Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:08:02.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Regional-to-global patterns of biodiversity, and what they have to say about mechanisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

By
David J. Currie
Edited by
David Storch ,
Pablo Marquet  and
James Brown
David J. Currie
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
David Storch
Affiliation:
Charles University, Prague
Pablo Marquet
Affiliation:
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
James Brown
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
Get access

Summary

Introduction

One of the most striking patterns in ecology is broad-scale variation of species richness (e.g. Fig. 13.1). Ecologists have noted these patterns for at least two centuries (von Humboldt & Bonpland, 1807; Wallace, 1878). Since then, geographical patterns of diversity have been extensively documented (see references in Table 1 in Hawkins et al., 2003a) and numerous reviews and textbooks have discussed factors hypothesized to have generated them (Huston, 1994; Rosenzweig, 1995; Chesson, 2000).

Two distinct points of view have characterized this discussion. The first, I would characterize as the multiple substituting influences family of hypotheses. According to this view, a wide variety of factors influence richness in very context-specific manners. The second view, I will call the strong constraint family of hypotheses. These hypotheses propose that, as in physical systems, a small number of general principles exert strong constraints on the behavior of ecological systems. Thus, the propensity (sensu Popper, 1990) of ecological systems to behave in particular ways can be related to one, or a small number of variables, while the rest of the world's complexity adds a bit of noise.

To reveal my own prejudice, I believe that the goal of science is to develop predictive models of the behavior of natural systems (Peters, 1991; Rigler & Peters, 1995). A search for strong propensities, perhaps reflecting strong constraints, is a logical way to begin to approach this goal.

