Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-8qdnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T21:40:16.832Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

W. E. Saris and A. van Meurs (Eds.). Evaluation of Measurement by Meta-Analysis of Multitrait Multimethod Studies. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990, 231 pp.

Review products

W. E. Saris and A. van Meurs (Eds.). Evaluation of Measurement by Meta-Analysis of Multitrait Multimethod Studies. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990, 231 pp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Herbert W. Marsh
Herbert W. Marsh*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, University of Western Sydney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 145 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, F. M. (1984). Construct-validity and error-components of survey measures: A structural modelling approach. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 409–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagozzi, R. P., Phillips, L. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 421–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, M. W. (1984). The decomposition of multitrait-multimethod matrices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, M. W., Shapiro, A. (1988). Robustness of normal theory methods in the analysis of linear latent variable models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 41, 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (1989). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitrait-multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 335–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Hocevar, D. (1988). A new, more powerful approach to multitrait-multimethod analyses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satorra, A. (1989). Alternative test criteria in covariance structure analysis: A unified approach. Psychometrika, 54, 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar