Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:45:18.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

Edited and translated by
P. Tzamalikos
Affiliation:
Aristotle University, Thessaloniki
Get access

Summary

The Codex

Codex 573 of the Metamorphosis cloister (the Μεγάλον Μετέωρον, the Great Meteoron) is a little token of the fate of old treasures of all kinds over the centuries. More specifically, it betokens the conflict waged in Greece in 1882, over preservation of extant manuscripts, shortly after Greece had become an independent state, after the annexation of Thessaly, while Northern Greece was still under the rule of Ottoman Turks. One facet of this battle was the enterprise by the newly independent state to bring all manuscripts that had remained after centuries of looting together for preservation in the National Library in Athens. This story I will relate shortly. Another facet of this battle is the one between scholars striving to capture the glory of originality in recording and cataloguing manuscripts. This story I will not relate, since this is the same everywhere in the world of scholars.

In the seventeenth century, a Cypriot monk called Athanasius had bought manuscripts from Meteora by weight. During the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, monks used to sell manuscripts to visitors from Western Europe. However disturbing to later locals the phenomenon may have appeared, this was the cause for many texts being saved and respected. When the government sent two savants to collect manuscripts for the National Library in Athens (in the late nineteenth century), this resulted in a real war between the peasants (including wives and children) and the state military force. Locals saw the removal of manuscripts from Meteora to the National Library of Athens as either a sacrilege, or appropriation of treasures belonging to the convents. Earlier still, the two savants, escorted by the same soldiers and faced with the resistance of the monks objecting to the removal of all extant books from the country to the capital, had taken by force all the books that were not hidden, and packed them in cases. However, the peasants who fell upon the military convoy, proved victorious. As a result, the government decided to yield to the will of the regional people, and only nine boxes with about 350 manuscripts were taken to Athens to be lodged in the National Library. This was virtually nothing, when one considers that the monastery of Metamorphosis alone has more than six hundred manuscripts.

