Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:39:21.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Structural imaging of Alzheimer's disease

from Section IV - Cognitive Disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2011

By
Liana G. Apostolova  and
Paul M. Thompson
Edited by
Martha E. Shenton  and
Bruce I. Turetsky
Liana G. Apostolova
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology David Geffen School of Medicine University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA, USA
Paul M. Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology David Geffen School of Medicine University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA, USA
Martha E. Shenton
Affiliation:
VA Boston Healthcare System and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Bruce I. Turetsky
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common neurodegenerative disorder worldwide, is the sixth most common overall cause of death in the USA. It ranks third in health care costs in the USA after heart disease and cancer, and claims an estimated $156 billion USD in direct and indirect costs annually (Wimo et al.,2006). An estimated 13 million elderly will be diagnosed with dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT) by the year 2050 in the USA alone (Hebert et al., 2003). As a result of the global aging of the population of all developed countries, the socioeconomic impact of DAT will continue to rise. By the time DAT is clinically diagnosed with current criteria, AD pathology has already spread widely in the brain. To ameliorate the personal and economic impact of DAT, we need to improve on our abilities to diagnose and treat patients as early as possible. This requires improved neuroimaging methods to track pathology in the living brain, and improved computational methods to identify factors that accelerate or resist disease progression.

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an intermediate cognitive state prior to dementia onset, in which people experience some cognitive changes but continue to do well in their daily activities. MCI carries a 4–6-fold increased risk of future diagnosis of dementia. Approximately 10–15% of MCI subjects transition into DAT annually (Petersen, 2007; Petersen et al., 2001), making the MCI state the single most important risk factor of future diagnosis of dementia.

Type
Chapter
Information
Understanding Neuropsychiatric Disorders
Insights from Neuroimaging
 , pp. 313 - 331
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aganj, I, Sapiro, G, Parikshak, N, Madsen, S K and Thompson, P M. 2009. Measurement of cortical thickness from MRI by minimum line integrals on soft-classified tissue. Hum Brain Mapp 30, 3188–99.Google Scholar
Apostolova, L G, Akopyan, G G, Partiali, N, et al. 2007a. Structural correlates of apathy in Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 24, 91–7.Google Scholar
Apostolova, L G, Beyer, M K, Green, A E, et al. 2010d. Hippocampal, caudate and ventricular changes in Parkinson's disease with and without dementia. Mov Disord 25, 687–8.Google Scholar
Apostolova, L G, Dinov, I D, Dutton, R A, et al. 2006a. 3D comparison of hippocampal atrophy in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Brain 129, 2867–73.Google Scholar
Apostolova, L G, Dutton, R A, Dinov, I D et al. 2006b. Conversion of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease predicted by hippocampal atrophy maps. Arch Neurol 63, 693–9.Google Scholar
Apostolova, L G, Lu, P, Rogers, S, et al. 2008. 3D mapping of language networks in clinical and pre-clinical Alzheimer's disease. Brain Lang 104, 33–41.Google Scholar
Apostolova, L G, Lu, P H, Rogers, S, et al. 2006c. 3D mapping of mini-mental state examination performance in clinical and preclinical Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 20, 224–31.Google Scholar
Apostolova, L G, Mosconi, L, Thompson, P M, et al. 2010a. Subregional hippocampal atrophy predicts future decline to Alzheimer's dementia in cognitively normal subjects. Neurobiol Aging 31, 1077–1088.Google Scholar
Apostolova, L G, Steiner, C A, Akopyan, G G, et al. 2007b. Three-dimensional gray matter atrophy mapping in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 64, 1489–95.Google Scholar
Apostolova, L G and Thompson, P M. 2007. Brain mapping as a tool to study neurodegeneration. Neurotherapeutics 4, 387–400.Google Scholar
Apostolova, L G and Thompson, P M. 2008. Mapping progressive brain structural changes in early Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia 46, 1597–612.Google Scholar
Apostolova, L G, Thompson, P M, Green, A E, et al. 2010b. 3D comparison of low, intermediate and advanced hippocampal atrophy in MCI. Brain 31, 786–97.Google Scholar
