Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:21:17.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Aletta J. Norval
Aletta J. Norval
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Aversive Democracy
Inheritance and Originality in the Democratic Tradition
 , pp. 215 - 229
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abizadeh, A., ‘Banishing the particular. Rousseau on rhetoric, patrie, and the passions’, Political Theory 29, no. 4 (2001), 556–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, B. and Fishkin, J. S., ‘Deliberation day’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 10, no. 2 (2002), 129–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akkerman, T., ‘Urban debates and deliberative democracy’, Acta Politika 1 (2001), 71–87.Google Scholar
Aronovitch, H., ‘The political importance of analogical argument’, Political Studies 45 (1997), 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L., How to Do Things with Words, ed. Urmson, J. O., and Sbisà, M. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Badiou, A., Ethics. An Essay on the Understanding of Evil, trans. Peter Hallward (London: Verso, 2001).Google Scholar
Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S., Wittgenstein. Meaning and Understanding, Essays on the Philosophical Investigations, vol. i (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983).Google Scholar
Balibar, E., ‘Ambiguous universality’, Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 7, no. 1 (1995), 48–74.Google Scholar
Barber, B. R., Strong Democracy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Barber, B. R., ‘Foundationalism and democracy’, in Benhabib, S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 348–59.Google Scholar
Basu, A., ‘Dialogic ethics and the virtue of humor’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 7, no. 4 (1999), 378–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R., S/Z, trans. R. Millar (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974).Google Scholar
Baz, A., ‘What’s the point of seeing aspects?’, Philosophical Investigations 23, no. 2 (2000), 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, J. and D. E. Wellbery, ‘Rhetoricality: On the modernist return of rhetoric’, in Bender, J. and Wellbery, D. E. (eds.), The Ends of Rhetoric. History, Theory, Practice (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1990), pp. 3–39.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S., ‘The democratic moment and the problem of difference’, in Benhabib, S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S., ‘Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy’, in Benhabib, S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 67–94.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S., ‘Liberal dialogue versus a critical theory of discursive legitimation’, in Rosenblum, N. L. (ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998), pp. 143–56.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. J., The New Constellation. The Ethical–Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. J., ‘ “Laws, morals, and ethics”: The retrieval of the democratic ethos’, Cardozo Law Review 17 (1996), 1127–46.Google Scholar
Blaug, R., ‘New theories of discursive democracy’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 22, no. 1 (1996), 49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, J., ‘Emancipation and rhetoric: The perlocutions and illocutions of the social critic’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 21, no. 3 (1988), 185–204.Google Scholar
Bohman, J., ‘Critical theory and democracy’, in Rasmussen, D. M. (ed.), Handbook of Critical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 190–215.Google Scholar
Bohman, J., Public Deliberation. Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Bohman, J., ‘Two versions of the linguistic turn: Habermas and poststructuralism’, in D’Entrèves, M. Passerin and Benhabib, S. (eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), pp. 197–220.Google Scholar
Bohman, J., ‘ “When water chokes”: Ideology, communication, and practical rationality’, Constellations 7, no. 3 (2000), 382–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borradori, G., Philosophy in a Time of Terror. Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Boraine, A., ‘Truth and reconciliation in South Africa’, in Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 141–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouveresse, J., Wittgenstein Reads Freud, trans. C. Cosman (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Brennan, W. J., ‘Reason, passion and “the progress of the law”’, Cardozo Law Review 10 (1988), 3–23.Google Scholar
Brockelman, T., ‘The failure of the radical democratic imaginary: Žižek versus Laclau and Mouffe on vestigial utopia’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (2003), 183–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J., ‘Critically queer’, in Butler, J., Bodies that Matter (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Butler, J. and Laclau, E., ‘The uses of equality’, diacritics 27, no. 1 (1995), 3–19.Google Scholar
Butler, J., Laclau, E. and Žižek, S., Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, Phronesis (London: Verso, 2000).Google Scholar
Caputo, J. D., ‘Without sovereignty, without being: Unconditionality, the coming God and Derrida’s democracy to come’, Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory 4 (2003), 9–26.Google Scholar
Cavell, S., Must We Mean What We Say? (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1976).Google Scholar
Cavell, S., The Claim of Reason. Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Cavell, S., This New Yet Unapproachable America (Alburquerque, N. Mex.: Living Batch Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Cavell, S., Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome. The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism, The Carus Lectures, 1988 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Cavell, S., ‘What is the Emersonian event? A comment on Kateb’s Emerson’, New Literary History, 25 (1994), 951–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavell, S., Cities of Words. Pedagogical Letters on a Register of the Moral Life (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Cavell, S., Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Cavell, S. ‘The incessance and absence of the political’, in Norris, A. (ed.), The Claim to Community. Essays on Stanley Cavell and Political Philosophy (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2006), pp. 263–317.Google Scholar
Chambers, S. A., ‘The language of disagreement’. Paper delivered to the Poststructuralism and Radical Politics Conferece: ‘Fidelity to the Disagreement: Jacques Rancière and the Political’, Goldsmiths College, London, 16–17 September 2003. See (www.homepages.gold.ac.uk/psrpsg/ranciere.doc).
Chambers, S. A., ‘The politics of literality’ (http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/toc/archive.html#8.3).
Chambers, S., Reasonable Democracy. Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse (London: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Churchill, J., ‘Rat and mole’s epiphany of Pan: Wittgenstein on seeing aspects and religious belief’, Philosophical Investigations 21, no. 4 (1998), 152–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J., ‘Democracy and liberty’, in Elster, J. (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 185–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, R., ‘Of democracy, discourse, and dirt virtue’, Political Theory 28 (2000), 540–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conant, J., ‘Nietzsche’s perfectionism: A reading of Schopenhauer as Educator’, in Schacht, R. (ed.), Nietzsche’s Postmoralism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 181–257.Google Scholar
Connolly, W. E., Identity\Difference. Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Connolly, W. E., ‘Democracy and contingency’, in Carens, J. H. (ed.), Democracy and Possessive Individualism. The Intellectual Legacy of C. B. Macpherson (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993), pp. 193–219.Google Scholar
Connolly, W. E., The Ethos of Pluralization (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Connolly, W. E., ‘Twilight of the idols’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 21 (1995), 127–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, W. E., ‘Speed, concentric cultures, and cosmopolitanism’, Political Theory 28, no. 5 (2000), 596–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombes, A. E., History after Apartheid. Visual Culture and Public Memory in a Democratic South Africa (Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copi, I. M. and Cohen, C., Introduction to Logic, 9th edn (New York: Macmillan, 1994).Google Scholar
Cornell, D., ‘ “Convention” and critique’, Cardozo Law Review7 (1986), 679–91.Google Scholar
Critchley, S., The Ethics of Deconstruction. Derrida and Levinas (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar
Critchley, S. and Marchart, O. (eds.), Laclau. A Critical Reader (Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Crusius, T. W., ‘Foreword’, in E. Grassi, Rhetoric as Philosophy, trans. J. M. Krois and A. Azodi (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 2001), pp. xi–xviii.Google Scholar
Dallmayer, F. R., ‘Critical theory criticized’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2, no. 3 (1972), 211–29.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, F., ‘Laclau and hegemony: Some (post) Hegelian caveats’, in Critchley, S. and Marchart, O. (eds.), Laclau. A Critical Reader (Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge, 2004), pp. 35–53.Google Scholar
Deranty, J. -P, ‘Jacques Rancière’s contribution to the ethics of recognition’, Political Theory, 31, no. 1 (2003), 136–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, J., Speech and Phenomena, trans. D. B. Allison (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Derrida, J., Of Grammatology, trans. G. Spivak (Baltimore, Md.: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Derrida, J., Limited Inc. (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Derrida, J., ‘Politics and friendship. A discussion with Jacques Derrida’, Centre for Modern French Thought, University of Sussex, 1 December 1997. At (www.hydra.umn.edu/derrida/pol+fr.html).
