Bibliography

doi:10.1017/9781009159463.027

Aalto, P. (1949) Untersuchungen über das lateinische Gerundium und Gerundivum (Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia).Google Scholar

Aarne, A. (1910) Verzeichnis der Märchentypen, Folklore Fellows Communications 3 (Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia).Google Scholar

Aarne, A. and Thompson, S. (1961) The Types of the Folktale: A Classification and Bibliography, Folklore Fellows Communications 184 (Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia).Google Scholar

Adema, S. M. (2017) Speech and Thought in Latin War Narratives: Words of Warriors (Leiden: Brill).CrossRef Google Scholar

Adler, W. (2009) ‘The Cesti and Sophistic Culture in the Severan Age,’ in Wallraff, M. and Mecella, L. (eds.), Die Kestoi des Julius Africanus und ihre Überlieferung (Berlin: De Gruyter), 1–15.Google Scholar

Adorjáni, Z. (2014) Pindars sechste olympische Siegesode. Text, Einleitung und Kommentar, Mnemosyne Supplement 370 (Leiden: Brill).CrossRef Google Scholar

Ager, S. L. (1993) ‘Why War?: Some Views on International Arbitration in Ancient Greece’, Echos du Monde Classique/Classical Views 37, 1–13.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. (1984) ‘The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome’, AJPh 105, 174–208.Google Scholar

Akujärvi, J. (2005) Researcher, Traveller, Narrator: Studies in Pausanias’ Periegesis (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International).Google Scholar

Akujärvi, J. (2012) ‘One and “I” in the Frame Narrative: Authorial Voice, Travelling Persona and Addressee in Pausanias’ Periegesis’, CQ 62, 327–58.Google Scholar

Allan, R. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and de Jonge, C. C. (2017) ‘From Enargeia to Immersion: The Ancient Roots of a Modern Concept’, Style 51, 34–51.CrossRef Google Scholar

Allison, G. (2017) Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? (New York: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar

Aly, W. (1969) Volksmärchen, Sage und Novelle bei Herodot und seinen Zeitgenossen, 2nd, revised ed., ed. Huber, L. (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar

Ampolo, C. (1994) ‘La città dell’eccesso: Per la storia di Sibari fino al 510 a.C.’, in Stazio, A. and Ceccoli, S. (eds.), Sibari e la Sibaritide. Atti del trentaduesimo convegno di studi sulla Magna Grecia, Taranto–Sibari 7–12 ottobre 1992 (Naples: Istituto per la storia e l’archeologia della Magna Grecia), 213–54.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. (1986) Philostratus: Biography and Belles Lettres in the Third Century A.D. (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Anderson, G. (2018) The Realness of Things Past: Ancient Greece and Ontological History (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Anderson, J. G. C. (1938) Tacitus: Germania (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Anderson, M., Cairns, D., and Sprevak, M. (eds.) (2019) Distributed Cognition in Classical Antiquity, The Edinburgh History of Distributed Cognition, vol. 1 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar

Andrewes, A. (1962) ‘The Mytilene Debate: Thucydides 3.36–49’, Phoenix 16, 64–85.CrossRef Google Scholar

Andrews, J. A. (2000) ‘Cleon’s Hidden Appeals’, CQ 50, 45–62.Google Scholar

Archibald, Z. H. (1998) The Odrysian Kingdom of Thrace: Orpheus Unmasked (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Armayor, O. K. (1978a) ‘Did Herodotus Ever Go to the Black Sea?’, HSCP 82, 45‒62.Google Scholar

Armayor, O. K. (1978b) ‘Did Herodotus Ever Go to Egypt?’, Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 15, 59‒73.CrossRef Google Scholar

Armayor, O. K. (1980) ‘Sesostris and Herodotus’ Autopsy of Thrace, Colchis, Inland Asia Minor, and the Levant’, HSCP 84, 51‒74.Google Scholar

Armayor, O. K. (1985) Herodotus’ Autopsy of the Fayoum: Lake Moeris and the Labyrinth of Egypt (Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben).Google Scholar

Armstrong, P. (ed.) (2013) Authority in Byzantium, Publications of the Centre for Hellenic Studies, King’s College London, 14 (Farnham: Ashgate).Google Scholar

Ash, R. (2007) Tacitus Histories II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Ash, R. (2018) Tacitus Annals Book XV (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Asheri, D. (1988) ‘Carthaginians and Greeks’, in Boardman, J., Hammond, N. G. L., Lewis, D. M., and Ostwald, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 4: Persia, Greece, and the Western Mediterranean c. 525 to 479 BC² (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 766–75.Google Scholar

Asheri, D., Lloyd, A., and Corcella, A. (2007) A Commentary on Herodotus Books I–IV, ed. Murray, O. and Moreno, A. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (1986) ‘Psychagogia in Plato’s Phaedrus’, Illinois Classical Studies 11, 153–72.Google Scholar

Astin, A. (1978) Cato the Censor (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Athanassaki, L. (1990) ‘Mantic Vision and Diction in Pindar’s Victory Odes’ (PhD thesis, Brown University).Google Scholar

Athanassaki, L. (2003) ‘A Divine Audience for the Celebration of Asopichus’ Victory in Pindar’s Fourteenth Olympian Ode’, in Bakewell, G. W. and Sickinger, J. P. (eds.), Gestures: Essays in Ancient History, Literature and Philosophy Presented to Alan L. Boegehold on the Occasion of His Retirement and His Seventy-Fifth Birthday (Oxford: Οxbow Books), 3–15.Google Scholar

Athanassaki, L. (2009) [=Αθανασάκη Λ.] ἀείδετο πὰν τέμενος. Οι χορικές παραστάσεις και το κοινό τους στην αρχαϊκή και πρώιμη κλασική περίοδο (Herakleion: University of Crete Press).Google Scholar

Athanassaki, L. (2014) ‘The Creative Impact of the Occasion: Pindar’s Songs for the Emmenids and Horace’s Odes 1.2 and 4.2’, in Cairns, D. and Scodel, R. (eds.), Defining Greek Narrative (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 197–225.Google Scholar

Athanassaki, L. (2018) ‘ἐν ζαθέῳ χρόνῳ: Ritual Interaction of Mortals and Immortals in Pindaric Choral Performance’, in Athanassaki, L., Nappa, C., and Vergados, A. (eds.), Gods and Mortals in Greek and Latin Poetry: Studies in Honor of Jenny Strauss Clay, Ariadne Supplement 2, 81–117.Google Scholar

Athanassaki, L. (2022) ‘The Lyric Chorus’, in Swift, L. (ed.), A Companion to Greek Lyric Poetry (Oxford: Wiley Blackwell), 3–18.Google Scholar

Avlamis, P. (2019) ‘Contextualizing Quintus: The Fall of Troy and Cultural Uses of the Paradoxical Cityscape in Posthomerica 13’, TAPA 149, 149–208.Google Scholar

Avotins, I. (1978) ‘The Date and the Recipient of the Vitae Sophistarum of Philostratus’, Hermes 106, 242–7.Google Scholar

Babbitt, F. C. (1936) Plutarch’s Moralia V (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1966) ‘The Early Historians’, in Dorey, T. A. (ed.), Latin Historians (London: Routledge), 1–38.Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1993) ‘Thucydides and the Outbreak of the Peloponnesian War’, in Badian, E. (ed.), From Plataea to Potidaea: Studies in the History and Historiography of the Pentekontaetia (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press), 125–62.Google Scholar

Bady, C. (2021) ‘La Rome des pepaideumenoi. Mobilité, patronage et sociabilité des élites intellectuelles hellénophones dans la Rome du Haut-Empire (31 av. J.-C.–235 ap. J.-C.)’ (doctoral thesis, Paris X – Nanterre).Google Scholar

Baier, T. (2005) ‘Autobiographie in der späten römischen Republik’, in Reichel, M. (ed.), Antike Autobiographien: Werke – Epochen – Gattungen (Cologne: Böhlau), 123–42.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (Austin: University of Texas Press).Google Scholar

Bakker, E. J. (2002) ‘The Marking of History: Herodotus’ Historiēs apodexis’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 1–32.Google Scholar

Bakker, E. J. (ed.) (2017) Authorship and Greek Song: Authority, Authenticity, and Performance (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Balot, R., Forsdyke, S., and Foster, E. (eds.) (2017) The Oxford Handbook of Thucydides (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Baragwanath, E. (2008) Motivation and Narrative in Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Baragwanath, E. (2013) ‘Herodotos and the Avoidance of Hindsight’, in Powell, A. (ed.), Hindsight in Greek and Roman History (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales), 25–48.Google Scholar

Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M. (eds.) (2012a) Myth, Truth, and Narrative in Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M. (2012b) ‘Introduction’, in Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M. (eds.), Myth, Truth, and Narrative in Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1‒57.Google Scholar

Baraz, Y. (2020) Reading Roman Pride (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Barker, E., Bouzarovski, S., Pelling, C., and Isaksen, L. (eds.) (2016) New Worlds out of Old Texts: Developing Techniques for the Spatial Analysis of Ancient Narratives (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Barlow, J. (1998) ‘Noble Gauls and Their Other in Caesar’s Propaganda’, in Welch, K. and Powell, A. (eds.), Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments (London: Duckworth; Swansea: Classical Press of Wales), 139–70.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan (ed.) (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, 2 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Barnes, Julian (1984) Flaubert’s Parrot (London: Cape).Google Scholar

Barrett, A. A. (2020) Rome Is Burning: Nero and the Fire That Ended a Dynasty (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Barrett, J. (2002) Staged Narrative: Poetics and the Messenger in Greek Tragedy (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Barwick, K. (1951) Caesars Bellum Civile. Tendenz, Abfassungszeit und Stil (Berlin: Akademie Verlag).Google Scholar

Barwick, K. (1967) ‘Zur Entstehungsgeschichte des Bellum Gallicum’, in Rasmussen, D. (ed.), Caesar (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), 255–78.Google Scholar

Bascom, W. (1975) ‘The Forms of Folklore: Prose Narratives’, The Journal of American Folklore 307, 3–20.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. (2018) ‘Caesar Constructing Caesar’, in Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 43–57.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. and Damon, C. (2006) Caesar’s Civil War (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Beagon, M. (2005) The Elder Pliny on the Human Animal: Natural History Book 7 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Beck, H. and Walter, U. (eds.) (2001) Die frühen römischen Historiker. 1: Von Fabius Pictor bis Cn. Gellius (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar

Bell, A. and Ensslin, A. (2011) ‘“I know what it was. You know what it was”: Second-Person Narration in Hypertext Fiction’, Narrative 19, 311–29.Google Scholar

Benardete, S. (1969) Herodotean Inquiries (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands).Google Scholar

Bernard, S., Damon, C., and Grey, C. (2014) ‘Rhetorics of Land and Power in the Polla Inscription (CIL 1² 638)’, Mnemosyne 67, 953–985.Google Scholar

Berry, D. (2008) ‘Letters from an Advocate: Pliny’s “Vesuvius” Narratives (Epistles 6.16, 6.20)’, Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar 13, 297–313.Google Scholar

Billault, A. (2000) L’univers de Philostrate (Bruxelles: Latomus).Google Scholar

Billows, R. A. (2009) Julius Caesar: The Colossus of Rome (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Biriotti, M. and Miller, N. (eds.) (1993) What Is an Author? (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar

Birke, D. (2015) ‘Author, Authority and “Authorial Narration”: The Eighteenth-Century English Novel as a Test Case’, in Birke, D. and Köppe, T. (eds.), Author and Narrator: Transdisciplinary Contributions to a Narratological Debate (Berlin: De Gruyter), 99–111.Google Scholar

Blänsdorf, J. (1995) Fragmenta Poetarum Latinorum Epicorum et Lyricorum praeter Ennium et Lucilium, post Wilhelm Morel novis curis adhibitis edidit Carolus Buechner (ed. tertiam auctam cur. Jürgen Blänsdorf) (Stuttgart: Teubner).Google Scholar

Bleckmann, B. (2006) Fiktion als Geschichte: Neue Studien zum Autor der Hellenika Oxyrhynchia und zur Historiographie des vierten vorchristlichen Jahrhunderts (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar

Bleicken, J. (1998) Augustus: Eine Biographie (Berlin: Alexander Fest Verlag).Google Scholar

Block, E. (1982) ‘The Narrator Speaks: Apostrophe in Homer and Vergil’, TAPA 92, 7–21.Google Scholar

Blösel, W. (2012) ‘Thucydides on Themistocles: A Herodotean Narrator?’, in Foster, E. and Lateiner, D. (eds.), Thucydides and Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 215–40.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (1987) ‘The Two Faces of Demaratus’, Arethusa 20, 185–201.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (1996) ‘Heroic Historiography: Simonides and Herodotus on Plataea’, Arethusa 29, 223–42.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (2002) ‘Epic Heritage and Mythical Patterns in Herodotus’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 97–116.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (2003) ‘Pedestrian Fatalities: The Prosaics of Death in Herodotus’, in Derow, P. and Parker, R. C. T. (eds.), Herodotus and His World: Essays from a Conference in Memory of George Forrest (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 17–36.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (2006) ‘Voiceless Victims, Memorable Deaths in Herodotus’, CQ 56, 393–403.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (2011) ‘Persian Gender Relations as Historical Motives in Herodotus’, in Rollinger, R., Truschnegg, B., and Bichler, R. (eds.), Herodot und das Persische Weltreich = Herodotus and the Persian Empire, Akten des 3. Internationalen Kolloquiums zum Thema Vorderasien im Spannungsfeld klassischer und altorientalischer Überlieferungen, Innsbruck, 24.–28. November 2008, Classica et Orientalia 3 (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz), 211–35.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (2015) ‘Two Tales of Spartan Envoys’, in Clark, C., Foster, E., and Hallett, J. (eds.), Kinesis: The Ancient Depiction of Gesture, Motion, and Emotion: Essays for Donald Lateiner (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), 103–115.Google Scholar

Bollansée, J. (2005) ‘Historians of Agathocles of Samus: Polybius on Writers of Historical Monographs’, in Schepens, G. and Bollansée, J. (eds.), The Shadow of Polybius: Intertextuality as a Research Tool in Greek Historiography: Proceedings of the International Colloquium, Leuven, 21–22 September 2001 (Leuven: Peeters), 237–53.Google Scholar

Bolte, J. and Polívka, J. (1915) Anmerkungen zu den Kinder- und Hausmärchen der Brüder Grimm, 2nd ed., vol. 2 (Leipzig: Theodor Weicher).Google Scholar

Bonheim, H. (1983) ‘Narration in the Second Person’, Recherches Anglaises et Américaines Strasbourg 16, 69–80.Google Scholar

Bosworth, A. (2003) ‘Plus ça change … : Ancient Historians and Their Sources’, ClAnt 22, 167–198.Google Scholar

Boter, G. (2015) ‘The Title of Philostratus’ Life of Apollonius of Tyana’, JHS 135, 1–7.Google Scholar

Botermann, H. (2007) ‘Gallia pacata – perpetua pax. Die Eroberung Galliens und der “gerechte Krieg”’, in Baltrusch, E. (ed.), Caesar (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), 137–58.Google Scholar

Bowie, A. M. (2007) Herodotus Histories Book VIII. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (2009) ‘Philostratus: The Life of a Sophist’, in Bowie, E. L. and Elsner, J. (eds.), Philostratus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 19–32.Google Scholar

Bradley, P. J. (2010) ‘Irony and the Narrator in Xenophon’s Anabasis’, in Gray, V. J. (ed.), Xenophon: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 520–52.Google Scholar

Branscome, D. (2010) ‘Herodotus and the Map of Aristagoras’, ClAnt 29, 1–44.Google Scholar

Branscome, D. (2013) Textual Rivals: Self-Presentation in Herodotus’ Histories (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar

Breed, B., Keitel, E., and Wallace, R. (eds.) (2018) Lucilius and Satire in Second-Century BC Rome (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Briant, P. (2002) From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire, trans. Peter T. Daniels (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns).Google Scholar

Brillante, C. (1986) ‘Il sogno nella riflessione dei presocratici’, MD 16, 9–53.Google Scholar

Brock, R. (2003) ‘Authorial Voice and Narrative Management in Herodotus’, in Derow, P. and Parker, R. C. T. (eds.), Herodotus and His World: Essays from a Conference in Memory of George Forrest (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 3–17.Google Scholar

Brosius, M. (2000) The Persian Empire from Cyrus II to Artaxerxes I (London: London Association of Classical Teachers).Google Scholar

Brown, T. S. (1958) Timaeus of Tauromenium (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Brugnone, M. A. (1995) ‘In margine alle tradizioni ecistiche di Massalia’, PdP 50, 46–66.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1976) Arrian. Anabasis Alexandri Books i–iv, Loeb Classical Library 236 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1993) ‘The Megarian Decree’, in Brunt, P. A. (ed.), Studies in Greek History and Thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 1–16.Google Scholar

Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S., and Taylor, H. A. (2009) ‘When You and I Share Perspectives: Pronouns Modulate Perspective Taking during Narrative Comprehension’, Psychological Science 20, 27–32.Google Scholar

Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., and Taylor, H. A. (2011) ‘Better You Than I: Perspectives and Emotion Simulation during Narrative Comprehension’, Journal of Cognitive Psychology 23, 659–66.Google Scholar

Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Giles, G.E., Holmes, A., and Taylor, H.A. (2016) ‘Mentally Simulating Narrative Perspective Is Not Universal or Necessary for Language Comprehension’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 42, 1592–605.Google Scholar

Büchner, K. (1960) Sallust (Heidelberg: Winter).Google Scholar

Bühler, K. (1982) ‘The Deictic Field of Language and Deictic Words’, in Jarvella, R. J. and Klein, W. (eds.), Speech, Place, and Action: Studies of Deixis and Related Topics (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell), 9–30.Google Scholar

Bundy, E. L. (1962) Studia Pindarica, I–II: The Eleventh Olympian Ode: The First Isthmian Ode (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1979) Structure and History in Greek Mythology and Ritual (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1985 [2013]) ‘Herodot über die Namen der Götter: Polytheismus als historisches Problem’, MH 43, 121–32, translated in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 198–209.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1990) ‘Herodot als Historiker fremder Religionen’, in Nenci, G. and Reverdin, O. (eds.), Hérodote et les peuples non grecs, Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 35 (Vandoeuvres-Geneva: Fondation Hardt), 1‒39.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1991) Wilder Ursprung. Opferritual und Mythos bei den Griechen (Berlin: Wagenbach).Google Scholar

Burton, P. J. (2008) ‘Livy’s Preface and Its Historical Context’, Scholia 17, 70–91.Google Scholar

Butler, T. (2003) ‘Ἐμπειρία in Aristotle’, SJPh 41, 329–50.Google Scholar

Byre, C. S. (1991) ‘The Narrator’s Addresses to the Narratee in Apollonius Rhodius’ Argonautica’, TAPA 121, 215–27.Google Scholar

Calame, C. (2003) Myth and History in Ancient Greece: The Symbolic Creation of a Colony, trans. D. W. Berman (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Calame, C. (2005) Masks of Authority: Fiction and Pragmatics in Ancient Greek Poetics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Calboli, G. (2003) Marci Porci Catonis Oratio pro Rhodiensibus² (Bologna: Pàtron).Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (2004) Greek Mythography in the Roman World (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Campbell, J. (1981) ‘Teach Yourself How to Be a General’, JRS 77, 13–29.Google Scholar

Candau, J. M. (2011) ‘Republican Rome: Autobiography and Political Struggle’, in Marasco, G. (ed.), Political Autobiographies and Memoirs in Antiquity: A Brill Companion (Leiden: Brill), 121–59.Google Scholar