Apostolova, L G, Thompson, P M, Rogers, S A, et al. 2010c. Surface feature-guided mapping of longitudinal FDG-PET changes in nondemented elderly. Mol Imag Biol 12, 218–24.Google Scholar
Ashburner, J. 2007. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage 38, 95–113.Google Scholar
Ashburner, J and Friston, K J. 2000. Voxel-based morphometry – The methods. Neuroimage 11, 805–21.Google Scholar
Ashburner, J and Friston, K J. 2005. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 26, 839–51.Google Scholar
Bakkour, A, Morris, J C and Dickerson, B C. 2009. The cortical signature of prodromal AD. Regional thinning predicts mild AD dementia. Neurology 72, 1048–55.Google Scholar
Ballmaier, M, O'Brien, J T, Burton, E J, et al. 2004. Comparing gray matter loss profiles between dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer's disease using cortical pattern matching: Diagnosis and gender effects. Neuroimage 23, 325–35.Google Scholar
Bearden, C E, Thompson, P M, Dalwani, M, et al. 2007. Greater cortical gray matter density in lithium-treated patients with bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry 62, 7–16.Google Scholar
Bookstein, F L. 2001. “Voxel-based morphometry” should not be used with imperfectly registered images. Neuroimage 14, 1454–62.Google Scholar
Braak, H and Braak, E. 1991. Neuropathological staging of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 82, 239–59.Google Scholar
Braskie, M N, Klunder, A D, Hayashi, K M, et al. 2010. Plaque and tangle imaging and cognition in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging Nov 10. 31, 1669–78.
Carmichael, O T, Aizenstein, H A, Davis, S W, et al. 2005. Atlas-based hippocampus segmentation in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neuroimage 27, 979–90.Google Scholar
Carmichael, O T, Kuller, L H, Lopez, O L, et al. 2007. Ventricular volume and dementia progression in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Neurobiol Aging 28, 389–97.Google Scholar
Chiang, M C, Dutton, R A, Hayashi, K M, et al. 2007. 3D pattern of brain atrophy in HIV/AIDS visualized using tensor-based morphometry. Neuroimage 34, 44–60.Google Scholar
Chou, Y, Lepore, N, Avedissian, C, et al. 2009. Mapping correlations between ventricular expansion and CSF amyloid and tau biomarkers in 240 subjects with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment and elderly controls. Neuroimage 46, 394–410.Google Scholar
Chou, Y, Lepore, N, Zubicaray, G, et al. 2007. Automated 3D mapping and shape analysis of the lateral ventricles via fluid registration of multiple surface-based atlases. Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro. Arlington, VA: IEEE Press, 1288–91.
Chou, Y, Lepore, N, Zubicaray, G, et al. 2008a. Automated ventricular mappping with multi-atlas fluid image allignment reveals genetic effects in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage 40, 615–30.Google Scholar
Chou, Y Y, Lepore, N, Zubicaray, G I, et al. 2008b. Automated ventricular mapping with multi-atlas fluid image alignment reveals genetic effects in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage 40, 615–30.Google Scholar
Christensen, G E, Rabbitt, R D and Miller, M I. 1996. Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics. IEEE Trans Image Process 5, 1435–47.Google Scholar
Chupin, M, Mukuna-Bantumbakulu, A R, Hasboun, D, et al. 2007. Anatomically constrained region deformation for the automated segmentation of the hippocampus and the amygdala: Method and validation on controls and patients with Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage 34, 996–1019.Google Scholar
Crum, W R, Scahill, R I and Fox, N C. 2001. Automated hippocampal segmentation by regional fluid registration of serial MRI: Validation and application in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage 13, 847–55.Google Scholar
Csernansky, J G, Wang, L, Joshi, S, et al. 2000. Early DAT is distinguished from aging by high-dimensional mapping of the hippocampus. Dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neurology 55, 1636–43.Google Scholar
Csernansky, J G, Wang, L, Swank, J, et al. 2005. Preclinical detection of Alzheimer's disease: Hippocampal shape and volume predict dementia onset in the elderly. Neuroimage 25, 783–92.Google Scholar
Cummings, J L, Doody, R and Clark, C. 2007. Disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer disease: Challenges to early intervention. Neurology 69, 1622–34.Google Scholar
Leon, M J, Mosconi, L, Blennow, K, et al. 2007. Imaging and CSF studies in the preclinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1097, 114–45.Google Scholar
Toledo-Morrell, L, Dickerson, B, Sullivan, M P, Spanovic, C, Wilson, R and Bennett, D A. 2000. Hemispheric differences in hippocampal volume predict verbal and spatial memory performance in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Hippocampus 10, 136–42.Google Scholar