Derrida, J., Politics of Friendship, trans. George Collins (London: Verso, 1997).Google Scholar
Derrida, J., Rogues. Two Essays on Reason, trans. P. -A. Brault and M. Naas (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R., Plato, Gorgias. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Dronsfield, J. and Midgley, N. (eds.), Responsibilities of Deconstruction (PLI, Warwick Journal of Philosophy 6, University of Warwick, 1997).Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S., ‘Political and ecological communication’, Environmental Politics 4 (1995), 10–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, J. S., Deliberative Democracy and Beyond, Oxford Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Du Bois, F., ‘ “Nothing but the truth”: The South African alternative to corrective justice in transitions to democracy’, in Christodoulidis, E. and Veitch, S. (eds.), Lethe’s Law. Justice, Law and Ethics in Reconciliation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001), pp. 91–114.Google Scholar
Du Toit, A., ‘The moral foundations of the South African TRC: Truth as acknowledgment and justice as recognition’, in Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 122–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., Judging the Judges, Judging Ourselves. Truth, Reconciliation and the Apartheid Legal Order (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998).Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Survey article: Justifying the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (2000), 470–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. C., Ethics without Philosophy. Wittgenstein and the Moral Life (Tampa: University Presses of South Florida, 1985).Google Scholar
Elster, J., ‘Introduction’, in Elster, J. (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fann, K. T., Wittgenstein’s Conception of Philosophy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Fearon, J., ‘Deliberation as discussion’, in Elster, John (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, A., ‘The communicative paradigm in moral theory’, in Rasmussen, D. M. (ed.), Handbook of Critical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 119–37.Google Scholar
Fishkin, J. S., and P. Laslett (eds.), Debating Deliberative Democracy (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flyvberg, B., ‘Ideal theory, real rationality: Habermas versus Foucault and Nietzsche’, Paper presented to the Political Studies Association’s 50th Annual Conference, ‘The Challenges for Democracy in the 21st Century’, London School of Economics and Political Science, 10–13 April 2000, 6–7.
Fontana, B., C. J. Nederman, and G. Remer, ‘Introduction: Deliberative democracy and the rhetorical turn’, in Fontana, B., Nederman, C. J. and Remer, G. (eds.), Talking Democracy. Historical Perspectives on Rhetoric and Democracy (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2004), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Forester, J., The Deliberative Practitioner (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Fraser, N., ‘Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to a critique of actually existing democracy’, in Calhoun, C. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 109–42.Google Scholar
Fraser, N., and Honneth, A., Redistribution or Recognition? (London: Verso, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeden, M., Ideologies and Political Theory. A Conceptual Approach (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Gasché, R., The Tain of the Mirror. Derrida and the Philosophy of Reflection (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Gasché, R., ‘ “In the name of reason”: The deconstruction of sovereignty’, Research in Phenomenology 34, no. 1 (2004), 289–303.Google Scholar
Glock, H. -J., A Wittgenstein Dictionary (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glynos, J., ‘Theory and evidence in the Freudian field: from observation to structure’, in Glynos, L. J. and Stavrakakis, Y. (eds.), Lacan and Science (London: Karnac Press, 2002), pp. 13–50.Google Scholar
Glynos, J. and Howarth, D., Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory (London: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar
Godby, M., ‘Memory and history in William Kentridge’s History of the Main Complaint’, in Nuttall, S. and Coetzee, C. (eds.), Negotiating the Past. The Making of Memory in South Africa (Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 100–11.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E., Reflective Democracy, Oxford Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassi, E., Rhetoric as Philosophy, trans. J. M. Krois and A. Azodi (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Griggs, S. and D. Howarth, ‘Populism, localism and environmental politics: The logic and rhetoric of the Stop Stansted Expansion Campaign in the United Kingdom’ (www.essex.ac.uk/centres/TheoStud/onlinepapers.asp).
Gutman A. and D. Thompson, ‘The moral foundations of truth commissions’, in Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 22–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., ‘A reply to my critics’, in Thompson, J. B. and Held, D. (eds.), Habermas: Critical Debates (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1982), pp. 219–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., Legitimation Crisis, trans. T. McCarthy (London: Heinemann, 1976).Google Scholar
Habermas, J.Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. W. Rehg (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S., Insight and Illusion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S., Wittgenstein: Meaning and Mind. Part 1: Essays (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S., Wittgenstein on Human Nature (London: Phoenix Paperback, 1997).Google Scholar
Hacking, I., ‘Language, truth, reason’, in Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (eds.), Rationality and Relativism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983), pp. 48–66.Google Scholar
Hacking, I., ‘Styles of scientific reasoning’, in Rajchman, J. and West, C. (eds.), Post-Analytic Philosophy (New York: Columbia University Press: 1985), pp. 145–65.Google Scholar
Hadad, S., ‘Derrida and democracy at risk’, Contretemps 4 (2004), 29–44.Google Scholar
Hall, C., ‘ “Passion and constraint”: The marginalization of passion in liberal political theory’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 28, no. 6 (2002), 727–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, E., Stanley Cavell. Skepticism, Subjectivity and the Ordinary (Cambridge: Polity, 2002).Google Scholar
Hampshire, S., Justice is Conflict (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Harrison, B., ‘White mythology revisited: Derrida and his critics on reason and rhetoric’, Critical Inquiry 25 (1999), 505–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayner, P. B., ‘Fifteen truth commissions – 1974 to 1994: A comparative study’, Human Rights Quarterly 16 (1994), 597–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helsloot, N., ‘Linguists of all countries … !’, Journal of Pragmatics 13 (1989), 547–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herwitz, D., ‘The future of the past in South Africa: On the legacy of the TRC’, Social Research 72 (2005), 531–48.Google Scholar
Hesse, M., ‘Habermas and the force of dialectical argument’, History of European Ideas 21, no. 3 (1995), 367–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. J. (ed.), The Grammar of Politics. Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy (Ithaca, N. J.: Cornell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Honig, B., Democracy and the Foreigner (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honig, B., ‘The time of rights’, keynote address, Sixth Essex Graduate Conference in Political Theory, 13–14th May 2005.