Canfora, L. (1971) ‘Il ciclo storico’, Belfagor 26, 653–70.Google Scholar

Canfora, L. (1972) Totalità e selezione nella storiografia classica (Rome: Laterza).Google Scholar

Canfora, L. (1991) ‘L’inizio della storia secondo i Greci’, QS 33, 5–19.Google Scholar

Canter, H. V. (1932) ‘Conflagrations in Ancient Rome’, CJ 27, 270–88.Google Scholar

Cartledge, P. and Greenwood, E. (2002) ‘Herodotus as a Critic: Truth, Fiction, Polarity’, in de Jong, I. J. F. and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 351–71.Google Scholar

Caterine, C. L. (2015) ‘Si credere velis: Lucan’s Cato and the Reader of the Bellum Civile’, Arethusa 48, 339–67.Google Scholar

Cawkwell, G. (1997) Thucydides and the Peloponnesian War (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Ceccarelli, P. (2016) ‘Charon of Lampsakos (262)’, in Brill’s New Jacoby (Leiden: Brill), online publication.Google Scholar

Ceulemans, R. and De Leemans, P. (2015) On Good Authority: Tradition, Compilation and the Construction of Authority in Literature from Antiquity to the Renaissance (Turnhout: Brepols).Google Scholar

Chadwick, H. (2001) The Church in Ancient Society: From Galilee to Gregory the Great (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Chamberlain, D. (1999) ‘“We the others”: Interpretive Community and Plural Voice in Herodotus’, ClAnt 20, 5–34.Google Scholar

Chambers, R. (1984) Story and Situation: Narrative Seduction and the Power of Fiction (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar

Champion, C. B. (2004) Cultural Politics in Polybius’ Histories (Berkeley: University of California Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Chandler, C. (2006) Philodemus On Rhetoric. Books 1 and 2: Translation and Exegetical Essays (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Chaniotis, A. (2019) ‘Epigraphy of the Night’, in Norena, C. F. and Papazarkadas, N. (eds.), From Document to History: Epigraphic Insights into the Greco-Roman World (Leiden: Brill), 13–36.Google Scholar

Chantraine, P. (1968) Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque: Histoire des mots, vol. 1 (Paris: Klincksieck).Google Scholar

Chaplin, J. D. (2000) Livy’s Exemplary History (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Chaplin, J. D. and Kraus, C. S. (eds.) (2009) Livy: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Chassignet, M. (2002) Caton. Les Origines. Fragments (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Chassignet, M. (2003) ‘La naissance de l’autobiographie à Rome: Laus sui ou apologia de vita sua?’, REL 81, 65–78.Google Scholar

Chassignet, M. (2004) L’annalistique romaine, vol. 3: L’annalistique récente, l’autobiographie politique (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Chassignet, M. (2018) ‘Caesar and Roman Historiography Prior to the Commentarii’, in Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 249–62.Google Scholar

Chlup, J. T. (2006) ‘The Rhetoric of Authority: Alcibiades’ Speech to the Spartans in Thucydides’, CEA 42, 299–325.Google Scholar

Christ, M. R. (1994) ‘Herodotean Kings and Historical Inquiry’, ClAnt 13, 167–202.Google Scholar

Christes, J. (1986) ‘Lucilius’, in Adamietz, J. (ed.), Die römische Satire (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), 57–122.Google Scholar

Christes, J. (1989) ‘Der frühe Lucilius und Horaz. Eine Entgegnung’, Hermes 117, 321–6.Google Scholar

Christes, J. and Garbugino, G. (2015) Lucilius, Satiren, Lateinisch und Deutsch (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar

Civiletti, M. (2002) Filostrato. Vite dei sofisti (Milan: Bompiani).Google Scholar

Clarke, K. (1999) Between Geography and History: Hellenistic Constructions of the Roman World (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Clarke, K. (2003) ‘Polybius and the Nature of Late Hellenistic Geography’, in Yanguas, J. S. and Pagola, E. T. (eds.), Polibio y la Península Ibérica, Revisiones de Historia Antigua 4 (Vitoria: Universidad del País Vasco, Servicio Editorial), 69–87.Google Scholar

Clarke, K. (2018) Shaping the Geography of Empire: Man and Nature in Herodotus’ Histories (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Closs, V. M. (2016) ‘Neronianis Temporibus: The So-Called Arae Incendii Neroniani and the 64 Fire in Rome’s Monumental Landscape’, JRS 106, 102–23.Google Scholar

Closs, V. M. (2020) While Rome Burned: Fire, Leadership, and Urban Disaster in the Roman Cultural Imagination (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar

Cluett, R. (2003) ‘In Caesar’s Wake: The Ideology of the Continuators’, in Cairns, F. and Fantham, E. (eds.), Caesar against Liberty: Perspectives on His Autocracy (Cambridge: Cairns), 118–31.Google Scholar

Cluett, R. (2009) ‘The Continuators: Soldiering Oon’, in Griffin, M. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 192–205.Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. (1978) ‘La statue de Cornélie, mère des Gracques et la crise politique à Rome au temps de Saturninus’, in Zehnacker, H. (ed.) Le dernier siècle de la république romaine et l’époque augustéenne (Strasbourg: Association pour l’étude de la civilisation romaine), 13–28.Google Scholar

Cobet, J. (2002) ‘The Organization of Time in the Histories’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 387–412.Google Scholar

Cogan, M. (1981) ‘Mytilene, Plataea and Corcyra: Ideology and Policy in Thucydides, Book Three’, Phoenix 35, 1–21.Google Scholar

Cohen, D. (2005) ‘Theories of Punishment’, in Gagarin, M. and Cohen, D. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 170–90.Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. (1946) The Idea of History (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Collins, J. H. (1972) ‘Caesar as Political Propagandist’, in Temporini, H. (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, vol. I.1 (Berlin: De Gruyter), 922–66.Google Scholar

Collins, J. H. (2012) ‘Prompts for Participation in Early Philosophical Texts’, in Minchin, E. (ed.), Orality, Literacy and Performance in the Ancient World, Mnemosyne Supplement 335 (Leiden: Brill), 151–82.Google Scholar

Connor, W. R. (1962) ‘Charinus’ Megarean Decree’, AJPh 53, 225–46.Google Scholar

Connor, W. R. (1984) Thucydides (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Conti, N. (2006) Natale Conti’s Mythologiae, trans. and ed. J. Mulryan and S. Brown, 2 vols. (Tempe, AZ: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies).Google Scholar

Cook, B. (2004) ‘Plutarch’s “Many Other” Imitable Events: Mor. 814B and the Statesman’s Duty’, in de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T., and Schenkeveld, D. M. (eds.), The Sstatesman in Plutarch’s Works: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the International Plutarch Society, Nijmegen/Castle Hernen, May 1–5, 2002, vol. 1: Plutarch’s Statesman and His Aftermath: Political, Philosophical, and Literary Aspects, Mnemosyne Supplement 250 (Leiden: Brill), 201–10.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. (2014) ‘Paratextual Perspectives upon the Senatus Consultum de Cn. Pisone Patre’, in Jansen, L. (ed.), The Roman Paratext: Frame, Texts, Reader (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 143–55.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. J. (2009) ‘Cato the Elder and the Origins of Roman Autobiography’, in Smith, C. and Powell, A. (eds.), The Lost Memoirs of Augustus and the Development of Roman Autobiography (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales), 15–40.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. J., Bispham, E., Rich, J. W., and Smith, C. J. (eds.) (2013) The Fragments of the Roman Historians, 3 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1995) Musa Lapidaria. A Selection of Latin Verse Inscriptions, American Classical Studies, no. 36 (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press).Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (2003) The Fragmentary Latin Poets, revised ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Cowan, R. (2018) ‘You Too: The Narratology of Apostrophe and Second-Person Narrative in Virgil’s Georgics’, Arethusa 51, 269–98.Google Scholar

Croce, B. (1921 [1919]) Teoria e storia della storiografia, 2nd ed., trans. D. Ainslie as Theory and History of Historiography (London: Wentworth Press).Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (1970) Epistolographi Latini Minores, 2 vols. (Turin: Paravia).Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (1973) ‘Le più antiche lettere papiracee latine’, Atti della Accademia delle Scienze di Torino 107, 641–92.Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. and Sblendorio Cugusi, M. T. (2001) Opere di Marco Porcio Catone Censore, vol. 1 (Turin: UTET).Google Scholar

D’Alessio, G. B. (2020) ‘Dancing with the Dogs: Mimetic Dance and the Hyporcheme (on Pind. fr. *107 M = Simonides 255 Poltera)’, in Agócs, P. and Prauscello, L. (eds.), Simonides Lyricus. Essays on the ‘Other’ Classical Choral Lyric Poet, CCJ Supplement 42 (Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society), 59–80.Google Scholar

Damon, C. (1994) ‘Caesar’s Practical Prose’, CJ 89, 183–94.Google Scholar

Damon, C. (2003) Tacitus Histories Book I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Damon, C. (2010) ‘Déjà vu or déjà lu? History as Intertext’, Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar 14, 375–88.Google Scholar

D’Angour, A. (1997) ‘How the Dithyramb Got Its Shape’, CQ 47, 331–51.Google Scholar

Dannenberg, H. P. (2004) ‘A Poetics of Coincidence in Narrative Fiction’, Poetics Today 25, 399–436.Google Scholar

Dannenberg, H. P. (2008) Coincidence and Counterfactuality: Plotting Time and Space in Narrative Fiction (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press).Google Scholar

Darbo-Peschanski, C. (2013) ‘Herodotus and Historia’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 78–105.Google Scholar

Daugherty, G. N. (1992) ‘The Cohortes Vigilum and the Great Fire of AD64’, CJ 87, 229–40.Google Scholar

Davidson, J. (1997) Courtesans and Fishcakes: The Consuming Passions of Classical Athens (London: HarperCollins).Google Scholar

Dawson, W. R. (1986) ‘Herodotus as a Medical Writer’, BICS 33, 87–96.Google Scholar

Day, J. W. (2010). Archaic Greek Epigram and Dedication: Representation and Reperformance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

de Blois, L. (2017) ‘Caesar the General and Leader’, in Raaflaub, K. (ed.), The Landmark Julius Caesar (New York: Pantheon), app. X: web essay at www.landmarkcaesar.com.Google Scholar

de Jong, I. J. F. (2002) ‘Narrative Unity and Units’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 245–66.Google Scholar

de Jong, I. J. F. (2004) ‘Herodotus’, in de Jong, I. J. F., Nünlist, R., and Bowie, A. (eds.), Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative (Leiden: Brill), 102–14.Google Scholar

de Jong, I. J. F. (2009) ‘Metalepsis in Ancient Greek Literature’, in Grethlein, J. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Narratology and Interpretation: The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature (Berlin: De Gruyter), 87–116.Google Scholar

de Jong, I. J. F. (2013 [1999]) ‘Narratological Aspects of the Histories of Herodotus’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 253–91.Google Scholar

de Jong, I. J. F. (2014a) Narratology and Classics: A Practical Guide (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

de Jong, I. J. F. (2014b) ‘The Anonymous Traveler in European Literature: A Greek Meme’, in Cairns, D. and Scodel, R. (eds.), Defining Greek Narrative, Edinburgh Leventis Studies 7 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 314–33.Google Scholar

de Jong, I. J. F. and Nünlist, R. (2004) ‘From Bird’s Eye View to Close-Up: The Standpoint of the Narrator in the Homeric Epics’, in Bierl, A., Schmitt, A., and Willi, A. (eds.), Antike Literatur in neuer Deutung (Munich: Saur), 63–83.Google Scholar

de Jonge, C. C. (2015) ‘Grammatical Theory and Rhetorical Teaching’, in Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, 2 vols. (Leiden: Brill), 979–1011.Google Scholar

de Jonge, C. C. (2020) ‘Ps.-Longinus on Ecstasy: Author, Audience, and Text’, in Grethlein, J., Huitink, L., and Tagliabue, A. (eds.), Experience, Narrative, and Criticism in Ancient Greece (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 148–71.Google Scholar

de la Bédoyère, G. (1995) The Diary of John Evelyn (Woodbridge: Boydell).Google Scholar

de Lacy, P. and Einarson, B. (eds.) (1959) Moralia, VII: 523C–612B (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar

de Lacy, P. and Einarson, B. (eds.) (1984) Plutarch’s Moralia VII (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

de Lannoy, L. (1997) ‘Le problème des Philostrate. État de la question’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II 34.3 (Berlin: De Gruyter), 2362–449.Google Scholar

de Romilly, J. (1967) Histoire et raison chez Thucydide (Paris: Les Belles Lettres), translated by Rawlings, E. T. as The Mind of Thucydides (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

de Romilly, J. (1971) ‘La vengeance comme explication historique dans l’oeuvre d’Hérodote’, REG 84, 314–57.Google Scholar

de Romilly, J. (2012) The Mind of Thucydides, trans. Rawlings, E. T. (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

de Sélincourt, A. (1960) Livy: The Early History of Rome (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books).Google Scholar

Debnar, P. A. (2000) ‘Diodotus’ Paradox and the Mytilene Debate (Thuc. 3.37–49)’, RhM 143, 161–78.Google Scholar

Debnar, P. A. (2001) Speaking the Same Language: Speech and Audience in Thucydides’ Spartan Debates (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar

Debnar, P. A. (2013) ‘Blurring the Boundaries of Speech: Thucydides and Indirect Discourse’, in Tsakmakis, A. and Tamiolaki, M. (eds.), Thucydides between History and Literature (Berlin: De Gruyter), 271–85.Google Scholar

DelConte, M. (2003) ‘Why You Can’t Speak: Second-Person Narration, Voice, and a New Model for Understanding Narrative’, Style 37, 204–19.Google Scholar

Delarue, F. (1998) ‘Sur la préface de Tite-Live’, Vita Latina 151, 44–58.Google Scholar

Dench, E. (2007) ‘Ethnography and History’, in Marincola, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography (Oxford: Blackwell), 493–503.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. (1986) The Creation of Mythology, trans. Cook, M. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press; originally published in French in 1981).Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (1985) ‘Practical Knowledge and the Historian’s Role’, in Jameson, M. (ed.), The Greek Historians: Papers Presented to A. E. Raubitschek (Saratoga, NY: ANMA Libri), 47–63.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (1987) ‘Narrative Surface and Authorial Voice in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Boedeker, D. (ed.), Herodotus and the Invention of History, Arethusa 20 (Buffalo: State University of New York), 147–70.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (1993) ‘Reading the World: The Interpretation of Objects in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Rosen, R. and Farrell, J. (eds.), Nomodeiktes: Festschrift for Martin Ostwald (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), 55–70.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (1999) ‘The Figured Stage: Focalizing the Initial Narratives of Herodotus and Thucydides’, in Falkner, T. M. and Peradotto, J. J. (eds.), Contextualizing Classics: Ideology, Perfomance, Dialogue: Essays in Honor of John J. Peradotto (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield), 221–52.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2002) ‘“I didn’t give my own genealogy”: Herodotus and the Authorial Persona’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 267‒89.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2003) ‘Form and Content: The Question of Tyranny in Herodotus’, in Morgan, K. (ed.), Popular Tyranny: Sovereignty and Its Discontents in Ancient Greece (Austin: University of Texas Press), 25–58.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2005) Thucydides’ War Narrative: A Structural Study (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2006a) ‘Humour and Danger in Herodotus’, in Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 145–64.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2006b) ‘Paying Attention: History as the Development of a Secular Narrative’, in Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (eds.), Rethinking Revolutions through Ancient Greece (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 164–82.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2007) ‘The Construction of Meaning in the First Three Historians’, in Marincola, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, vol. 1 (Malden, MA: Blackwell), 89–101.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2011) ‘Happiness in Herodotus’, Symbolae Osloensis 85, 18–39.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2013 [1997]) ‘Wanton Kings, Pickled Heroes, and Gnomic Founding Fathers: Strategies of Meaning at the End of Herodotus’s Histories’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 379–402.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2013 [1981]) ‘Women and Culture in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 151–82.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2015) ‘“The medium is the message”: Herodotus and His Logoi’, in Ash, R., Mossman, J., and Titchener, F. B. (eds.), Fame and Infamy: Essays for Christopher Pelling on Characterization in Greek and Roman Biography and Historiography (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 67–82.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dewald, C. and Kitzinger, R. (2015) ‘Speaking Silences in Herodotus and Sophocles’, in Clark, C. A., Foster, E., and Hallett, J. P. (eds.), Kinesis: The Ancient Depiction of Gesture, Motion, and Emotion. Essays for Donald Lateiner (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), 86–102.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.) (2006) The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Diano, C. and Serra, G. (1980) Eraclito. I Frammenti e le Testimonianze (Milan: Fondazione Lorenzo Valla, Mondadori).Google Scholar

Díaz-Tejera, A. (1978) ‘Concordancias terminológicas con La Poética en la historia universal: Aristóteles y Polibio’, Habis 9, 33–48.Google Scholar

Diels, H. (1922) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 4th ed. (Berlin: Weidmann).Google Scholar

Diggle, J. (2004) Theophrastus: Characters (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Dillery, J. (1995) Xenophon and the History of His Times (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2014) ‘Plutarch and Platonism’, in Beck, M. (ed.), A Companion to Plutarch (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell), 61–72.Google Scholar

Ditman, T., Brunyé, T. T., Mahoney, C. R., and Taylor, H. A. (2010) ‘Simulating an Enactment Effect: Pronouns Guide Action Simulation during Narrative Comprehension’, Cognition 115, 172–8.Google Scholar

Dixon, S. (2007) Cornelia, Mother of the Gracchi (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Dougherty, C. (1993) The Poetics of Colonization: From City to Text in Archaic Greece (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1973) Thucydides, Greece & Rome New Surveys in the Classics 7 (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1983 [2009]) ‘Thucydides “as History” and “as Literature”’, History & Theory 22, 54–63, reprinted in J. S. Rusten (ed.), Thucydides (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 44–59.Google Scholar

Drumann, W. and Groebe, P. (1899) Geschichte Roms, vol. 1² (Berlin: Borntraeger).Google Scholar

Duchemin, J. (1955) Pindare: Poète et prophète (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Eberhardt, W. (1959) ‘Der Melierdialog und die Inschriften ATL A 9 (IG I2 63 +) und IG I2 97 +’, Historia 8, 284–314.Google Scholar

Eck, W., Caballos, A., and Fernández, F. (1996) Das senatus consultum de Cn. Pisone patre (Munich: Beck).Google Scholar

Eckstein, A. M. (1995) Moral Vision in the Histories of Polybius (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (2011) ‘Imagining Ruins in Ancient Rome’, European Review of History – Revue européenne d’histoire 18, 645–61.Google Scholar

Eidinow, E. (2011) Luck, Fate and Fortune: Antiquity and Its Legacy (London: I. B. Tauris).Google Scholar

Eidinow, E. (2016) ‘Popular Theologies: The Gift of Divine Envy’, in Eidinow, E., Kindt, J., and Osborne, R. (eds.), Theologies of Ancient Greek Religion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 205–32.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. (2015) ‘The Epic Vantage-Point: Roman Historiographical Allusion Reconsidered’, Histos 9, 277–311.Google Scholar

Erbse, H. (1953) ‘Über eine Eigenheit thukydideischer Geschichtsbetrachtung’, RhM 96, 38–62.Google Scholar

Erbse, H. (1992) Studien zum Verständnis Herodots (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Eshleman, K. J. (2008) ‘Defining the Circle of Sophists: Philostratus and the Construction of the Second Sophistic’, CP 103, 395–413.Google Scholar

Evans, J. A. S. (1987) ‘The Faiyum and the Lake of Moeris’, AHB 92, 66‒74.Google Scholar

