No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 January 2008
1. Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia)
On 2 July 1993, in pursuance of a Special Agreement of 7 April 1993, Hungary and Slovakia requested the Court to determine certain issues arising out of the implementation and termination of a 1977 Agreement on the construction and operation of the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros barrage system. In its judgment of 25 September 199790 the Court found both States to be in breach of their obligations and called on them to negotiate a settlement in good faith.91 On 3 September 1998 Slovakia filed a request for an additional judgment, arguing that Hungary was unwilling to implement the judgment92 and it was subsequently agreed that Hungary would file a written statement of its position regarding this request by 7 December 1998.93
2. Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v Democratic Republic of the Congo) Guinea instituted proceedings against the Democratic Republic of Congo on 28 December 1998 alleging grave breaches of international law perpetrated upon a national of Guinea. By an order of 25 November 199994 the following time limits were set for the submission of written pleadings: Republic of Guinea, memorial, 11 September 2000; Democratic Republic of the Congo, counter-memorial, 11 September 2001. By an order of 8 September 200095 these were extended to: Republic of Guinea, memorial, 23 March 2001; Democratic Republic of the Congo, counter-memorial, 4 October 2002. On 3 October 2002 the Democratic Republic of the Congo filed preliminary objections to the admissibility of the Application and in an order of 7 November 200296 the Court fixed 7 July 2003 as the time limit for submission of written observations by the Republic of Guinea. On 18 July 2006, the Court set 27 November 2006 as the date for the opening of public hearings on preliminary objections in relation to the case.97 The public hearings concluded on 1 December 2006 at which time the Court commenced its deliberations.98 The Court gave its decision in the case on 24 May 2007.99
90 ICJ Rep 1777, 7.Google Scholar
91 See Okowa, PN, Case Note, (1998) 47 ICLQ 688.Google Scholar
92 ICJ Press Communiqué No 98/28.
93 ibid No 98/31.
94 [1999] ICJ Rep 1042.Google Scholar
95 [2000] ICJ Rep 146.Google Scholar
96 [2002] ICJ Rep 607.Google Scholar
97 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2006/30.
98 ibid No 2006/41.
99 ibid No 2007/12.
100 [1999] ICJ Rep 1015.Google Scholar
101 [2000] ICJ Rep 3.Google Scholar
102 [2000] ICJ Rep 108.Google Scholar
103 [2002] ICJ Rep 610.Google Scholar
104 [2000] ICJ Rep 6.Google Scholar
105 [2002] ICJ Rep 216.Google Scholar
106 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2006/31.
107 ibid No 2007/9.
108 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2001/34.
109 [2002] ICJ Rep 189.Google Scholar
110 [2003] ICJ Rep 158.Google Scholar
111 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2006/37.
112 ibid No 2002/37.
113 ibid No 2003/14.
114 [2003] ICJ Rep 102.Google Scholar See Turns, D, Case Note (2004) 53 ICLQ 775.Google Scholar
115 [2003] ICJ Rep 143.Google Scholar
116 [2004] ICJ Rep 130.Google Scholar
117 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2004/38.
118 ibid No 2005/1.
119 ibid No 2006/2.
120 [2003] ICJ Rep 146.Google Scholar
121 ICJ Press Communiqué No 2005/3.
122 ibid No 2006/38.
123 ibid No 2004/34.
124 ibid No 2006/24.
125 ibid No 2005/24.
126 ibid No 2006/16.
127 ibid No 2006/23.
128 ibid No 2006/17.
129 ibid No 2006/22.
130 ibid No 2006/28.
131 ibid No 2006/29.
132 ibid No 2006/40.
133 ibid No 2006/44.
134 ibid No 2007/2.
135 ibid No 2006/1.
136 ibid No 2006/32.
137 ibid No 2006/39.