No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 May 2025
Japanese lawyers and activists supporting compensation lawsuits for Chinese forced labor in wartime Japan once called Chinese attorney Kang Jian the “window.” The term acknowledged Kang's pivotal role in coordinating between plaintiffs typically located in the Chinese countryside and Japanese legal teams pressing claims on their behalf in a dozen courtrooms across Japan over the past decade.
Chinese version of this article is also available: https://apjjf.org/data/KangRejected_By_All_PlaintiffsChinese.pdf
[1] This article is a revised version of my previous article entitled A “Settlement” Based on the Premise of the Right to Claim Being Waived - Comment on the Nishimatsu-Shinanogawa “Settlement” published in China Legal Daily and People's Daily OnlinePeopl on May 18, 2010.
[2] For the Nishimatsu-Shinanagawa Settlement Agreement refer to Appendix A for the Japanese version and Appendix B for the translated Chinese version as provided by the Japanese lawyers representing the Chinese victims.
[3] Refer to Appendix E - Statement issued by Canada ALPHA on March 25, 2010.
[4] Besides Han Yinglin, the other 4 forced labor plaintiffs all passed away during the course of the litigation. Their descendants who inherited their legal status as plaintiffs were formally recognized by the Japan courts.
[5] For Confirmation Items refer to Appendix C for the Japanese version and Appendix D for the translated Chinese version as provided by the Japanese lawyers representing the Chinese victims.
[6] For Prof. Guan Jianqiang's article refer to Appendix F.
[7] For the “Proposal on the Complete Resolution of the Issue of Abduction of the Chinese People to Japan for Forced Labor during Wartime” refer to Appendix G.