Evans, J. A. S. (2013 [1980]) ‘Oral Tradition in Herodotus’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 113–23.Google Scholar

Everson, J. (2011) ‘Il Mambriano di Francesco Cieco da Ferrara – fra tradizione cavalleresca e mondo estense’, in Venturi, G. (ed.), L’uno e l’altro Ariosto: In corte e nelle delizie (Florence: Olschki), 153–73.Google Scholar

Fairbank, K. (2017) ‘Caesar’s Portrait of “Caesar”’, in Raaflaub, K. (ed.), The Landmark Julius Caesar (New York: Pantheon), app. EE: web essay at www.landmarkcaesar.com.Google Scholar

Fairweather, J. (1974) ‘Fiction in the Biographies of Ancient Writers’, AncSoc 5, 231–75.Google Scholar

Farrington, S. T. (2008) ‘As the Tragic Poets Do: Polybius’ Conception of Tragedy and Its Relationship to “Tragic History”’ (PhD dissertation, University of Colorado).Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1991) The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRef Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2007) Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Fehling, D. C. (1989) Herodotus and His ‘Sources’: Citation, Invention and Narrative Art (Leeds: Francis Cairns), English trans. by J. G. Howie of a revised version of Die Quellenangaben bei Herodot (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1971).Google Scholar

Fisher, N. R. E. (2002) ‘Popular Morality in Herodotus’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 199–224.Google Scholar

Fisher, N. R. E. (2003) ‘Let Envy Be Absent: Envy, Liturgies, and Reciprocity in Athens’, in Konstan, D. and Rutter, N. K. (eds.), Envy, Spite and Jealousy: The Rivalrous Emotions in Ancient Greece, Edinburgh Leventis Studies 2 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 181–215.Google Scholar

Fisher, N. R. E. (2010) ‘Kharis, Kharites, Festivals, and Social Peace in the Classical Greek City’, in Rosen, R. M. and Sluiter, I. (eds.), Valuing Others in Classical Antiquity, Mnemosyne Supplement 323 (Leiden: Brill), 71–112.Google Scholar

Flach, D. (1985) Einführung in die römische Geschichtsschreibung (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar

Flinterman, J.-J. (1995) Power, Paideia and Pythagoreanism: Greek Identity, Conceptions of the Relationship between Philosophers and Monarchs and Political Ideas in Philostratus’ Life of Apollonius (Amsterdam: Gieben).Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (1992) ‘Thucydides and the Pylos Debate (4.27–29)’, Historia 41, 40–57.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (1996) Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2014) ‘Memory and Memoirs in Republican Rome’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), Memoria Romana: Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, supplement 10 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), 27–40.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2015a) ‘Sulla’s Memoirs as an Account of Personal Religious Experiences’, Religion in the Roman Empire 1, 297–320.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2015b) ‘The Rapture and the Sorrow: Characterization in Sulla’s Memoirs’, in Ash, R., Mossman, J., and Titchener, F. B. (eds.), Fame and Infamy: Essays for Christopher Pelling on Characterization in Greek and Roman Biography and Historiography (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 209–23.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2020) ‘The Freedom of the Rhodians: Cato the Elder and Demosthenes’, in Balmaceda, C. (ed.), Libertas and Res Publica in the Roman Republic (Leiden: Brill), 84–103.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (forthcoming) ‘Self-Representation in a Time of Civil Strife: Publius Rutilius Rufus’ de vita sua’, in Havener, W. and Gotter, U. (eds.), A Culture of Civil War? Bellum Civile in the Late Republic and Early Empire, HABES (Steiner: Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. (1994) Theopompus of Chios: History and Rhetoric in the Fourth Century BC. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. (2000) ‘From Simonides to Isocrates: The Fifth-Century Origins of Fourth-Century Panhellenism’, ClAnt 19, 65–101.Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. (2006) ‘Herodotus and Persia’, in Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 274–89.Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. (2007) ‘The Size of Xerxes’ Expeditionary Forces’, in Strassler, R. (ed.), The Landmark Herodotus: The Histories, app. R (New York: Pantheon), 802–6.Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. (2012) Xenophon’s Anabasis, or The Expedition of Cyrus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. (2017) ‘Xenophon as a Historian’, in Flower, M. A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Xenophon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 301–22.Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. and Marincola, J. (eds.) (2002) Herodotus Histories Book IX, Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Fludernik, M. (1993) ‘Second-Person Fiction: Narrative You as Addressee and/or Protagonist’, Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 18, 217–47.Google Scholar

Fludernik, M. (1994) ‘ Introduction: Second-Person Narrative and Related Issues’, in Mosher, H. F. (ed.), ‘Second-Person Narrative’, special issue of Style 28.3, 281–311.Google Scholar

Fludernik, M. (1996) Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Fontenrose, J. (1978) The Delphic Oracle (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Fornara, C. W. (1971) Herodotus: An Interpretative Essay (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Fornara, C. W. (1983) The Nature of History in Ancient Greece and Rome (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Fornara, C. W. (2013 [1971]) ‘Herodotus’ Perspective’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 321–33.Google Scholar

Foster, B. O. (1919) Livy (Loeb edition), vol. 1 (London: William Heinemann; New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons).Google Scholar

Fowler, A. (1982) Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Fowler, H. N. (1936) Plutarch’s Moralia X (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (2000) ‘P. Oxy. 4458: Poseidonios’, ZPE 132, 133–42.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (2000–13) Early Greek Mythography, 2 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (2006a) ‘Herodotus and His Prose Predecessors’, in Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 29–45.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (2006b) ‘How to Tell a Myth: Genealogy, Mythology, Mythography’, Kernos 19, 35–46.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (2010) ‘Gods in Early Greek Historiography’, in Bremmer, J. N. and Erskine, A. (eds.), The Gods of Ancient Greece: Identities and Transformations (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 318‒34.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (2011) ‘Mythos and Logos’, JHS 131, 45‒66.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (2013) Early Greek Mythography, vol. 2: Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (2013 [1996]) ‘Herodotos and His Contemporaries’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.) Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 46–83.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1964) ‘Eine Form römischer Kriegsbulletins’, in Fraenkel, E. (ed.), Kleine Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie, vol. 2 (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura), 69–73.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. (1975) Early Greek Poetry and Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. (2001) Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Fulkerson, L. (2008) ‘Emotional Appeals in the Mytilenean Debate’, SyllClass 19, 115–54.Google Scholar

Gaertner, J. F. (2008) ‘Livy’s Camillus and the Political Discourse of the Late Republic’, JRS 98, 27–52.Google Scholar

Gaertner, J. F. (2018) ‘The Corpus Caesarianum’, in Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 263–76.Google Scholar

Gaertner, J. F. and Hausburg, B. (2013) Caesar and the Bellum Alexandrinum: An Analysis of Style, Narrative Technique, and the Reception of Greek Historiography (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar

Garcea, A. (2012) Caesar’s De Analogia: Edition, Translation, and Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Gardthausen, V. (1891) Augustus und seine Zeit (Aalen: Scientia Verlag).Google Scholar

Gelzer, M. (1959) Pompeius, 2nd ed. (Munich: Bruckmann).Google Scholar

Gelzer, M. (1963) ‘Caesar als Historiker’, in Gelzer, M. (ed.), Kleine Schriften, vol. 2 (Wiesbaden: Steiner), 307–35.Google Scholar

Gelzer, M. (1968) Caesar: Politician and Statesman (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Gera, D. L. (2000) ‘Two Thought Experiments in the Dissoi Logoi’, AJPh 121, 21–45.Google Scholar

Gerrish, J. (2013) ‘Civitatem recipit: Responding to Revolt in Thucydides 3 and Caesar’s Bellum Gallicum 7’, New England Classical Journal 40, 69–85.Google Scholar

Gerrish, J. (2018) ‘Heroic Resonances in Caesar’s Bellum Gallicum 5’, CW 111.3, 351–70.Google Scholar

Gesche, H. (1976) Caesar (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar

Gibson, B. J. (1998) ‘Rumours as Causes of Events in Tacitus’, Materiali e iscussion per l’analisi dei testi classici 40, 111–29.Google Scholar

Gibson, B. J. (2010) ‘Causation in Post-Augustan Epic’, in Miller, J. F. and Woodman, A. J. (eds.), Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire: Generic Interactions (Leiden: Brill), 29–47.Google Scholar

Gibson, B. J. (2018) ‘Praise in Polybius’, in Miltsios, N. and Tamiolaki, M. (eds.), Polybius and His Legacy (Berlin: De Gruyter), 75–101.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. (2003) ‘Pliny and the Art of (In)offensive Self-Praise’, Arethusa 36, 235–54.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. (2020) Man of High Empire: The Life of Pliny the Younger (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Gilbert, C. D. (1970) ‘Blind Cupid’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 33, 304–5.Google Scholar

Gilmartin, K. (1975) ‘A Rhetorical Figure in Latin Historical Style: The Imaginary Second Person Singular’, TAPA 105, 99–121.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J. (1981) Tradition and Theme in the Annals of Tacitus (New York: Arno Press).Google Scholar

Ginzburg, C. (2012) ‘The Bitter Truth: Stendhal’s Challenge to Historians’, in Ginzburg, C., Tedeschi, A., and Tedeschi, J. (eds.), Threads and Traces: True False Fictive (Berkeley: University of California Press), 137–50.Google Scholar

Gleason, M. (2011) ‘Identity Theft: Doubles and Masquerades in Cassius Dio’s Contemporary History’, ClAnt 30, 33–86.Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M. and Kaschak, M. P. (2002) ‘Grounding Language in Action’, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 558–65.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. (2010) Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Goldknopf, D. (1972) The Life of the Novel (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Goldman, M. L. (2015) ‘Associating the aulêtris: Flute Girls and Prostitutes in the Classical Greek Symposium’, Helios 42, 29–60.Google Scholar

Goldsworthy, A. (1998) ‘“Instinctive Genius”: The Depiction of Caesar the General’, in Welch, K. and Powell, A. (eds.), Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments (London: Duckworth; Swansea: Classical Press of Wales), 193–219.Google Scholar

Goldsworthy, A. (2006) Caesar: Life of a Colossus (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar

Gomme, A. W., Andrewes, A., and Dover, K. J. (1945–81) A Historical Commentary on Thucydides, 5 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Goodyear, F. R. D. (1972) The Annals of Tacitus, vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Gorman, R. G. and Gorman, V. B. (2007) ‘The Tryphê of the Sybarites: A Historiographical Problem in Athenaeus’, JHS 127, 38–60.Google Scholar

Gorman, V. B. (2001) Miletos, the Ornament of Ionia: A History of the City to 400 B.C.E. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar

Gould, H. E. and Whiteley, J. L. (1952) Livy Book 1 (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar

Gould, J. (1985) ‘On Making Sense of Greek Religion’, in Easterling, P. E. and Muir, J. V. (eds.), Greek Religion and Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1–33, reprinted in J. Gould, Myth, Ritual, Memory and Exchange: Essays in Greek Literature and Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 203–34.Google Scholar

Gould, J. (1989) Herodotus (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson).Google Scholar

Gould, J. (1994) ‘Herodotus and Religion’, in Hornblower, S. (ed.), Greek Historiography (Oxford: Oxford University Press) 91–106, reprinted in J. Gould, Myth, Ritual, Memory and Exchange: Essays in Greek Literature and Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 283–303.Google Scholar

Gould, J. (2001) Myth, Ritual, Mmemory and Exchange: Essays in Greek Literature and Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Gould, J. (2003) ‘Herodotus and the “Resurrection”’, in Derow, P. and Parker, R. C. T. (eds.), Herodotus and His World: Essays from a Conference in Memory of George Forrest (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 297–302.Google Scholar

Gow, A. S. F. (1950–1952) Theocritus, vol. 1: Introduction, Text and Translation; vol. 2: Commentary, Appendix, Indexes and Plates (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (1995) ‘The Anatomy of Rome from Capitol to Cloaca’, JRS 85, 23–32.Google Scholar

Grafton, A. T. (1983‒93) Joseph Scaliger: A Study in the History of Classical Scholarship (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Graham, D. W. (2008) ‘Heraclitus: Flux, Order, and Knowledge’, in Curd, P. and Graham, D. W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 169–84.Google Scholar

Green, P. (2010) Diodorus Siculus: The Persian Wars to the Fall of Athens: Books 11–14.34 (480–401 BCE) (Austin: University of Texas Press).Google Scholar

Greenblatt, S. (1991) Marvelous Possessions: The Wonder of the New World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Greenhalgh, P. (1980) Pompey: The Roman Alexander (Columbia: University of Missouri Press).Google Scholar

Greenwood, E. (2006) Thucydides and the Shaping of History (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar

Grene, D. (1946 [1965]) Greek Political Theory: The Image of Man in Plato and Thucydides (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2009) ‘How Not to Do History: Xerxes in Herodotus’ Histories,’ AJPh 130, 195–218.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2010) The Greeks and Their Past: Poetry, Oratory and History in the Fifth Century BCE (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2012) ‘Xenophon’s Anabasis from Character to Narrator’, JHS 132, 23–40.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2013) Experience and Teleology in Ancient Historiography: ‘Futures Past’ from Herodotus to Augustine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2017) Aesthetic Experiences and Classical Antiquity: The Significance of Form in Narratives and Pictures (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2018) ‘The Dynamics of Time: Herodotus’ Histories and Contemporary Athens before and after Fornara’, in Harrison, T. and Irwin, E. (eds.), Interpreting Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 223–42.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2020) ‘World and Words: The Limits to mimesis and Immersion in Heliodorus’ Ethiopica’, in Grethlein, J., Huitink, L., and Tagliabue, A. (eds.), Experience, Narrative, and Criticism in Ancient Greece: Under the Spell of Stories (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 127–47.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. and Huitink, L. (2017) ‘Homer’s Vividness: An Enactive Approach’, JHS 137, 67–91.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J., Huitink, L., and Tagliabue, A. (eds.) (2020) Experience, Narrative, and Criticism in Ancient Greece: Under the Spell of Stories (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1990) ‘Die Ursprünge der Historien Herodots’, in von Ax, W. (ed.), Memoria rerum veterum: Neue Beiträge zur antiken Historiographie und alten Geschichte. Festschrift für Carl Joachim Classen zum 60. Geburtstag (Stuttgart: Steiner), 51–82, translated as ‘The Emergence of Herodotus’, Histos 8 (2014), 1–24.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (2006) ‘Herodotus and Tragedy’, in Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 46–59.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A. (1989) ‘Was Cleomenes mad?’, in Powell, A. (ed.), Classical Sparta (London: Routledge), 51–78.Google Scholar

Grillo, L. (2012) The Art of Caesar’s Bellum Civile: Literature, Ideology, and Community (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Grillo, L. (2018a) ‘Literary Approaches to Caesar: Three Case Studies’, in Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 157–69.Google Scholar

Grillo, L. (2018b) ‘Speeches in the Commentarii’, in Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 131–43.Google Scholar

Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.) (2018) The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Grimm, J. and Grimm, W. (1812–15) Kinder- und Hausmärchen, 1st ed. in 2 vols. (Berlin: Realschulbuchhandlung).Google Scholar

Grote, G. (1904‒7) History of Greece (London: John Murray); orig. pub. 1846‒56.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1992) ‘Lucilius and the Contemporary Scene’, in Gruen, E. S. (ed.), Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome (London: Duckworth; Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), 272–318.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (2009) ‘Caesar as a Politician’, in Griffin, M. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 23–36.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (2011) Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Grüner, A. (2004) Venus Ordinis: Der Wandel von Malerei und Literatur im Zeitalter der römischen Bürgerkriege (Paderborn: Schöningh).Google Scholar

Gulick, C. B. (1927) Athenaeus: The Deipnosophists, Volume I, Books 1–3.106e (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Guthrie, W. K. C. (1965–81) A History of Greek Philosophy, 6 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Guzzo, P. G. (2010) ‘Intorno a Lampsake: Ipotesi di un modello foceo’, Incidenza dell’antico 8, 197–212.Google Scholar

Hägg, T. (2012) The Art of Biography in Antiquity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Hallett, J. P. (2002) ‘Women Writing in Rome and Cornelia, Mother of the Gracchi’, in Churchill, L. J., Brown, P. R., and Jeffrey, J. E. (eds.), Women Writing Latin from Roman Antiquity to Early Modern Europe, vol. 1 Women Writing Latin in Roman Antiquity, Late Antiquity, and the Early Christian Era (London: Routledge), 13–24.Google Scholar

Hallett, J. P. (2006) ‘Introduction: Cornelia and Her Maternal Legacy’, Helios 33.2, 119–47.Google Scholar

Hallett, J. P. (2018) ‘Oratorum Romanorum Fragmenta Liberae Rei Publicae: The Letter of Cornelia, Mater Gracchorum and the Speeches of her Father and Son’, in Gray, C., Balbo, A., Marshall, R. M. A., and Steel, C. E. W. (eds.), Reading Republican Oratory. Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 309–18.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (1991) ‘The Uses of Laughter in Greek Culture’, CQ 41, 279–96.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (2012) Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Hammond, N. G. L. (1972) A History of Macedonia, vol. 1 (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Hansen, M. H. (1983–9) The Athenian Ecclesia, 2 vols. (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press).Google Scholar

Hansen, W. (2002) Ariadne’s Thread: A Guide to International Tales Found in Classical Literature (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (2012) Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Harrison, T. (2000) Divinity and Herodotus: The Religion of Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Harrison, T. (2002) ‘The Persian Invasions’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and Van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 551–78.Google Scholar

Harrison, T. (2003) ‘The Cause of Things: Envy and the Emotions in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Konstan, D. and Rutter, K. (eds.), Envy, Spite and Jealousy: The Rivalrous Emotions in Ancient Greece (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 143–63.Google Scholar

Hartog, F. (1988) The Mirror of Herodotus: The Representation of the Other in the Writing of History (French original: Le miroir d’Herodote [Paris: ´Editions Gallimard, 1980]), trans. J. Lloyd (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Hass, K. (2007) Lucilius und der Beginn der Persönlichkeitsdichtung in Rom (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar

Hau, L. I. (2016) Moral History from Herodotus to Diodorus Siculus (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar

Haubold, J. (2013) Greece and Mesopotamia. Dialogues in Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Havener, W. (2016) Imperator Augustus: die diskursive Konstituierung der militärischen persona des ersten römischen princeps (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar

Hawthorn, G. (2014) Thucydides on Politics: Back to the Present (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Helmbold, W. C. (1939) Plutarch’s Moralia VI (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Hemelrijk, E. A. (1999) Matrona Docta: Educated Women in the Roman Élite from Cornelia to Julia Domna (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Henderson, W. J. (1992) ‘Pindar Fr. 140B Snell-Maehler: The Chariot and the Dolphin’, Hermes 120.2, 148–58.Google Scholar

Henrichs, A. (1994/5) ‘“Why Should I Dance?”: Choral Self-Referentiality in Greek Tragedy’, in Golder, H. (ed.), ‘The Chorus in Greek Tragedy and Culture’, special issue of Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics, Third Series 3.1, 56–111.Google Scholar

Hepperle, A. (1956) ‘Charon von Lampsakos’, in Festschrift für Otto Regenbogen zum 65. Geburtstage (Heidelberg: n.p.), 67–76.Google Scholar

Herkommer, E. (1968) ‘Die Topoi in den Proömien der römischen Geschichtswerke’ (dissertation, University of Tübingen).Google Scholar

Herman, D. (1994) ‘Textual You and Double Deixis in Edna O’Brien’s A Pagan Place’, Style 28, 378–410.Google Scholar