Type
Chapter
Information
An Ancient Commentary on the Book of Revelation
A Critical Edition of the Scholia in Apocalypsin
, pp. 1 - 94
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bogiadjedes, J. (c. 1900)
Nicol, Donald M., Meteora: The Rock Monasteries of Thessaly (London 1963) pp. 191–99Google Scholar
Bees, N., ‘Die Kollation der Apokalypse Johannis mit dem Kodex 573 des Meteoronklosters’, Zeitschrift für neutestamentliche Wissenschaft, 13 (1912), 260–265Google Scholar
Diobouniotis, C., Hippolytus Danielcommentar in Handschrift No 573 des Meteoronklosters. TU 38, 1 (Leipzig, 1911)Google Scholar
Tzamalikos, P., A Newly Discovered Greek Father, Cassian the Sabaite Eclipsed by ‘John Cassian’ of Marseilles, A Critical Edition from an Ancient Manuscript with Commentary and an English Translation (Leiden 2012)Google Scholar
Tzamalikos, P., The Real Cassian Revisited, Monastic Life, Greek Paideia, and Origenism in the Sixth Century, A Critical Study of an Ancient Manuscript (Leiden, 2012)Google Scholar
Hoskier, H. C., ‘Manuscripts of the Apocalypse – Recent Investigations. I’, Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 7 (1922–23), 120–137 and 2 platesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Concerning the Text of the Apocalypse. Collations of all Existing Available Greek Documents with the Standard Text of Stephens’s Third Edition, together with the Testimony of Versions, Commentaries and Fathers. 2 vols. (London, 1929), vol. 1, pp. 637–652
Teill, , Der Apokalypse-Kommentar des Andreas von Kaisareia 2 vols. (Munich, 1956)Google Scholar
Teil, , Die alten Stämme (Munich, 1955), pp. 9Google Scholar
Elliott, J. K. gives an account of the proportions: ‘The distinctiveness of the Greek manuscripts of the Book of Revelation’, Journal of Theological Studies, NS 48 (1997) 116–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilpatrick, G. D., ‘Professor J. Schmid on the Greek text of the Apocalypse’, Vigiliae Christianae, 130 (1959), 1–13 (pp. 3–4)Google Scholar
Diobouniotis, K. and Harnack, A., Der Scholien-Kommentar des Origenes zur Apokalypse Johannis nebst einem Stück aus Irenaeus, Lib. V, Graece, TU, 38,3 (Leipzig, 1911), p. 81Google Scholar
Charles, R. H., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Revelation of St John, 2 vols. (Edinburgh, 1920), vol. 1, pp. clxxvi– clxxviiGoogle Scholar
Nerses of Lambron, Commentary on the Revelation of Saint John, translation of the Armenian text, notes and introduction by Thomson, Robert W., (Leuven, 2007), pp. 4–5Google Scholar
Alberigo, Giuseppe (ed.), Conciliorum Oecumenicorum Generaliumque Decreta, Concilium Constantinopolitanum 381 (Brepols 2006), p. 63
Bauer, Walter, Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity, ed. Kraft, R. A. and Krodel, G. from the 2nd German edn (1934), (Philadelphia, 1971), p. 45Google Scholar
Zuberi, Masarrat Husain, Aristotle 384–322 BC and Al Gazali 1058–1111 AD (Karachi, Pakistan, 1986)Google Scholar
Stephanides, B., Ecclesiastical History (Ἐκκλησιαστικὴ Ἱστορία) (Athens, 1959)Google Scholar
Diekamp, F., Doctrina Patrum De Incarnatione Verbi (Münster, 1907), p. 225Google Scholar
Roberts, Alexander and Donaldson, James, ‘Introductory Note to Clement of Alexandria’, The Ante-Nicene Fathers (Grand Rapids 1983), v. 2, p. 166Google Scholar
Theodoret de Cyr, Thérapeutique des maladies helléniques, ed. and French transl. by Canivet, Pierre, 2 vols. Paris 1958Google Scholar
Canivet, P., Histoire d’une enterprise apologétique au Ve siècle (Paris 1957), p. 162Google Scholar
Siniossoglou, N., Plato and Theodoret (Cambridge, 2008), p. 7, n. 19Google Scholar
des Places, É., ‘Le Platon de Théodoret: les citations des Lois et de l’Epinomis’, Revue des Études Greques, 68 (1955) 171–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Le Platon de Théodoret: les citations du Phédon, de la République et du Timée’, in Studi in onore di A. Calderini e R. Paribeni, (Milan, 1956), vol. I, pp. 325–336
Canivet, Pierre, Histoire d’une enterprise apologétique au Ve siècle . (Paris, 1957), p. 263Google Scholar
Canivet, P. (ed.), Théodoret de Cyr. Thérapeutique des maladies helléniques, Sources chrétiennes 57 (Paris, 1958)
Canivet, P. and Leroy-Molinghen, A. (eds.), Théodoret de Cyr. L’histoire des moines de Syrie, 2 vols., Sources chrétiennes 234, 257, (Paris, 1977–1979)
Harl, M., La chaîne Palestinienne sur le Psaume 118 (Origène, Eusèbe, Didyme, Apollinaire, Athanase, Théodoret), Sources chrétiennes, 189 (Paris, 1972)Google Scholar
Mercati, G., Note di letteratura biblica e cristiana antica (Studi e testi, 5), Rome, 1901, p. 29Google Scholar
Bethe, E., Pollucis Onomasticon, 2 vols. Lexicographi Graeci 9.1–9.2 (Leipzig, 1900–1931 (repr. 1967))Google Scholar
Lejay, Paul, article in the Catholic Encyclopedia, v. 9 (New York, 1913), lemma ‘Janus Lascaris’Google Scholar
Legrand, É., Cent-dix lettres greques de François Filelfe (Paris, 1892), pp. 363–366 (p. 366)Google Scholar