Dickerson, B C, Bakkour, A, Salat, D H, et al. 2009. The cortical signature of Alzheimer's disease: Regionally specific cortical thinning relates to symptom severity in very mild to mild AD dementia and is detectable in asymptomatic amyloid-positive individuals. Cereb Cortex 19, 497–510.Google Scholar
Dickerson, B C and Sperling, R A. 2008. Functional abnormalities of the medial temporal lobe memory system in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: Insights from functional MRI studies. Neuropsychologia 46, 1624–35.Google Scholar
Dubois, B and Albert, M L. 2004. Amnestic MCI or prodromal Alzheimer's disease? Lancet Neurology 3, 246–8.Google Scholar
Dubois, B, Feldman, H H, Jacova, C, et al. 2007. Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurol 6, 734–46.Google Scholar
Durrleman, S, Pennec, X, Trouve, A, Thompson, P and Ayache, N. 2008. Inferring brain variability from diffeomorphic deformations of currents: An integrative approach. Med Image Anal 12, 626–37.Google Scholar
Duyckaerts, C and Dickson, D W. 2003. Neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease. In Dickson, D W (Ed.) Neurodegeneration: The Molecular Pathology of Dementia and Movement Disorders. Basel: ISN Neuropath Press, pp. 47–65.
Fischl, B, Salat, D H, Busa, E, et al. 2002. Whole brain segmentation: Automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 33, 341–55.Google Scholar
Fischl, B, Salat, D H, Kouwe, A J, et al. 2004. Sequence-independent segmentation of magnetic resonance images. Neuroimage 23 (Suppl 1), S69–84.Google Scholar
Fox, N C, Warrington, E K and Rossor, M N. 1999. Serial magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral atrophy in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Lancet 353, 2125.Google Scholar
Freund, Y and Shapire, R. 1997. A decision-theoretic generalization of online learning and an application to boosting. J Comp Sys Sci 55, 119–39.Google Scholar
Frisoni, G B, Pievani, M, Testa, C, et al. 2007. The topography of grey matter involvement in early and late onset Alzheimer's disease. Brain 130, 720–30.Google Scholar
Gogtay, N, Giedd, J N, Lusk, L, et al. 2004. Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 8174–9.Google Scholar
Golland, P, Grimson, W E, Shenton, M E and Kikinis, R. 2005. Detection and analysis of statistical differences in anatomical shape. Med Image Anal 9, 69–86.Google Scholar
Grundman, M, Jack, C R, Petersen, R C, et al. 2003. Hippocampal volume is associated with memory but not monmemory cognitive performance in patients with mild cognitive impairment. J Mol Neurosci 20, 241–8.Google Scholar
Hammers, A, Heckemann, R, Koepp, M J, et al. 2007. Automatic detection and quantification of hippocampal atrophy on MRI in temporal lobe epilepsy: A proof-of-principle study. Neuroimage 36, 38–47.Google Scholar
Haroutunian, V, Perl, D P, Purohit, D P, et al. 1998. Regional distribution of neuritic plaques in the nondemented elderly and subjects with very mild Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 55, 1185–91.Google Scholar
Hebert, L E, Scherr, P A, Bienias, J L, Bennett, D A and Evans, D A. 2003. Alzheimer disease in the US population: Prevalence estimates using the 2000 census. Arch Neurol 60, 1119–22.Google Scholar
Hogan, R E, Mark, K E, Wang, L, Joshi, S, Miller, M I and Bucholz, R D. 2000. Mesial temporal sclerosis and temporal lobe epilepsy: MR imaging deformation-based segmentation of the hippocampus in five patients. Radiology 216, 291–7.Google Scholar
Hua, X, Leow, A D, Parikshak, N, et al. 2008. Tensor-based morphometry as a neuroimaging biomarker for Alzheimer's disease: An MRI study of 676 AD, MCI, and normal subjects. Neuroimage 43, 458–69.Google Scholar
Jack, C R, Bernstein, M A, Fox, N C, et al. 2008. The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): MRI methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 27, 685–91.Google Scholar
Jack, C R, Shiung, M M, Gunter, J L, et al. 2004. Comparison of different MRI brain atrophy rate measures with clinical disease progression in AD. Neurology 62, 591–600.Google Scholar
Joshi, A A, Shattuck, D W, Thompson, P M and Leahy, R M. 2007. Surface-constrained volumetric brain registration using harmonic mappings. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 26, 1657–69.Google Scholar
Klein, A, Andersson, J, Ardekani, B A, et al. 2009. Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage 46, 786–802.Google Scholar
Lao, Z, Shen, D, Jawad, A, et al. 2006. Automated segmentation of white matter lesions in 3D brain MRI images, using multivariate pattern classification. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging. Arlington, VA, IEEE Press, pp. 307–10.
Leow, A, Yu, C L, Lee, S J, et al. 2005. Brain structural mapping using a novel hybrid implicit/explicit framework based on the level-set method. Neuroimage 24, 910–27.Google Scholar
Leow, A D, Yanovsky, I, Parikshak, N, et al. 2009. Alzheimer's Neuroimaging Initiative: A one-year follow-up study correlating degenerative rates, biomarkers and cognition. Neuroimage 45, 645–55.Google Scholar
Lepore, N, Brun, C, Chou, Y Y, et al. 2008. Generalized tensor-based morphometry of HIV/AIDS using multivariate statistics on deformation tensors. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27, 129–41.Google Scholar
Lerch, J P, Pruessner, J C, Zijdenbos, A, et al. 2005. Focal decline of cortical thickness in Alzheimer's disease identified by computational neuroanatomy. Cereb Cortex 15, 995–1001.Google Scholar
Lerch, J P, Pruessner, J, Zijdenbos, A P, et al. 2008. Automated cortical thickness measurements from MRI can accurately separate Alzheimer's patients from normal elderly controls. Neurobiol Aging 29, 23–30.Google Scholar
Lin, J J, Salamon, N, Lee, A D, et al. 2007. Reduced neocortical thickness and complexity mapped in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis. Cereb Cortex 17, 2007–18.Google Scholar
Liu, L M, Wang, Y L, Thompson, P M and Chan, T F. 2008. Optimized conformal parameterization of cortical surfaces using shape based matching of landmark curves. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 494–502.
Lu, L H, Dapretto, M, O'Hare, E D, et al. 2009. Experience mediates brain function–brain structure correlates in children. J Neurosci Feb 24. [Epub ahead of print].
Michie, P T, Budd, T W, Fulham, W R, et al. 2008. The potential for new understandings of normal and abnormal cognition by integration of neuroimaging and behavioral data: not an exercise bringing coals to Newcastle. Brain Imag Behav published online, December 2008.
Morra, J H, Tu, Z, Apostolova, L G, Green, A, Toga, A W and Thompson, P M. 2010. Comparison of Adaboost and Support Vector Machines for detecting Alzheimer's disease through automated hippocampal segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29, 30–43.Google Scholar
Morra, J H, Tu, Z, Apostolova, L G, et al. 2008a. Validation of a fully automated 3D hippocampal segmentation method using subjects with Alzheimer's disease mild cognitive impairment, and elderly controls. Neuroimage 43, 59–68.Google Scholar
Morra, J H, Tu, Z, Apostolova, L G, et al. 2009a. Automated 3D mapping of hippocampal atrophy and its clinical correlates in 400 subjects with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment and elderly controls. Hum Brain Mapp 30, 2766–88.Google Scholar
Morra, J H, Tu, Z, Apostolova, L G, et al. 2009b. Automated 3D mapping of hippocampal atrophy and its clinical correlates in 400 subjects with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and elderly controls. Hum Brain Mapp 30, 2766–88.Google Scholar
Morra, J H, Tu, Z, Apostolova, L G, et al. 2009c. Automated mapping of hippocampal atrophy in 1-year repeat MRI data from 490 subjects with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and elderly controls. Neuroimage 45 (1 Suppl), S3–15.Google Scholar
Morra, J H, Tu, Z, Apostolova, L G, Green, A E, Toga, A W and Thompson, P M. 2008b. Automatic subcortical segmentation using a contextual model. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 11, 194–201.Google Scholar
Morra, J H, Tu, Z, Toga, A W and Thompson, P M. 2009d. Machine learning for brain image segmentation. In Gonzalez F and Romero E (Eds.) Biomedical Image Analysis and Machine Learning Technologies. Available from: http://ebook30.com/internet/internet/199031/biomedical-image-analysis-and-machine-learning-technologies-applications-and-techniques-premier-reference-source.html
Perelman, G. 2002. The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applications. arXiv:math.DG/0211159 2002.
Petersen, R C. 2007. Mild cognitive impairment. Contin Lifelong Learning Neurol 13, 13–36.Google Scholar
Petersen, R C, Doody, R, Kurz, A, et al. 2001. Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol 58, 1985–92.Google Scholar
Petersen, R C, Thomas, R G, Grundman, M, et al. 2005. Vitamin E and donepezil for the treatment of mild cognitive impairment. N Engl J Med 352, 2379–88.Google Scholar
Pohl, K M, Kikinis, R and Wells, W M. 2007. Active mean fields: Solving the mean field approximation in the level set framework. Inf Process Med Imaging 20, 26–37.Google Scholar
Powell, S, Magnotta, V A, Johnson, H, Jammalamadaka, V K, Pierson, R and Andreasen, N C. 2008. Registration and machine learning-based automated segmentation of subcortical and cerebellar brain structures. Neuroimage 39, 238–47.Google Scholar
Price, J L and Morris, J C. 1999. Tangles and plaques in nondemented aging and “preclinical” Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol 45, 358–68.Google Scholar
Raji, C A, Ho, A J, Parikshak, N, et al. 2009. Tensor Based Morphometry of body mass index, insulin and type II diabetes effects on brain structure in the Cardiovascular Health Cognition study. PNAS submitted.
Rasser, P E, Johnston, P, Lagopoulos, J, et al. 2005. Functional MRI BOLD response to Tower of London performance of first-episode schizophrenia patients using cortical pattern matching. Neuroimage 26, 941–51.Google Scholar
Reisberg, B, Franssen, E H, Hasan, S M, et al. 1999. Retrogenesis: Clinical, physiologic, and pathologic mechanisms in brain aging, Alzheimer's and other dementing processes. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 249 (Suppl 3), 28–36.Google Scholar
Salloway, S, Ferris, S, Kluger, A, et al. 2004. Efficacy of donepezil in mild cognitive impairment: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 63, 651–7.Google Scholar
Schuff, N, Woerner, N, Boreta, L, et al. 2009. Progression of hippocampal decline in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairmant in relation to ApoE status and CSF biomarkers: An MRI study of ADNI. Brain 132, 1067–77.Google Scholar
Shattuck, D W, Sandor-Leahy, S R, Schaper, K A, Rottenberg, D A and Leahy, R M. 2001. Magnetic resonance image tissue classification using a partial volume model. Neuroimage 13, 856–76.Google Scholar
Shen, D, Moffat, S, Resnick, S M and Davatzikos, C. 2002. Measuring size and shape of the hippocampus in MR images using a deformable shape model. Neuroimage 15, 422–34.Google Scholar
Shi, Y, Thompson, P M, Dinov, I, Osher, S and Toga, A W. 2007a. Direct cortical mapping via solving partial differential equations on implicit surfaces. Med Image Anal 11, 207–23.Google Scholar
Shi, Y, Tu, Z, Reiss, A L, et al. 2007b. Joint sulci detection using graphical models and boosted priors. Inf Process Med Imaging 20, 98–109.Google Scholar
Singh, V, Chertkow, H, Lerch, J P, Evans, A C, Dorr, A E and Kabani, N J. 2006. Spatial patterns of cortical thinning in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Brain 129, 2885–93.Google Scholar
Sowell, E R, Kan, E, Yoshii, J, et al. 2008. Thinning of sensorimotor cortices in children with Tourette syndrome. Nat Neurosci 11, 637–9.Google Scholar
Sowell, E R, Peterson, B S, Kan, E, et al. 2007. Sex differences in cortical thickness mapped in 176 healthy individuals between 7 and 87 years of age. Cereb Cortex 17, 1550–60.Google Scholar
Sowell, E R, Peterson, B S, Thompson, P M, Welcome, S E, Henkenius, A L and Toga, A W. 2003a. Mapping cortical change across the human life span. Nat Neurosci 6, 309–15.Google Scholar
Sowell, E R, Thompson, P M, Welcome, S E, Henkenius, A L, Toga, A W and Peterson, B S. 2003b. Cortical abnormalities in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Lancet 362, 1699–707.Google Scholar
Thacker, N. 2003. Tutorial: A critical analysis of VBM. Available at: http://www.tina-vision.net/docs/memos/2003-011.pdf. Last updated 08/28/05. Accessed 03/17/07 2003.
Thal, L J, Carta, A, Doody, R, et al. 1997. Prevention protocols for Alzheimer disease. Position paper from the International Working Group on Harmonization of Dementia Drug Guidelines. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 11 (Suppl 3), 46–9.Google Scholar
Thompson, P M and Apostolova, L G. 2007. Computational anatomical methods as applied to ageing and dementia. Br J Radiol 80 (Spec No 2), S78–91.Google Scholar
Thompson, P M, Bartzokis, G, Hayashi, K M, et al. 2009. Time-lapse mapping reveals different disease trajectories in schizophrenia depending on antipsychotic treatment. Cereb Cortex 19, 1107–23.Google Scholar
Thompson, P M, Dutton, R A, Hayashi, K M, et al. 2005a. Thinning of the cerebral cortex visualized in HIV/AIDS reflects CD4+ T lymphocyte decline. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102, 15 647–52.Google Scholar
Thompson, P M, Giedd, J N, Woods, R P, MacDonald, D, Evans, A C and Toga, A W. 2000. Growth patterns in the developing brain detected by using continuum mechanical tensor maps. Nature 404, 190–3.Google Scholar
Thompson, P M, Hayashi, K M, Zubicaray, G, et al. 2003. Dynamics of gray matter loss in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 23, 994–1005.Google Scholar
Thompson, P M, Hayashi, K M, Zubicaray, G I, et al. 2004a. Mapping hippocampal and ventricular change in Alzheimer disease. Neuroimage 22, 1754–66.Google Scholar
Thompson, P M, Hayashi, K M, Simon, S L, et al. 2004b. Structural abnormalities in the brains of human subjects who use methamphetamine. J Neurosci 24, 6028–36.Google Scholar
Thompson, P M, Hayashi, K M, Sowell, E R, et al. 2004c. Mapping cortical change in Alzheimer's disease, brain development, and schizophrenia. Neuroimage 23 (Suppl 1), S2–18.Google Scholar
Thompson, P M, Lee, A D, Dutton, R A, et al. 2005b. Abnormal cortical complexity and thickness profiles mapped in Williams syndrome. J Neurosci 25, 4146–58.Google Scholar
Thompson, P M, Mega, M S, Woods, R P, et al. 2001. Cortical change in Alzheimer's disease detected with a disease-specific population-based brain atlas. Cereb Cortex 11, 1–16.Google Scholar
Viola, P and Jones, M. 2004. Robust real-time face detection. Int J Comp Vision 57, 137–54.Google Scholar
Economo, C. 1929. The Cytoarchitectonics of the Human Cerebral Cortex. London: Oxford Medical Publications.
Wang, Y L, Chiang, M C and Thompson, P M. 2005. Automated Surface Matching Using Mutual Information Applied to Reimann Surface Structures. MICCAI. Palm Springs, CA., Berlin: Springer, pp. 666–74.
Wang, Y L, Gu, X, Chan, T F, Thompson, P M and Yau, S T. 2008. Brain mapping with the Ricci flow conformal parametrization and multivariate statistics on deformation tensors. MICCAI Workshop on Mathematical Foundations of Computational Anatomy (MFCA), 13 May 2008.
Wells, W M, Grimson, W E L, Kikinis, R and Jolesz, F A. 1996. Adaptive segmentation of MRI data. Med Imag IEEE Trans 15, 429–42.Google Scholar
Wimo, A, Jonsson, L and Winblad, B. 2006. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and direct costs of dementia in 2003. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 21, 175–81.Google Scholar
Wright, I C, McGuire, P K, Poline, J B, et al. 1995. A voxel-based method for the statistical analysis of gray and white matter density applied to schizophrenia. Neuroimage 2, 244–52.Google Scholar
Yanovsky, I, Leow, A D, Osher, S J and Thompson, P M. 2009. Asymmetric and symmetric unbiased image registration: Statistical assessment of performance. Med Image Anal 13, 679–700.Google Scholar
Yushkevich, P A, Piven, J, Hazlett, H C, et al. 2006. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31, 1116–28.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×