Hershbell, J. P. (2004) ‘Plutarch’s Political Philosophy: Peripatetic and Platonic’, in de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T., and Schenkeveld, D. M. (eds.), The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the International Plutarch Society, Nijmegen/Castle Hernen, May 1–5, 2002, vol. 1: Plutarch’s Statesman and His Aftermath: Political, Philosophical, and Literary Aspects, Mnemosyne Supplement 250 (Leiden: Brill), 151–62.Google Scholar

Heubeck, A. (1980) ‘Πρόφασις und keine Ende (zu Thuk. 1.23)’, Glotta 58, 222–36.Google Scholar

Heurgon, J. (1970) Tite-Live: Ab Vrbe Condita Liber Primus, 2nd ed. (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar

Hillard, T. W. (2001) ‘Popilia and the Laudationes Funebres for Women’, Antichthon 35, 45–63.Google Scholar

Holmes, T. R. (1928) The Architect of the Roman Empire (Oxford: Humphrey Milford).Google Scholar

Horden, P. and Purcell, N. (2000) The Corrupting Sea (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (1991–2008) A Commentary on Thucydides, 3 vols. (revised editions, vols. 1 and 2, 1997 and 2004) (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (1994) Greek Historiography (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (2003) ‘Panionios of Chios and Hermotimos of Pedasa (Hdt. 8.104–6)’, in Derow, P. and Parker, R. C. T. (eds.), Herodotus and His World: Essays from a Conference in Memory of George Forrest (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 37–57.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (2004) Thucydides and Pindar: Historical Narrative and the World of Epinikian Poetry (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. and Pelling, C. (2017) Herodotus: Histories, Book VI (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1974) ‘Virgil’s Roman Chronography: A Reconsideration’, CQ 24, 111–15, reprinted in N. Horsfall, Fifty Years at the Sibyl’s Heels: Selected Papers on Virgil and Rome (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), 34–9.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1981) ‘Some Problems of Titulature in Roman Literary History’, BICS 28, 103–14.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1989) Cornelius Nepos, a Selection Including the Lives of Cato and Atticus (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

How, W. W. and Wells, J. (1912, rev. 1928) A Commentary on Herodotus, 2 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Howe, A. (2013) Byron and the Forms of Thought (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press).Google Scholar

Howell, P. (1995) Martial Epigrams V (Warminster: Aris and Phillips).Google Scholar

Huitink, L. (2019) ‘“There was a river on their left-hand side”: Xenophon’s Anabasis, Arrival Scenes, Reflector Narrative and the Evolving Language of Greek Historiography’, in Willi, A. and Derron, P. (eds.), Formes et fonctions des langues littéraires en Grèce ancienne, Entr. Hardt 65 (Vandoeuvres-Genève: Fondation Hardt), 185–226.Google Scholar

Hunter, V. J. (1973) Thucydides: The Artful Reporter (Toronto: Hakkert).Google Scholar

Hunter, V. (1980) ‘Thucydides and the Uses of the Past’, Klio 62, 190–219.Google Scholar

Hunter, V. J. (1982) Past and Process in Herodotus and Thucydides. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hurst, A. (1975) ‘Prose historique et poésie. Le cas de Charon de Lampsaque’, in Fischer, I. (ed.), Actes de la XIIe conférence international d’études classiques Eirene, Cluj-Napoca, 2–7 octobre 1972 (Amsterdam: Hakkert), 231–7.Google Scholar

Hussey, E. L. (1985) ‘Thucydidean History and Democritean Theory’, History of Political Thought 6, 118–38.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (2020) Motion in Classical Literature: Homer, Parmenides, Sophocles, Ovid, Seneca, Tacitus, Art (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Immerwahr, H. (2013 [1956]) ‘Aspects of Historical Causation in Herodotus’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 157–93.Google Scholar

Instinsky, H. U. (1971) ‘Zur Echtheitsfrage der Brieffragmente der Cornelia, Mutter der Gracchen’, Chiron 1, 177–89.Google Scholar

Irwin, E. (2007) ‘The Politics of Precedence: First “Historians” on First “Thalassocrats”’, in Osborne, R. (ed.), Debating the Athenian Cultural Revolution: art, Literature, Philosophy, and Politics 430–380 BC (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 188–223.Google Scholar

Isaac, B. (1986) The Greek Settlements in Thrace until the Macedonian Conquest (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Iser, W. (1978) The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Isnardi, M. (1953) ‘Τέχνη e ἦθος nella metodologia storiografica di Polibio’, SCO 3, 102–10.Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1902) Apollodors Chronik: Eine Sammlung der Fragmente (Berlin: Weidmann).Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1909) ‘Über die Entwicklung der griechischen Geschichtsschreibung und den Plan einer neuen Sammlung der griechischen Historikerfragmente’, Klio 9, 80‒123.Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1913) ‘Herodotos’, RE Suppl. 2, 205‒520.Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1922) ‘Ktesias’, RE 11, 2032–37.Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1926) Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker. Zweiter Teil C: Kommentar zu Nr. 56–105 (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1943) Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker, vol. IIIa, Kommentar (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1949) Atthis: The Local Chronicles of Ancient Athens (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1956) ‘Charon of Lampsakos’, originally SIFC 15 (1938), 207–42, quoted from H. Bloch (ed.), Abhandlungen zur griechischen Geschichtsschreibung (Leiden: Brill), 178–206.Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (2015) On the Development of Greek Historiography and the Plan for a New Collection of the Fragments of the Greek Historians, trans. M. Chambers and S. Schorn (Histos Supplement 3, Newcastle upon Tyne).Google Scholar

Jaeger, M. (1999) ‘Guiding Metaphor and Narrative Point of View in Livy’s Ab Vrbe Condita’, in Kraus, C. S. (ed.), The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts (Leiden: Brill), 169–95.Google Scholar

Jervis, A. (2017) ‘The Gallic War as a Work of Propaganda’, in Raaflaub, K. (ed.), The Landmark Julius Caesar (New York: Pantheon), app. HH: web essay at www.landmarkcaesar.com.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. (1974) ‘The Reliability of Philostratus’, in Bowersock, G. W. (ed.), Approaches to the Second Sophistic: Papers Presented at the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Philological Association (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press), 11–16.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. (2002) ‘Philostratus and the Gordiani’, MedAnt 5, 759–67.Google Scholar

Judson, L. (1991) ‘Chance and “Always for the Most Part” in Aristotle’, in Judson, L. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 73–99.Google Scholar

Judson, L. (1998) ‘What Can Happen When You Eat Pungent Food’, in Avgelis, N. and Peonidis, F. (eds.), Aristotle on Logic, Language and Science (Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas Publications), 185–204.Google Scholar

Kacandes, I. (1990) ‘Orality, Reader Address and “Anonymous You”: On Translating Second Person References from Modern Greek Prose’, Journal of Modern Greek Studies 8, 223–43.Google Scholar

Kacandes, I. (1993) ‘Are You in the Text?: The “Literary Performative” in Postmodernist Fiction’, Text and Performance Quarterly 13, 139–53.Google Scholar

Kagan, D. (1969) The Outbreak of the Peloponnesian War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Kagan, D. (2009) Thucydides: The Reinvention of History (New York: Viking).Google Scholar

Kahane, A. (2005) Diachronic Dialogues: Authority and Continuity in Homer and the Homeric Tradition (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books).Google Scholar

Kajanto, I. (1957) God and Fate in Livy (Turku: Turun Yliopiston Kustantama).Google Scholar

Kallet, L. (2001) Money and the Corrosion of Power in Thucydides: The Sicilian Expedition and Its Aftermath (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Karttunen, K. (2002) ‘The Ethnography of the Fringes,’ in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 457–74.Google Scholar

Kayser, C. L. (1870–1) Flavii Philostrati opera auctiora, 2 vols. (Leipzig: Teubner, reprinted in 1985).Google Scholar

Keitel, E. (2009) ‘“Is Dying So Very Terrible?”: The Neronian Annals’, in Woodman, A. J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 127–43.Google Scholar

Keitel, E. (2010) ‘The Art of Losing: Tacitus and the Disaster Narrative’, in Kraus, C. S., Marincola, J., and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ancient Historiography and Its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 331–52.Google Scholar

Kemezis, A. M. (2011) ‘Narrative of Cultural Geography in Philostratus’ Lives of the Sophists’, in Fleury, P. and Schmidt, T. (eds.), Regards sur la Seconde Sophistique et son époque (Toronto: University of Toronto Press), 3–22.Google Scholar

Kemezis, A. M. (2014) Greek Narratives of the Roman Empire under the Severans: Cassius Dio, Philostratus and Herodian (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Kemezis, A. M. (2016–17) ‘“Inglorius Labor”?: The Rhetoric of Glory and Utility in Plutarch’s Precepts and Tacitus’ Agricola’, CW 110, 87–117.Google Scholar

Keulen, W. (2006) Gellius the Satirist: Roman Cultural Authority in Attic Nights (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Kienast, D. (2009) Augustus: Prinzeps und Monarch, 4th ed. (Darmstadt: Primus Verlag).Google Scholar

Kierdorf, W. (1962) ‘Zum Melier-Dialog des Thukydides’, RhM 105, 253–6.Google Scholar

Kierdorf, W. (1980) Laudatio funebris: Interpretationen und Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der römischen Leichenrede (Meisenheim: Hain).Google Scholar

Kirwan, C. (1993) Aristotle, Metaphysics Books Γ, Δ and Ε, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Klotz, F. (2007) ‘Portraits of the Philosopher: Plutarch’s Self-Presentation in the Quaestiones Convivales’, CQ 57, 550–7.Google Scholar

Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.) (2011) The Philosophers’ Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Knausgaard, K. O. (2019) So Much Longing in So Little Space: The Art of Edvard Munch, trans. I. Burkey, Norwegian original 2017 (New York: Penguin, London: Harvill Secker).Google Scholar

König, J. (2009) ‘Conventions of Prefatory Self-Representation in Galen’s On the Order of My Own Books’, in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T. J. G., and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Galen and the World of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 35–58.Google Scholar

König, J. (2011) ‘Self-Promotion and Self-Effacement in Plutarch’s Table Talk’, in Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.), The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 179–203.Google Scholar

König, J. (2014) ‘Images of Elite Communities in Philostratus: Re-reading the Preface to the Lives of the Sophists’, in Madsen, J. M. and Rees, R. (eds.), Roman Rule in Greek and Latin Writing: Double Vision (Leiden: Brill), 246–70.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (1987) ‘Persians, Greeks and Empire’, in D. Boedeker (ed.), ‘Herodotus and the Invention of History’, special issue of Arethusa 20, 59–73.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2005) ‘Pity and Politics’, in Hall Sternberg, R. (ed.), Pity and Power in Ancient Athens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 48–66.Google Scholar

Kowalzig, B. (2007) Singing for the Gods: Performances of Myth and Ritual in Archaic and Classical Greece (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Kraay, C. M. and Moorey, P. R. S. (1981) ‘A Black Sea Hoard of the Late Fifth Century BC’, NC 141, 1–19.Google Scholar

Kraus, C. S. (1994) ‘“No Second Troy”: Topoi and Refoundation in Livy Book V’, TAPA 164, 267–89.Google Scholar

Kraus, C. S. (2009) ‘Bellum Gallicum’, in Griffin, M. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 159–74.Google Scholar

Krebs, C. B. (2006) ‘“Imaginary Geography” in Caesar’s Bellum Gallicum’, AJPh 127, 111–36.Google Scholar

Krebs, C. B. (2016) ‘Thucydides in Gaul and Signposting in the Gallic War. The Sieges of Plataea and Avaricum’, Histos 10, 1–11.Google Scholar

Krebs, C. B. (2017) ‘Caesar the Historian’, in Raaflaub, K. (ed.), The Landmark Julius Caesar (New York: Pantheon), app. DD: web essay at www.landmarkcaesar.com.Google Scholar

Krebs, C. B. (2018) ‘More Than Words. The Commentarii in Their Propagandistic Context’, in Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 29–42.Google Scholar

Kremer, B. (1994) Das Bild der Kelten bis in Augusteische Zeit. Studien zur Instrumentalisierung eines antiken Feindbildes bei griechischen und römischen Autoren (Wiesbaden: Steiner).Google Scholar

Krentz, P. (1982) The Thirty at Athens (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Krentz, P. (ed.) (1995) Xenophon: Hellenika II.3.11–IV.2.8 (Warminster: Aris and Phillips).Google Scholar

Kuhn-Treichel, T. (2020–1) ‘Pindar’s Poetic “I” and the Muses: Metaphorical Role Characterization in Different Genres’, CJ 116.2, 152–71.Google Scholar

Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C. (1962) Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache, vol. 2 Satzlehre. Parts 1 and 2, 4th ed., repr. (Munich: Max Hueber Verlag).Google Scholar

Kurke, L. (1988) ‘The Poet’s Pentathlon: Genre in Pindar’s First Isthmian’, GRBS 29, 97–113.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. (1989) ‘Καπηλεία and Deceit: Theognis 59–60’, AJPh 110, 535–44.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. (1991) The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Kurke, L. (2011) Aesopic Conversations: Popular Tradition, Cultural Dialogue, and the Invention of Greek Prose (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Kuukkanen, J.-M. (2015) Postnarrativist Philosophy of Historiography (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar

Kyle, D. G. (2008) ‘Herodotus on Ancient Athletics, Olympia, and Egypt’, in Mauritsch, P., Petermandl, W., Rollinger, R., and Ulf, C. (eds.), Antike Lebenswelten. Konstanz – Wandel – Wirkungsmacht. Festschrift für Ingomar Weiler. Phillippika: Marburger altertumskundliche Abhandlungen 25 (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz), 149–59.Google Scholar

LaBarge, S. (2006) ‘Aristotle on Empeiria’, AncPhil 26, 23–44.Google Scholar

Lamarque, P. (1990) ‘The Death of the Author: An Analytical Autopsy’, The British Journal of Aesthetics 30, 319–31.Google Scholar

Landauer, M. (2019) Dangerous Counsel: Accountability and Advice in Ancient Greece (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Lanser, S. (1992) Fictions of Authority: Women Writers and Narrative Voice (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Laqueur, R. (1907) ‘Zur Griechischen Sagenchronographie’, Hermes 42, 513‒32.Google Scholar

Larcher, P.-H. (1786) (trans.) Histoire d’Hérodote, 7 vols. (Paris).Google Scholar

Lardinois, A. (1996) ‘Who Sang Sappho’s Songs?’, in Green, E. (ed.), Reading Sappho: Contemporary Approaches (Berkeley: University of California Press), 150‒72.Google Scholar

Latacz, J. (1977) Kampfparänese, Kampfdarstellung und Kampfwirklichkeit in der Ilias, bei Kallinos und Tyrtaios (Munich: Beck).Google Scholar

Lateiner, D. (1977) ‘No Laughing Matter: A Literary Tactic in Herodotus’, TAPA 107, 173–82.Google Scholar

Lateiner, D. (1989) The Historical Method of Herodotus (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar

Lateiner, D. (1990) ‘Mimetic Syntax: Metaphor from Word Order Especially in Ovid’, AJPh 111, 204–37.Google Scholar

Lateiner, D. (2012) ‘Herodotos the Pathographer: Persian and Hellenic Grief Displays’, Scripta Classica Israelica 31, 133–50.Google Scholar

Le Bohec, Y. (2001) César chef de guerre: César stratège et tacticien (Monaco: Rocher; reprint Paris: Tallandier, 2019).Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1997) ‘Die Literatur der republikanischen Zeit’, in Graf, F. (ed.), Einleitung in die lateinische Philologie (Stuttgart: Teubner), 165–91.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (2001) ‘Lucilius und die Politik’, in Manuwald, G. (ed.), Der Satiriker Lucilius und seine Zeit (Munich: Beck), 139–49.Google Scholar

Lefkowitz, M. R. (1991) First-Person Fictions: Pindar’s Poetic ‛I’ (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Legrand, Ph.-E. (1932–54) (ed. and trans.) Hérodote: Histoires (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Lehmann, G. A. (1974) ‘Polybios und die ältere und zeitgenössische Geschichtsschreibung: Einige Bemerkungen’, in Gabba, E. (ed.), Polybe, Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique, XX (Vandoeuvres-Genève: Fondation Hardt), 145–205.Google Scholar

Lendon, J. E. (2009) ‘Historians without History: Against Roman Historiography’, in Feldherr, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 41–62.Google Scholar

Lendon, J. E. (2017) ‘Battle Description in the Ancient Historians’, G&R 64, 39–64, 145–67.Google Scholar

Leumann, M., Hofmann, J. B., and Szantyr, A. (1972) Lateinische Grammatik, vol. 2 Syntax und Stilistik, revised ed. (Munich: Beck).Google Scholar

Levene, D. S. (2010) Livy on the Hannibalic War (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Levene, D. S. and Nelis, D. P. (eds.) (2002) Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Leyden, W. M. von (1949‒50) ‘Spatium historicum: The Historical Past as Viewed by Hecataeus, Herodotus and Thucydides’, Durham University Journal 11, 89‒104.Google Scholar

Lilie, R.-J. (2014) ‘Reality and Invention: Reflections on Byzantine Historiography’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 68, 157–210.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. (1999) The Constitution of the Roman Republic (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Liotsakis, V. (2017) Redeeming Thucydides’ Book VIII: Narrative Artistry in the Account of the Ionian War, Trends in Classics 48 (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Llewellyn-Jones, L. (2010) ‘Introduction’, in Llewellyn-Jones, L. and Robson, J. (eds.), Ctesias’ History of Persia: Tales of the Orient (London: Routledge), 1–87.Google Scholar

Lloyd, A. B. (1975–88) Herodotus Book Two, 3 vols. (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Lloyd, A. B. (1988) ‘Herodotus’ Account of Pharaonic History’, Historia 37, 22‒53.Google Scholar

Lloyd, A. B. (1995) ‘Herodotus on Egyptian Buildings: A Test Case’, in Powell, A. (ed.), The Greek World (London: Routledge), 273‒300.Google Scholar

Lloyd, M. (1984) ‘Croesus’ Priority: Herodotus 1.5.3’, Liverpool Classical Monthly 9, 11.Google Scholar

Loomis, W. T. (1992) The Spartan War Fund: IG V 1, 1 and a New Fragment (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar

Loraux, N. (1980 [2011]) ‘Thucydides Is Not a Colleague’ (French original 1980), repr. in translation in Marincola, J. (ed.), Greek and Roman Historiography (Oxford: Oxford University Press), ch. 1.Google Scholar

Loukopoulou, L. (2004) ‘Thracian Chersonesos’, in Hansen, M. H. and Nielsen, T. H. (eds.), An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 900–11.Google Scholar

Low, P. A. (ed.) (2008) The Athenian Empire (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar

Lubtchansky, N. (1993) ‘La valse tragique des cavaliers sybarites selon Aristote’, Annali di Archeologia e Storia Antica/Dipartimento di Studi del Mondo Classico e del Mediterraneo Antico 15, 31–57.Google Scholar

Lubtchansky, N. (2005) Le cavalier tyrrhénien. Représentations équestres dans l’Italie archaïque, BEFAR 320 (Paris: De Boccard).Google Scholar

Luce, T. J. (1977) Livy: The Composition of His History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Luce, T. J. (1989) ‘Ancient Views on the Causes of Bias in Historical Writing’, CP 84, 16–31, reprinted in J. Marincola (ed.), Greek and Roman historiography (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 291–313.Google Scholar

Luce, T. J. (1998) Livy. The Rise of Rome: Books One to Five (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Luckenbill, D. D. (1924) The Annals of Sennacherib, Oriental Institute Publications 2 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Lund, A. A. (1989) ‘Zu drei unechten Stellen in den Ann. des Tacitus’, Mnemosyne 42, 124–8.Google Scholar

Luraghi, N. (2001a) ‘Introduction’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1–15.Google Scholar

