Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- 1 From Imperial to Socialist Nature Preservation
- 2 Stalinism
- 3 The Khrushchev Reforms, Environmental Politics, and the Awakening of Environmentalism, 1953–1964
- 4 Developed Socialism, Environmental Degradation, and the Time of Economic “Stagnation,” 1964–1985
- 5 Gorbachev's Reforms, Glasnost, and Econationalism
- Conclusion After the Breakup of the Soviet Union
- Index
- References
3 - The Khrushchev Reforms, Environmental Politics, and the Awakening of Environmentalism, 1953–1964
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2013
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- 1 From Imperial to Socialist Nature Preservation
- 2 Stalinism
- 3 The Khrushchev Reforms, Environmental Politics, and the Awakening of Environmentalism, 1953–1964
- 4 Developed Socialism, Environmental Degradation, and the Time of Economic “Stagnation,” 1964–1985
- 5 Gorbachev's Reforms, Glasnost, and Econationalism
- Conclusion After the Breakup of the Soviet Union
- Index
- References
Summary
At the end of World War II, the Communist Party approved the fourth Five-Year Plan (1946–1951), which, like the first Five-Year Plans, was dedicated to building – and in this case also rebuilding – the country's heavy industry and military sectors. As in the 1930s, investment income was extracted from the agricultural sector, whereas housing, light industry, and medicine were ignored. A famine in 1946 killed hundreds of thousands of people. Millions of citizens lived in burned-out hovels, rubble, or holes in the ground. The Stalinist Plan for the Transformation of Nature (1948) ensured that nature, too, no less than Soviet citizens, would serve reconstruction purposes through the taming of its resources and through its coal, oil and rivers generating power. The Soviet Union was an industrial economy, yet leaders had superimposed it on a backward agricultural community, and the economy remained dependent on forced labor in such sectors as mining, timber, fossil fuels, and power production. This was the Stalinist centrally planned economy, with its ability to mobilize resources fully and harshly, if not rationally.
When Stalin died in March 1953, a succession struggle broke out between Georgy Malenkov, Viacheslav Molotov, secret police chief Lavrenty Beria, and Nikita Khrushchev. By 1956, Khrushchev had won this struggle and embarked fully on a reform program that included the economy, culture, and society. After the novel The Thaw (Ottopel’, originally published in the journal Novyi Mir) by Ilya Ehrenburg, the Khrushchev era became known as the “thaw” period. De-Stalinization became the official policy, especially after Khrushchev condemned the excesses of Stalinism in a special session at the close of the twentieth Communist Party Congress in February 1956.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- An Environmental History of Russia , pp. 136 - 183Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
, O Dal'neshem Sovershenstvovanii Organizatsii Upravleniia Promyshlennost'iu i Stroitel'stvom: Doklad i Zakliuchitel'noe Slovo na VII sessii Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR Chetvertogo Sozyva 7 i 10 Maia 1957 g. (Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1957)Google Scholar
, “The Decentralization of Industry,” Soviet Studies, vol. 9, no. 1 (July 1957), pp. 65–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Industrial Planning System: Reforms in Prospect,” Soviet Studies, vol. 14, no. 1 (July 1962), pp. 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Bloody Saturday in the Soviet Union: Novocherkassk 1962 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
, , and , eds., Soviet Natural Resources in the World Economy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983)
, “Prospects of the Soviet Iron and Steel Industry,” Soviet Studies, vol. 14, no. 3 (January 1963), pp. 275–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Belye Piatna Istorii Prirodookhrany, 2nd ed. (Kiev: Kievskii Ekolog-Kul'turnyi Tsentr, “Logos,” 2003), p. 289Google Scholar
and , “Cybernetics and Information Theory in the United States, France and the Soviet Union,” in , ed., Science and Ideology: A Comparative History (London: Routledge, 2003), pp. 66–95Google Scholar
, “Wilderness and the Nature Conservation Ideal: Britain, Canada, and the United States,” Ambio, vol. 21, no. 6 (September 1992), pp. 394–399Google Scholar
, , and , “Property Rights Case Law and the Challenge to the Endangered Species Act,” Conservation Biology, vol. 9, no. 4 (August 1995), pp. 725–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Environmental Protection, Population Change, and Economic Development in the Rural Western United States,” Population and Environment, vol. 24, no. 3 (January 2003), pp. 255–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Virgin and Idle Lands of Western Siberia and Northern Kazakhstan: A Geographical Appraisal,” Geographical Review, vol. 46, no. 1 (January 1956), pp. 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Stroitel'stvo Kommunizma i Razvitie Sel'skogo Khoziaiastva,” in Rechi i Dokumenty, I (Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1962), pp. 85–100Google Scholar
, O Dal'neishem Uvelichenii Proizvodstva Zerna v Strane i ob Osvoenii Tselinnykh i Zalezhnykh Zemel’ (Moscow: Gosizdatpolit, 1954)Google Scholar