Houghton, D., The Role of Analogical Reasoning in Novel Foreign Policy Situations, Cambridge Studies in International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Howarth, D., ‘Ideology, hegemony and political subjectivity’, in Hampsher-Monk, I. and Stanyer, J. (eds.), Contemporary Political Studies 1996, vol. ii (Oxford: Political Studies Association of the UK, 1996), pp. 944–56.Google Scholar
Howarth, D., ‘Complexities of identity/difference: the ideology of black consciousness in South Africa’, Journal of Political Ideologies 2, no. 1 (1997), 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, D., ‘Paradigms gained? A critique of theories and explanations of democratic transition in South Africa’, in Howarth, D. R. and Norval, A. J., South Africa in Transition (London: Macmillan, 1998), pp. 182–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, D., Discourse (Buckingham: Open University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Jonsen, A. R. and Toulmin, S., The Abuse of Casuistry (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Kahn, P. W., Putting Liberalism in its Place (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Keenan, A., Democracy in Question. Democratic Openness in a Time of Political Closure (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Kiss, E., ‘Moral ambition within and beyond political constraints: Reflections on restorative justice’, in Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 68–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, J. and J. Johnson, ‘What sort of political equality does deliberative democracy require?’, in Bohman, J. and Rehg, W. (eds.), Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1997), pp. 279–320.Google Scholar
Kohn, M., ‘Language, power, and persuasion: Towards a critique of deliberative democracy’, Constellations 7, no. 3 (2000), 408–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krog, K., ‘The TRC and national unity’, in Dorsman, R., Hartman, H. and Notenboom-Kronemeijer, L. (eds.), Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa and the Netherlands (Utrecht: SMI Special No. 23, 1999), pp. 14–31.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C., Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (London: Verso, 1985).Google Scholar
Laclau, E., New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time (London: Verso, 1990).Google Scholar
Laclau, E., ‘Universalism, particularism and the question of identity’, in E. Laclau, Emancipation(s) (London: Verso, 1996), pp. 20–35.Google Scholar
Laclau, E., ‘Deconstruction, Pragmatism, Hegemony’, in S. Critchley, J. Derrida, E. Laclau and R. Rorty, Deconstruction and Pragmatism, ed. Mouffe, C. (London: Routledge, 1996), pp. 47–68.Google Scholar
Laclau, E., ‘Paul de Man and the politics of rhetoric’, Pretexts 7, no. 2 (1998), 153–70.Google Scholar
Laclau, E., ‘Identity and hegemony: The role of universality in the constitution of political logics’, in Butler, J., Laclau, E. and Žižek, S., Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, Phronesis (London: Verso, 2000).Google Scholar
Laclau, E., ‘Structure, history and the political’, in Butler, J., Laclau, E. and Žižek, S., Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, Phronesis (London: Verso, 2000), pp. 182–212.Google Scholar
Laclau, E., ‘Glimpsing the future: A reply’, in Critchley, Simon and Marchart, Oliver (eds.), Laclau. A Critical Reader (London: Routledge, 2004), pp. 279–328.Google Scholar
Laclau, E., On Populist Reason (London: Verso, 2005).Google Scholar
Laden, A. S., Reasonably Radical. Deliberative Liberalism and the Politics of Identity (Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Lefort, C., The Political Forms of Modern Society (Oxford: Polity Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Lefort, C., Democracy and Political Theory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R., Polarity and Analogy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Lueken, G. -L., ‘On showing in argumentation’, Philosophical Investigations 20, no. 3 (1997), 205–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, S., ‘Of gods and demons: Habermas and practical reason’, in Thompson, J. B. and Held, D. (eds.), Habermas. Critical Debates (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1982), pp. 134–48.Google Scholar
Luntley, M., Wittgenstein (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, S. (ed.), Deliberative Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Majone, G., Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Marcus, G., The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
McCarthy, T. and Studd, S. C. (eds.), Wittgenstein in America (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001).Google Scholar
McFee, G., ‘Wittgenstein on art and aspects’, Philosophical Investigations 22, no. 3 (1999), 262–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehan, J., ‘Feminism and Habermas’ discourse ethics’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 26, no. 3 (2000), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meintjies, S. and B. Goldblatt, ‘Gender and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission: A submission to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, May 1996 (www.truth.org.za/submit/gender.htm).
Mendus, S., Feminism and Emotion. Readings in Moral and Political Philosophy (New York: St Martin’s Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Miller, D., ‘Deliberative democracy and social choice’, in Held, D. (ed.), Prospects for Democracy. North, South, East, West (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993), pp. 74–92.Google Scholar
Miller, D., ‘Is deliberative democracy unfair to disadvantaged groups’, in D’Entrèves, M. Passerin (ed.), Democracy as Public Deliberation (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002), pp. 201–25.Google Scholar
Minow, M., ‘The hope for healing: What can truth commissions do?’, in Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 235–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouffe, C. (ed.), Gramsci and Marxist Theory (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979).Google Scholar
Mouffe, C. (ed.), Dimensions of Radical Democracy (London: Verso, 1992).Google Scholar
Mouffe, C., The Return of the Political (London: Verso, 1993).Google Scholar
Mouffe, C., ‘Democratic politics and the question of identity’, in Rajchman, J. (ed.), The Identity in Question (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 33–45.Google Scholar
Mouffe, C., ‘Politics, democratic action, and solidarity’, Inquiry 39 (1995), 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouffe, C., The Democratic Paradox (London: Verso, 2000).Google Scholar
Mouffe, C., ‘Politics and Passion: The stakes of democracy’, Centre for the Study of Democracy Perspectives, 2002.
Mulhall, S., On Being in the World. Wittgenstein and Heidegger on Seeing Aspects (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
Mulhall, S., Stanley Cavell. Philosophy’s Recounting of the Ordinary (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Mulhall, S., ‘Promising, consent, and citizenship: Rawls and Cavell on morality and politics’, Political Theory 25 (1997), 171–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulhall, S., Inheritance and Originality. Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Kierkegaard (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Ndebele, N., ‘Memory, metaphor, and the triumph of narrative’, in Nuttall, S. and Coetzee, C. (eds.), Negotiating the Past. The Making of Memory in South Africa (Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 19–28.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F., ‘Schopenhauer as Educator’, in Levy, O. (ed.), The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche, vol. ii, Thoughts Out of Season, Part Two (London: T.N. Foulis, 1909).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F., ‘On truth and lies in a nonmoral sense (1873)’, in Pearson, K. Ansell and Large, D. (eds.), The Nietzsche Reader (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006), pp. 114–23.Google Scholar
Norris, A., ‘Political revisions: Stanley Cavell and political philosophy’, Political Theory 30 (2002), 828–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, A., ‘Political revisions: Stanley Cavell and political philosophy’, in Norris, A. (ed.), The Claim to Community. Essays on Stanley Cavell and Political Philosophy (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2006), pp. 80–97.Google Scholar
Norval, A. J., ‘Frontiers in question’, Acta Philosophica 2 (1997), 51–76.Google Scholar
Norval, A. J., ‘Memory, identity and the (im)possibility of reconciliation: The work of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa’, Constellations 5 (1998), 250–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norval, A. J., ‘Future trajectories of research in discourse theory’, in Howarth, D., Norval, A. J. and Stavrakakis, Y. (eds.), Discourse Theory and Political Analysis (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000), pp. 219–36.Google Scholar
Norval, A. J., ‘Radical democracy’, in Foweraker, J. and Clarke, B. (eds.), Dictionary of Democratic Thought (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Norval, A. J., ‘Reconstructing national identity and renegotiating memory: the work of the TRC’, in Hansen, T. Blom and Stepputat, F. (eds.), States of Imagination. Ethnographic Explorations of the Post-Colonial State (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2001), pp. 182–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norval, A. J., ‘Hegemony after deconstruction: The consequences of undecidability’, Journal of Political Ideologies 9, no. 2 (2004), 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norval, A. J., ‘Democratic identification: A Wittgensteinian approach’, Political Theory 34 (2006), 229–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, M., ‘Explaining “the hardness of the logical must”: Wittgenstein on grammar, arbitrariness and logical necessity’, Philosophical Investigations 24, no. 1 (2001), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, O., Towards Virtue and Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, O., ‘Political liberalism and public reason: A critical notice of John Rawls, Political Liberalism’, The Philosophical Review 106, no. 3 (1997), 417.Google Scholar
O’Neill, O., Bounds of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outhwaite, W., Habermas. A Critical Introduction (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Owen, D., ‘Cultural diversity and the conversation of justice’, Political Theory 27, no. 5 (1999), 579–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, D., ‘Democracy, perfectionism and “undetermined messianic hope” ’, in Mouffe, C. and Nagl, L. (eds.), The Legacy of Wittgenstein: Pragmatism and Deconstruction (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2001), pp. 139–56.Google Scholar
Owen, D., ‘Genealogy as perspicuous representation’, in Heyes, C. J. (ed.), The Grammar of Politics. Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy (London: Cornell University Press, 2003), pp. 82–96.Google Scholar
Owen, D., ‘Perfectionism, parrhesia and the care of the self: Foucault and Cavell on ethics and politics’, in Norris, A. (ed.), The Claim to Community. Essays on Stanley Cavell and Political Philosophy (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2006), pp. 128–55.Google Scholar
Panagia, D., ‘The predicative function in ideology: On the political uses of analogical reasoning in contemporary political thought’, Journal of Political Ideologies 6, no. 1 (2001), 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagia, D., ‘The force of political argument’, Political Theory 32, no. 6 (2004), 825–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Entrèves, Passerin M. (ed.), Democracy as Public Deliberation (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Pelletier, D., Kraak, V., McCullum, C., Uusitalo, U. and Rich, R., ‘The shaping of collective values through deliberative democracy: An empirical case study from New York’s North County’, Policy Sciences 32 (1999), 103–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohlhaus, G. and Wright, , ‘Using Wittgenstein critically’, Political Theory 30, no. 6 (2002), 800–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. D., Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000).Google Scholar
Rancière, J., The Names of History, trans. H. Melehy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Rancière, J., ‘Post-democracy, politics and philosophy’, interview with J. Sumič and R. Riha, in Howarth, D. and Norval, A. J. (eds.), Reconsidering the Political, special issue of Angelaki (1994), 171–8.Google Scholar
Rancière, J., On the Shores of Politics, trans. Liz Heron (London: Verso, 1995).Google Scholar
Rancière, J., Disagreement. Politics and Philosophy, trans. J. Rose (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Rancière, J., ‘Ten theses on politics’, Theory and Event, trans. Davide Panagia, 5, no. 3 (2001) (http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/v005/5.3ranciere.html).
Rancière, J., The Politics of Aesthetics. The Distribution of the Sensible, trans. Gabriel Rockhill (London: Continuum, 2004).Google Scholar
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Rehg, W., ‘Translator’s introduction’, in Habermas, J., Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. W. Rehg (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997), pp. ix–xxxvii.Google Scholar
Renn, O., Webler, T. and Wiedemann, P. (eds.), Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, F. C., ‘On having voice and being heard: Some after–effects of testifying before the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, Anthropological Theory 30 (2003), 325–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, J. J., The Social Contract (London: Penguin Classics, 1968).Google Scholar
Sanders, L. M., ‘Against deliberation’, Political Theory 25, no. 3 (1997), 347–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheuerman, W. E., ‘Between radicalism and resignation: Democratic theory in Habermas in Between Facts and Norms’, in Dews, P. (ed.), Habermas. A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 153–77.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M. J., ‘Radicalizing democratic theory: Social space in Connolly, Deleuze and Rancière’, Paper delivered to the Poststructuralism and Radical Politics Conferece: ‘Fidelity to the disagreement: Jacques Rancière and the political’, Goldsmiths College, London, 16–17 September 2003. See (www.homepages.gold.ac.uk/psrpsg/ranciere.doc).
Shusterman, R., ‘Putnam and Cavell on the ethics of democracy’, Political Theory 25 (1997), 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Q., Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparti, D., ‘Responsiveness as responsibility: Cavell’s reading of Wittgenstein and King Lear as a source for an ethics of interpersonal relationships’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (2000), 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, G.Why Politics Matters. Making Democracy Work (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).Google Scholar
Sumič, J., ‘Anachronism of emancipation or fidelity to politics’, in Critchley, S. and Marchart, O. (eds.), Laclau. A Critical Reader (Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge, 2004), pp. 182–98.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., ‘The law of group polarization’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 10, no. 2 (2002), 175–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, A. J. P., Deconstruction and Democracy, Continuum Studies in Continental Philosophy (London: Continuum, 2005).Google Scholar
Thomson, A. J. P., ‘What’s to become of “democracy to come”?’, Postmodern Culture 15 (2005) (http://muse.jhu.edu/demo/postmodern_culture/v015/15.3thomson.html).
Todorov, T., Theories of the Symbol, trans. Catherine Porter (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Toulmin, S., Return to Reason (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Tully, J., ‘Wittgenstein and political philosophy: understanding practices of critical reflection’, Political Theory 17, no. 2 (1989), 172–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, J., Strange Multiplicity. Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, J., ‘Political philosophy as a critical activity’, Political Theory 30, no. 4 (2002), 533–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, J., ‘Wittgenstein and political philosophy: Understanding practices of critical reflection’, in Heyes, C. J. (ed.), The Grammar of Politics. Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2003), pp. 17–42.Google Scholar
Veitch, S., ‘The legal politics of amnesty’, in Christodoulidis, E. and Veitch, S. (eds.), Lethe’s Law. Justice, Law and Ethics in Reconciliation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001), pp. 32–45.Google Scholar
Vickers, B., In Defence of Rhetoric (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Villa-Vicencio C. and W. Verwoerd, ‘Constructing a report: Writing up the “truth” ’, in Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 279–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J., The Dignity of Legislation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, B., ‘Thoreau on democratic cultivation’, Political Theory 29 (2001), 155–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, M., ‘A critique of philosophical conversation’, The Philosophical Forum 21, no. 1–2 (1989–90), 182–96.Google Scholar
Walzer, M., Thick and Thin. Moral Argument at Home and Abroad (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Walzer, M., Politics and Passion. Towards a More Egalitarian Liberalism (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Ward, H., Norval, A. J., Landman, T. and Pretty, J., ‘Open citizens’ juries and the politics of sustainability’, Political Studies, 51 (2003), 282–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, M., ‘Democratic theory and self-transformation’, American Political Science Review 86, no. 1 (1992), 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, M., ‘The self in discursive democracy’, in Stephen White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 167–200.Google Scholar
Warren, M. ‘What can democratic participation mean today?’, Political Theory 30, no. 5 (2002), 677–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, M. E., ‘What should and should not be said: Deliberating sensitive issues’, Journal of Social Philosophy 37, no. 2 (2006), 163–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, E. C., ‘The practice of deliberative democracy: Results from four large-scale trials’, Public Administration Review 60, no. 4 (2000), 360–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. K., The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas. Reason, Justice and Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
White, S., Political Theory and Postmodernism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
White, S., ‘After Critique: Affirming subjectivity in contemporary political theory’, European Journal of Political Theory 2, no. 2 (2003), 209–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widder, N., Genealogies of Difference (Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Wiley, J., ‘Review essay: The impasse of radical democracy’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (2002), 483–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., On Certainty, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M and Wright, G. H., trans. D. Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge 1932–35, ed. Ambrose, A. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M. and Rhees, R., trans. G. E. M. Anscombe (1958; Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, ed. Cyril Barrett (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989).Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, M., Vindication of the Rights of Woman, ed. with introduction Brody, M. (London: Penguin Books, 1983).Google Scholar
Wood, D., ‘The experience of the ethical’, in Kearney, R. and Dooley, M. (eds.), Questioning Ethics. Contemporary Debates in Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1999), pp. 105–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, I. M., ‘Difference as resource for democratic communication’, in Bohman, J. and Rehg, W. (eds.), Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1997), pp. 383–406.Google Scholar
Zerilli, L. M. G., ‘ “This universalism which is not one”: A review of Ernesto Laclau’s Emancipation(s)’, Diacritics 28, no. 2 (1998), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerilli, L. M. G., ‘Doing without knowing: Feminisms’ politics of the ordinary’, Political Theory 26, no. 4 (1998), 434–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerilli, L. M. G., Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Zerilli, L. M. G., ‘ “We feel our freedom”: Imagination and judgment in the thought of Hannah Arendt’, Political Theory 33, no. 2 (2005), 158–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žižek, S., The Sublime Object of Ideology (London: Verso, 1989).Google Scholar
Žižek, S., For They Know Not What They Do. Enjoyment as a Political Factor (London: Verso, 1991).Google Scholar
Žižek, S., The Ticklish Subject (London: Verso, 1999).Google Scholar
Žižek, S., ‘Melancholy and the act’, Critical Inquiry 26 (2000), 657–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abizadeh, A., ‘Banishing the particular. Rousseau on rhetoric, patrie, and the passions’, Political Theory 29, no. 4 (2001), 556–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, B. and Fishkin, J. S., ‘Deliberation day’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 10, no. 2 (2002), 129–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akkerman, T., ‘Urban debates and deliberative democracy’, Acta Politika 1 (2001), 71–87.Google Scholar
Aronovitch, H., ‘The political importance of analogical argument’, Political Studies 45 (1997), 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L., How to Do Things with Words, ed. Urmson, J. O., and Sbisà, M. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Badiou, A., Ethics. An Essay on the Understanding of Evil, trans. Peter Hallward (London: Verso, 2001).Google Scholar
Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S., Wittgenstein. Meaning and Understanding, Essays on the Philosophical Investigations, vol. i (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983).Google Scholar
Balibar, E., ‘Ambiguous universality’, Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 7, no. 1 (1995), 48–74.Google Scholar
Barber, B. R., Strong Democracy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Barber, B. R., ‘Foundationalism and democracy’, in Benhabib, S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 348–59.Google Scholar
Basu, A., ‘Dialogic ethics and the virtue of humor’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 7, no. 4 (1999), 378–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R., S/Z, trans. R. Millar (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974).Google Scholar
Baz, A., ‘What’s the point of seeing aspects?’, Philosophical Investigations 23, no. 2 (2000), 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, J. and D. E. Wellbery, ‘Rhetoricality: On the modernist return of rhetoric’, in Bender, J. and Wellbery, D. E. (eds.), The Ends of Rhetoric. History, Theory, Practice (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1990), pp. 3–39.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S., ‘The democratic moment and the problem of difference’, in Benhabib, S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S., ‘Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy’, in Benhabib, S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 67–94.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S., ‘Liberal dialogue versus a critical theory of discursive legitimation’, in Rosenblum, N. L. (ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998), pp. 143–56.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. J., The New Constellation. The Ethical–Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. J., ‘ “Laws, morals, and ethics”: The retrieval of the democratic ethos’, Cardozo Law Review 17 (1996), 1127–46.Google Scholar
Blaug, R., ‘New theories of discursive democracy’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 22, no. 1 (1996), 49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, J., ‘Emancipation and rhetoric: The perlocutions and illocutions of the social critic’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 21, no. 3 (1988), 185–204.Google Scholar
Bohman, J., ‘Critical theory and democracy’, in Rasmussen, D. M. (ed.), Handbook of Critical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 190–215.Google Scholar
Bohman, J., Public Deliberation. Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Bohman, J., ‘Two versions of the linguistic turn: Habermas and poststructuralism’, in D’Entrèves, M. Passerin and Benhabib, S. (eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), pp. 197–220.Google Scholar
Bohman, J., ‘ “When water chokes”: Ideology, communication, and practical rationality’, Constellations 7, no. 3 (2000), 382–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borradori, G., Philosophy in a Time of Terror. Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Boraine, A., ‘Truth and reconciliation in South Africa’, in Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 141–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouveresse, J., Wittgenstein Reads Freud, trans. C. Cosman (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Brennan, W. J., ‘Reason, passion and “the progress of the law”’, Cardozo Law Review 10 (1988), 3–23.Google Scholar
Brockelman, T., ‘The failure of the radical democratic imaginary: Žižek versus Laclau and Mouffe on vestigial utopia’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (2003), 183–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J., ‘Critically queer’, in Butler, J., Bodies that Matter (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Butler, J. and Laclau, E., ‘The uses of equality’, diacritics 27, no. 1 (1995), 3–19.Google Scholar
Butler, J., Laclau, E. and Žižek, S., Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, Phronesis (London: Verso, 2000).Google Scholar
Caputo, J. D., ‘Without sovereignty, without being: Unconditionality, the coming God and Derrida’s democracy to come’, Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory 4 (2003), 9–26.Google Scholar
Cavell, S., Must We Mean What We Say? (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1976).Google Scholar
Cavell, S., The Claim of Reason. Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Cavell, S., This New Yet Unapproachable America (Alburquerque, N. Mex.: Living Batch Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Cavell, S., Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome. The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism, The Carus Lectures, 1988 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Cavell, S., ‘What is the Emersonian event? A comment on Kateb’s Emerson’, New Literary History, 25 (1994), 951–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavell, S., Cities of Words. Pedagogical Letters on a Register of the Moral Life (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Cavell, S., Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Cavell, S. ‘The incessance and absence of the political’, in Norris, A. (ed.), The Claim to Community. Essays on Stanley Cavell and Political Philosophy (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2006), pp. 263–317.Google Scholar
Chambers, S. A., ‘The language of disagreement’. Paper delivered to the Poststructuralism and Radical Politics Conferece: ‘Fidelity to the Disagreement: Jacques Rancière and the Political’, Goldsmiths College, London, 16–17 September 2003. See (www.homepages.gold.ac.uk/psrpsg/ranciere.doc).
Chambers, S. A., ‘The politics of literality’ (http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/toc/archive.html#8.3).
Chambers, S., Reasonable Democracy. Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse (London: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Churchill, J., ‘Rat and mole’s epiphany of Pan: Wittgenstein on seeing aspects and religious belief’, Philosophical Investigations 21, no. 4 (1998), 152–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J., ‘Democracy and liberty’, in Elster, J. (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 185–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, R., ‘Of democracy, discourse, and dirt virtue’, Political Theory 28 (2000), 540–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conant, J., ‘Nietzsche’s perfectionism: A reading of Schopenhauer as Educator’, in Schacht, R. (ed.), Nietzsche’s Postmoralism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 181–257.Google Scholar
Connolly, W. E., Identity\Difference. Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Connolly, W. E., ‘Democracy and contingency’, in Carens, J. H. (ed.), Democracy and Possessive Individualism. The Intellectual Legacy of C. B. Macpherson (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993), pp. 193–219.Google Scholar
Connolly, W. E., The Ethos of Pluralization (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Connolly, W. E., ‘Twilight of the idols’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 21 (1995), 127–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, W. E., ‘Speed, concentric cultures, and cosmopolitanism’, Political Theory 28, no. 5 (2000), 596–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombes, A. E., History after Apartheid. Visual Culture and Public Memory in a Democratic South Africa (Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copi, I. M. and Cohen, C., Introduction to Logic, 9th edn (New York: Macmillan, 1994).Google Scholar
Cornell, D., ‘ “Convention” and critique’, Cardozo Law Review7 (1986), 679–91.Google Scholar
Critchley, S., The Ethics of Deconstruction. Derrida and Levinas (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar
Critchley, S. and Marchart, O. (eds.), Laclau. A Critical Reader (Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Crusius, T. W., ‘Foreword’, in E. Grassi, Rhetoric as Philosophy, trans. J. M. Krois and A. Azodi (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 2001), pp. xi–xviii.Google Scholar
Dallmayer, F. R., ‘Critical theory criticized’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2, no. 3 (1972), 211–29.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, F., ‘Laclau and hegemony: Some (post) Hegelian caveats’, in Critchley, S. and Marchart, O. (eds.), Laclau. A Critical Reader (Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge, 2004), pp. 35–53.Google Scholar
Deranty, J. -P, ‘Jacques Rancière’s contribution to the ethics of recognition’, Political Theory, 31, no. 1 (2003), 136–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, J., Speech and Phenomena, trans. D. B. Allison (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Derrida, J., Of Grammatology, trans. G. Spivak (Baltimore, Md.: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Derrida, J., Limited Inc. (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Derrida, J., ‘Politics and friendship. A discussion with Jacques Derrida’, Centre for Modern French Thought, University of Sussex, 1 December 1997. At (www.hydra.umn.edu/derrida/pol+fr.html).