Luraghi, N. (2001b) ‘Local Knowledge in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 138–60.Google Scholar

Luraghi, N. (2006) ‘Meta-historiê: Method and Genre in the Histories’, in Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 76–91.Google Scholar

Luraghi, N. (2013 [2005]) ‘The Stories before the Histories: Folktale and Traditional Narrative in Herodotus’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Reading in Classical Studies, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 87–123, revised and updated translation of ‘Le storie prima delle Storie. Prospettive di ricerca’, in M. Giangiulio (ed.), Erodoto e il ‘modello erodoteo’. Formazione e trasmissione delle tradizioni storiche in Grecia (Trento: Università degli Studi di Trento, 2005), 61–90.Google Scholar

Luraghi, N. (2014) ‘Ephorus in Context: The Return of the Heraclidae and Fourth-Century Peloponnesian Politics’, in Parmeggiani, G. (ed.), Between Thucydides and Polybius: The Golden Age of Greek Historiography (Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies), 133–51.Google Scholar

Luschnat, O. (1970) ‘Thukydides der Historiker’, Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft Supplementband 12, 1085–354.Google Scholar

Ma, J., Papazarkadas, N., and Parker, R. (eds.) (2009) Interpreting the Athenian Empire (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar

MacLachlan, B. (1993) The Age of Grace: Charis in Early Greek Poetry (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Macleod, C. W. (1983a [1974]) ‘Form and Meaning in the Melian Dialogue’, Historia 23, 385–400, reprinted in O. Taplin (ed.), The Collected Essays of Colin Macleod (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 52–67.Google Scholar

Macleod, C. W. (1983b [1978]) ‘Reason and Necessity: Thucydides III 9–14, 37–48’, JHS 98, 64–78, reprinted in O. Taplin (ed.), The Collected Essays of Colin Macleod (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 88–102.Google Scholar

Magnetto, A. (2004) ‘Agnoia, ignoranza, errore’, in Porciani, L. (ed.), Lexicon historiographicum Graecum et Latinum (LHG&L), vol. I (Pisa: Edizioni della Normale), 14–18.Google Scholar

Maier, F. K. (2018) ‘Past and Present as paradoxon theōrēma in Polybius’, in Miltsios, N. and Tamiolaki, M. (eds.), Polybius and His Legacy (Berlin: De Gruyter), 55–74.Google Scholar

Malitz, J. (2006) ‘Klassische Philologie’, in Wirbelauer, E. (ed.), Die Freiburger Philosophische Fakultät 1920–1960. Mitglieder – Strukturen – Vernetzungen (Freiburg: Verlag Karl Alber), 303–64.Google Scholar

Malkin, I. (1990) ‘Territorialisation mythologique: Les autels des Philènes en Cyrénaïque’, DHA 16, 219–29.Google Scholar

Malkin, I. (2011) A Small Greek World: Networks in Ancient Mediterranean (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Malloch, S. J. V. (2013) The Annals of Tacitus Book 11 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Mallon, Th. (2011) ‘Fictions of Alternative History’, The New Yorker, November 21.Google Scholar

Maltby, R. (1991) A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies (Leeds: Francis Cairns Publications).Google Scholar

Manuwald, B. (1979 [2009]) ‘Diodotus’ Deceit (on Thucydides 3.42–48)’, trans. Rusten, J. S., in Rusten, J. S. (ed.), Thucydides (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 241–60.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (ed.) (2001) Der Satiriker Lucilius und seine Zeit (Munich: Beck).Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (2019) Fragmentary Republican Latin, vol. 4 Oratory, Part 2 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Marasco, G. (1984) ‘L’apologia di Q. Lutazio Catulo e la tradizione sulla guerra cimbrica’, Giornale Filologico Ferrarese 7, 75–84.Google Scholar

Marasco, G. (ed.) (2011) Political Autobiographies and Memoirs in Antiquity: A Brill Companion (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Marcovich, M. (1967) Heraclitus: Greek Text with a Short Commentary (Merida: Los Andes University Press).Google Scholar

Marcozzi, D., Sinatra, M., and Vannicelli, P. (1994) ‘Tra epica e storiografia: Il Catalogo delle navi’, Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici 33, 163–74.Google Scholar

Margolin, U. (1993) ‘Narrative “You” Revisited’, Language and Style 23, 1–21.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (1987) ‘Herodotean Narrative and the Narrator’s Presence’, Arethusa 20, 121‒37.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (1994) ‘Plutarch’s Refutation of Herodotus’, AW 25, 191–203.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (1997) Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (1999a) ‘Genre, Convention, and Innovation in Greco-Roman Historiography’, in Kraus, C. S. (ed.), The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts (Leiden: Brill), 281–324.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (1999b) ‘Tacitus’ Prefaces and the Decline of Imperial Historiography’, Latomus 58, 391–404.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2001) Greek Historians, Greece & Rome New Surveys in the Classics 31 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2003) ‘Beyond Pity and Fear: The Emotions of History’, AncSoc 33, 285–315.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2006) ‘Herodotus and the Poetry of the Past’, in Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 13–28.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2007a) ‘Aletheia’, in Ampolo, C., Fantasia, U., and Porciani, L. (eds.), Lexicon Historiographicum Graecum et Latinum, vol. 2 (Pisa: Edizioni della Normale), 7–29.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2007b) ‘Odysseus and the Historians’, SyllClass 18, 1–79.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2007c) ‘Speeches in Classical Historiography’, in Marincola, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, vol. 1 (Oxford: Blackwell), 118–32.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2007d) ‘The Persian Wars in Fourth-Century Oratory and Historiography’, in Bridges, E., Hall, E., and Rhodes, P. J. (eds.), Cultural Responses to the Persian Wars (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 105–26.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (ed.). (2007e) A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2010) ‘Aristotle’s Poetics and “Tragic History”’, in Tsitsiridis, S. (ed.), Parachoregema: Studies on Ancient Theatre in Honour of Professor Gregory M. Sifakis (Heraklion: Crete University Press), 445–60.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2013) ‘Polybius, Phylarchus, and “Tragic History”: A Reconsideration’, in Gibson, B. J. and Harrison, T. (eds.), Polybius and His World: Essays in Memory of F. W. Walbank (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 73–90.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2013 [2007]) ‘Herodotus and Odysseus’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 109–32.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2015a) ‘Defending the Divine: Plutarch on the Gods of Herodotus’, in Ellis, A. (ed.), God in History: Reading and Rewriting Herodotean Theology from Plutarch to the Renaissance, Histos Supplement 4 (Newcastle: University of Newcastle), 41–83.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2015b) ‘Plutarch, Herodotus, and the Historian’s Character’, in Ash, R., Mossman, J., and Titchener, F. B. (eds.), Fame and Infamy: Essays for Christopher Pelling on Characterization in Greek and Roman Biography and Historiography (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 83–96.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2017) On Writing History from Herodotus to Herodian (London: Penguin Random House).Google Scholar

Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J. (eds.) (2013) The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Martin, R. H. and Woodman, A. J. (1989) Tacitus Annals 4 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Martini, E. (2016) Un romanzo di crisi: Il Mambriano del Cieco da Ferrara (Florence: Società Editrice Fiorentina).Google Scholar

Maslov, B. (2015) Pindar and the Emergence of Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Massar, N. (2010) ‘“Choose Your Master Well”: Medical Training, Testimonies and Claims to Authority’, in Horstmanshoff, M. (ed.), Hippocrates and Medical Education: Selected Papers Read at the XIIth International Hippocrates Colloquium, Universiteit Leiden, 24–26 August 2005 (Leiden: Brill), 169–86.Google Scholar

Massaro, M. (1992) Epigrafia metrica latina in età repubblicana, Quaderni di Invigilata Lucernis, vol. 1 (Bari: Istituto di Latino, Università di Bari).Google Scholar

Massaro, M. (2002) ‘Il “ciclo degli Scipioni” e le origini della epigrafia metrica latina’, in del Hoyo Calleja, J. and Gómez Pallarès, J. (eds.), Asta ac pellege: 50 años de la publicación de ‘Inscripciones Hispanas en verso’ de S. Mariner (Madrid: Signifer Libros), 17–37.Google Scholar

Mauersberger, A. (1956–) Polybios-Lexikon (Berlin: Akademie Verlag).Google Scholar

Mayor, J. E. B. (1872) Thirteen Satires of Juvenal with a Commentary, vol. 1 (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar

Mazzarino, S. (1966) Il Pensiero Storico Classico, 3 vols. (Bari: Laterza).Google Scholar

Mazzucchi, C. M. (1992) Dionisio Longino: Del sublime (Milan: Vita e pensiero).Google Scholar

McDonnell, M. A. (2006) Roman Manliness: Virtus and the Roman Republic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

McHale, B. (1985) ‘“You used to know what these words mean”: Misreading Gravity’s Rainbow’, Language and Style 18, 93–118.Google Scholar

McHale, B. (1992) Constructing Postmodernism (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Meeus, A. (2017) ‘Ctesias of Cnidus: Poet, Novelist or Historian?’, in Ruffell, I. and Hau, L. I. (eds.), Truth and History in the Ancient World: Pluralising the Past (New York : Routledge), 172–201.Google Scholar

Meier, C. (1995) Caesar (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar

Meiggs, R. (1972) The Athenian Empire (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Meijering, R. (1987) Literary and Rhetorical Theories in Greek Scholia (Groningen: Egbert Forsten).Google Scholar

Meineck, P., Short, W. M., and Devereaux, J. (eds.) (2019) The Routledge Handbook of Classics and Cognitive Theory (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Meister, K. (1992) La Storiografia Greca: Dalle Origini alla fine dell’Ellenismo (Rome: Laterza).Google Scholar

Meister, K. (2013) Thukydides als Vorbild der Historiker: Von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart (Paderborn: Schöningh).Google Scholar

Mensching, E. (1988) Caesars Bellum Gallicum: Eine Einführung (Frankfurt am Main: Diesterweg).Google Scholar

Meyer, E. A. (1997) ‘The Outbreak of the Peloponnesian War after Twenty-Five Years’, in Hamilton, C. D. and Krentz, P. M. (eds.), Polis and Polemos: Essays on Politics, War and History in Ancient Greece, in Honor of Donald Kagan (Claremont, CA: Regina Books), 23–54.Google Scholar

Meyer, , Ed. (1899) Forschungen zur alten Geschichte, vol. 2 (Halle: M. Niemeyer).Google Scholar

Mikalson, J. (2003) Herodotus and Religion in the Persian Wars (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press).Google Scholar

Mildorf, J. (2006) ‘Reconsidering Second-Person Narration and Involvement’, Language and Literature 25, 145–58.Google Scholar

Miles, G. B. (1995) Livy: Reconstructing Early Rome (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Miller, J. F. and Woodman, A. J. (2010) Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire: Generic Interactions (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Miltsios, N. (2013) The Shaping of Narrative in Polybius (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Minar, E. L., Sandbach, F. H., and Helmbold, W. C. (1961) Plutarch: Moralia, Volume 9: Table-Talk, Books 7–9. Dialogue on Love, Loeb Classical Library 425 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Missiou, A. (2004) The Subversive Oratory of Andokides: Politics, Ideology and Decision-Making in Democratic Athens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Mitchell, L. (2010) ‘Cleon and Diodotus: Masters of Thucydidean Irony’, Pegasus 53, 10–14.Google Scholar

Mitchell, S. A. (1987) ‘The Sagaman and Oral Literature: The Icelandic Traditions of Hjörleifr inn kvensami and Geirmundr heljarskinn’, in Foley, J. M. (ed.), Comparative Research in Oral Traditions: A Memorial for Milman Parry (Columbus, OH: Slavica), 395–423.Google Scholar

Mitsis, P. and Tsagalis, C. (eds.) (2010) Allusion, Authority, and Truth: Critical Perspectives on Greek Poetic and Rhetorical Praxis (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Moggi, M. (1972) ‘Autori greci di Persikà, I: Dionisio di Mileto’, ASNP 2, 433–68.Google Scholar

Moggi, M. (1977) ‘Autori greci di Persikà, II: Carone di Lampsaco’, ASNP 7, 1–26.Google Scholar

Moles, J. (1993a) ‘Livy’s Preface’, PCPhS 39, 141–68, reprinted in Chaplin, J. D. and Kraus, C. S. (eds.), Livy: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies (New York: Oxford University Press 2009), 49–87.Google Scholar

Moles, J. (1993b) ‘Truth and Untruth in Herodotus and Thucydides’, in Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (eds.), Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World (Austin: University of Texas Press), 88–121.Google Scholar

Moles, J. (1996) ‘Herodotus Warns the Athenians’, in Cairns, F. and Heath, M. (eds.), Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar, vol. 9 Roman Poetry and Prose, Greek Poetry, Etymology, Historiography (Leeds: Cairns), 259–84.Google Scholar

Moles, J. (1998) ‘Cry Freedom: Tacitus Annals 4.32–35’, Histos 2, 95–184.Google Scholar

Moles, J. (2001) ‘A False Dilemma: Thucydides’ History and Historicism’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Texts, Ideas, and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory, and Classical Literature (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 195–219.Google Scholar

Moles, J. (2011) ‘Luke’s Preface: The Greek Decree, Classical Historiography and Christian Redefinitions’, New Testament Studies 57, 461–82.Google Scholar

Möller, A. (2005) ‘Epoch-Making Eratosthenes’, GRBS 45, 245–60.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. (1978) Alien Wisdom: The Limits of Hellenization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. (1981) ‘The Rhetoric of History and the History of Rhetoric: On Hayden White’s Tropes’, Comparative Criticism 3, 260–1.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. (2013 [1966]) ‘The Place of Herodotus in the History of Historiography’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 31–45.Google Scholar

Morelli, A. M. (2007) ‘Hellenistic Epigram in the Roman World: From the Beginnings to the End of the Republican Age’, in Bing, P. and Bruss, J. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Hellenistic Epigram: Down to Philip (Leiden: Brill), 521–41.Google Scholar

Morelli, A. M. (2018) ‘The Beginnings of Roman Epigram and Its Relationship with Hellenistic Poetry’, in Henriksén, C. (ed.), A Companion to Ancient Epigram (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley), 425–39.Google Scholar

Morello, R. (2018) ‘Innovation and Cliché: The Letters of Caesar’, in Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 223–34.Google Scholar

Morley, N. D. G. (2017) ‘Resisting the Thucydides Trap’, https://thesphinxblog.com/2017/03/31/resisting-the-thucydides-trap/.Google Scholar

Morley, N. D. G. and Harloe, K. (eds.) (2012) Thucydides and the Modern World: Reception, Reinterpretation and Influence from the Renaissance to the Present (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Morrison, A. (2011) Narrator in Archaic Greek and Hellenistic Poetry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Morrissette, B. (1965) ‘Narrative “You” in Contemporary Literature’, Comparative Literature Studies 2, 1–24.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. (2007) ‘Caesar’s Alleged Fear of Prosecution and His Ratio Absentis in the Approach to the Civil War’, Historia 56, 159–78.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, R. (2009) ‘Dignitas and res publica: Caesar and Republican Legitimacy’, in Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (ed.), Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise? Die ‘letzte Generation’ der römischen Republik (Munich: Oldenbourg), 115–40.Google Scholar

Moyer, I. S. (2002) ‘Herodotus and an Egyptian Mirage: The Genealogies of the Theban Priests’, JHS 122, 70‒90.Google Scholar

Muecke, F. (2005) ‘Rome’s First “Satirists”: Themes and Genre in Ennius and Lucilius’, in Freudenburg, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 33–47.Google Scholar

Munson, R. V. (1991) ‘The Madness of Cambyses (Herodotus 3.16–38)’, Arethusa 24, 43–65.Google Scholar

Munson, R. V. (2001) Telling Wonders: Ethnographic and Political Discourse in the Work of Herodotus (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar

Munson, R. V. (2012) ‘Persians in Thucydides’, in Foster, E. and Lateiner, D. (eds.), Thucydides and Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 241–77.Google Scholar

Munson, R. V. (2013 [2009]) ‘Who Are Herodotus’ Persians?’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 321–35.Google Scholar

Munson, R. V. (ed.) (2013) Herodotus, 2 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Munson, R. V. (2017) ‘Thucydides and Myth’, in Balot, R., Forsdyke, S., and Foster, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thucydides (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 257–66.Google Scholar

Munson, R. V. (2019) ‘Liberalizing Persia: The Shadow of a Greek Dream in Herodotus’, in Fink, S. and Rollinger, R. (eds.), Conceptualizing Past, Present, and Future: Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium of the Melammu Project in Helsinki/Tartu, May 18–24, 2015 (Münster: Ugarit-Verlag), 495–507.Google Scholar

Murray, O. (1988) ‘The Ionian Revolt’, in Boardman, J., Hammond, N. G. L., Lewis, D. M., and Ostwald, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 4 Persia, Greece and the Western Mediterranean c. 525 to 479 B.C. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 461–90.Google Scholar

Murray, O. (2001 [1987]) ‘Herodotus and Oral History’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 16–44, originally in H. Sancisi-Weerdenburg and A. Kuhrt (eds.), Achaemenid History, vol. 2 The Greek Sources (Leiden: Nederlands Inst. voor het Nabije Oosten), 93–115.Google Scholar

Murray, O. (2018) The Symposion: Drinking Greek Style. Essays on Greek Pleasure, 1983–2017, ed. Cazzato, V. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Musti, D. (2010) ‘Un carattere fondamentale della storiografia polibiana: Apodeiktikè historía’, in Brüggemann, T., Meissner, B., and Mileta, C. [et al.] (eds.), Studia hellenistica et historiographica: Festschrift für Andreas Mehl (Gutenberg: Computus), 203–10.Google Scholar

Mutschler, F.-H. (1975) Erzählstil und Propaganda in Caesars Kommentarien (Heidelberg: Winter).Google Scholar

Mynors, R. A. B. (1990) Virgil: Georgics (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Mynott, J. (ed. and trans.) (2013) Thucydides: The War of the Peloponnesians and the Athenians (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Naerebout, F. G. (2017) ‘Moving in Unison: The Greek Chorus in Performance’, in Gianvittorio, L. (ed.), Choreutika: Performing and Theorising Dance in Ancient Greece, Biblioteca di QUCC 13 (Pisa: Serra), 39–66.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (1990) Pindar’s Homer: The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (1996) Poetry as Performance: Homer and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Nagy, G. (2013) ‘The Delian Maidens and Their Relevance to Choral Mimesis in Classical Drama’, http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hlnc.essay:Nagy.The_Delian_Maidens.2013.Google Scholar

Naiden, F. S. (1999) ‘The Prospective Imperfect in Herodotus’, HSCP 99, 135–49.Google Scholar

Neer, R. T and Kurke, L. (2014) ‘Pindar Fr. 75 SM and the Politics of Athenian Space’, GRBS 54, 527–79.Google Scholar

Nenci, G. (1990) ‘L’Occidente barbarico’, in Nenci, G. and Reverdin, O. (eds.), Hérodote et les peuples non grecs: neuf exposés suivis de discussions, Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique, 35 (Vandoeuvres-Genève: Fondation Hardt), 301–21.Google Scholar

Nenci, G. (1994) Erodoto. Le Storie. Libro V: La rivolta della Ionia (Milan: Fondazione Lorenzo Valla, Mondadori).Google Scholar

Newbold, R. F. (1976) ‘The Vulgus in Tacitus’, RhM 119, 85–92.Google Scholar

Newton, I. (1728) The Chronology of Ancient Kingdoms Amended (London: Printed for J. Tonson, and J. Osborn and T. Longman).Google Scholar

