Book contents
- Translingual Practices
- Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact
- Translingual Practices
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Beyond Translingual Playfulness
- Part II Online Activism
- Part III Critical Pedagogy
- Part IV Ways Forward
- 12 Translanguaging as Mass
- 13 Afterword
- Index
- References
12 - Translanguaging as Mass
A Lay-Oriented Approach
from Part IV - Ways Forward
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 May 2024
Book contents
- Translingual Practices
- Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact
- Translingual Practices
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Beyond Translingual Playfulness
- Part II Online Activism
- Part III Critical Pedagogy
- Part IV Ways Forward
- 12 Translanguaging as Mass
- 13 Afterword
- Index
- References
Summary
In this chapter, the authors underline the need for a lay-oriented approach to translanguaging. They explicitly retain the trans-prefix – not merely to transcend the language systems and structures of the mainstream paradigm, i.e. ‘language’ as count, but to question the very nature of ‘language’ as mass. Adopting a southern perspective, they suggest that ‘language’ (mass) may possess multiple natures i.e. they move from a critique of ‘languages’ as socially constructed fixed-codes, i.e. hermetically sealed entities, to a critique of ‘language’ as having a universal ontology. They argue that linguistics needs to be lay-oriented, whereby ‘lay-orientedness’ is to be construed in two ways: (i) it takes seriously the most diverse cultural and individual views on what constitutes ‘language’ (and ‘a language’), i.e. it moves beyond northern folklinguistic categories and conceptions to include the Global South as a rich field of radically different lay metalinguistic discourses. And (ii), it theorizes language and communication in ways lay people might not express it, while allowing them to recognize their own communicational practices in the theory, irrespective of cultural differences. On that view, ‘languaging’ is not a separate or separable activity – pace translanguaging scholarship – the reason being that it does not possess a determinate ontology.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Translingual PracticesPlayfulness and Precariousness, pp. 221 - 236Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Alim, S., Reyes, A., & Kroskrity, P. (2020). The field of language and race: A linguistic anthropological approach to race, racism, and racialization. In Alim, H. S., Reyes, A., and Kroskrity, P. V. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language and Race. (pp. 1–24). Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amselle, J-L. (2020). On cultural and linguistic specificities. In Diagne, S. B. and& Amselle, J-L (eds.), In Search of Africa. (pp. 50–60). Cambridge & Malden, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Asante, M. (1998). Afrocentricity: The Theory of Social Change. Philadelphia, PA, Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, R. (2004). Speaking Potlids from the Lower Congo (Cabinda)/Angola. In Beck, R. and Wittman, F. (eds.), African Media Cultures –Transdisciplinary Perspectives. Cultures des medias en Afrique. Perspectives transdisciplinaires – Topics in African Studies, Vol. 2, (pp. 99–122). Cologne, Koppe.Google Scholar
Bou, A. N. (2019). Toward Translingual Realities in Composition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Canut, C. (2022). Provincializing language. In Makoni, S., Kaiper-Marquez, X, and Mokwena, L. (eds.), Language in the Global Souths. (pp. 45–57). London & New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Cornell, D., & van Marle, K. (2015). Ubuntu feminism: Tentative reflections. Verbum et Ecclesia 36(2). Article 1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980). A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis, University Press.Google Scholar
Descola, P. (2013). Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Souza, L. M. (2022). Foreword. In Antia, B. & Makoni, S. (eds.), Southernizing Sociolinguistics, (xiv–xviii). London & New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Deumert, A. (2019). The mangrove or moving with and beyond the rhizome. www.diggitmagazine.com/column/mangrove/-or-moving-and-beyond-rhizomeGoogle Scholar
Deumert, A., & Makoni, S. (2023). (eds.), From Southern Theory to Decolonizing Sociolinguistics, Voices, Questions and Alternatives. Bristol, Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncker, D. (2022). Methodology in language research – a sailing between Scylla and Charybdis. Forum Linguistico, 9, 7190–205.Google Scholar
Guldin, R. (2020). Metaphors of Multilingualism: Changing Attitudes towards Language Diversity in Literature, Linguistics and Philosophy. London & New York, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, C., & Wicaksono, R. (2020). Ontologies of English: Conceptualising the Language for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. (1984). The semiologiy of textualization. Language Sciences 6(2), 271–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. (2011). On ultimate questions. Integrationist Notes and Papers 2009–2011, 91–8. Gamlingay, Bright Pen.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (2012). Any questions? Integrationist Notes and Papers 2012, 83–96. Gamlingay, Bright Pen.Google Scholar
Hauck, J. D., & Heurich, G. O. (2018). Language in the Amerindian imagination: An inquiry into linguistic natures. Language & Communication, 63, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, C. (2022). Can there be a politics of language? Reflections on language and metalanguage. In Antia, B. and Makoni, S. (eds.), Southernizing Sociolinguistics, (pp. 17–32). London & New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karkov, N., & Valivcharska, Z. (2018). Rethinking East-European socialism: Notes toward an anti-capitalist decolonial methodology. Intervention: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, 20(5), 1–27.Google Scholar