Type
Chapter
Information
Scaling Biodiversity , pp. 258 - 282
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. M. & Woodward, F. I. (1989). Patterns in tree species richness as a test of the glacial extinction hypothesis. Nature, 339, 699–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, A. P., Brown, J. H. & Gillooly, J. F. (2002). Global biodiversity, biochemical kinetics, and the energetic-equivalence rule. Science, 297, 1545–1548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, K. J. & Jetz, W. (2005). The broad-scale ecology of energy expenditure of endotherms. Ecology Letters, 8, 310–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthlott, W., Lauer, W. P. A. & Placke, A. (1996). Global distribution of species diversity in vascular plants: toward a world map of phytodiversity. Erkunde, 50, 317–327.Google Scholar
Brown, J. H. (1981). Two decades of homage to Santa Rosalia: toward a general theory of diversity. American Zoologist, 21, 877–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. H. & Lomolino, M. V. (1998). Biogeography. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Brown, J. H., Gillooly, J. F., Allen, A. P., Savage, V. M. & West, G. B. (2004). Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology, 85, 1771–1789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bystrak, D. (1981). The North American Breeding Bird Survey. Studies in Avian Biology, 6, 34–41.Google Scholar
Chesson, P. (2000). Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics, 31, 343–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, J. H. (1978). Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science, 199, 1302–1310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, R. E. (1969). Variation in species density of North American birds. Systematic Zoology, 18, 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, D. J. (1991). Energy and large scale patterns of animal and plant species richness. American Naturalist, 137, 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, D. J. & Paquin, V. (1987). Large-scale biogeographical patterns of species richness in trees. Nature, 329, 326–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, D. J., Mittelbach, G. G., Cornell, H. V., et al. (2004). Predictions and tests of climate-based hypotheses of broad-scale variation in taxonomic richness. Ecology Letters, 7, 1121–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, A. & Currie, D. J. (1998). Global patterns of tree species richness in moist forests: another look. Oikos, 81, 598–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, A. P. & Currie, D. J. (2003). A globally-consistent richness-climate relationship for angiosperms. American Naturalist, 161, 523–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukami, T. & Morin, P. J. (2003). Productivity-diversity relationships depend upon the history of the community assembly. Nature, 424, 423–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, B. A., Field, R., Cornell, H. V., et al. (2003a). Energy, water, and broad-scale patterns of species richness. Ecology, 84, 3105–3117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, B. A., Porter, E. E. & Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. (2003b). Productivity and history as predictors of the latitudinal diversity gradient of terrestrial birds. Ecology, 84, 1608–1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heywood, V. H. (1993). Flowering Plants of the World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holt, R. D., Lawton, J. H., Polis, G. A. & Martinez, N. D. (1999). Trophic rank and the species-area relationship. Ecology, 80(5), 1495–1504.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, A. H. (2004). Species-energy relationships and habitat complexity in bird communities. Ecology Letters, 7, 714–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huston, M. (1994). Biological Diversity: The Coexistence of Species on a Changing Landscape. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E. (1959). Homage to Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many kinds of animals? American Naturalist, 93, 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, J. T. & Packer, L. (1997). Habitat heterogeneity as a determinant of mammal species richness in high-energy regions. Nature, 385, 252–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleidon, A. & Mooney, H. A. (2000). A global distribution of biodiversity inferred from climatic constraints: results from a process-based modelling study. Global Change Biology, 6, 507–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latham, R. E. & Ricklefs, R. E. (1993a). Continental comparisons of temperate-zone tree species diversity. In Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and Geographical Perspectives, ed. Ricklefs, R. E. & Schluter, D., pp. 294–314. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Latham, R. E. & Ricklefs, R. E. (1993b). Global patterns of tree species richness in moist forests – energy-diversity theory does not account for variation in species richness. Oikos, 67, 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, J. H. (1999). Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos, 84, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieth, H. (1975). Modeling the primary productivity of the world. In Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, ed. Lieth, H. & Whittaker, R. H., pp. 237–263. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, E. J. Jr. (1971). Atlas of United States Trees. Vols. 1–5. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittelbach, G., Steiner, C., Scheiner, S. M., et al. (2001). What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology, 82, 2381–2396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmper, M. W. & White, P. S. (1994). Scale dependence and the species-area relationship. American Naturalist, 144, 717–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pautasso, M. G. & Gaston, K. J. (2005). Resources and global avian assemblage structure in forests. Ecology Letters, 8, 282–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, R. H. (1983). The Ecological Implications of Body Size. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, R. H. (1991). A Critique for Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Petit, R. J., Aguinagalde, I., Beaulieu, J.-L., et al. (2003). Glacial refugia: hotspots but not melting pots of genetic diversity. Science, 300, 1563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, O. & Miller, J. S. (2002). Global Patterns of Plant Diversity: Alwyn H. Gentry's Forest Transect Data Set. St. Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1990). A World of Propensities. Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar
Qian, H. & Ricklefs, R. E. (1999). A comparison of the taxonomic richness of vascular plants in China and the United States. American Naturalist, 154, 160–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qian, H. & Ricklefs, R. E. (2004). Taxon richness and climate in angiosperms: is there a globally consistent relationship that precludes region effects? American Naturalist, 163, 773–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E., Latham, R. E. & Qian, H. (1999). Global patterns of tree species richness in moist forests: distinguishing ecological influences and historical contingency. Oikos, 86, 369–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigler, F. H. & Peters, R. H. (1995). Science and Limnology. Oldendorf/Luhe: Ecology Institute.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1968). Net primary productivity of terrestrial communities: predictions from climatological data. American Naturalist, 102, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1995). Species Diversity in Time and Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, J. R., Hines, J. E. & Fallon, J. (2004). The North American Breeding Brid Survey, Results and Analysis 1966–2003. Version 2004.1. Laurel, MD: USES Patuxent Wildlife Research Center.Google Scholar
Sax, D. F. (2001). Latitudinal gradients and geographic ranges of exotic species: implications for biogeography. Journal of Biogeography, 28, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schall, J. J. & Pianka, E. R. (1978). Geographical trends in the numbers of species. Science, 201, 679–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, F. (2001). Historical regulation of local species richness across a geographic region. Ecology, 82, 792–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starnes, W. C. & Etnier, D. A. (1986). Drainage evolution and fish biogeography of the Tennessee and Cumberlan Rivers drainage realm. In The Zoogeography of North American Fishes, ed. Hocutt, C. H. & Wiley, E. O., pp. 325–362. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Stohlgren, T. J., Binkley, D., Chong, G. W., et al. (1999). Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecological Monographs, 69, 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venevsky, S. & Veneskaia, I. (2003). Large-scale energetic and landscape factors of vegetation diversity. Ecology Letters, 6, 1004–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humboldt, A. & Bonpland, A. (1807). Essai sur la géographie des plantes accompagné d'un tableau physique des régions équinoxales. Paris: Shoell, reprinted by Arno Press, New York.Google Scholar
Wallace, A. R. (1878). Tropical Nature and Other Essays. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. H. (1983). Species-energy theory: an extension of species-area theory. Oikos, 41, 496–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. H., Currie, D. J. & Maurer, B. A. (1993). Energy supply and patterns of species richness on local and regional scales. In Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and Geographical Perspectives, ed. Ricklefs, R. E. & Schluter, D., pp. 66–74. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×