Nickau, K. (1990) ‘Mythos und Logos bei Herodot’, in Ax, W. (ed.), Memoria rerum veterum: Neue Beiträge zur antiken Historiographie und alten Geschichte. Festschrift für Carl Joachim Classen zum 60. Geburtstag (Stuttgart: Steiner), 83–100.Google Scholar

Nicolai, R. (1995) ‘Κτῆμα ἐς αἰει: Aspetti della fortuna di Tucidide nel mondo antico’, RFIC 123, 5–26.Google Scholar

Nicolai, R. (2001) ‘Thucydides’ Archaeology: Between Epic and Oral Traditions’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 263–85.Google Scholar

Nicolson, F. W. (1891) ‘Greek and Roman Barbers’, HSCP 2, 41–56.Google Scholar

Niles, J. D. (1999) Homo narrans: The Poetics and Anthropology of Oral Literature (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).Google Scholar

Nolan, D. (2016) ‘Caesar’s Exempla and the Role of Centurions in Battle’, in Armstrong, J. (ed.), Circum mare: Themes in Ancient Warfare (Leiden: Brill), 34–64.Google Scholar

Nousek, D. L. (2018) ‘Genres and Generic Contaminations: The Commentarii’, in Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 97–109.Google Scholar

Nünning, V. (2012) ‘Voicing Criticism in Eighteenth-Century Novels by Women: Narrative Attempts at Claiming Authority’, English Past and Present 81–107.Google Scholar

Oakley, S. P. (1997) A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X, vol. 1 (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Ober, J. (1998) Political DisiIn Democratic Athens: Intellectual Critics of Popular Rule, Martin Classical Lectures (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Occhipinti, E. (2016) The Hellenica Oxyrhynchia and Historiography: New Research Perspectives (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Ogilvie, R. M. (1965) A Commentary on Livy Books 1–5 (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

O’Gorman, E. (2000) Irony and Misreading in the Annals of Tacitus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

O’Gorman, E. (2009) ‘Intertextuality and Historiography’, in Feldherr, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 231–41.Google Scholar

Olearius, G. (1709) ΤΑ ΤΩΝ ΦΙΛΟΣΤΡΑΤΩΝ ΛΕΙΠΟΜΕΝΑ ΠΑΝΤΑ. Philostratorum quae supersunt omnia (Leipzig: Apud Thomam Fritsch).Google Scholar

Olson, D. S. (2007) Athenaeus: The Learned Banqueters, vol. 1: Books 1–3.106e, Loeb Classical Library 204 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Oniga, R. (1990) Il confine conteso: Lettura antropologica di un capitolo sallustiano, Bellum Iugurthinum 79 (Bari: Edipuglia).Google Scholar

Ooms, S. and de Jonge, C.C. (2013) ‘The semantics of ENAΓΩNIOΣ in Greek literary criticism’, CP 108, 95–110.Google Scholar

Ormerod, H. A. (1924) Piracy in the Ancient World: An Essay in Mediterranean History (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press).Google Scholar

Orwin, C. (1984) ‘The Just and the Advantageous in Thucydides: The Case of the Mytilenaian Debate’, The American Political Science Review 78, 485–94.Google Scholar

Osborne, R. and Rhodes, P. J (eds.) (2017) Greek Historical Inscriptions: 478–404 BC (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Osgood, J. (2009) ‘The Pen and the Sword: Writing and Conquest in Caesar’s Gaul’, ClAnt 28, 328–58.Google Scholar

Östenberg, I. (2009a) Staging the World: Spoils, Captives, and Representations in the Roman Triumphal Procession (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Östenberg, I. (2009b) ‘Titulis oppida capta leget: The Role of the Written Placards in the Roman Triumphal Procession’, MEFRA 121, 463–72.Google Scholar

Östenberg, I. (2013) ‘Veni, vidi, vici and Caesar’s Triumph’, CQ 63, 813–27.Google Scholar

Ostwald, M. (1979 [2009]) ‘Diodotus, Son of Eucrates’, GRBS 20, 5–13, reprinted as ch. 11 in M. Ostwald, Language and History in Ancient Greek Culture (Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Ostwald, M. (1988) Ἀνάγκη in Thucydides (Atlanta: Scholars Press).Google Scholar

Otto, N. (2009) Enargeia: Untersuchung zur Charakteristik alexandrinischer Dichtung, Hermes Einzelschriften 102 (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. (1983) ‘Philosophical Invective’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1, 1–25.Google Scholar

Page, R. E. (2006) Literary and Linguistic Approaches to Feminist Narratology (Basingstoke: Arts & Humanities Research Council; New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar

Pani, M. (2001) Le ragioni della storiografia in Grecia e a Roma: Una introduzione (Bari: Edipuglia).Google Scholar

Panofsky, H. (1885) ‘Quaestionum de historiae Herodoteae fontibus pars prima’ (dissertation, Berlin).Google Scholar

Papadopoulos, J. K. (2003) Ceramicus Redivivus: The Early Iron Age Potters’ Field, Hesperia Supplement 31 (Princeton, NJ: American School of Classical Studies at Athens).Google Scholar

Pape, W. (1981) ‘Doppelgänger’, Enzyklopädie des Märchens 3, 766–73.Google Scholar

Parker, V. (2004) ‘Two Notes on Early Athenian History’, Tyche 19, 131–48.Google Scholar

Parker, V. (2011) ‘Ephoros of Kyme (70)’, in Worthington, I. (ed.), Brill’s New Jacoby (Leiden: Brill), online publication.Google Scholar

Parmeggiani, G. (1999) ‘Mito e spatium historicum nelle Storie di Eforo di Cuma (Note a Eph. FGrHist 70 T8)’, RSA 29, 107–25.Google Scholar

Parmeggiani, G. (2011) Eforo di Cuma: Studi di storiografia greca (Bologna: Pàtron).Google Scholar

Parmeggiani, G. (2014) ‘On the Translation of Polybius 1.1.2’, Histos 8, 180–8.Google Scholar

Parmeggiani, G. (2018) ‘How Sparta and Its Allies Went to War: Votes and Diplomacy in 432–1 B.C.’, Historia 12, 244–55.Google Scholar

Parry, A. (1972a) ‘Language and Characterization in Homer’, HSCP 76, 1–22.Google Scholar

Parry, A. (1972b [1989]) ‘Thucydides’ Historical Perspective’, YClS 22, 47–61, reprinted in A. Parry (ed.), The Language of Achilles and Other Papers (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 286–300.Google Scholar

Paul, G. M. (1982) ‘Vrbs Capta’, Phoenix 36, 144–55.Google Scholar

Pearson, L. (1987) The Greek Historians of the West: Timaeus and His Predecessors (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press).Google Scholar

Pédech, P. (1964) La méthode historique de Polybe (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Pelikan Pittenger, M. R. (2008) Contested Triumphs: Politics, Pageantry, and Performance in Livy’s Republican Rome (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1981) ‘Caesar’s Battle-Descriptions and the Defeat of Ariovistus’, Latomus 40, 741–66.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1990 [2002]) ‘Truth and Fiction in Plutarch’s Lives’, in Russell, D. A. (ed.), Antonine Literature (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 19–52, reprinted in C. Pelling (ed.), Plutarch and History: Eighteen Studies (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales), 143–70.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1992 [2002]) ‘Plutarch and Thucydides’, in Stadter, P. A. (ed.), Plutarch and the Historical Tradition (London: Routledge), 10–40, reprinted in C. Pelling (ed.), Plutarch and History: Eighteen Studies (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales), 117–42.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1997a) ‘Biographical History? Cassius Dio on the Early Principate’, in Edwards, M. J. and Swain, S. (eds.), Portraits: Biographical Representation in the Greek and Latin Literature of the Roman Empire (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 117–44.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (1997b) ‘East Is East and West Is West – Or Are They? National Stereotypes in Herodotus’, Histos 1, 51–66.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2000) Literary Texts and the Greek Historian (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2002a) ‘Speech and Action: Herodotus’ Debate on the Constitutions’, PCPhS 48, 123–58.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2002b) Plutarch and History: Eighteen Studies (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales).Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2006a) ‘Breaking the Bounds: Writing about Caesar’, in McGing, B. and Mossman, J. (eds.), The Limits of Ancient Biography (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales), 255–79.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2006b) ‘Herodotus and Homer’, in Clarke, M. J., Currie, B. G. F., and Lyne, R. O. A. M. (eds.), Epic Interactions: Perspectives on Homer, Virgil, and the Epic Tradition Presented to Jasper Griffin (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 75–104.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2006c) ‘Speech and Narrative’, in Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 103–21.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2007a) ‘Aristagoras (5.49–55, 97)’, in Irwin, E. and Greenwood, E. (eds.), Reading Herodotus: A Study of the logoi in Book 5 of Herodotus’ Histories (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 179–201.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2007b) ‘De malignitate Plutarchi: Plutarch, Herodotus, and the Persian Wars’, in Bridges, E., Hall, E., and Rhodes, P. J. (eds.), Cultural Responses to the Persian Wars: Antiquity to the Third Millennium (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 145–64.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2007c) ‘Ion’s Epidemiai and Plutarch’s Ion’, in Jennings, V. and Katsaros, A. (eds.), The World of Ion of Chios (Leiden: Brill), 75–109.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2009a) ‘Herodotus’ Persian Stories: Narrative Shape and Historical Interpretation’, SyllClass 27, 65–92.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2009b) ‘Tacitus’ Personal Voice’, in Woodman, A. J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 147–67.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2009c) ‘Was There an Ancient Genre of “Autobiography”? Or Did Augustus Know What He Was Doing?’, in Smith, C. and Powell, A. (eds.), The Lost Memoirs of Augustus and the Development of Roman Autobiography (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales), 41–64.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2013) ‘Xenophon’s and Caesar’s Third-Person Narratives – Or Are They?’, in Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J. (eds.), The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 39–75.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2019) Herodotus and the Question Why (Austin: University of Texas Press).Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2022) Thucydides: The Peloponnesian War. Book VI (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (2023) ‘Plutarch and Biography’, in Zadorojnyi, A. and Titchener, F. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Plutarch (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 11–28.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (forthcoming a) ‘Literature as Evidence: The Case of Herodotus’, in Carey, C., Edwards, M., and Griffith-Williams, B. (eds.), Evidence and Proof in Ancient Greece.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. (forthcoming b) ‘Polybius’ Self-Representation’, in Maier, F. and Gibson, B. J. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Polybius (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Peponi, A.-E. (2012) Frontiers of Pleasure: Models of Aesthetic Response in Archaic and Classical Greek Thought (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Perrin, B. (ed.) (1914) Lives, Loeb Classical Library I (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Perrin, B. (ed.) (1916) Lives, Loeb Classical Library III (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Perrin, B. (ed.) (1918) Lives, Loeb Classical Library IV (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Perrin, B. (ed.) (1919) Lives, Loeb Classical Library VII (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Peter, H. (1906) Historicorum Romanorum Reliquiae, vol. 2 (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar

Peter, H. (1914) Historicorum Romanorum Reliquiae², vol. 1 (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar

Petzold, K. E. (1969) Studien zur Methode des Polybios und zu ihrer historischen Auswertung (Munich: Beck).Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, R. (1968) History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginning to the End of the Hellenistic Age (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Phelan, J. (1994) ‘Self-Help for Narratee and Narrative Audience: How “I” – And “You”? – Read “How”’, Style 28, 350–65.Google Scholar

Phelan, J. (1996) Narrative as Rhetoric: Technique, Audiences, Ethics, Ideology (Columbus: Ohio State University Press).Google Scholar

Piérart, M. (1995) ‘Chios entre Athènes et Sparte. La contribution des exiles de Chios à l’effort de guerre lacédémonien pendant la Guerre du Péloponnèse. IG V 1, 1 + (SEG XXXIX 370)’, BCH 119, 253–82.Google Scholar

Pigoń, J. (ed.) (2008) The Children of Herodotus: Greek and Roman Historiography and Related Genres (Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publisher).Google Scholar

Pinkster, H. (2015) The Oxford Latin Syntax, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Pitcher, L. (2018) ‘Caesar and Greek Historians’, in Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 237–48.Google Scholar

Plant, I. M. (1988) ‘A Note on Thucydides 1,22,1’, Athenaeum 66, 201–2.Google Scholar

Pohlenz, M. (1937) Herodot: Der erste Geschichtschreiber des Abendlandes (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar

Porciani, L. (1999) ‘Come si scrivono i discorsi: su Tucidide 1.22’, QS 49, 103–35.Google Scholar

Potter, D. (1991) ‘The Inscriptions on the Bronze Herakles from Mesene: Vologeses IV’s War with Rome and the Date of Tacitus’ Annales’, ZPE 88, 277–90.Google Scholar

Potter, D. (2010) ‘Caesar and the Helvetians’, in Fagan, G. G. and Trundle, M. (eds.), New Perspectives on Ancient Warfare (Leiden: Brill), 305–29.Google Scholar

Power, T. (2011) ‘Cyberchorus: Pindar’s Κηληδόνες and the Aura of the Artificial’, in Athanassaki, L. and Bowie, E. (eds.), Archaic and Classical Choral Song: Performance, Politics and Dissemination (Berlin: De Gruyter), 67–113.Google Scholar

Prince, G. (2008) ‘Classical and/or Postclassical Narratology’, L’Esprit Créateur, 115–23.Google Scholar

Pritchett, W. K. (1975) Dionysius of Halicarnassus: On Thucydides (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Pritchett, W. K. (1982) Studies in Ancient Greek Topography: Part IV (Passes) (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Pritchett, W. K. (1993) The Liar School of Herodotos (Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben).Google Scholar

Propp, V. J. (1928) Morfologija skaski (Leningrad: Academia).Google Scholar

Purcell, N. (1990) ‘Mobility and the Polis’, in Murray, O. and Price, S. (eds.), The Greek City, from Homer to Alexander (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 29–58.Google Scholar

Purcell, N. (1995) ‘On the Sacking of Carthage and Corinth’, in Innes, D., Hine, H., and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 133–48.Google Scholar

Purves, A. C. (2010) Space and Time in Ancient Greek Narrative (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Purves, A. C. (2013) ‘Haptic Herodotus’, in Butler, S. and Purves, A.C. (eds.), Synaesthesia and the Ancient Senses (Durham: Acumen), 35–50.Google Scholar

Quinton, A. M. (1954 [2015]) ‘On Punishment’, Analysis 14, 33–42, reprinted in Ezorsky, G. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Punishment (Albany: State University of New York Press), 6–15.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K.A. (2002) ‘Philosophy, Science, Politics: Herodotus and the Intellectual Trends of His Time’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 149–86.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K.A. (2010) ‘Ulterior Motives in Ancient Historiography: What Exactly, and Why?’, in Foxhall, L., Gehrke, H.-J., and Luraghi, N. (eds.), Intentional History: Spinning Time in Ancient Greece (Stuttgart: Steiner), 189–210.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. A. (2013) ‘Ktema es aiei: Thucydides’ Concept of “Learning through History” and Its Realization in His Work’, in Tsakmakis, A. and Tamiolaki, M. (eds.), Thucydides between History and Literature (Berlin: De Gruyter), 3–21.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. A. (2016) ‘Die grosse Herausforderung. Herodot, Thukydides und die Erfindung einer neuen Form von Geschichtsschreibung’, Historische Zeitschrift 302, 593–622.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. A. (2017a) ‘The Civil War as a Work of Propaganda’, in Raaflaub, K. (ed.), The Landmark Julius Caesar (New York: Pantheon), app. JJ: web essay at www.landmarkcaesar.com.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. A. (ed.) (2017b) The Landmark Julius Caesar (New York: Pantheon).Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. A. (2018) ‘Caesar, Literature, and Politics at the End of the Republic’, in Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 13–28.Google Scholar

Race, W. H. (1987) ‘P. OXY. 2438 and the Order of Pindar’s Works’, RhM 130, 407–10.Google Scholar

Race, W. H. (1997) Nemean Odes – Isthmian Odes – Fragments, Loeb Classical Library 485 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Radice, B. (1969) Pliny. Letters and Panegyricus. II, Books VIII-X and the Panegyricus. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rahe, P. (2002) ‘Justice and Necessity: The Conduct of the Spartans and the Athenians in the Peloponnesian War’, in Grimsley, M. and Rogers, C. J. (eds.), Civilians in the Path of War (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press), 1–32.Google Scholar

Rainbird, J. (1986) ‘The Fire Stations of Imperial Rome’, PBSR 54, 147–69.Google Scholar

Ramage, E. S. (1983) ‘Urban Problems in Ancient Rome’, in Marchese, R. T. (ed.), Aspects of Graeco-Roman Urbanism, BAR International Series 188 (Oxford: BAR International), 74–9.Google Scholar

Rambaud, M. (1966 [1953]) L’art de la déformation historique dans les Commentaires de César (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Raschke, W. J. (1979) ‘The Chronology of the Early Books of Lucilius’, JRS 69, 78–89.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, D. (1963) Caesars Commentarii: Stil und Stilwandel am Beispiel der direkten Rede (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar

Raubitschek, A. E. (1963) ‘War Melos tributpflichtig?’, Historia 12, 78–83.Google Scholar

Rawlings, H. R. (1858–60) ‘KTEMA TE ES AIEI … AKOUEIN’, CP 111, 107–16.Google Scholar

Rawlings, H. R. (2021) ‘Thucydides’ ἔργα’, Histos 2021, 189–205.Google Scholar

Rawlinson, G. (1858–60) The History of Herodotus, 4 vols. (London: John Murray).Google Scholar

Rawson, E. (1994) The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 9² (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Reale, G. (2006) I Presocratici. Prima traduzione intergrale con testi originali a fronte delle testimonianze e dei frammenti nella raccolta di Hermann Diels e Walther Kranz, a cura di Giovanni Reale, con la collaborazione di Diego Fusaro, Maurizio Migliori, Ilaria Ramelli, Maria Timpanaro Cardini, Angelo Tonelli (Milan: Bompiani).Google Scholar

Redfield, J. (1985) ‘Herodotus the Tourist’, CP 80, 97–118.Google Scholar

Reed Doob, P. (1990) The Idea of the Labyrinth from Classical Antiquity through the Middle Ages (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Rengakos, A. and Tsakmakis, A. (eds.) (2006) Brill’s Companion to Thucydides (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Rhodes, P. J. (1985) ‘What Alcibiades Did or What Happened to Him’, University of Durham Inaugural Lecture.Google Scholar

Rhodes, P. J. (1994) ‘In Defence of the Greek Historians’, G&R 41, 156–71.Google Scholar

Richardson, B. (1991) ‘The Poetics and Politics of Second-Person Narrative’, Genre 24, 309–30.Google Scholar

Richardson, B. (2006) Unnatural Voices: Extreme Narration in Modern and Contemporary Fiction (Columbus: Ohio State University Press).Google Scholar

Richardson, J. (2000) The Annals of London (London: Cassell).Google Scholar

Richardson, J. (2008) The Language of Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Richter, W. (1977) Caesar als Darsteller seiner Taten. Eine Einführung (Heidelberg: Winter).Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (2004) Memory, History, Forgetting (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Riggsby, A. M. (2006) Caesar in Gaul and Rome: War in Words (Austin: University of Texas Press).Google Scholar

Riggsby, A. M. (2018) ‘The Politics of Geography’, in Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 68–80.Google Scholar

Riggsby, A. M. (2019) Mosaics of Knowledge: Representing Information in the Roman World (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Riginos, A. S. (1976) Platonica: The Anecdotes Concerning the Life and Writings of Plato (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Rives, J. B. (1999) Tacitus: Germania (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Robinson, E. (2017) ‘Thucydides on the Causes and Outbreak of the Peloponnesian War’, in Balot, R., Forsdyke, S., and Foster, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thucydides (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 115–24.Google Scholar

Robinson, O. (1977) ‘Fire-Prevention at Rome’, Revue internationale des droits de l’antiquité 24, 377–88.Google Scholar

Roche, P. (2016) ‘Latin Prose Literature: Author and Authority in the Prefaces of Pliny and Quintilian’, in Zissos, A. (ed.), A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell), 434–49.Google Scholar

Röhrich, L. (1949/50) ‘Eine antike Grenzsage und ihre neuzeitlichen Parallelen’, WJA 4, 339–69, reprinted in L. Röhrich, Sage und Märchen: Erzählforschung heute (Freiburg: Herder, 1976), 210–34.Google Scholar

Rölleke, H. (1977) ‘Arnim, Achim von’, Enzykopädie des Märchens 1, 815–20.Google Scholar

Roller, M. (2009) ‘The Exemplary Past in Roman Historiography and Culture’, in Feldherr, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 214–30.Google Scholar

Rollinger, R., Truschnegg, B., and Bichler, R. (eds.), (2011) Herodot und das Perserreich (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz).Google Scholar

Rood, T. (1998) Thucydides: Narrative and Explanation (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Rood, T. (2006a) ‘Herodotus and Foreign Lands’, in Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 290–305.Google Scholar

Rood, T. (2006b) ‘Objectivity and Authority: Thucydides’ Historical Method’, in Tsakmakis, A. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), The Brill Companion to Thucydides (Leiden: Brill), 225–49.Google Scholar

Rood, T. (2010) ‘Herodotus’ Proem: Space, Time, and the Origins of International Relations’, Ariadne 16, 43–74.Google Scholar

Rood, T. (2012a) ‘Herodotus’, in de Jong, I. J. F. (ed.), Space in Ancient Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative (Leiden: Brill), 121–40.Google Scholar

Rood, T. (2012b) ‘Polybius, Thucydides, and the First Punic War’, in Smith, C. J. and Yarrow, L. M. (eds.), Imperialism, Cultural Politics, and Polybius (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 50–67.Google Scholar

Rood, T. (2013) ‘The Cylon Conspiracy: Thucydides and the Uses of the Past’, in Tsakmakis, A. and Tamiolaki, M. (eds.), Thucydides between History and Literature (Berlin: De Gruyter), 119–38.Google Scholar

Rood, T. (2018) ‘Geographical and Historical Patterning in Diodorus Siculus’, in Meeus, A. (ed.), Narrative in Hellenistic Historiography (Histos Supplement 8; Newcastle-upon-Tyne), 23–68.Google Scholar

Rood, T. (2019) ‘Thucydides and Myth’, in Baines, J., van der Blom, H., Chen, Y. S., and Rood, T. (eds.), Historical Consciousness and the Use of the Past in the Ancient World (Sheffield: Equinox Publishing), 331–44.Google Scholar

Rosen, R. (2012) ‘Satire in the Republic: From Lucilius to Horace’, in Braund, S. and Osgood, J. (eds.), A Companion to Persius and Juvenal (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell), 19–40.Google Scholar

Rosenstein, N. (2009) ‘General and Imperialist’, in Griffin, M. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 85–99.Google Scholar

Rosillo López, C. (2010) La corruption à la fin de la République romaine (IIe-Ier s. av. J.-C.): Aspects politiques et financiers (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2021) Plutarch of Chaeronea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rösler, W. (1991) ‘Die “Selbsthistorisierung” des Autors: Zur Stellung Herodots zwischen Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit’, Philologus 135, 215–20.Google Scholar

Rösler, W. (2002) ‘The Histories and Writing’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 79–94.Google Scholar

Rossi, A. (2002) ‘The Fall of Troy: Between Tradition and Genre’, in Levene, D. S. and Nelis, D. P. (eds.), Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography (Leiden: Brill), 231–51.Google Scholar

Rothe, S. (1989) Kommentar zu ausgewählten Sophistenviten des Philostratos: Die Lehrstuhlinhaber in Athen und Rom (Heidelberg: Groos).Google Scholar

Roveri, A. (1964) Studi su Polibio (Bologna: Zanichelli).Google Scholar

Rowe, G. O. (1967) ‘Dramatic Structures in Caesar’s Bellum Civile’, TAPA 98, 399–414.Google Scholar

Rubincam, C. (2003) ‘Numbers in Greek Poetry and Historiography: Quantifying Fehling’, CQ 53, 448–63.Google Scholar

Rubincam, C. (2008) ‘Herodotus and His Descendants: Numbers in Ancient and Modern Narratives of Xerxes’ Campaign’, HSCP 104, 93–138.Google Scholar

Ruffell, I. and Hau, L. I. (2017) ‘Introduction’, in Ruffell, I. and Hau, L. I. (eds.), Truth and History in the Ancient World: Pluralising the Past (New York : Routledge), 1–12.Google Scholar

Rüpke, J. (1992) ‘Wer las Caesars bella als Commentarii?’, Gymnasium 99, 201–26.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. (ed.) (1964) Longinus: On the Sublime (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. (1993) ‘Self-Disclosure in Plutarch and Horace’, in Most, G., Petersmann, H., and Ritter, A. (eds.), Philanthropia kai eusebeia: Festschrift für Albrecht Dihle zum 70. Geburtstag (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht), 426–37.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. and Winterbottom, M. (eds.) (1972) Ancient Literary Criticism: The Principal Texts in New Translations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Rusten, J. S. (ed.) (2009) Thucydides: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Rutherford, I. C. (2001) Pindar’s Paeans: A Reading of the Fragments with a Survey of the Genre (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Rutherford, R. B. (2012) Greek Tragic Style: Form, Language and Interpretation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Rutherford, R. B. (2013) Homer, 2nd ed., Greece & Rome New Surveys in the Classics 41; original edition 1996 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Rutherford, R. B. (2018) ‘Herodotean Ironies’, Histos 12, 1–48.Google Scholar

Ryan, M.-L. (2001) Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Sablayrolles, R. (1996) Libertinus miles: Les cohortes de vigiles, CEFR 224 (Paris: De Boccard).Google Scholar

Saïd, S. (2002) ‘Herodotus and Tragedy’, in Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 117–47.Google Scholar

Saller, R. (1980) ‘Anecdotes as Historical Evidence for the Principate’, G&R 27, 69–83.Google Scholar

Salmon, J. (2003) ‘Cleisthenes (of Athens) and Corinth’, in Derow, P. and Parker, R. C. T. (eds.), Herodotus and His World: Essays from a Conference in Memory of George Forrest (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 219–34.Google Scholar

Sanders, E. (2014) Envy and Jealousy in Classical Athens. A Socio-Psychological Approach (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Sanford, A. J. and Emmott, C. (2012) Mind, Brain and Narrative (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Saxonhouse, A. W. (2017) ‘Kinēsis, Navies, and the Power Trap in Thucydides’, in Balot, R., Forsdyke, S., and Foster, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thucydides (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 339–53.Google Scholar

Sayce, A. H. (1883) The Ancient Empires of the East: Herodotus I‒III (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar

Scaliger, J. J. (1583) Opus nouum de emendatione temporum (Paris).Google Scholar

Scaliger, J. J. (1598) Opus nouum de emendatione temporum, 2nd ed. (Leiden).Google Scholar

Scaliger, J. J. (1606a) Animadversiones in Chronologica Eusebii, in J. J. Scaliger, Thesaurus temporum (Leiden).Google Scholar

Scaliger, J. J. (1606b) Isagogici chronologiae canones, in J. J. Scaliger, Thesaurus temporum (Leiden).Google Scholar

Scaliger, J. J. (1607) Elenchus utriusque orationis chronologicae D. Davidis Parei (Leiden).Google Scholar

Scanlon, T. (1980) The Influence of Thucydides on Sallust (Heidelberg: Winter).Google Scholar

Scanlon, T. (2015) Greek Historiography (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell).Google Scholar

Schadee, H. (2008) ‘Caesar’s Construction of Northern Europe: Inquiry, Contact, and Corruption in De Bello Gallico’, CQ 58, 158–80.Google Scholar

Schadee, H. (2017) ‘Caesar as Ethnographer’, in Raaflaub, K. (ed.), The Landmark Julius Caesar (New York: Pantheon), app. FF: web essay at www.landmarkcaesar.com.Google Scholar

Schadee, H. (2018) ‘Writing War with Caesar: The Commentarii’s Afterlife in Military Memoirs’, in Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 318–32.Google Scholar

Schauer, M. (2016) Der Gallische Krieg: Geschichte und Täuschung in Caesars Meisterwerk (Munich: Beck).Google Scholar

Scheller, P. (1911) ‘De Hellenistica Historiae Conscribendae Arte’ (dissertation, University of Leipzig).Google Scholar

Schepens, G. (1980) L’‘autopsie’ dans la méthode des historiens grecs du Ve siècle avant J.-C. (Brussels: Paleis der Academiën [Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België, Klasse der Letteren Jaargang 42 No. 93]).Google Scholar

Schick, C. (1955) ‘Studi sui primordi della prosa greca’, Archivio glottologico italiano 40, 89–135.Google Scholar

Schieffer, R. (1972) ‘Die Rede des Critognatus (BG VII 77) und Caesars Urteil über den Gallischen Krieg’, Gymnasium 79, 477–94.Google Scholar

Schironi, F. (2018) The Best of the grammarians: Aristarchus of Samothrace on the Iliad (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar

Schmitt, R. (2015) ‘Herodotus as Practitioner of Iranian Anthroponomastics?’, Glotta 91, 250–63.Google Scholar

Schmitz, T. A. (2009) ‘Narrator and Audience in Philostratus’ Lives of the Sophists’, in Bowie, E. L. and Elsner, J. (eds.), Philostratus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 49–68.Google Scholar

Schmitz, T. A. (2010) ‘The Mytilene Debate in Thucydides’, in Pausch, D. (ed.), Stimmen in der Geschichte. Funktionen von Reden in der antiken Historiographie, Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 284 (Berlin: De Gruyter), 45–65.Google Scholar

Scholz, P. (2013) ‘Philomathia statt philosophia: Polybios, die Philosophie und die Idee der paideia’, in Grieb, V. and Koehn, C. (eds.), Polybios und seine Historien (Stuttgart: Steiner), 285–300.Google Scholar

Scholz, P., Walter, U., and Winkle, C. (2013) Fragmente römischer Memoiren (Heidelberg: Verlag Antike).Google Scholar

Schwartz, E. (1897) ‘Die Berichte über die Catilinarische Verschwörung’, Hermes 32, 554–608.Google Scholar

Schwartz, E. (1929) Das Geschichtswerk des Thukydides, 2nd ed. (Bonn: Cohen).Google Scholar

Schweighäuser, J. (1822) Lexicon Polybianum, ab Is. et Merico Casaubonis olim adumbratum; inde ab Jo. Aug. Ernesti elaboratum; nunc ab Joanne Schweighæusero passim emendatum plurimisque partibus auctum (Oxford: W. Baxter).Google Scholar

Sciarrino, E. (2007) ‘Roman Oratory before Cicero: The Elder Cato and Gaius Gracchus’, in Dominik, W. and Hall, J. (eds.), A Companion to Roman Rhetoric (Oxford: Blackwell), 54–66.Google Scholar

Sciarrino, E. (2011) Cato the Censor and the Beginnings of Latin Prose: From Poetic Translation to Elite Transcription (Columbus: Ohio State University Press).Google Scholar

Scott, -Kilvert, I., and Pelling, C. (trans.) (2010) Plutarch: Rome in Crisis (London: Penguin Classics).Google Scholar

Scullion, S. (2006) ‘Herodotus and Greek Religion’, in Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 192‒208.Google Scholar

Seager, R. (2002) Pompey the Great: A Political Biography, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Seager, R. (2003) ‘Caesar and Gaul: Some Perspectives on the Bellum Gallicum’, in Cairns, F. and Fantham, E. (eds.), Caesar against Liberty: Perspectives on His Autocracy (Cambridge: Cairns), 19–34.Google Scholar

Sealey, R. (1957) ‘Thucydides, Herodotus, and the Causes of War’, CQ 7, 1–12.Google Scholar

Seaman, M. G. (1997) ‘The Athenian Expedition to Melos in 416 B.C.’, Historia 46, 385–418.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. (2007) Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Shannon, K. E. (2012) ‘Memory, Religion, and History in Nero’s Great Fire: Tacitus Annals 15.41–47’, CQ 62, 749–65.Google Scholar

Shannon-Henderson, K. E. (2018) ‘Women in Thucydides: Absence and Inferiority’, in Tsakiropoulou-Summers, A. and Kitsi-Mytakou, K. (eds.), Women and the Ideology of Political Exclusion: From Classical Antiquity to the Modern Era (London: Routledge), 89–103.Google Scholar

Shannon-Henderson, K. E. (2019) Religion and Memory in Tacitus’ Annals (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Shapiro, S. (1994) ‘Learning through Suffering: Human Wisdom in Herodotus’, CJ 89, 349–55.Google Scholar

Shaw, B. D. (2015) ‘The Myth of the Neronian Persecution’, JRS 105, 73–100.Google Scholar

Shear, J. (2011) Polis and Revolution: Responding to Oligarchy in Classical Athens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Sherk, R. K. (ed. and trans.) (1969) Roman Documents from the Greek East (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Sigelman, A. C. (2016) Pindar’s Poetics of Immortality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Simion, E. (1996) The Return of the Author, trans. Newcomb, J. W. and Vianu, L. (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar

Simonton, M. (2017) Classical Greek Oligarchy: A Political History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Skinner, J. (2012) The Invention of Greek Ethnography. Ethnography and History from Homer to Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Skutsch, O. (1953) ‘The Fall of the Capitol’, JRS 43, 77–8.Google Scholar

Skutsch, O. (1978) ‘The Fall of the Capitol Again’, JRS 68, 93–4.Google Scholar

Slater, W. (1969) A Lexicon to Pindar (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Slings, S. (2002) ‘Oral Strategies in the Language of Herodotus’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 53–77.Google Scholar

Smith, C. (2009) ‘Sulla’s Memoirs’, in Smith, C. and Powell, A. (eds.), The Lost Memoirs of Augustus and the Development of Roman Autobiography (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales), 65–85.Google Scholar

Smith, C. and Powell, A. (eds.) (2009) The Lost Memoirs of Augustus and the Development of Roman Autobiography (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales).Google Scholar

Smith, P.-B. (2014) ‘Paul, Plutarch and the Problematic Practice of Self-Praise’, New Testament Studies 60.3, 341–59.Google Scholar

Smyth, H. W. (1956) Greek Grammar, revised by Gorgon M. Messing (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Snyder, H. A. (2015) Jesus and Pocahontas: Gospel, Mission, and National Myth (Eugene, OR: Cascade Books).Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (1980) Necessity, Cause and Blame: Perspectives on Aristotle’s Theory (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar

Soria, M. C. G. (1982) Filóstrato el Ateniense, Vidas de los sofistas, introducción, traducción y notas de María Concepción Giner Soria, Biblioteca clásica Gredos 55 (Madrid: Editorial Gredos).Google Scholar

Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (2003) Tragedy and Athenian Religion (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books).Google Scholar

Spelman, H. (2018) Pindar and the Poetics of Permanence (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Stadter, P. A. (1965) Plutarch’s Historical Methods: An Analysis of the Mulierum Virtutes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Stadter, P. A. (1989) A Commentary on Plutarch’s Pericles (Chapel Hill: North Carolina University Press).Google Scholar

Stahl, H.-P. (1975) ‘Learning through Suffering? Croesus’ Conversations in the History of Herodotus’, YClS 24, 1–36.Google Scholar

Stahl, H.-P. (2003 [1966]) Thucydides: Man’s Place in History (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales).Google Scholar

Stahl, H.-P. (2012) ‘Herodotus and Thucydides on Blind Decisions Preceding Military Action’, in Foster, E. and Lateiner, D. (eds.), Thucydides and Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 125–53.Google Scholar

Stahl, H.-P. (2015) ‘Herodotus and Thucydides on Not Learning from Mistakes’, in Clark, C., Foster, E., and Hallet, J. (eds.), Kinesis: The Ancient Depiction of Gesture, Motion, and Emotion. Essays for Donald Lateiner (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), 74–85.Google Scholar

Ste. Croix, G. E. M. de (1972) The Origins of the Peloponnesian War (London: Duckworth; Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Ste. Croix, G. E. M. de (1975 [1992]) ‘Aristotle on History and Poetry (Poetics 9, 1451a36–b11)’, in The Ancient Historian and His Materials: Essays in Honour of C. E. Stevens (Farnborough: Gregg International), 45–58, reprinted in A. O. Rorty (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Poetics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), 23–32.Google Scholar

Stefec, R. S. (2016) Flavii Philostrati Vitas sophistarum: Ad quas accedunt Polemonis Laodicensis Declamationes quae exstant duae (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Steiner, D. (2016) ‘Harmonic Divergence: Pindar’s Fr. 140b and Early Fifth-Century Choral Polemics’, JHS 136, 132–51.Google Scholar

Stephanus, H. (1566) (ed.) Herodoti Halicarnassei Historia (Geneva).Google Scholar

Strasburger, H. (2013 [1955]) ‘Herodotus and Periclean Athens’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 295–320.Google Scholar

Strauch, G. (1699) Breviarium chronologicum, trans. Sault, G. (London).Google Scholar

Strauss, R. and Krauss, C. (1942 [first performed]) Capriccio: A Conversation Piece for Music (Munich).Google Scholar

Strelan, R. (2013) Luke the Priest: The Authority of the Author of the Third Gospel (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar

Stronk, J. P. (2010) Ctesias’ Persian History, Part I: Introduction, Text, and Translation (Düsseldorf: Wellem).Google Scholar

Stroup, S. C. (2010) Catullus, Cicero, and a Society of Patrons: The Generation of the Text (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Suerbaum, W. (2002) Die Archaische Literatur: Von den Anfängen bis Sullas Tod. Handbuch der Lateinischen Literatur der Antike 1 (Munich: Beck).Google Scholar

Sulimani, I. (2011) Diodorus’ Mythistory and the Pagan Mission: Historiography and Culture-Heroes in the First Pentad of the Bibliotheke (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Susini, G. (1984) ‘Le lapis de Polla’, MAWBL 46, 101–10.Google Scholar

Swain, S. (1991) ‘The Reliability of Philostratus’ Lives of the Sophists’, ClAnt 10, 148–63.Google Scholar

Swain, S. (1996) Hellenism and Empire: Language, Classicism, and Power in the Greek World, AD 50–250 (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1939) The Roman Revolution (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1964) Sallust (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Sze, C. P. (1977) ‘Εἰκασία and πίστις in Plato’s Cave Allegory’, CQ 27, 127–38.Google Scholar

Tanner, R. G. (1970) ‘Διάνοια and Plato’s Cave’, CQ 20, 81–91.Google Scholar

Tatum, J. (2011) ‘The Late Republic: Autobiography and Memoirs in the Age of Civil Wars’, in Marasco, G. (ed.), Political Autobiographies and Memoirs in Antiquity: A Brill Companion (Leiden: Brill), 161–87.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. (2011) ‘Graffiti and the Epigraphic Habit: Creating Communities and Writing Alternate Histories in Classical Attica’, in Baird, J. A. and Taylor, C. (eds.), Ancient Graffiti in Context (London: Routledge), 90–109.Google Scholar

Thein, A. (2009) ‘Felicitas and the Memoirs of Sulla and Augustus’, in Smith, C. and Powell, A. (eds.), The Lost Memoirs of Augustus and the Development of Roman Autobiography (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales), 87–109.Google Scholar

