Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T11:32:21.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reading list

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2019

William Shakespeare
Edited by
David Bevington
David Bevington
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Antony and Cleopatra , pp. 281 - 285
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelman, Janet. The Common Liar: An Essay on ‘Antony and Cleopatra’, 1973Google Scholar
Adelman, Janet Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, ‘Hamlet’ to ‘The Tempest’, 1992Google Scholar
Adelman, Janet ‘Making defect perfection: Shakespeare and the one-sex model’, in Comensoli, Viviana and Russell, Anne (eds.), Enacting Gender on the English Renaissance Stage, 1999, pp. 23–52Google Scholar
Barroll, J. Leeds. ‘Shakespeare and Roman history’, MLR 53 (1958), 327–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barroll, J. Leeds ‘The chronology of Shakespeare’s Jacobean plays and the dating of Antony and Cleopatra’, in Smith, Gordon Ross (ed.), Essays on Shakespeare, 1965, pp. 115–62Google Scholar
Barroll, J. Leeds, Shakespearean Tragedy: Genre, Tradition, and Change in ‘Antony and Cleopatra’, 1984Google Scholar
Beckerman, Bernard. ‘Past the size of dreaming’, in Rose, Mark (ed.), Twentieth Century Interpretations of ‘Antony and Cleopatra’, 1977, pp. 99–112Google Scholar
Belsey, Catherine. ‘Cleopatra’s seduction’, in Hawkes, Terence (ed.), Alternative Shakespeares, vol. ii, 1996Google Scholar
Berry, Philippa. ‘“The crown o’th’earth doth melt”: the alchemy of states in Antony and Cleopatra’, in Iselin, Pierre (ed.), William Shakespeare: ‘Antony and Cleopatra’, 2000, pp. 47–61Google Scholar
Bethell, S. L. Shakespeare and the Popular Dramatic Tradition, 1944, pp. 116–33Google Scholar
Bono, Barbara J. Literary Transvaluation: From Vergilian Epic to Shakespearean Tragicomedy, 1984, pp. 1–6, 140–224Google Scholar
Bradley, A. C. ‘Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra’, in Oxford Lectures on Poetry, 1909, pp. 279–305Google Scholar
Brower, Reuben A. Hero and Saint: Shakespeare and the Graeco-Roman Heroic Tradition, 1971, pp. 317–53Google Scholar
Brown, John Russell (ed.). Shakespeare: Antony and Cleopatra: A Casebook, 1969Google Scholar
Burckhardt, Sigurd. ‘The king’s language: Shakespeare’s drama as social discovery’, AR 21 (1961), 369–87Google Scholar
Cantor, Paul. Shakespeare’s Rome: Republic and Empire, 1976, pp. 125–208Google Scholar
Charnes, Linda. Notorious Identity: Materializing the Subject in Shakespeare, 1993Google Scholar
Charney, Maurice. Shakespeare’s Roman Plays: The Function of Imagery in the Drama, 1961, pp. 79–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, John. ‘“The choice of Hercules” in Antony and Cleopatra’, S.Sur. 31 (1978), 45–52Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T. Samuel Taylor Coleridge: Shakespeare Criticism, ed. Raysor, T. M., 2 vols., 2nd edn, 1960, i, 76–9Google Scholar
Colie, Rosalie. Shakespeare’s Living Art, 1974, pp. 168–207Google Scholar
Conti, Natale. Natalis Comitis Mythologiae, 1581Google Scholar
Danby, John F. Poets on Fortune’s Hill: Studies in Sidney, Shakespeare, Beaumont and Fletcher, 1952, pp. 128–51Google Scholar
Dickey, Franklin. Not Wisely But Too Well: Shakespeare’s Love Tragedies, 1957Google Scholar
Dollimore, Jonathan. Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology, and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries, 1984, pp. 204–17Google Scholar