Derrida, J., Politics of Friendship, trans. George Collins (London: Verso, 1997).Google Scholar
Derrida, J., Rogues. Two Essays on Reason, trans. P. -A. Brault and M. Naas (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R., Plato, Gorgias. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Dronsfield, J. and Midgley, N. (eds.), Responsibilities of Deconstruction (PLI, Warwick Journal of Philosophy 6, University of Warwick, 1997).Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S., ‘Political and ecological communication’, Environmental Politics 4 (1995), 10–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, J. S., Deliberative Democracy and Beyond, Oxford Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Du Bois, F., ‘ “Nothing but the truth”: The South African alternative to corrective justice in transitions to democracy’, in Christodoulidis, E. and Veitch, S. (eds.), Lethe’s Law. Justice, Law and Ethics in Reconciliation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001), pp. 91–114.Google Scholar
Du Toit, A., ‘The moral foundations of the South African TRC: Truth as acknowledgment and justice as recognition’, in Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 122–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., Judging the Judges, Judging Ourselves. Truth, Reconciliation and the Apartheid Legal Order (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998).Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Survey article: Justifying the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (2000), 470–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. C., Ethics without Philosophy. Wittgenstein and the Moral Life (Tampa: University Presses of South Florida, 1985).Google Scholar
Elster, J., ‘Introduction’, in Elster, J. (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fann, K. T., Wittgenstein’s Conception of Philosophy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Fearon, J., ‘Deliberation as discussion’, in Elster, John (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, A., ‘The communicative paradigm in moral theory’, in Rasmussen, D. M. (ed.), Handbook of Critical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 119–37.Google Scholar
Fishkin, J. S., and P. Laslett (eds.), Debating Deliberative Democracy (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flyvberg, B., ‘Ideal theory, real rationality: Habermas versus Foucault and Nietzsche’, Paper presented to the Political Studies Association’s 50th Annual Conference, ‘The Challenges for Democracy in the 21st Century’, London School of Economics and Political Science, 10–13 April 2000, 6–7.
Fontana, B., C. J. Nederman, and G. Remer, ‘Introduction: Deliberative democracy and the rhetorical turn’, in Fontana, B., Nederman, C. J. and Remer, G. (eds.), Talking Democracy. Historical Perspectives on Rhetoric and Democracy (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2004), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Forester, J., The Deliberative Practitioner (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Fraser, N., ‘Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to a critique of actually existing democracy’, in Calhoun, C. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 109–42.Google Scholar
Fraser, N., and Honneth, A., Redistribution or Recognition? (London: Verso, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeden, M., Ideologies and Political Theory. A Conceptual Approach (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Gasché, R., The Tain of the Mirror. Derrida and the Philosophy of Reflection (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Gasché, R., ‘ “In the name of reason”: The deconstruction of sovereignty’, Research in Phenomenology 34, no. 1 (2004), 289–303.Google Scholar
Glock, H. -J., A Wittgenstein Dictionary (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glynos, J., ‘Theory and evidence in the Freudian field: from observation to structure’, in Glynos, L. J. and Stavrakakis, Y. (eds.), Lacan and Science (London: Karnac Press, 2002), pp. 13–50.Google Scholar
Glynos, J. and Howarth, D., Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory (London: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar
Godby, M., ‘Memory and history in William Kentridge’s History of the Main Complaint’, in Nuttall, S. and Coetzee, C. (eds.), Negotiating the Past. The Making of Memory in South Africa (Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 100–11.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E., Reflective Democracy, Oxford Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassi, E., Rhetoric as Philosophy, trans. J. M. Krois and A. Azodi (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Griggs, S. and D. Howarth, ‘Populism, localism and environmental politics: The logic and rhetoric of the Stop Stansted Expansion Campaign in the United Kingdom’ (www.essex.ac.uk/centres/TheoStud/onlinepapers.asp).
Gutman A. and D. Thompson, ‘The moral foundations of truth commissions’, in Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 22–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., ‘A reply to my critics’, in Thompson, J. B. and Held, D. (eds.), Habermas: Critical Debates (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1982), pp. 219–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., Legitimation Crisis, trans. T. McCarthy (London: Heinemann, 1976).Google Scholar
Habermas, J.Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. W. Rehg (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S., Insight and Illusion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S., Wittgenstein: Meaning and Mind. Part 1: Essays (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S., Wittgenstein on Human Nature (London: Phoenix Paperback, 1997).Google Scholar
Hacking, I., ‘Language, truth, reason’, in Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (eds.), Rationality and Relativism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983), pp. 48–66.Google Scholar
Hacking, I., ‘Styles of scientific reasoning’, in Rajchman, J. and West, C. (eds.), Post-Analytic Philosophy (New York: Columbia University Press: 1985), pp. 145–65.Google Scholar
Hadad, S., ‘Derrida and democracy at risk’, Contretemps 4 (2004), 29–44.Google Scholar
Hall, C., ‘ “Passion and constraint”: The marginalization of passion in liberal political theory’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 28, no. 6 (2002), 727–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, E., Stanley Cavell. Skepticism, Subjectivity and the Ordinary (Cambridge: Polity, 2002).Google Scholar
Hampshire, S., Justice is Conflict (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Harrison, B., ‘White mythology revisited: Derrida and his critics on reason and rhetoric’, Critical Inquiry 25 (1999), 505–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayner, P. B., ‘Fifteen truth commissions – 1974 to 1994: A comparative study’, Human Rights Quarterly 16 (1994), 597–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helsloot, N., ‘Linguists of all countries … !’, Journal of Pragmatics 13 (1989), 547–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herwitz, D., ‘The future of the past in South Africa: On the legacy of the TRC’, Social Research 72 (2005), 531–48.Google Scholar
Hesse, M., ‘Habermas and the force of dialectical argument’, History of European Ideas 21, no. 3 (1995), 367–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. J. (ed.), The Grammar of Politics. Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy (Ithaca, N. J.: Cornell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Honig, B., Democracy and the Foreigner (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honig, B., ‘The time of rights’, keynote address, Sixth Essex Graduate Conference in Political Theory, 13–14th May 2005.
Houghton, D., The Role of Analogical Reasoning in Novel Foreign Policy Situations, Cambridge Studies in International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Howarth, D., ‘Ideology, hegemony and political subjectivity’, in Hampsher-Monk, I. and Stanyer, J. (eds.), Contemporary Political Studies 1996, vol. ii (Oxford: Political Studies Association of the UK, 1996), pp. 944–56.Google Scholar
Howarth, D., ‘Complexities of identity/difference: the ideology of black consciousness in South Africa’, Journal of Political Ideologies 2, no. 1 (1997), 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, D., ‘Paradigms gained? A critique of theories and explanations of democratic transition in South Africa’, in Howarth, D. R. and Norval, A. J., South Africa in Transition (London: Macmillan, 1998), pp. 182–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, D., Discourse (Buckingham: Open University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Jonsen, A. R. and Toulmin, S., The Abuse of Casuistry (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Kahn, P. W., Putting Liberalism in its Place (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Keenan, A., Democracy in Question. Democratic Openness in a Time of Political Closure (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Kiss, E., ‘Moral ambition within and beyond political constraints: Reflections on restorative justice’, in Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 68–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, J. and J. Johnson, ‘What sort of political equality does deliberative democracy require?’, in Bohman, J. and Rehg, W. (eds.), Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1997), pp. 279–320.Google Scholar
Kohn, M., ‘Language, power, and persuasion: Towards a critique of deliberative democracy’, Constellations 7, no. 3 (2000), 408–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krog, K., ‘The TRC and national unity’, in Dorsman, R., Hartman, H. and Notenboom-Kronemeijer, L. (eds.), Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa and the Netherlands (Utrecht: SMI Special No. 23, 1999), pp. 14–31.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C., Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (London: Verso, 1985).Google Scholar
Laclau, E., New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time (London: Verso, 1990).Google Scholar
Laclau, E., ‘Universalism, particularism and the question of identity’, in E. Laclau, Emancipation(s) (London: Verso, 1996), pp. 20–35.Google Scholar
Laclau, E., ‘Deconstruction, Pragmatism, Hegemony’, in S. Critchley, J. Derrida, E. Laclau and R. Rorty, Deconstruction and Pragmatism, ed. Mouffe, C. (London: Routledge, 1996), pp. 47–68.Google Scholar
Laclau, E., ‘Paul de Man and the politics of rhetoric’, Pretexts 7, no. 2 (1998), 153–70.Google Scholar
Laclau, E., ‘Identity and hegemony: The role of universality in the constitution of political logics’, in Butler, J., Laclau, E. and Žižek, S., Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, Phronesis (London: Verso, 2000).Google Scholar
Laclau, E., ‘Structure, history and the political’, in Butler, J., Laclau, E. and Žižek, S., Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, Phronesis (London: Verso, 2000), pp. 182–212.Google Scholar
Laclau, E., ‘Glimpsing the future: A reply’, in Critchley, Simon and Marchart, Oliver (eds.), Laclau. A Critical Reader (London: Routledge, 2004), pp. 279–328.Google Scholar
Laclau, E., On Populist Reason (London: Verso, 2005).Google Scholar
Laden, A. S., Reasonably Radical. Deliberative Liberalism and the Politics of Identity (Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Lefort, C., The Political Forms of Modern Society (Oxford: Polity Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Lefort, C., Democracy and Political Theory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R., Polarity and Analogy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Lueken, G. -L., ‘On showing in argumentation’, Philosophical Investigations 20, no. 3 (1997), 205–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, S., ‘Of gods and demons: Habermas and practical reason’, in Thompson, J. B. and Held, D. (eds.), Habermas. Critical Debates (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1982), pp. 134–48.Google Scholar
Luntley, M., Wittgenstein (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, S. (ed.), Deliberative Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Majone, G., Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Marcus, G., The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
McCarthy, T. and Studd, S. C. (eds.), Wittgenstein in America (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001).Google Scholar
McFee, G., ‘Wittgenstein on art and aspects’, Philosophical Investigations 22, no. 3 (1999), 262–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehan, J., ‘Feminism and Habermas’ discourse ethics’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 26, no. 3 (2000), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meintjies, S. and B. Goldblatt, ‘Gender and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission: A submission to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, May 1996 (www.truth.org.za/submit/gender.htm).
Mendus, S., Feminism and Emotion. Readings in Moral and Political Philosophy (New York: St Martin’s Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Miller, D., ‘Deliberative democracy and social choice’, in Held, D. (ed.), Prospects for Democracy. North, South, East, West (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993), pp. 74–92.Google Scholar
Miller, D., ‘Is deliberative democracy unfair to disadvantaged groups’, in D’Entrèves, M. Passerin (ed.), Democracy as Public Deliberation (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002), pp. 201–25.Google Scholar
Minow, M., ‘The hope for healing: What can truth commissions do?’, in Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 235–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouffe, C. (ed.), Gramsci and Marxist Theory (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979).Google Scholar
Mouffe, C. (ed.), Dimensions of Radical Democracy (London: Verso, 1992).Google Scholar
Mouffe, C., The Return of the Political (London: Verso, 1993).Google Scholar
Mouffe, C., ‘Democratic politics and the question of identity’, in Rajchman, J. (ed.), The Identity in Question (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 33–45.Google Scholar
Mouffe, C., ‘Politics, democratic action, and solidarity’, Inquiry 39 (1995), 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouffe, C., The Democratic Paradox (London: Verso, 2000).Google Scholar
Mouffe, C., ‘Politics and Passion: The stakes of democracy’, Centre for the Study of Democracy Perspectives, 2002.
Mulhall, S., On Being in the World. Wittgenstein and Heidegger on Seeing Aspects (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
Mulhall, S., Stanley Cavell. Philosophy’s Recounting of the Ordinary (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Mulhall, S., ‘Promising, consent, and citizenship: Rawls and Cavell on morality and politics’, Political Theory 25 (1997), 171–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulhall, S., Inheritance and Originality. Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Kierkegaard (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Ndebele, N., ‘Memory, metaphor, and the triumph of narrative’, in Nuttall, S. and Coetzee, C. (eds.), Negotiating the Past. The Making of Memory in South Africa (Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 19–28.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F., ‘Schopenhauer as Educator’, in Levy, O. (ed.), The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche, vol. ii, Thoughts Out of Season, Part Two (London: T.N. Foulis, 1909).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F., ‘On truth and lies in a nonmoral sense (1873)’, in Pearson, K. Ansell and Large, D. (eds.), The Nietzsche Reader (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006), pp. 114–23.Google Scholar
Norris, A., ‘Political revisions: Stanley Cavell and political philosophy’, Political Theory 30 (2002), 828–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, A., ‘Political revisions: Stanley Cavell and political philosophy’, in Norris, A. (ed.), The Claim to Community. Essays on Stanley Cavell and Political Philosophy (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2006), pp. 80–97.Google Scholar
Norval, A. J., ‘Frontiers in question’, Acta Philosophica 2 (1997), 51–76.Google Scholar
Norval, A. J., ‘Memory, identity and the (im)possibility of reconciliation: The work of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa’, Constellations 5 (1998), 250–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norval, A. J., ‘Future trajectories of research in discourse theory’, in Howarth, D., Norval, A. J. and Stavrakakis, Y. (eds.), Discourse Theory and Political Analysis (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000), pp. 219–36.Google Scholar
Norval, A. J., ‘Radical democracy’, in Foweraker, J. and Clarke, B. (eds.), Dictionary of Democratic Thought (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Norval, A. J., ‘Reconstructing national identity and renegotiating memory: the work of the TRC’, in Hansen, T. Blom and Stepputat, F. (eds.), States of Imagination. Ethnographic Explorations of the Post-Colonial State (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2001), pp. 182–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norval, A. J., ‘Hegemony after deconstruction: The consequences of undecidability’, Journal of Political Ideologies 9, no. 2 (2004), 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norval, A. J., ‘Democratic identification: A Wittgensteinian approach’, Political Theory 34 (2006), 229–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, M., ‘Explaining “the hardness of the logical must”: Wittgenstein on grammar, arbitrariness and logical necessity’, Philosophical Investigations 24, no. 1 (2001), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, O., Towards Virtue and Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, O., ‘Political liberalism and public reason: A critical notice of John Rawls, Political Liberalism’, The Philosophical Review 106, no. 3 (1997), 417.Google Scholar
O’Neill, O., Bounds of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outhwaite, W., Habermas. A Critical Introduction (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Owen, D., ‘Cultural diversity and the conversation of justice’, Political Theory 27, no. 5 (1999), 579–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, D., ‘Democracy, perfectionism and “undetermined messianic hope” ’, in Mouffe, C. and Nagl, L. (eds.), The Legacy of Wittgenstein: Pragmatism and Deconstruction (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2001), pp. 139–56.Google Scholar
Owen, D., ‘Genealogy as perspicuous representation’, in Heyes, C. J. (ed.), The Grammar of Politics. Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy (London: Cornell University Press, 2003), pp. 82–96.Google Scholar
Owen, D., ‘Perfectionism, parrhesia and the care of the self: Foucault and Cavell on ethics and politics’, in Norris, A. (ed.), The Claim to Community. Essays on Stanley Cavell and Political Philosophy (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2006), pp. 128–55.Google Scholar
Panagia, D., ‘The predicative function in ideology: On the political uses of analogical reasoning in contemporary political thought’, Journal of Political Ideologies 6, no. 1 (2001), 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagia, D., ‘The force of political argument’, Political Theory 32, no. 6 (2004), 825–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Entrèves, Passerin M. (ed.), Democracy as Public Deliberation (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Pelletier, D., Kraak, V., McCullum, C., Uusitalo, U. and Rich, R., ‘The shaping of collective values through deliberative democracy: An empirical case study from New York’s North County’, Policy Sciences 32 (1999), 103–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohlhaus, G. and Wright, , ‘Using Wittgenstein critically’, Political Theory 30, no. 6 (2002), 800–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. D., Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000).Google Scholar
Rancière, J., The Names of History, trans. H. Melehy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Rancière, J., ‘Post-democracy, politics and philosophy’, interview with J. Sumič and R. Riha, in Howarth, D. and Norval, A. J. (eds.), Reconsidering the Political, special issue of Angelaki (1994), 171–8.Google Scholar
Rancière, J., On the Shores of Politics, trans. Liz Heron (London: Verso, 1995).Google Scholar
Rancière, J., Disagreement. Politics and Philosophy, trans. J. Rose (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Rancière, J., ‘Ten theses on politics’, Theory and Event, trans. Davide Panagia, 5, no. 3 (2001) (http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/v005/5.3ranciere.html).
