMed
Christopher, M. (2011). Logistics and Supply Chain Management. 4th Edition. Harlow, Essex: Pearson.Google Scholar
Deleney, M. (2015). Northwest Biochar Commercialization Strategy Paper. [online] Available at: http://nwbiochar.org/sites/default/files/sites/default/files/attached/nw_biochar_strategy_02-24-15.pdf [Accessed 16 March 2015].Google Scholar
Downie, A., Munroe, P., Cowie, A., Van Zwieten, L. and Lau, D. (2012). Biochar as a geoengineering climate solution: hazard identification and risk management. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 42, pp. 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duku, M. H., Gu, S. and Hagan, E. B. (2011). Biochar production potential in Ghana – a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, pp. 3539–3551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumroese, K., Heiskanen, J., Englund, K. and Tervahauta, A. (2011). Pelleted biochar: chemical and physical properties show potential use as a substrate in container nurseries. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, pp. 2018–2027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fellet, G., Marchiol, L., Delle Vedove, G. and Peressotti, A. (2011). Application of biochar on mine tailings: effects and perspectives for land reclamation. Chemosphere, 83, pp. 1262–1267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forest Stewardship Council (FSC, 2010). FSC-US Forest Management Standard Version 1.0. [online] Available at: https://ic.fsc.org/national-standards.247.htm [Accessed 16 March 2015].Google Scholar
Gaunt, J. L. and Cowie, A. (2009). Biochar, greenhouse gas accounting, and emissions trading. Chapter 18. In: Lehman, J. and Joseph, S. (eds.) Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Goetschalckx, M. (2011). Supply Chain Engineering. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagelaar, G. and van der Vorst, J. (2002). Environmental supply chain management: using life cycle assessment to structure supply chains. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 4, pp. 399–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Biochar Initiative (IBI, 2014). Standardized Product Definition and Product Testing Guidelines for Biochar That is Used in Soil. [online] Available at: www.biochar-international.org/characterizationstandard [Accessed 16 March 2015].Google Scholar
Jack, B. K., Kousky, C. and Sims, K. (2008). Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, pp. 9465–9470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keefe, R., Anderson, N., Hogland, J. and Muhlenfeld, K. (2014). Woody biomass logistics. Chapter 14. In: Karlen, D. (ed.) Cellulosic Energy Cropping Systems. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Kim, D., Anderson, N. and Chung, W. (2015). Financial performance of a mobile pyrolysis system used to produce biochar from sawmill residues. Forest Products Journal, 65, pp. 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laser, M. and Lynd, L. (2014). Introduction to cellulosic energy crops. Chapter 1. In: Karlen, D. (ed.) Cellulosic Energy Cropping Systems. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Leach, M., Fairhead, J. and Fraser, J. (2012). Green grabs and biochar: revaluing African soils and farming in the new carbon economy. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39, pp. 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (2009). Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. Chapter 1. In: Lehman, J. and Joseph, S. (eds.) Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Leonardo Academy (2012). National Sustainable Agriculture Standard, LEO-4000. Madison, WI: Leonardo Academy.Google Scholar
Loeffler, D. and Anderson, N. (2014). Emissions tradeoffs associated with cofiring forest biomass with coal: a case study in Colorado, USA. Applied Energy, 113, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, J. A. (2008). Carbon-negative biofuels. Energy Policy, 36, pp. 940–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odesola, I. F. and Owoseni, T. A. (2010). Development of local technology for a small-scale biochar production processes from agricultural wastes. Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences, 1, 205–208.Google Scholar
Reza, M. T., Uddin, M. H., Lynam, J. and Coronella, C. (2014). Engineered pellets from dry torrefied and HTC biochar blends. Biomass and Bioenergy, 63, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, K., Gloy, B., Joseph, S., Scott, N. and Lehmann, J. (2010). Life cycle assessment of biochar systems: estimating the energetic, economic, and climate change potential. Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 827–833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rocke, M. (2014). Cool Planet starts construction on first commercial facility: Louisiana facility to produce green fuels and biochar from sustainable wood residues. [online] Available at: www.bloomberg.com/bb/newsarchive/aB3nqCdei4c0.html [Accessed 16 March 2015].Google Scholar
Sparrevik, M., Field, J. L., Martinsen, V., Breedveld, G. D. and Cornelissen, G. (2013). Life cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impact of biochar implementation in conservation agriculture in Zambia. Environmental Science and Technology, 47, pp. 1206–1215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stock, J. R. and Lambert, D. M. (2001). Strategic Logistics Management. 4th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, G. K., Strijakova, E. R. and Shea, P. J. (2006). Use of activated carbon for soil remediation, pp. 309–322. In: Twardowska, I., Allen, H. E., Haggblom, M. M. and Stefaniak, S. (eds.) Soil and Water Pollution Monitoring, Protection and Remediation. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z., Dunn, J. B., Han, J. and Wang, M. Q. (2014). Effects of co-produced biochar on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of pyrolysis-derived renewable fuels. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 8, pp. 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

ASTM (2011). ASTM D3588-98, Standard Practice for Calculating Heat Value, Compressibility Factor, and Relative Density of Gaseous Fuels, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.Google Scholar
ASTM (2014). ASTM D1945-14, Standard Test Method for Analysis of Natural Gas by Gas Chromatography, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.Google Scholar
Bare, J. C. (2011). TRACI 2.0: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 13, pp. 687–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, R. D. and Bowe, S. A. (2011). Life-cycle inventory of manufacturing prefinished engineered wood flooring in the eastern United States with a comparison to solid strip wood flooring. Wood and Fiber Science, 43, pp. 421–441.Google Scholar
Bergman, R. D. and Bowe, S. A. (2012). Life-cycle inventory of hardwood lumber manufacturing in the southeastern United States. Wood and Fiber Science, 44, pp. 71–84.Google Scholar
Bergman, R. D., Han, H-S., Oneil, E. and Eastin, I. (2013). Life-cycle assessment of redwood decking in the United States with a comparison to three other decking materials. University of Washington. Seattle, WA. Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials.Google Scholar
Bergman, R. D. and Gu, H. (2014). Life-cycle inventory analysis of bio-products from a modular advanced biomass pyrolysis system. In: Proceedings, Society of Wood Science and Technology 57th International Convention, 23–27 June 2014. Zvolen, Slovakia, pp. 405–415.Google Scholar
Brewer, C. E., Hu, Y. Y., Schmidt-Rohr, K., Loynachan, T. E., Laird, D. A. and Brown, R. C. (2012). Extent of pyrolysis impacts on fast pyrolysis biochar properties. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, pp. 1115–1122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeLuca, T. H. and Aplet, G. H. (2008). Charcoal and carbon storage in forest soils of the Rocky Mountain West. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 6, pp. 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutta, B. and Raghavan, V. (2014). A life cycle assessment of environmental and economic balance of biochar systems in Quebec. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 5, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekvall, T. and Andrae, A. S. G. (2006). Attributional and consequential environmental assessment of the shift to lead-free solders. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11, pp. 344–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekvall, T. and Weidema, B. P. (2004). System boundaries and input data in consequential life-cycle analysis. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 9, pp. 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FPL (2004). Fuel value calculator. Techline WOE-3. Madison, WI: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. [online] Available at: www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/techline/fuel-value-calculator.pdf. [Accessed 12 March 2015].Google Scholar
Gaudreault, C., Samson, R. and Stuart, P. R. (2010). Energy decision making in a pulp and paper mill: selection of LCA system boundary. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, pp. 198–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaunt, J. L. and Lehmann, J. (2008). Energy balance and emissions associated with biochar sequestration and pyrolysis bioenergy production. Environmental Science & Technology, 42, pp. 4152–4158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaunt, J. L. and Cowie, A. (2009). Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. Chapter 18. Biochar, greenhouse gas accounting, and emissions trading. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Gu, H. and Bergman, R. (2015). Life-cycle GHG emissions of electricity from syngas by pyrolyzing woody biomass. In: Proceedings, Society of Wood Science and Technology 58th International Convention, 7–12 June 2015. Jackson Hole, WY, pp. 376–389.Google Scholar
Guo, Z., Sun, C. and Grebner, D. L. (2007). Utilization of forest derived biomass for energy production in the USA: status, challenges, and public policies. International Forestry Review, 9, pp. 748–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J., Shackley, S., Sohi, S. and Brownsort, P. (2011). Prospective life cycle carbon abatement for pyrolysis biochar system in the UK. Energy Policy, 39, pp. 646–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homagain, K., Shahi, C., Luckai, N. and Sharma, M. (2014). Biochar-based bioenergy and its environmental impact in Northwestern Ontario Canada: a review. Journal of Forestry Research, 25, pp. 737–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILCD (2010). ILCD System Handbook – General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment – Detailed Guidance. EUR 24708 EN. European Commission – Joint Research Centre – Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Luxembourg. International Reference Life Cycle Data System. Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Ince, P. J. (1979). How to estimate recoverable heat energy in wood or bark fuels. General Technical Report FPL–GTR–29. Madison, WI: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.Google Scholar
Ippolito, J. A., Laird, D. A. and Busscher, W. J. (2012). Environmental benefits of biochar. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, pp. 967–972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ISO (2006a). Environmental Management – Life-cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework. ISO 14040. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO (2006b). Environmental Management – Life-cycle Assessment – Requirements and Guidelines. ISO 14044. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Kammann, C., Ratering, S., Eckhard, C. and Müller, C. (2012). Biochar and hydrochar effects on greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane) fluxes from soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, pp. 1052–1066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lal, R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 304, pp. 1623–1627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehmann, J., Gaunt, J. and Rondon, M. (2006). Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems – a review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 11, pp. 403–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentz, R. D. and Ippolito, J. A. (2012). Biochar and manure affect calcareous soil and corn silage nutrient concentrations and uptake. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, pp. 1033–1043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loeffler, D. R. and Anderson, N. M. (2014). Emissions tradeoffs associated with cofiring forest biomass with coal: a case study in Colorado, USA. Applied Energy, 113, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, K. and Lal, R. (2014). Biochar application to soil for climate change mitigation by soil organic carbon sequestration. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 177, pp. 651–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKechnie, J., Colombo, S., Chen, J., Mabee, W. and Maclean, H. L. (2011). Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuel. Environmental Science & Technology, 45, pp. 789–795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NETL (2013). NETL Life Cycle Inventory Data – Unit Process: Burning Crowns in Slash Piles. US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. Last Updated: March 2013 (version 01). [online] Available at: www.netl.doe.gov/LCA [Accessed 23 July 2015].Google Scholar
NREL (2012). Life-cycle inventory database project. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. [online] Available at: www.lcacommons.gov/nrel/search [Accessed 23 July 2015].Google Scholar
Pennington, D. W., Potting, J., Finnveden, G., et al. (2004). Life-cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice. Environment International, 30, pp. 721–739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierobon, F., Ganguly, G., Anfodillo, T. and Eastin, I. L. (2014). Evaluation of environmental impacts of harvest residue-based bioenergy using radiative forcing analysis. The Forestry Chronicle, 90, pp. 577–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, K. G., Gloy, B. A., Joseph, S., Scott, N. R. and Lehmann, J. (2010). Life cycle assessment of biochar systems: estimating the energetic, economic, and climate change potential. Environmental Science & Technology, 44, pp. 827–833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sackett, T. E., Basiliko, N., Noyce, G. L., et al. (2014). Soil and greenhouse gas responses to biochar additions in a temperate hardwood forest. Bioenergy, 7, 1062–1074.Google Scholar
Spokas, K. A. and Reicosky, D. C. (2009). Impacts of sixteen different biochars on soil greenhouse gas production. Annals of Environmental Science, 3, pp. 179–93.Google Scholar
Spokas, K. A., Cantrell, K. B., Novak, D. A., et al. (2012). Biochar: a synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, pp. 973–989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomassen, M. A., Dalgaard, R., Heijungs, R. and de Boer, I. (2008). Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13, pp. 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US EPA (1995). Compilation of Air Pollutants Emission Factors. Vol. I. Stationary Point and Area Sources. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
US EPA (2015). eGRID 2012 Summary Tables. Available at: www.epa.gov/sites/production/ files/2015-10/documents/egrid2012_summarytables_0.pdf [Accessed 11 August 2016].Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Dunn, J. B., Han, J. and Wang, M. Q. (2014). Effects of co-produced biochar on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of pyrolysis-derived renewable fuels. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 8, pp.189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, D., Amonette, J. E., Street-Perrott, F. A., Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (2010). Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nature Communications, 1, Article No. 56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoo, G. and Kang, H. (2012). Effects of biochar addition on greenhouse gas emissions and microbial responses in a short-term laboratory experiment. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, pp. 1193–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Adeyeye, A., Barrett, J., Diamond, J., Goldman, L., Pendergrass, J. and Schramm, D. (2009). Estimating US Government Subsidies to Energy Sources 2002–2008. Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute.Google Scholar