Doran, Madeleine. ‘“High events as these”: the language of hyperbole in Antony and Cleopatra’, QQ 72 (1965), 26–51Google Scholar
Dorius, R. J. ‘Shakespeare’s dramatic modes and Antony and Cleopatra’, in Hess, Rudolf et al. (eds.), Literatur als Kritik des Lebens, 1975, pp. 83–96Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terence. Shakespeare and Society, 1967, pp. 122–9Google Scholar
Erickson, Peter. Patriarchal Structures in Shakespeare’s Drama, 1985, pp. 123–47Google Scholar
Fisch, Harold. ‘Antony and Cleopatra: the limits of mythology’, S.Sur. 23 (1970), 59–67Google Scholar
Fitz, L. T. ‘Egyptian queens and male reviewers: sexist attitudes in Antony and Cleopatra criticism’, SQ 28 (1977), 297–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd-Wilson, Mary. ‘Transmigrations: crossing regional and gender boundaries in Antony and Cleopatra’, in Comensoli, Viviana and Russell, Anne (eds.), Enacting Gender on the English Renaissance Stage, 1999, pp. 73–96Google Scholar
French, A. L. Shakespeare and the Critics, 1972, pp. 206–35Google Scholar
Garner, Shirley Nelson, and Madelon, Sprengnether (eds.). Shakespearean Tragedy and Gender, 1996, essays by Cook, Carol and Charnes, Linda, pp. 241–67, 68–86Google Scholar
Goddard, Harold C. The Meaning of Shakespeare, 2 vols., 1951, ii, 184–208Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. L. ‘The tragedy of the imagination: a reading of Antony and Cleopatra’, Melbourne Critical Review 4 (1961), 41–64Google Scholar
Goldman, Michael. Acting and Action in Shakespearean Tragedy, 1985, pp. 112–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granville-Barker, Harley. Prefaces to Shakespeare, 2nd ser., 1930, pp. 116–66Google Scholar
Hamer, Mary. Signs of Cleopatra: History, Politics, Representation, 1993Google Scholar
Harris, Duncan S. ‘“Again for Cydnus”: the dramaturgical resolution of Antony and Cleopatra’, SEL 17 (1977), 219–31Google Scholar
Harris, Jonathan Gil. ‘“Narcissus in thy face”: Roman desire and the difference it fakes in Antony and Cleopatra’, SQ 45 (1994), 408–25Google Scholar
Harrison, Thomas P. ‘Shakespeare and Marlowe’s Dido, Queen of Carthage’, UTSE 35 (1956), 57–63Google Scholar
Heffner, Ray L. Jr. ‘The messengers in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra’, ELH 43 (1976), 154–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinemann, Margot. ‘“Let Rome in Tiber melt”: order and disorder in Antony and Cleopatra’, in Antony and Cleopatra, New Casebooks, ed. Drakakis, John, 1994, reprinted from SJ 128 (1992), 39–48Google Scholar
Henn, T. R. The Living Image, 1972, pp. 117–36Google Scholar
Hibbard, G. R. ‘Feliciter audax: “Antony and Cleopatra”, i, i, 1–24’, in Edwards, Philip et al. (eds.), Shakespeare’s Styles: Essays in Honour of Kenneth Muir, 1980, pp. 95–109Google Scholar
Holloway, John. The Story of the Night: Studies in Shakespeare’s Major Tragedies, 1961, pp. 99–120Google Scholar
Honigmann, E. A. J. Shakespeare: Seven Tragedies: The Dramatist’s Manipulation of Response, 1976, pp. 150–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes-Hallet, Lucy. Cleopatra: Histories, Dreams, and Distortions, 1990Google Scholar
Hume, Robert D. ‘Individuation and development of character through language in Antony and Cleopatra’, SQ 24 (1973), 280–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jankowski, Theodora A. Women in Power in the Early Modern Drama, 1992Google Scholar
Jones, Emrys (ed.). Antony and Cleopatra, 1977Google Scholar