Irenaeus, , Contra Haereses, ed. Rousseau, A., Doutreleau, L., and Mercier, C., Irénée de Lyon. Contre les hérésies, livre 5, vol. 2, Sources chrétiennes 153 (Paris, 1969)Google Scholar
Otto, J. C. T., ed., Corpus apologetarum Christianorum saeculi secundi, vol. 5, 3rd edn. (Jena, 1881 (repr. 1969)), pp. 2–246
ed. Otto, J. C. T., Corpus apologetarum Christianorum saeculi secundi, vol. 4, third edn. [Jena, 1880 (repr. Wiesbaden, 1969], pp. 100–222
Funk, F. X., ‘Le pseudo-Justin et Théodore de Tarse’, Revue d’Histoire Ecclésiastique (1902), 947–971Google Scholar
Richard, M., ‘Les citations de Théodoret conservées dans la chaîne de Nicétas sur l’évangélie selon saint Luc’, Revue Biblique 43 (1934) 92Google Scholar
Grillmeier, Aloys, Christ in Christian Tradition, v. I, From the Apostolic Age to Chalcedon (451), tr. Bowden, J. S., revised 2nd edn (London, 1975), p. 368Google Scholar
Clayton, Paul, The Christology of Theodoret of Cyrus, (Oxford, 2007), p. 88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ignatius Aphram Barsoum, Patriarch, The Scattered Pearls: A History of Syriac Literature and Sciences, tr. Moosa, Matti (Piscataway, NJ, 2003), pp. 370–371Google Scholar
Klostermann, E., ‘Des Origenes Scholien-Kommentar zur Apocalypse Johannis’, Theologische Literaturzeitung, 37 (1912) 73– 74Google Scholar
Robinson, A., ‘Origen’s comments on the Apocalypse’, Journal of Theological Studies, 13 (1912) 295–97Google Scholar
Turner, C. H., ‘The text of the newly discovered Scholia of Origen on the Apocalypse’, Journal of Theological Studies, 13, (1912) 386–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Document: Origen Scholia in Apocalypsin’, Journal of Theological Studies, 25 (1923), 1–16
Wohlenberg, G. conceded the ascription with some reservations: ‘Noch einiges zu dem Scholien-Kommentar (des Origenes) zur Offenbarung Johannis’, Theologisches Literaturblatt, 33 (1912), 217–220Google Scholar
Kelly, J. F. T. thought that he had found medieval testimony that Origen had made Revelation an ad hoc concern of his: ‘Early Medieval evidence for twelve homilies by Origen on the Apocalypse’, Vigiliae Christianae, 39 (1985), 273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekamp, F. reviewing the initial edition of the Scholia, in Theologische Revue, 11 (1912) 51–55
de Boysson, A., ‘Avons-nous un commentaire d’Origène sur l’Apocalypse?’, Revue Biblique Internationale, NS 10 (1913) 555–567Google Scholar
Quasten, J., Patrology (Allen, Tx., 1975)Google Scholar
Strathmann, D., ‘Origenes und die Johannesoffenbarung’, Neue kirchliche Zeitschrift, 34 (1923) 228–236Google Scholar
Schmid, J., Studien zur Geschichte des griechischen Apokalypse-Textes, 1 Teil, (Munich, 1955), p. 158Google Scholar
Charles, R. H., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Revelation of St John, 2 vols. (Edinburgh, 1920), vol. 1, pp. clxxvi–lxxviiGoogle Scholar
Turner, C. H., ‘The text of the newly discovered Scholia of Origen on the Apocalypse’, Scholia i–xxvii: Journal of Theological Studies, 13, (1912) 386–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, C. H., ‘Document: Origen Scholia in Apocalypsin’, Journal of Theological Studies, 25 (1923) 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skard, Seuls addressed the problem in 1936 focusing on some parallels of the Scholia found in Origen. ‘Zum Scholien-Kommentar des Origenes zur Apokalypse Joannis’, Symbolae Osloenses, 15–16 (1936) 204–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stählin, O., who presented his conclusion in Berliner Philologische Wochenschrift, 32 (1912) 132–140
Schermann, T. in Theologische Revue, 11 (1912) 29
Nautin, P., Origène, (Paris 1977), p. 449Google Scholar
Junod, E., ‘A propos des soi-disant scholies sur l’Apocalypse d’Origène’, Rivista de Storia e Letteratura Religiosa (Firenze) 20 (1984), 112–121Google Scholar
Gumerlock, Francis X., ‘Patristic Commentaries on Revelation’, Kerux, 23 (2008) 3–13Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction
  • Edited and translated by P. Tzamalikos, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki
  • Book: An Ancient Commentary on the Book of Revelation
  • Online publication: 05 August 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139208758.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction
  • Edited and translated by P. Tzamalikos, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki
  • Book: An Ancient Commentary on the Book of Revelation
  • Online publication: 05 August 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139208758.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction
  • Edited and translated by P. Tzamalikos, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki
  • Book: An Ancient Commentary on the Book of Revelation
  • Online publication: 05 August 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139208758.003
Available formats
×