Basu, P. (2010). Biomass Gasification and Pyrolysis – Practical Design and Theory. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Beesley, L., Moreno, E., Fellet, G., Carrijo, L. and Sizmur, T. (2015). Biochar and heavy metals. In: Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation, Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (eds.). 2nd Edition. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beesley, L., Moreno-Jiménez, E. and Gomez-Eyles, J. L. (2010). Effects of biochar and green waste compost amendments on mobility, bioavailability and toxicity of inorganic and organic contaminants in a multi-element polluted soil. Environmental Pollution, 158, 2282–2287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, W., Masek, O., Graham, M. and Wüst, D. (2015). Inherent organic compounds in biochar – their content, composition and potential toxic effects. Journal of Environmental Management, 156, 150–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlile, W. R., Cattivello, C. and Zaccheo, P. (2015). Organic growing media: constituents and properties. Vadose Zone Journal, 14, doi:10.2136/vzj2014.09.0125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaney, R. L., Angle, J. S., Broadhurst, C. L., Peters, C. A., Tappero, R. V. and Sparks, D. L. (2007). Improved understanding of hyperaccumulation yields commercial phytoextraction and phytomining technologies. Journal of Environmental Quality, 36, 1429–1443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, B., Yuan, M. and Qian, L. (2012). Enhanced bioremediation of PAH-contaminated soil by immobilized bacteria with plant residue and biochar as carriers. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 12, 1350–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherubini, F. (2010). The biorefinery concept: using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals. Energy Conversion and Management, 51, 1412–1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christis, M. (2012). An exploration of the economic value of pyrolysis oil from short rotation wood. MSc thesis, Hasselt University, the Netherlands (in Dutch).Google Scholar
de Jong, E., Higson, A., Walsh, P. and Wellisch, M. (2012). Biobased Chemicals – Value Added Products from Biorefineries. IEA Bioenergy – Task 42 Biorefinery. Vienna: International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Defra, (2007). Growing Short Rotation Coppice – Best Practice Guidelines for Applicants to Defra’s Energy Crops Scheme. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).Google Scholar
Drake-Brockman, G. R. (1996). Establishment and Maintenance of a Woodfuel Resource. Forest Research Technical Note 17/96. Rugeley: Forestry Commission.Google Scholar
Edwards, R. A., Šúri, M., Huld, T. A. and Dallemand, J. F. (2005). GIS-based assessment of cereal straw energy resource in the European Union. In Proceedings of the 14th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, Paris, France, 17–21 October.Google Scholar
Environment Agency (2014). Regulatory Position Statement on the Environmental Regulation of Wood. Bristol: Environment Agency.Google Scholar
European Commission (1999). Council Resolution of 15 December 1998 on a forestry strategy for the European Union. Official Journal of the European Communities, 26.2.1999, C 56.Google Scholar
European Commission (2000). Directive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2000 on the incineration of waste. Official Journal of the European Communities, 28.12.2000, L 332/ 91–111.Google Scholar
European Commission (2006). Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, 30.12.2006, L396/1–849.Google Scholar
European Commission (2009a). Directive 2008/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control. Official Journal of the European Communities, 29.1.2008, L24/8–29.Google Scholar
European Commission (2009b). Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 20009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Official Journal of the European Communities, 5.6.2009, I140.Google Scholar
European Commission (2013a). A New EU Forest Strategy: for Forests and the Forest-Based Sector. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
European Commission (2013b). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Relating to Fertilisers, Liming Materials, Soil Improvers, Growing Media and Plant Biostimulants and Repealing Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003. Brussels: European Commission. [online] Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/impact/planned_ia/docs/183_entr_fertilisers_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Evangelou, M. W. H., Conesa, H. M., Robinson, B. H. and Schulin, R. (2012). Biomass production on trace element-contaminated land: a review. Environmental Engineering Science, 29, 823–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (2006). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2006: Progress Towards Sustainable Forest Management. Forestry Paper, 147. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).Google Scholar
Freddo, A., Cai, C. and Reid, B. (2012). Environmental contextualisation of potential toxic elements and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biochar. Environmental Pollution, 171, 18–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galinato, S.P., Yoder, J. K. and Granatstein, D. (2011). The economic value of biochar in crop production and carbon sequestration. Energy Policy, 39, 6344–6350.Google Scholar
Ghosh, M. and Singh, S. P. (2005). A review on phytoremediation of heavy metals and utilization of its byproducts. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 3, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbins, J. and Chalmers, H. (2008). Preparing for global rollout: a ‘developed country first’ demonstration programme for rapid CCS deployment. Energy Policy, 36, 501–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilber, I., Blum, F., Leifeld, J., Schmidt, H.-P. and Bucheli, T. D. (2012). Quantitative determination of PAHs in biochar: a prerequisite to ensure its quality and safe application. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60, 3042–3050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, Y., Lei, M., Duan, L. and Longhurst, P. (2015). Integrating phytoremediation with biomass valorisation and critical element recovery: a UK contaminated land perspective. Biomass and Bioenergy, 83, 328–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keegan, D., Kretschmer, B., Elbersen, B. and Panoutsou, C. (2013). Cascading use: a systematic approach to biomass beyond the energy sector. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 7, 193–206.Google Scholar
Kokossis, A. C. and Yang, A. (2010). On the use of systems technologies and a systematic approach for the synthesis and the design of future biorefineries. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 34, 1397–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuppens, T., van Dael, M., Vanreppelen, K., Thewys, T., Yperman, J., Carleer, R., Schreurs, S., van Passel, S. (2015). Techno-economic assessment of fast pyrolysis for the valorization of short rotation coppice cultivated for phytoextraction. Journal of cleaner production, 88, 336–344.Google Scholar
Laird, D. A., Brown, R. C., Amonette, J. E. and Lehmann, L. (2009). Review of the pyrolysis platform for coproducing bio-oil and biochar. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 3, 547–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margeot, A., Hahn-Hagerdal, B., Edlund, M., Slade, R. and Monot, F. (2009). New improvements for lignocellulosic ethanol. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 20, 372–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlashan, N. R., Workman, M. H. W., Caldecott, B. and Shah, N. (2012). Negative Emissions Technologies. Grantham Institute for Climate Change, Briefing paper No. 8. London: Imperial College.Google Scholar
Méndeza, A., Terradillos, M. and Gascó, G. (2013). Physicochemical and agronomic properties of biochar from sewage sludge pyrolysed at different temperatures. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 102, 124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monforti, F., Lugato, E., Motola, V., Bodis, K., Scarlat, N. and Dallemand, J.-F. (2015). Optimal energy use of agricultural crop residues preserving soil organic carbon stocks in Europe. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 519–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montanarella, L. and Lugato, E. (2013). The application of biochar in the EU: challenges and opportunities. Agronomy, 3, 462–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, F., Kindred, D., Bhogal, A., Roques, S., Kerley, J., Twining, S., Brassington, T., Gladders, P., Balshaw, H., Cook, S. and Ellis, S. (2014). Straw Incorporation Review. Research Review No. 81, HGCA. Kenilworth: Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board.Google Scholar
Pulford, I. D. and Watson, C. (2003). Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated land by trees – a review. Environment International, 29, 529–540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sasaki, N. and Putz, F. E. (2009). Critical need for new definitions of ‘forest’ and ‘forest degradation’ in global climate change agreement. Conservation Letters, 2, 226–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, A. W., Gillespie, I., Hirsch, M. and Begley, C. (2011). Biosecurity and sustainability within the growing global bioeconomy. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3, 4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohi, S. P., McDonagh, J., Novak, J., Wu, W. and Miu, L.-M. (2015). Biochar systems and system fit. In: Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (eds.) Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation. 2nd Edition. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 735–759.Google Scholar
Stals, M., Thijssen, E., Vangronsveld, J., Carleer, R., Schreurs, S. and Yperman, J. (2010). Flash pyrolysis of heavy metal contaminated biomass from phytoremediation: influence of temperature, entrained flow and wood/leaves blended pyrolysis on the behaviour of heavy metals. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 87, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, J., Bird, L. and Smith, H. (2009). Carbon Taxes: A Review of Experience and Policy Design Considerations. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A2-47312. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).Google Scholar
Thewys, T. and Kuppens, T. (2008). Economics of willow pyrolysis after phytoextraction. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 10, 561–583.Google Scholar
Thewys, T., Vassilev, A., Meers, E., Nehnevajova, E., van der Lelie, D., and Mench, M. (2009). Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: lessons from the field. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 16, 765–794.Google Scholar
Thomassen, G., Van Dael, M., Lemmens, B. and Van Passel, S. (2016). A review of the sustainability of algal-based biorefineries: Towards an integrated assessment framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (in press) 10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.015.Google Scholar
UNFCCC (2002). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventh Session, Marrakesh 29 October to 10 November 2001, FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.1. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).Google Scholar
Van Dael, M., Van Passel, L., Pelkmans, L., Guisson, R., Swinnen, G., and Schreurs, E. (2012). Determining potential locations for biomass valorization using a macro screening approach. Biomass and Bioenergy, 45, 175–186.Google Scholar
Van Dael, M., Márquez, N., Reumerman, P., Pelkmans, L., Kuppens, T. and Van Passel, S. (2014). Development and techno-economic evaluation of a biorefinery based on biomass (waste) streams - case study in the Netherlands. Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining, 8, 635–644.Google Scholar
Van Laer, T., De Smedt, P., Ronsse, F., Ruysschaert, G., Boeckx, P., Verstraete, W., Buysse, J. and Lavrysen, L. J. (2015). Legal constraints and opportunities for biochar: a case analysis of EU law. GCB Bioenergy, 7, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voets, T., Neven, A., Thewys, T. and Kuppens, T. (2013). GIS-based location optimization of a biomass conversion plant on contaminated willow in the Campine region (Belgium). Biomass and Bioenergy, 55, 339–349.Google Scholar
Whitman, T., Scholz, S. M. and Lehmann, J. (2010). Biochar projects for mitigating climate change: an investigation of critical methodology issues for carbon accounting. Carbon Management, 1, 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, D., Amonette, J. E., Street-Perrott, F. A., Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (2010). Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nature Communications, 1, 56. doi:10.1038/ncomms1053.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, X., Wang, H., He, L., Lu, K., Sarmah, A., Li, J., Bolan, N. S., Pei, J. and Huang, H. (2013). Using biochar for remediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals and organic pollutants. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 20, 8472–8483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Amlinger, F., Peyr, S., Geszti, J., Dreher, P., Weinfurther, H. and Nortcliff, S. (2006). Evaluierung der nachhaltig positiven Wirkung von Kompost auf die Fruchtbarkeit und Produktivität von Böden. Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft, Wien.Google Scholar
Andersen, J. K., Boldrin, A., Christensen, T. H. and Scheutz, C. (2010). Greenhouse gas emissions from home composting of organic household waste. Waste Management, 30, pp. 2475–2482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BBodSchV (1999). Federal Soil Protection and Contaminated Sites Ordinance (BBodSchV).Google Scholar
Bernal, M. P., Alburquerque, J. A. and Moral, R. (2009). Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review. Bioresource Technology, 100, pp. 5444–5453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bettendorf, T., Wendland, C. and Schuetze, T. (2015). Terra Preta sanitation systems and technologies. Terra Preta Sanitation, 1, pp. 62–85.Google Scholar
Blackwell, P., Riethmuller, G. and Collins, M. (2009). Biochar application to soil. In: Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (eds.) Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. London: Earthscan, pp. 207–226.Google Scholar
Böttger, S., Töws, I., Bleicher, J., Krüger, M., Scheinemann, H., Dorgeloh, E., Khan, P. and Philipp, O. (2013). Applicability of Terra Preta produced from sewage sludge of decentralized wastewater systems in Germany. In: Bettendorf, T., Wendland, C. and Otterpohl, R. (eds.) Terra Preta Sanitation. Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt, ISBN 978-3-00-046586-4.Google Scholar
Boh, M. Y., Germer, J., Müller, T. and Sauerborn, J. (2013). Comparative effect of human urine and ammonium nitrate application on maize (Zea mays L.) grown under various salt (NaCl) concentrations. Soil Science, 176, pp. 703–711.Google Scholar
Dias, B. O., Silva, C. A., Higashikawa, F. S., Roig, A. and Sanchez-Monedero, M. A. (2010). Use of biochar as bulking agent for the composting of poultry manure: effect on organic matter degradation and humification. Bioresource Technology, 101, pp. 1239–1246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DIN 19527 (2012). Leaching of solid materials – Batch test for the examination of the leaching behaviour of organic substances at a liquid to solid ratio of 2 l/kg.Google Scholar