Kaula, David. ‘The time sense of Antony and Cleopatra’, SQ 15 (1964), 211–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, G. Wilson. ‘The transcendental humanism of Antony and Cleopatra’, in The Imperial Theme, 1931, rev. edn, 1951, pp. 199–262Google Scholar
Knights, L. C. ‘On the tragedy of Antony and Cleopatra’, Scrutiny 16 (1949), 318–23; reprinted in Some Shakespearean Themes, 1959Google Scholar
Krook, Dorothea. ‘Tragic and heroic in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra’, in Sachs, Ariel (ed.), Scripta Hierosolymitana, 1967, pp. 231–61Google Scholar
Lee, Robin. Shakespeare: ‘Antony and Cleopatra’, 1971Google Scholar
Levine, Laura. ‘“Strange flesh”: Antony and Cleopatra and the story of the dissolving warrior,’ in Men in Women’s Clothing: Anti-theatricality and Effeminization, 1579–1642, 1994, pp. 44–72Google Scholar
Lloyd, Michael. ‘Cleopatra as Isis’, S.Sur. 12 (1959), 88–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAlindon, T. Shakespeare and Decorum, 1973, pp. 167–213Google Scholar
MacCallum, M. W. Shakespeare’s Roman Plays and Their Background, 1910, pp. 300–453Google Scholar
Macdonald, Ronald R. ‘Playing till Doomsday: interpreting Antony and Cleopatra’, ELR 15 (1985), 78–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, Maynard. ‘The Jacobean Shakespeare: some observations on the construction of the tragedies’, in Brown, J. R. and Harris, Bernard (eds.), Jacobean Shakespeare, 1960, pp. 11–41Google Scholar
Mack, Maynard ‘Antony and Cleopatra: the stillness and the dance’, in Crane, Milton (ed.), Shakespeare’s Art: Seven Essays, 1973, pp. 79–113Google Scholar
Markels, Julian. The Pillar of the World: ‘Antony and Cleopatra’ in Shakespeare’s Development, 1968Google Scholar
Marshall, Cynthia. ‘Man of steel done got the blues: melancholic subversion of presence in Antony and Cleopatra’, SQ 44 (1993), 385–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, H. A. Shakespeare’s Tragedies of Love, 1970Google Scholar
Merchant, W. M. ‘Classical costume in Shakespearian productions’, S.Sur. 10 (1957), 71–6Google Scholar
Miola, Robert. Shakespeare’s Rome, 1983, pp. 116–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Helen. ‘Shakespeare and Dürer’s Apocalypse’, S.St. 4 (1968), 252–62Google Scholar
Nandy, Dipak. ‘The realism of Antony and Cleopatra’, in Kettle, Arnold (ed.), Shakespeare in a Changing World, 1964, pp. 172–94Google Scholar
Neill, Michael (ed.). Anthony and Cleopatra. World’s Classics. 1994Google Scholar
Norman, Arthur M. Z. ‘Daniel’s The Tragedie of Cleopatra and Antony and Cleopatra’, SQ 9 (1958), 11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakeshott, Walter. ‘Shakespeare and Plutarch’, in Garrett, John (ed.), Talking of Shakespeare, 1954, pp. 111–25Google Scholar
Odell, George C. D. Shakespeare from Betterton to Irving, 2 vols., 1920Google Scholar
Ornstein, Robert. ‘The ethic of the imagination: love and art in Antony and Cleopatra’, in Brown, J. R. and Harris, Bernard (eds.), Later Shakespeare, 1966, pp. 31–46Google Scholar
Paster, Gail. The Body Embarrassed: Drama and the Disciplines of Shame in Early Modern England, 1993Google Scholar
Phillips, James Emerson Jr. The State in Shakespeare’s Greek and Roman Plays, 1940, pp. 188–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rackin, Phyllis. ‘Shakespeare’s boy Cleopatra, the decorum of nature, and the golden world of poetry’, PMLA 87 (1972), 201–11Google Scholar
Ridley, M. R. (ed.). Antony and Cleopatra, based on the 1906 edition of Case, R. H. Arden2. 1954Google Scholar
