Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T13:27:57.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - The Implications of Federalism for Indigenous Australians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Yash Ghai
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

Australian federalism is a by-product of the manner in which the Australian state was created in 1901, through the voluntary amalgamation of six self-governing British colonies, each with its own constitution, institutions and laws. For its critics, the federal system is kept in place largely by habit and entrenched interests. More objectively, however, a federal form of government still plays an important role in Australia. Decentralised government of some kind is dictated by geographic size. By offering a more local level of government, federalism thus contributes, at least potentially, to Australian democracy. In the absence of other significant constitutional constraints, including protection of rights, federalism provides a check on public power. Indeed, given Australia's adherence to the British constitutional tradition, had a normative constitution not been necessitated by the introduction of a federal system, it is doubtful that Australia would have had one at all.

Australian federalism plays no role in moderating competing ethnic demands. For the first fifty years after federation, the Australian population overwhelmingly, although not exclusively, was Anglo–Celtic in composition. Successive waves of migration following World War II, initially from Europe and more recently from Asia, have created a multi-ethnic people, but in a way that has no particular implications for the federal system. There is no concentration of discrete groups in different parts of Australia. Multicultural policies are disputed, but no one seeks to resolve the dispute through the application of federal principles, in the sense of providing forms of self-government for particular ethnic groups.

Type
Chapter
Information
Autonomy and Ethnicity
Negotiating Competing Claims in Multi-Ethnic States
, pp. 266 - 286
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×