DIN 19528 (2009). Leaching of solid materials – Percolation method for the joint examination of the leaching behaviour of inorganic and organic substances.Google Scholar
DIN 19529 (2009). Leaching of solid materials – Batch test for the examination of the leaching behaviour of inorganic substances at a liquid to solid ratio of 2 l/kg.Google Scholar
DIN EN 303–5 (2012). Heating boilers – Part 5: Heating boilers for solid fuels, manually and automatically stoked, nominal heat output of up to 500 kW – Terminology, requirements, testing and marking; German version EN 303–5:2012.Google Scholar
DIN EN ISO 14240–1 (2010). Soil quality – Determination of soil microbial biomass – Part 1: Substrate-induced respiration method (ISO 14240–1:1997).Google Scholar
DüMV (2012). Verordnung über das Inverkehrbringen von Düngemitteln, Bodenhilfsstoffen, Kultursubstraten und Pflanzenhilfsmitteln. (Düngemittelverordnung) (BGBl. I S. 2482).Google Scholar
DWA (2008). Neuartige Sanitärsysteme. Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e. V., Hennef.Google Scholar
EBC (2012). European Biochar Certificate – Guidelines for a Sustainable Production of Biochar. European Biochar Foundation (EBC), Arbaz, Switzerland. [online] Available at: www.european-biochar.org/en/download. Version 4.8 of 13 December 2013 [Accessed 3 February 2015].Google Scholar
Elad, Y., Cytryn, E., Meller Harel, Y., Lew, B. and Graber, E. R. (2011). The biochar effect: plant resistance to biotic stresses. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 50, pp. 335–349.Google Scholar
Erben, G. A. (2011). Carbon dynamics and stability of biochar compost – an evaluation of three successive composting experiments. Bachelor Thesis, University of Bayreuth.Google Scholar
Fascella, G., Dispensa, V., De Pasquale, C., Fontana, G. and Zizzo, G. (2013). Evaluation of biochar as growing substrate for ornamental plants. 1st Mediterranen Biochar Symposium. [online] Available at: http://meditbiochar2.weebly.com/uploads/1/1/0/8/1108765/sp1_09_poster_fascella_et_al.pdf [Accessed 15 June 2015].Google Scholar
Fischer, D. and Glaser, B. (2012). Synergisms between compost and biochar for sustainable soil amelioration. In: Sunil, K. and Bharti, A. (eds.) Management of Organic Waste. Rijeka, Croatia: In Tech, pp. 167–198.Google Scholar
Fuchs, J. (1996). Komposteinsatz im Gartenbau: Möglichkeiten und Limiten aus der Sicht der biologischen Komposteigenschaften. Branchenmagazin G’plus, 12, p. 19.Google Scholar
Germer, J., Addai, S. and Sauerborn, J. (2011). Response of grain sorghum to fertilisation with human urine. Field Corps Research, 122, pp. 234–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, B., and Woods, W. I. (eds.) (2004). Amazonian Dark Earths: Explorations in Space and Time. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, B. (2007). Prehistorically modified soils of central Amazonia: a model for sustainable agriculture in the twenty-first century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 362, pp. 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinonen-Tanski, H. and Van Wijk-Sijbesma, C. (2004). Human excreta for plant production. Bioresource Technology, 96, pp. 403–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, L., Chen, Y. and Wu, W. (2012). Impacts upon soil quality and plant growth of bamboo charcoal addition to composted sludge. Environmental Technology, 33, pp. 61–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IfaS (2008). [online] Available at: www.stoffstrom.org/fileadmin/userdaten/dokumente/ Veroeffentlichungen/2008-09-Broschuere_Info-Plattform_Reg_SSM_IfaS.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, S., Verheijen, F. G. A., van der Velde, M. and Bastos, A. C. (2011). A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agricultures, Ecosystem & Environment, 144, pp. 175–187.Google Scholar
Jindo, K., Suto, K., Matsumoto, K., Garcia, C., Sonoki, T. and Sanchez-Monedero, M. A. (2012). Chemical and biochemical characterisation of biochar-blended composts prepared from poultry manure. Bioresource Technology, 110, pp. 396–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kammann, C., Ratering, S., Eckhard, C. and Muller, C. (2012). Biochar and hydrochar effects on greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and methane) fluxes from soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, pp. 1052–1066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kammann, C., Glaser, B. and Schmidt, H. P. (2016). Combining biochar and organic amendments. In: Shackley, S. Ruysschaert, G. and Zwart, K. (eds.) Biochar in European Soils and Agriculture: Science and Practice. London: Earthscan, Routledge, pp. 136–164.Google Scholar
Kehres, B., Kirsch, A., Luyten-Naujoks, K. et al. (2006). Methodenhandbuch zur Analyse organischer Düngemittel, Bodenverbesserungsmittel und Substrate. Bundesgütegemeinschaft Kompost e.V.Google Scholar