Riemer, A. P. A Reading of Shakespeare’s ‘Antony and Cleopatra’, 1968Google Scholar
Schanzer, Ernest. The Problem Plays of Shakespeare: A Study of ‘Julius Caesar’, ‘Measure for Measure’, and ‘Antony and Cleopatra’, 1963, pp. 132–83Google Scholar
Seaton, Ethel. ‘Antony and Cleopatra and the Book of Revelation’, RES 22 (1946), 219–24Google Scholar
Shapiro, Stephen A. ‘The varying shore of the world: ambivalence in Antony and Cleopatra’, MLQ 27 (1966), 18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, J. L. Shakespeare’s Pagan World: The Roman Tragedies, 1973, pp. 109–63Google Scholar
Simonds, Peggy Muñoz. ‘“To the very heart of loss”: Renaissance iconography in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra’, S.St. 22 (1994), 220–76Google Scholar
Singh, Jyotsna. ‘Renaissance antitheatricality, antifeminism, and Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra’, RD 20 (1990), 99–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Susan. ‘Patterns of motion in Antony and Cleopatra’, S.Sur. 33 (1980), 113–22Google Scholar
Stein, Arnold. ‘The image of Antony: lyric and tragic imagination’, KR 21 (1959), 586–606Google Scholar
Stone, George Winchester Jr. ‘Garrick’s presentation of Antony and Cleopatra’, RES 13 (1937), 20–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennenhouse, Leonard. ‘Antony and Cleopatra’, in Holderness, Graman, Loughrey, Bryan, and Murphy, Andrew (eds.), Shakespeare: The Roman Plays, 1996, pp. 66–70, reprinted from Power on Display: The Politics of Shakespeare’s Genres, 1986Google Scholar
Traci, Philip J. The Love Play of Antony and Cleopatra: A Critical Study of Shakespeare’s Play, 1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traversi, Derek. Shakespeare: The Roman Plays, 1963, pp. 79–203Google Scholar
Waddington, Raymond B. ‘Antony and Cleopatra: “What Venus did with Mars”’, S.St. 2 (1966), 210–26Google Scholar
Waith, Eugene. The Herculean Hero in Marlowe, Chapman, Shakespeare, and Dryden, 1962, pp. 113–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, Stanley, and Gary, Taylor, William Shakespeare: A Textual Companion, 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilders, John (ed.). Antony and Cleopatra. Arden3. 1995Google Scholar
Williamson, Marilyn L. Infinite Variety: Antony and Cleopatra in Renaissance Drama and Earlier Tradition, 1974Google Scholar
Wilson, John Dover (ed.). Antony and Cleopatra. Cambridge Shakespeare (Cam1). 1950Google Scholar
Wind, Edgar. Pagan Mysteries in the Renaissance, 1968Google Scholar
Wofford, Susanne L. (ed.) Shakespeare’s Late Tragedies, 1996, essays by Dollimore, Jonathan, Loomba, Ania, Hodgdon, Barbara, and James, Heather, pp. 197–207, 235–48, 268–96, and 208–34Google Scholar
Wood, Nigel (ed.). Antony and Cleopatra. Theory in Practice Series, 1996, essays by Baines, Barbara J., Callaghan, Dympna, Hamer, Mary, and Wilcher, Robert, pp. 9–39, 40–65, 66–91, and 92–124Google Scholar
Wortham, Christopher. ‘Temperance and the end of time: emblematic Antony and Cleopatra’, CD 29 (1995–6), 1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthen, W. B. ‘“The weight of Antony”: staging “character” in Antony and Cleopatra’, SEL 26 (1986), 295–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yachnin, Paul. ‘“Courtiers of beauteous freedom”: Antony and Cleopatra in its time’, R&R 26 (1991), 1–29Google Scholar
Yachnin, Paul ‘Shakespeare’s politics of loyalty: sovereignty and subjectivity in Antony and Cleopatra’, SEL 33 (1993), 343–63Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×