Rancière, J., The Politics of Aesthetics. The Distribution of the Sensible, trans. Gabriel Rockhill (London: Continuum, 2004).Google Scholar
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Rehg, W., ‘Translator’s introduction’, in Habermas, J., Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. W. Rehg (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997), pp. ix–xxxvii.Google Scholar
Renn, O., Webler, T. and Wiedemann, P. (eds.), Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, F. C., ‘On having voice and being heard: Some after–effects of testifying before the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, Anthropological Theory 30 (2003), 325–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, J. J., The Social Contract (London: Penguin Classics, 1968).Google Scholar
Sanders, L. M., ‘Against deliberation’, Political Theory 25, no. 3 (1997), 347–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheuerman, W. E., ‘Between radicalism and resignation: Democratic theory in Habermas in Between Facts and Norms’, in Dews, P. (ed.), Habermas. A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 153–77.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M. J., ‘Radicalizing democratic theory: Social space in Connolly, Deleuze and Rancière’, Paper delivered to the Poststructuralism and Radical Politics Conferece: ‘Fidelity to the disagreement: Jacques Rancière and the political’, Goldsmiths College, London, 16–17 September 2003. See (www.homepages.gold.ac.uk/psrpsg/ranciere.doc).
Shusterman, R., ‘Putnam and Cavell on the ethics of democracy’, Political Theory 25 (1997), 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Q., Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparti, D., ‘Responsiveness as responsibility: Cavell’s reading of Wittgenstein and King Lear as a source for an ethics of interpersonal relationships’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (2000), 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, G.Why Politics Matters. Making Democracy Work (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).Google Scholar
Sumič, J., ‘Anachronism of emancipation or fidelity to politics’, in Critchley, S. and Marchart, O. (eds.), Laclau. A Critical Reader (Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge, 2004), pp. 182–98.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., ‘The law of group polarization’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 10, no. 2 (2002), 175–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, A. J. P., Deconstruction and Democracy, Continuum Studies in Continental Philosophy (London: Continuum, 2005).Google Scholar
Thomson, A. J. P., ‘What’s to become of “democracy to come”?’, Postmodern Culture 15 (2005) (http://muse.jhu.edu/demo/postmodern_culture/v015/15.3thomson.html).
Todorov, T., Theories of the Symbol, trans. Catherine Porter (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Toulmin, S., Return to Reason (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Tully, J., ‘Wittgenstein and political philosophy: understanding practices of critical reflection’, Political Theory 17, no. 2 (1989), 172–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, J., Strange Multiplicity. Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, J., ‘Political philosophy as a critical activity’, Political Theory 30, no. 4 (2002), 533–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, J., ‘Wittgenstein and political philosophy: Understanding practices of critical reflection’, in Heyes, C. J. (ed.), The Grammar of Politics. Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2003), pp. 17–42.Google Scholar
Veitch, S., ‘The legal politics of amnesty’, in Christodoulidis, E. and Veitch, S. (eds.), Lethe’s Law. Justice, Law and Ethics in Reconciliation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001), pp. 32–45.Google Scholar
Vickers, B., In Defence of Rhetoric (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Villa-Vicencio C. and W. Verwoerd, ‘Constructing a report: Writing up the “truth” ’, in Rotberg, R. I. and Thompson, D. (eds.), Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 279–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J., The Dignity of Legislation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, B., ‘Thoreau on democratic cultivation’, Political Theory 29 (2001), 155–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, M., ‘A critique of philosophical conversation’, The Philosophical Forum 21, no. 1–2 (1989–90), 182–96.Google Scholar
Walzer, M., Thick and Thin. Moral Argument at Home and Abroad (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Walzer, M., Politics and Passion. Towards a More Egalitarian Liberalism (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Ward, H., Norval, A. J., Landman, T. and Pretty, J., ‘Open citizens’ juries and the politics of sustainability’, Political Studies, 51 (2003), 282–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, M., ‘Democratic theory and self-transformation’, American Political Science Review 86, no. 1 (1992), 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, M., ‘The self in discursive democracy’, in Stephen White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 167–200.Google Scholar
Warren, M. ‘What can democratic participation mean today?’, Political Theory 30, no. 5 (2002), 677–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, M. E., ‘What should and should not be said: Deliberating sensitive issues’, Journal of Social Philosophy 37, no. 2 (2006), 163–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, E. C., ‘The practice of deliberative democracy: Results from four large-scale trials’, Public Administration Review 60, no. 4 (2000), 360–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. K., The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas. Reason, Justice and Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
White, S., Political Theory and Postmodernism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
White, S., ‘After Critique: Affirming subjectivity in contemporary political theory’, European Journal of Political Theory 2, no. 2 (2003), 209–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widder, N., Genealogies of Difference (Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Wiley, J., ‘Review essay: The impasse of radical democracy’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (2002), 483–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., On Certainty, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M and Wright, G. H., trans. D. Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge 1932–35, ed. Ambrose, A. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations, ed. Anscombe, G. E. M. and Rhees, R., trans. G. E. M. Anscombe (1958; Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, ed. Cyril Barrett (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989).Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, M., Vindication of the Rights of Woman, ed. with introduction Brody, M. (London: Penguin Books, 1983).Google Scholar
Wood, D., ‘The experience of the ethical’, in Kearney, R. and Dooley, M. (eds.), Questioning Ethics. Contemporary Debates in Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1999), pp. 105–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, I. M., ‘Difference as resource for democratic communication’, in Bohman, J. and Rehg, W. (eds.), Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1997), pp. 383–406.Google Scholar
Zerilli, L. M. G., ‘ “This universalism which is not one”: A review of Ernesto Laclau’s Emancipation(s)’, Diacritics 28, no. 2 (1998), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerilli, L. M. G., ‘Doing without knowing: Feminisms’ politics of the ordinary’, Political Theory 26, no. 4 (1998), 434–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerilli, L. M. G., Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Zerilli, L. M. G., ‘ “We feel our freedom”: Imagination and judgment in the thought of Hannah Arendt’, Political Theory 33, no. 2 (2005), 158–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žižek, S., The Sublime Object of Ideology (London: Verso, 1989).Google Scholar
Žižek, S., For They Know Not What They Do. Enjoyment as a Political Factor (London: Verso, 1991).Google Scholar
Žižek, S., The Ticklish Subject (London: Verso, 1999).Google Scholar
Žižek, S., ‘Melancholy and the act’, Critical Inquiry 26 (2000), 657–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Aletta J. Norval, University of Essex
  • Book: Aversive Democracy
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490316.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Aletta J. Norval, University of Essex
  • Book: Aversive Democracy
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490316.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Aletta J. Norval, University of Essex
  • Book: Aversive Democracy
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490316.007
Available formats
×