, Itogi Razvitiia Sel'skogo Khoziaistva za Poslednie Piat’ Let (Moscow: Gosizdatpolit, 1958)Google Scholar
and , Climate Dependence and ood Problems in Russia, 1900–1990 (Budapest: CEU Press, 2005), pp. 171–218Google Scholar
, Mistakes in Exploitation of the Virgin Lands, September 6, 1967
, “The ‘Planet of 100 Languages’: Ethnic Relations and Soviet Identity in the Virgin Lands,” in , , and , eds., Peopling the Russian Periphery: Borderland Colonization in Eurasian History (London: Routledge, 2007), pp. 238–261Google Scholar
, “Problema Zashchity Pochv ot Vetrovoi Erozii v Raionakh Osvoeniia Tselinnykh i Zalezhnykh Zemel’ Severnogo Kazakhstana,” Pochvovedenie, no. 10 (1956), pp. 37–39
, “The New Soviet Agricultural Programme,” Soviet Studies, vol. 17, no. 2 (October 1965), pp. 129–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Soviet Agriculture under Brezhnev,” Slavic Review, vol. 29, no. 3 (September 1970), pp. 379–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Soviet Agriculture Since 1953,” Political Science Quarterly, vol. 75, no. 1 (March 1960), p. 60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed., Problemy Ekonomiki Selskogo Khoziaistva na Iugo-Vostoke i v Zapadnom Kazakhstane. Sbornik Nauchnykh Rabot (Saratov: Saratovskii Selskokhoziaistvennyi Institut, 1967), p. 159
, More Data on Dust Storms in the Virgin Lands, June 24, 1963
, Khrushchev and the Development of Soviet Agriculture: The Virgin Land Programme 1953–1964 (London: Macmillan, 1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Dust Bowl: The Southern Plains in the 1930s (New York: Oxford University Press, 1979), p. 277Google Scholar
, “Soviet Agriculture Marks Time,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 40, no. 4 (July, 1962), p. 579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Uskorennoe Razvitie Khimicheskoi Promyshlennosti – Vazhneishee Uslovie Podema Selskokhoziaistvennogo Proizvodstva i Rosta Blagosostoianiia Naroda: Postanovlenie Plenuma TsK KPSS po Dokladu Tovarishch N. C. Khrushcheva, Priniatoe Edinoglasno 13 Dekabria 1963 goda (Moscow: Izdatpolit, 1963)Google Scholar
’ End,” New York Times, February 23, 1964
et al., Vital Signs 2002, Worldwatch Institute (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2002)Google Scholar
, “The Khrushchev Livestock Plan,” Soviet Studies, vol. 7, no. 1 (July, 1955), p. 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narodnoe khoziaistvo RSFSR v 1965 (Moscow: Gostatizdat, 1966
, Fear of Famine and Panic-Buying in the USSR, Radio Liberty Research Institute, October 17, 1963Google Scholar
, State of Agriculture in Vologda Oblast, May 16, 1963
, “Soviet Timber: Regional Supply and Demand, 1970–1990” Arctic, vol. 32, no. 4 (December 1979), pp. 308–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komsomol'skaia Pravda, October 14, 1970
Narodnoe Khoziaistvo SSSR v 1972 (Moscow: Gosstatizdat, 1973)
, Annihilation of Natural Resources in the Ukraine, May 17, 1963
Nash Sovremennik, no. 6 (November/December 1963)
, New Forestry Decree, Radio Liberty Research Institute, March 12, 1964
, New Forestry Decree; and , and , eds., Khrestomatiia po Noveishei Istorii Rossii, 1917–2004 (Moscow: Drofa, 2005)Google Scholar
, Russ Woodlands May be Taken From Collective Farms, July 8, 1961
, “Khrushchev Urges More Steam Power; Soviet to Stress Power by Stream,” New York Times, August 11, 1958
Zheleznodorozhnyi Transport, no. 3 (1962)
, Cadillac Desert: the American West and its Disappearing Water (New York: Viking 1986)Google Scholar
, “Soviet Dam Work Far off Schedule; Delay in Kuibyshev Project Illustrates Time Factor Noted by Khrushchev,” New York Times, August 11, 1958
, The Destruction of Nature in the Soviet Union (White Plains, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1980), p. 150Google Scholar
, “Industrial Location in the Tadzhik Republic,” Soviet Studies, vol. 21, no. 4 (April 1970), pp. 494–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., “Development of Dams in the Russian Federation and Other NIS Countries,” WCD Briefing Paper (Capetown, South Africa: World Commission on Dams, n. y), and Stephanie Joyce, “Is It Worth a Dam?” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 105, no. 10 (October, 1997), pp. 1050–1055Google Scholar
, “Sustainable Development of the Mountain Regions of the USSR. The Realities, the Role of Science, and Research Orientations,” Mountain Research and Development, vol. 10, no. 2
, “Environmental Politics in the American South: The Fight over the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway,” Environmental History Review, vol. 15, no. 1 (Spring 1991), pp. 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Angarlag i Ozerlag pri Stroitel'stve GES Angarskogo Kaskada v kontse 1950 – nachale 1960-x gg (Irkutsk: Ottisk, 2008), pp. 104–109Google Scholar
, ed., Regional'nye Problemy Razvitiia Proizvoditel'nykh Sil SSSR (Moscow: Nauka, 1972)
Nash Sovremennik, no. 3 (1963)
, Gidrografiia SSSR (Moscow: Nauka, 1954)
, ed., Ekologiia i Vlast’, 1917–1990 (Moscow: Mezhdunarodnyi Fond “Demokratiia,” 1999), p. 428
at Plenum Tsentral'nogo Komiteta KPSS, 10–18-ogo Ianvaria 1961 g., Stenograficheskii Otchet (Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1961), pp. 601–603Google Scholar
and , Khrestomatiia po Otechestvennoi Istorii.