Makalela, L. (2016). Ubuntu translanguaging: An alternative framework for complex multilingual encounters. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 34(3), 187–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30.Google Scholar
Makoni, S. (1998). African languages as European scripts: The shaping of communal memory. In Nuttall, S and Cotzee, C (eds.), Negotiating the Past: The Making of Memory in South Africa (pp. 242–8). South Africa: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Makoni, S. (2003). From misinvention to disinvention of language: multilingualism and the South African Constitution. In Makoni, S, Smitherman, G., Ball, A., and Spears, A. (eds.), Black Linguistics: Language, Society and Politics in Africa and the Americas (pp. 132–53). London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Makoni, S. (2011). Sociolinguistics, colonial and postcolonial: An integrationist perspective. Language Sciences 33: 680–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (2007). (eds.), Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages. Bristol, Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Makoni, S., Kaiper-Marquez, A., & Verity, D. (2021). (eds.), Integrationism and Philosophy of Language in the Global South. London & New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Makoni, S., & Pablé, A. (2022). Decolonial integrational linguistics: A critical discussion. Journal of Postcolonial Linguistics, 8, 1–24.Google Scholar
Mignolo, W. (2007). De-linking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies, 21 (2), 449–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignolo, W. (2018). On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis. Durham, NC, Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Molefi, A. (1998). The Afrocentric Idea. (Revised and expanded edition), Philadelphia, Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Molefi, A. (2021). An Afrocentric Manifesto: Toward an African Renaissance. Cambridge & Malden, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Monteiro-Ferreira, A. (2015). Demise of the Inhuman, the Afrocentricity, Modernism, and Postmodernism. Albany, NJ, Suny Press.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, N., & Preston, D. (1999). Folk Linguistics. Berlin & New York, Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Neimanis, A. (2017). Bodies of Water: Posthuman Feminist Phenomenology. London, Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Orman, J. (2013). New lingualisms, same old codes. Language Sciences, 37, 90–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orman, J., & Pablé, A. (2016). Polylanguaging, integrational linguistics and contemporary sociolinguistic theory: A commentary on Ritzau. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19 (5), 592–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pablé, A. (2019a). In what sense is integrational theory lay-oriented? Notes on Harrisian core concepts and explanatory terminology. Language Sciences, 72 (1), 150–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pablé, A. (2019b). Is a general non-ethnocentric theory of human communication possible? An integrationist approach. Lingua, 230, Article 102735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pablé, A. (2021). Three critical perspectives on the ontology of ‘language’. In Makoni, S., Kaiper-Marquez, A., and Verity, D. (eds.), Integrationism and Philosophy of Language in the Global South (pp. 30–47). London & New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2016). Mobile times, mobile terms. The Trans-super-poly-metro movement. In Coupland, N. (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates (pp. 201–16). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A., & Makoni, S. (2020). Innovations and Challenges in Applied Linguistics from the Global South. London & New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Prah, K. (2018). The Challenge of Decolonizing Education, 128. Cape Town, South Africa, Centre for the Advanced Studies of African Societies.Google Scholar
Sabino, R. (2021). Beyond IL: Languaging without languages. In Makoni, S., Kaiper-Maquez, A., and Verity, D. (eds.), Integrationism and Philosophy of Language in the Global South (pp. 183–96). London & New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Severo, C., & Makoni, S. (2021a). Integrationism and the Global South: Songs as epistemic frameworks. In Makoni, S., Kaiper-Marquez, A., and Verity, D. (eds.), Integrationism and Philosophy of Language in the Global South (pp. 156–69). London & New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Severo, C., & Makoni, S. (2021b). Can Southern epistemological and Indigenous ontological orientations to applied linguistics challenge its ethnocentrism? In Cunningham, C. and Hall, C. (eds.), Vulnerabilities, Challenges and Risks in Applied Linguistics (pp. 15–31). Bristol, Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, P., & Peters, K. (2015). Wet ontologies, fluid spaces: Giving depth to volume through oceanic thinking. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33 (2), 247–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taiwo, O. (2019). Rethinking the decolonization trope in philosophy. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 57, 135–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tlostanova, M. (2014). On last crisitunities, vanishing postsoviet and decolonization of thinking, being and perception. Journal of Colonial and Religious Theory, 13(1), 53–67.Google Scholar
wa Thiong’o, N. (1986). Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. Melton, UK, James Currey.Google Scholar
Yan, R. (2022). Translanguaging space: Prolegomena to an integrational critique. Forum Linguistico, 19, 7248–62.Google Scholar