Körschens, M., Albert, E., Armbruster, M. et al. (2013). Effect of mineral and organic fertilization on crop yield, nitrogen uptake, carbon and nitrogen balances, as well as soil organic carbon content and dynamics: results from 20 European long-term field experiments of the twenty-first century. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 59, pp. 1017–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lashari, M. S., Liu, Y., Li, L., Pan, W., Fu, J., Pan, G., Zheng, Ju, Zheng, Ji, Zhang, X. and Yu, A. (2013). Effects of amendment of biochar-manure compost in conjunction with pyroligneous solution on soil quality and wheat yield of a salt-stressed cropland from Central China Great Plain. Field Crops Research, 144, pp. 113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, J., Czimczik, C., Laird, D. and Sohi, S. (2009). Stability of biochar in soil. In: Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (eds) Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. London: Earthscan, pp. 183–205.Google Scholar
Lehmann, J., da SilvaJr., J. P., Steiner, C., Nehls, T., Zech, W. and Glaser, B. (2003). Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant and Soil, 249, pp. 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (2009). Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In: Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (eds.) Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. London: Earthscan, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Ma, J., Wilson, K., Zhao, Q., Yorgey, G. and Frear, C. (2013). Odor in commercial scale compost: literature review and critical analysis. Washington State Department of Ecology, p. 74.Google Scholar
Major, J., Steiner, C., Downie, A. and Lehmann, J. (2009). Biochar effects on nutrient leaching. In: Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (eds.) Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. London: Earthscan, pp. 271–287.Google Scholar
Mnkeni, P. N. S., Kutu, F. R., Muchaonyerwa, P. and Austin, L. M. (2008). Evaluation of human urine as a source of nutrients for selected vegetables and maize under tunnel house conditions in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Waste Management & Research, 26, pp. 132–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prost, K., Borchard, N., Siemens, J., Kautz, T., Möller, A. and Amelung, A. (2013). Biochar affected by composting with farmyard manure. Journal of Environmental Quality, 42, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinhold, J. (2013). Betrachtung zu Möglichkeiten der Optimierung der offenen Mietenkompostierung. [online] Available at: www.guetegemeinschaftkompostbbs.de/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/02-Mietenkompostierung-Dr.Reinhold.pdf [Accessed 03 February 2015].Google Scholar
Schmidt, Hans-Peter (2013): Schweiz bewilligt Pflanzenkohle zur Bodenverbesserung. Journal für Terroirwein und Biodiversität, 2010, ISSN 1663-0521. Available at: www.ithaka-journal.net/schweiz-bewilligt-pflanzenkohle-zur-bodenverbesserungGoogle Scholar
Schuetze, M. and Thomas, P. (2013). Terra Preta sanitation – a key component in sustainable urban resource management systems. In: Bettendorf, T., Wendland, C. and Otterpohl, R. (eds.) Terra Preta Sanitation. Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt, ISBN 978-3-00-046586-4.Google Scholar
Schimmelpfennig, S. and Glaser, B. (2012). One step forward toward characterization: some important material properties to distinguish biochar. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, pp. 1001–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, C., Das, K. C., Melear, N. and Lakly, D. (2010). Reducing nitrogen loss during poultry litter composting using biochar. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39, pp. 1236–1242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steiner, C., Melear, N., Harris, K. and Das, K. C. (2011). Biochar as bulking agent for poultry litter composting. Carbon Management, 2, pp. 227–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, S. C., Frye, S., Gale, N., Garmon, M., Launchbury, R., Machado, N., Melamed, S., Murray, J., Petroff, A. and Winsborough, C. (2013). Biochar mitigates negative effects of salt additions on two herbaceous plant species. Journal of Environmental Management, 129, pp. 62–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tian, Y., Sun, X., Li, S. et al. (2012). Biochar made from green waste as peat substitute in growth media for Calathea rotundifola cv. Fasciata. Scientia Horticulturae, 143, pp. 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C. Lu, H., Dong, D., Deng, H., Strong, P. J., Wang, H. and Wu, W. (2013). Insight into the effects of biochar on manure composting: evidence supporting the relationship between N2O emissions and denitrifying community. Environmental Science & Technology, 47, pp. 7341–7349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, Y., Xu, G. and Shao, H. B. (2014). Furfural and its biochar improve the general properties of a saline soil. Solid Earth, 5, pp. 665–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, Y., Gao, B., Zhang, M., Inyang, M. and Zimmerman, A. R. (2012). Effect of biochar amendment on sorption and leaching of nitrate, ammonium and phosphate in a sandy soil. Chemosphere, 89, pp. 1467–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., Sun, X.-Y., Tian, Y. et al. (2014). Biochar and humic acid amendments improve the quality of composted green waste as a growth medium for the ornamental plant Calathea insignis. Scientia Horticulturae, 176, pp. 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×