Thomas, D. (2009) ‘Chronological Problems in the Continuation (1.1.1–2.3.10) of Xenophon’s Hellenika’, in Marincola, J., Strassler, R. B., and Thomas, D. (eds.), The Landmark Xenophon’s Hellenika: A New Translation (New York: Pantheon), 331–9.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. (1989) Oral Tradition and Written Record in Classical Athens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Thomas, R. (1997) ‘Ethnography, Proof and Argument in Herodotus’ Histories,’ PCPhS 43, 128–48.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. (2000) Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science and the Art of Persuasion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Thomas, R. (2001) ‘Herodotus’ Histories and the Floating Gap’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 198–210.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. (2011) ‘Herodotus’ Persian Ethnography’, in Rollinger, R., Truschnegg, B., and Bichler, R. (eds.), Herodot und das Persische Weltreich = Herodotus and the Persian Empire, Akten des 3. Internationalen Kolloquiums zum Thema Vorderasien im Spannungsfeld klassischer und altorientalischer Überlieferungen, Innsbruck, 24.–28. November 2008, Classica et Orientalia 3 (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz), 237–54.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. (2012) ‘Herodotus and Eastern Myths and logoi: Deioces the Mede and Pythius the Lydian’, in Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M. P. (eds.), Myth, Truth and Narrative in Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 233–53.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. (2019) Polis Histories, Collective Memories and the Greek World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Thompson, S. (1946) The Folktale (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston).Google Scholar

Thompson, S. (1955–58) Motif-Index of Folk-Literature: A Classification of Narrative Elements in Folk-Tales, Ballads, Myths, Fables, Mediaeval Romances, Exempla, Fabliaux, Jest-Books, and Local Legends, revised and enlarged ed., 6 vols. (Copenhagen: Rosenkilde and Bagger).Google Scholar

Thornton, J. (2013) ‘Polybius in Context: The Political Dimension of the Histories’, in Gibson, B. J. and Harrison, T. (eds.), Polybius and His World: Essays in Memory of F. W. Walbank (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 213–29.Google Scholar

Thornton, J. (2018) ‘Un’intertestualità complessa: Paralleli tucididei (e non solo) alla giustificazione dell’intervento romano in Sicilia (Pol. 1.10.5-9)’, in Devillers, O. and Sebastiani, B. Battistin (eds.), Sources et modèles des historiens anciens (Bordeaux: Ausonius), 99–109.Google Scholar

Throsby, C. (2016) ‘Byron Burning’, Times Literary Supplement, June 10.Google Scholar

Tinniswood, A. (2003) By Permission of Heaven: The Story of the Great Fire of London (London: Jonathan Cape).Google Scholar

Titchener, F. (1996) ‘The Structure of Plutarch’s Nicias’, in Fernandez Delgado, J. and Pordomingo Pardo, F. (eds.), Estudios sobre Plutarco. Aspectos formales. Actas del IV simposio español sobre Plutarco. Salamanca, 26 a 28 de mayo de 1994 (Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca, Ediciones Clásicas), 351–7.Google Scholar

Titchener, F. (2002) ‘Plutarch and Roman(ized) Athens’, in Ostenfeld, E. N., Blomqvist, K., and Nevett, L. (eds.), Greek Romans and Roman Greeks: Studies in Cultural Interaction, Aarhus Studies in Mediterranean Antiquity 3 (Aarhus : Aarhus University Press), 136–41.Google Scholar

Titchener, F. (2008) ‘Is Plutarch’s Nicias Devout, Superstitious, or Both?’, in Nikolaidis, A. G. (ed.), The Unity of Plutarch’s Work: ‘Moralia’ Themes in the ‘Lives’, Features of the ‘Lives’ in the ‘Moralia’ (Berlin: De Gruyter), 277–84.Google Scholar

Titchener, F. (2010) ‘The Role of Reality in Plutarch’s Quaestiones Convivales’, in Ferreira, J. R., Leão, D. F., Tröster, M., and Barata Dias, P. (eds.), Symposion and Philanthropia in Plutarch, Humanitas Supplementum 6 (Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Clássicos e Humanísticos), 395–401.Google Scholar

Titchener, F. (2011) ‘Plutarch’s Table talk: Sampling a Rich Blend. A Survey of Scholarly Appraisal’, in Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.), The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in The Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 35–48.Google Scholar

Titchener, F. (2013) ‘Plutarch the Architect: The Structure of Plutarch’s Nicias’, in Santamaría Heríquez, G. (ed.), Plutarco y Las Artes, XI Simposio Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Plutarquistas, 8–10 November 2012, Gran Canaria (Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas), 249–54.Google Scholar

Titchener, F. (2014) ‘Fate and Fortune’, in Beck, M. (ed.), A Companion to Plutarch (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell), 479–87.Google Scholar

Toher, M. (2017) Nicolaus of Damascus: The Life of Augustus and the Autobiography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Tolkien, J. R. R. (1964) Tree and Leaf (London: Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar

Tomlin, R. S. O. (2016) Roman London’s First Voices: Writing Tablets from the Bloomberg Excavations, 2010–2014, MOLA Monograph 72 (London: Museum of London Archaeology).Google Scholar

Too, Y. L. (1998) The Idea of Ancient Literary Criticism (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Török, L. (2014) Herodotus in Nubia (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Trapp, M. (2004) ‘Statesmanship in a Minor Key?’, in de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T., and Schenkeveld, D. M. (eds.), The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the International Plutarch Society, Nijmegen/Castle Hernen, May 1–5, 2002, vol. 1: Plutarch’s Statesman and His Aftermath: Political, Philosophical, and Literary Aspects. Mnemosyne Supplement 250/1 (Leiden: Brill), 189–200.Google Scholar

Treu, M. (1954) ‘Athen und Melos und der Melierdialog des Thukydides’, Historia 3, 253–73.Google Scholar

Trilling, L. (1972) Sincerity and Authenticity (London: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Trüdinger, K. (1918) Studien zur Geschichte der griechisch-römischen Ethnographie (Basel: E. Birkhäuser).Google Scholar

Tsakmakis, A. (1995) Thukydides über die Vergangenheit, Classica Monacensia 35 (Tübingen: Narr).Google Scholar

Tsakmakis, A. and Tamiolaki, M. (eds.) (2013) Thucydides between History and Literature (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Tucker, A. (2004) Our Knowledge of the Past: A Philosophy of Historiography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Tuplin, C. J. (1993) The Failings of Empire: A Reading of Xenophon Hellenica 2.3.11–7.5.27, Historia Einzelschriften 76 (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar

Tuplin, C. J. (2009) ‘Revisiting Dareios’ Scythian Expedition’, in Nieling, J. and Rehm, E. (eds.), The Achaemenid Impact in the Black Sea: Communication of Powers (Aarhus: Aarhus University Press), 281–312.Google Scholar

Tuplin, C. J. (2013) ‘Xenophon’s Cyropaedia: Fictive History, Political Analysis and Thinking with Iranian Kings’, in Mitchell, L. and Melville, C. (eds.), Every Inch a King: Comparative Studies on Kings and Kingship in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds (Leiden: Brill), 67–90.Google Scholar

Turner, J. W. (1979) ‘The Kinds of Historical Fiction: An Essay in Definition and Methodology’, Genre 12, 333–55.Google Scholar

Ullman, B. L. (1942) ‘History and Tragedy’, TAPA 73, 25–53.Google Scholar

Uther, H.-J. (2011) The Types of International Folktales: A Classification and Bibliography, Folklore Fellows Communications 284–6 (Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia).Google Scholar

Uther, H.-J. (2013) Handbuch zu den ‘Kinder- und Hausmärchen’ der Brüder Grimm, 2nd ed. (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

van den Berg, R. (2003) ‘The Plight of the Poor Urban Tenant’, Revue Internationale des Droits de l’Antiquité 50, 443–77.Google Scholar

van den Hout, M. P. J. (1988) M. Cornelii Frontonis Epistulae (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar

van den Hout, M. P. J. (1999) A Commentary on the Letters of M. Cornelius Fronto (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

van der Blom, H. (2016) Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

van Wees, H. (2017) ‘Thucydides on Early Greek history’, in Balot, R., Forsdyke, S., and Foster, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thucydides (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 39–62.Google Scholar

Vannicelli, P. (2001) ‘Herodotus’ Egypt and the Foundations of Universal History’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 211–40.Google Scholar

Vargish, T. (1985) The Providential Aesthetic in Victorian Fiction (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia).Google Scholar

Vasaly, A. (2015) Livy’s Political Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Vasunia, P. (2001) The Gift of the Nile: Hellenizing Egypt from Aeschylus to Alexander (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Veegens, D. J. (1839) Disputatio literaria de Polycrate Samio (Amsterdam: L. van Der Vinne).Google Scholar

Veith, G. (1967) ‘Caesar als “Vater der Strategie”’, in Rasmussen, D. (ed.), Caesar (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), 372–8.Google Scholar

Vidal-Naquet, P. (1986) The Black Hunter: Forms of Thought and Forms of Society in the Greek World, trans. Szegedy-Maszak, A. (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Voigt, V. (2000) ‘Propp. Vladimir Jakovlevič’, Enzyklopädie des Märchens 10, 1435–42.Google Scholar

von Albrecht, M. (1997) A History of Roman Literature: From Livius Andronicus to Boethius, with Special Regard to Its Influence on World Literature, vol. 1, Mnemosyne Supplement 165 (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

von Fritz, K. (1957) ‘Aristotle’s Contribution to the Practice and Theory of Historiography’, University of California Publications in Philosophy 28.3, 113–38.Google Scholar

von Scala, R. (1890) Die Studien des Polybios I (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer).Google Scholar

Waddell, P. (2013) ‘Eloquent Collisions: The Annales of Tacitus, the Column of Trajan, and the Cinematic Quick-Cut’, Arethusa 46, 471–97.Google Scholar

Walbank, F. W. (1957) A Historical Commentary on Polybius, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Walbank, F. W. (1960) ‘History and Tragedy’, Historia 9, 216–34.Google Scholar

Walbank, F. W. (1962 [1985]) ‘Polemic in Polybius’, JRS 52, 1–12, reprinted in F. W. Walbank (ed.), Selected Papers: Studies in Greek and Roman History and Historiography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 262–79.Google Scholar

Walbank, F. W. (1965 [1985]) Speeches in Greek Historians, J. L. Myres Memorial Lectures, III (Oxford: Blackwell), reprinted in F. W. Walbank (ed.), Selected Papers: Studies in Greek and Roman History and Historiography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 242–61.Google Scholar

Walbank, F. W. (1975) ‘Symploke: Its Role in Polybius’ Histories’, YClS 24, 197–212.Google Scholar

Walker, A. D. (1993) ‘Enargeia and the Spectator in Greek Historiography’, TAPA 123, 353–77.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1983) Suetonius: The Scholar and His Caesars (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar

Wallinga, H. T. (2005) Xerxes’ Greek Adventure: The Naval Perspective (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Wallraff, M. (2012) ‘Iulius Africanus and the Background of the Cesti’, in Wallraff, M., Scardino, C., Mecella, L., and Guignard, C. (eds.), Iulius Africanus. Cesti. The Extant Fragments, trans. Adler, W. (Berlin: De Gruyter), xi–xvii.Google Scholar

Wallraff, M., Scardino, C., Mecella, L., and Guignard, C. (2012) Iulius Africanus. Cesti. The Extant Fragments, trans. Adler, W. (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Walsh, J. J. (2019) The Great Fire of Rome: Life and Death in the Ancient City (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Walter, U. (2003) ‘Natam me consule Romam: Historisch-politische Autobiographien in republikanischer Zeit: Ein Überblick’, AU 46.2, 36–43.Google Scholar

Walter, U. (2004) Memoria und res publica: Zur Geschichtskultur im republikanischen Rom (Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Antike).Google Scholar

Wardle, D. (2014) Suetonius: Life of Augustus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Waters, M. (2014) Ancient Persia: A Concise History of the Achaemenid Empire, 550–330 BCE (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Waters, M. (2017) Ctesias’ Persica and Its Near Eastern Context (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).Google Scholar

Weinstock, S. (1971) Divus Julius (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Weissenborn, W. and Müller, H. J. (1908) T. Livi Ab Vrbe Condita Libri, 9th ed., vol. 1, Part 1 (Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung).Google Scholar

Welch, K. and Powell, A. (eds.) (1998) Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments (London: Duckworth; Swansea: Classical Press of Wales).Google Scholar

Wellesley, K. (1972) Cornelius Tacitus: The Histories Book III (Sydney: Sydney University Press).Google Scholar

Wesseling, P. (1763) (ed.) Herodoti Halicarnassei Historiarum libri IX, Musarum Nominibus Inscripti = Hērodotu Halikarnēssēos Historiōn Logoi (Amsterdam: Schouten).Google Scholar

Wesselmann, K. (2011) Mythische Erzählstrukturen in Herodots Historien (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

West, M. L. (2011) The Making of the Iliad: Disquisition and Analytical Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

West, S. (1985) ‘Herodotus’ Epigraphical Interests’, CQ 35, 278‒305.Google Scholar

West, S. (1991) ‘Herodotus’ Portrait of Hecataeus’, JHS 111, 144‒60.Google Scholar

West, S. (1992) ‘Sesostris’ Stelae (Herodotus 2.102‒106)’, Historia 41, 117‒20.Google Scholar

West, S. (1999) ‘Sophocles’ Antigone and Herodotus’ Book Three’, in Griffin, J. (ed.), Sophocles Revisited: Essays Presented to Sir Hugh Lloyd-Jones (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 109–36.Google Scholar

West, S. (2002) ‘Scythia’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 437–56.Google Scholar

West, S. (2004) ‘Herodotus on Aristeas’, in Tuplin, C. J. (ed.), Pontus and the Outside World: Studies in Black Sea History, Historiography, and Archaeology (Leiden: Brill), 43–68.Google Scholar

West, S. (2011) ‘Herodotus’ Sources of Information on Persian Matters’, in Rollinger, R., Truschnegg, B., and Bichler, R. (eds.), Herodot und das Persische Weltreich = Herodotus and the Persian Empire, Akten des 3. Internationalen Kolloquiums zum Thema Vorderasien im Spannungsfeld klassischer und altorientalischer Überlieferungen, Innsbruck, 24.–28. November 2008, Classica et Orientalia 3 (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz), 256–72.Google Scholar

Wharton, D. (2009) ‘On the Distribution of Adnominal Prepositional Phrases in Latin Prose’, CP 104, 184–207.Google Scholar

White, H. (1912) Appian’s Roman History, Loeb Classical Library 2–5 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

White, H. (1973) Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

White, H. (1978) Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

White, H. (1980) ‘The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality’, Critical Inquiry 7.1 (On Narrative), 5–27.Google Scholar

White, H. (1987) The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation (Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Whitehead, D. (1979) ‘Tacitus and the Loaded Alternative’, Latomus 38, 474–95.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. J. G. (2004) ‘Philostratus’, in de Jong, I. J. F., Nünlist, R., and Bowie, A. M. (eds.), Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, vol. 1: Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature, Mnemosyne Supplement 257 (Leiden: Brill), 423–39.Google Scholar

Whitton, C. (2011) ‘Dubitatio comparatiua: A Misunderstood Idiom in Pliny (Natural History 7.150) and Tacitus (Histories 4.6) and Others’, CQ 61, 267–77.Google Scholar

Wiater, N. (2016) ‘Shifting Endings, Ambiguity and Deferred Closure in Polybius’ Histories’, in Lianeri, A. (ed.), Knowing Future Time in and through Greek Historiography (Berlin: De Gruyter), 243–65.Google Scholar

Wiater, N. (2017) ‘Expertise, “Character” and the “Authority Effect” in the “Early Roman History” of Dionysius of Halicarnassus’, in König, J. (ed.), Authority and Expertise in Ancient Scientific Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 231–59.Google Scholar

Will, É. (1964) ‘Deux livres sur les guerres médiques et leur temps’, Revue de Philologie, de Littérature et d’Histoire Anciennes 38, 70–88.Google Scholar

Williams, B. (2002) Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Wills, J. (1996) Repetition in Latin Poetry: Figures of Allusion (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Wilson, A. (2013) ‘Hayden White’s Theory of the Historical Work: A Re-examination’, Journal of the Philosophy of History 7, 32–56.Google Scholar

Wilson, A. (2014) ‘The Reflexive Test of Hayden White’s Metahistory’, History and Theory 53, 1–23.Google Scholar

Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1965) ‘Cleon and Diodotus’, BICS 12, 70–82.Google Scholar

Winton, R. I. (1999) ‘Thucydides, I.22.1’, Athenaeum 87, 527–33.Google Scholar

Wiseman, A. and Wiseman, T. P. (trans.) (1980) Julius Caesar: The Battle for Gaul (Boston: David R. Godine).Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. (1993 [2011]) ‘Lying Historians: Seven Types of Mendacity’, in Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (eds.), Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World (Austin: University of Texas Press; Exeter: University of Exeter Press), 122–46, reprinted in J. Marincola (ed.), Greek and Roman Historiography (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 314–36.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. (1998) ‘The Publication of De Bello Gallico’, in Welch, K. and Powell, A. (eds.), Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments (London: Duckworth; Swansea: Classical Press of Wales), 1–9.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. (2002) ‘History, Poetry, and Annales’, in Levene, D. S. and Nelis, D. P. (eds.), Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography (Leiden: Brill), 331–62.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. (2015) The Roman Audience: Classical Literature as Social History (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Wolpert, A. (2002) Remembering Defeat: Civil War and Civic Memory in Ancient Athens (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Woodcock, E. C. (1959) A New Latin Syntax (London: Methuen).Google Scholar

Woodhead, A. G. (1960) ‘Thucydides’ Portrait of Cleon’, Mnemosyne 13, 289–317.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (1988) Rhetoric in Classical Historiography: Four Studies (London: CroomHelm).Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (1998) Tacitus Reviewed (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (2004) Tacitus: The Annals (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett).Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (2006) ‘Mutiny and Madness: Tacitus Annals 1.16–49’, Arethusa 39, 303–29.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (2012) From Poetry to History: Selected Papers (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (2017) The Annals of Tacitus: Books 5 and 6 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (2018) The Annals of Tacitus: Book 4 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. and Kraus, C. S. (2014) Tacitus: Agricola (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Woodmansee, M. and Jaszi, P. (eds.) (1994) The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).Google Scholar

Wright, W. C. (1921) Philostratus and Eunapius: The Lives of the Sophists, Loeb Classical Library 134 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Xenophontos, S. (2012) ‘Plutarch’s Compositional Technique in the An Seni Respublica Gerenda Sit: Clusters vs. Patterns’, AJPh 133, 61–91.Google Scholar

Zali, V. (2015) The Shape of Herodotean Rhetoric: A Study of the Speeches in Herodotus’ Histories with Special Attention to Books 5–9 (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Zambrini, A. (2006) ‘Aspetti dell’etnografia in Jacoby’, in Ampolo, C. (ed.), Aspetti dell’opera di Felix Jacoby (Pisa: Edizioni della Normale), 189–200.Google Scholar

Ziolkowski, A. (1993) ‘Vrbs direpta, or How the Romans Sacked Cities’, in Rich, J. and Shipley, G. (eds.), War and Society in the Roman World (London: Routledge), 69–91.Google Scholar

Ziolkowski, T. J. (2009) Heidelberger Romantik: Mythos und Symbol (Heidelberg: Winter).Google Scholar

Zuccarini, M. (2018) ‘What’s Love Got to Do with It? Eros, Democracy and Pericles’ Rhetoric’, GRBS 58, 473–89.Google Scholar

Zucchelli, B. (1985) ‘Echi della Poetica di Aristotele in Polibio. A proposito di storiografia e tragedia’, in V. E. Alfieri et alii (eds.), Sapienza antica: Studi in onore di Domenico Pesce (Milan: Franco Angeli Libri), 297–309.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive