Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:32:13.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2020

Katja Creutz
Katja Creutz
Affiliation:
Finnish Institute of International Affairs
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
State Responsibility in the International Legal Order
A Critical Appraisal
 , pp. 311 - 344
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select Bibliography

Abi-Saab, Georges, ‘The Uses of Article 19’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Kenneth S., ‘Individual Action and Collective Responsibility: The Dilemma of Mass Tort Reform’ (1987) 73 Virginia Law Review 845–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ago, Roberto, ‘Le délit international’ (1939–II) 68 Collected Courses of the Hague Academy Lecture of International Law 415–554.Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo, ‘The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-State Parties: Legal Basis and Limits’ (2003) 1 Journal of International Criminal Justice 618–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akande, Dapo, and Tzanakopoulos, Antonios, ‘The Crime of Aggression in the ICC and State Responsibility’ (2017) 58 Harvard International Law Online Journal 33–36.Google Scholar
Akhavan, Payam, ‘Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhavan, Payam, ‘The Rise, and Fall, and Rise, of International Criminal Justice’ (2013) 11 Journal of International Criminal Justice 527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, James F., ‘The International Criminal Court and the Prevention of Atrocities: Predicting the Court’s Impact’ (2009) 54 Villanova Law Review 1–56.Google Scholar
Alland, Denis, ‘Countermeasures of General Interest’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 1221–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allott, Philip, ‘State Responsibility and the Unmaking of International Law’ (1988) 29 Harvard International Law Journal 1–26.Google Scholar
Alston, Philip, ‘The Myopia of the Handmaidens: International Lawyers and Globalization’ (1997) 3 European Journal of International Law 435–448.Google Scholar
Amann, Diane Marie, ‘Group Mentality, Expressivism, and Genocide’ (2002) 2 International Criminal Law Review 93–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amann, Diane Marie, ‘Message as Medium in Sierra Leone’ (2001) 7 ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 237–245.Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai, ‘Article 25: Individual Criminal Responsibility’, in Triffterer, Otto (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (2nd ed., Munich: C. H. Beck, 2008), pp. 743–770.Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai, ‘The ICC and Common Purpose – What Contribution Is Required under Article 25(3)(d)?’, in Stahn, Carsten (ed.), The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 592–607.Google Scholar
Andenaes, Johannes, ‘The General Preventive Effects of Punishment’ (1966) 114 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 949–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andenaes, Johs, ‘General Prevention – Illusion or Reality?’ (1952) 43 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 176–198.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elisabeth S., and Pildes, Richard H., ‘Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement’ (1999–2000) 148 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1503–1575.Google Scholar
Anderson, Kenneth, ‘The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, the Role of International Non-governmental Organizations and the Idea of International Civil Society’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law 91–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, Georg J., Andrews, Lori B., and Isasi, Rosari M., ‘Protecting the Endangered Human: Toward an International Treaty Prohibiting Cloning and Inheritable Alterations’ (2002) 28 American Journal of Law & Medicine 151–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anscombe, Gertrude Elisabeth Margareta, ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’ (1958) 33 Philosophy 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzilotti, Dionisio, Corso di diritto internazionale (Rome: Atheneum, 1912).Google Scholar
Anzilotti, Dionisio, Cours de droit international (trans. Gidel, 1929, Paris: Panthéon-Assas/LGDJ, 1999).Google Scholar
Anzilotti, Dionisio, ‘La responsabilité internationale des États a raison des dommages soufferts par des étrangers’ (1906) 13 Revue generale de droit international public 5–29.Google Scholar
Anzilotti, Dionisio, Teoria generale della responsabilità dello stato nel diritto internazionale (Florence: F. Lumachi Libraio-editore, 1902).Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, ‘Eichmann in Jerusalem’, The New Yorker, 16 February 1963, p. 40.Google Scholar
Aust, Helmut Philipp, Complicity and the Law of State Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aust, Helmut Philipp, ‘The Normative Environment for Peace – On the Contribution of the ILC’s Articles on State Responsibility’, in Nolte, Georg (ed.), Peace through International Law: The Role of the International Law Commission. A Colloquium at the Occasion of Its Sixtieth Anniversary (Dordrecht: Springer, 2009), pp. 13–46.Google Scholar
Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined and the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence (1st published 1832, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1954).Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan K., ‘Who Governs the Globe?’, in Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha and Sell, Susan K. (eds.), Who Governs the Globe? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahar, Mohamed Elewa, ‘“Just Convict Everyone!” – Joint Perpetration: From Tadic to Stakic and Back’ (2006) 6 International Criminal Law Review 293–302.Google Scholar
Barboza, Julio, The Environment, Risk and Liability in International Law (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, John, ‘The Different Forms of Reparation: Compensation’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 599–611.Google Scholar
Barkun, Michael, ‘International Law from a Functional Perspective’ (1970) 1 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 19–28.Google Scholar
Barstow Magraw, Daniel, ‘Transboundary Harm: The International Law Commission’s Study of “International Liability”’ (1986) 80 American Journal of International Law 305–330.Google Scholar
Bartholomeusz, Lance, ‘The Amicus Curiae before International Courts and Tribunals’ (2005) 5 Non-State Actors and International Law 209–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif, and Blakesley, Christopher L., ‘The Need for an International Criminal Court in the New International World Order’ (1992–1993) 25 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 151–182.Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard R., ‘Reflections on Codification in Light of the International Law of State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens’ (1964–1965) 16 Syracuse Law Review 745–761.Google Scholar
Beaucillon, Charlotte, Fernandez, Julian, and Raspail, Hélèn, ‘State Responsibility for Conduct of Private Military and Security Companies’, in Francioni, Francesco and Ronzitti, Natalino (eds.), War by Contract: Human Rights, Humanitarian Law, and Private Contractors (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 396–420.Google Scholar
Beccaria, Cesare, Of Crimes and Punishments (Dei delitti e delle pene) (trans. Edward D. Ingraham, Philadelphia: R. Bell, 1774).Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (trans. Mark Ritter, London: Sage Publishing, 1992).Google Scholar
Becker, Tal, Terrorism and the State: Rethinking the Rules of State Responsibility (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar
Bederman, David, ‘Counterintuiting Countermeasures’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 817–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedjaoui, Mohammed, ‘Responsibility of States: Fault and Strict Liability’, in Bernhardt, Rudolf (ed.), Encyclopedia of International Law, vol. IV (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1984), pp. 212–216.Google Scholar
Bennett, Paul, ‘Mutual Risk: P & I Insurance Clubs and Maritime Safety and Environmental Performance’ (2001) 25 Marine Policy 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensouda, Fatou, ‘Reflections from the International Criminal Court Prosecutor’ (2012) 45 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 505–511.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (London: The Athlone Press, 1789).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton Heath, J., ‘Human Dignity at Trial: Hard Cases and Broad Concepts in International Criminal Law’ (2012) 44 George Washington International Law Review 317–366.Google Scholar
Benzing, Markus, ‘The Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court: International Criminal Justice between State Sovereignty and the Fight against Impunity’ (2003) 7 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 591–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Peter, Invitation to Sociology: A Humanistic Perspective (Doubleday: Anchor Books, 1963).Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, ‘State and Individual Secondary Liability in Case of International Organizations’ Responsibility: The Challenge of Unfairness Unveiled’ (2017) 1 Rivista di filosofia del diritto 51–78.Google Scholar
Betlehem, Daniel, ‘The Secret Life of International Law’ (2012) 1 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 23–36.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Andrea, ‘Choice and (the Awareness of) Its Consequences: The ICJ’s “Structural Bias” Strikes Again in the Marshall Islands Case’ (2017) 111 American Journal of International Law Unbound 81–87.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Andrea, ‘State Responsibility and Criminal Liability of Individuals’, in Cassese, Antonio (ed.), The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 16–24.Google Scholar
Bigi, Giulia, ‘Joint Criminal Enterprise in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the Prosecution of Senior Political and Military Leaders: The Krajisnik Case’ (2010) 14 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 51–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Annie, ‘Third State Responsibility for Human Rights Violations’ (2011) 21 European Journal of International Law 883–900.Google Scholar
Birkett, Norman, ‘International Legal Theories Evolved at Nuremberg’, in Mettraux, Guénaël (ed.), Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trial (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 299–307.Google Scholar
Birnie, Patricia W., and Boyle, Alan E., International Law & the Environment (2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Black, Donald, The Behavior of Law (1st ed. 1976, special ed. 2010, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2010).Google Scholar
Bleeker, Arne, ‘Does the Polluter Pay? The Polluter-Pays Principle in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice’ (2009) 18 European Energy and Environmental Law Review 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, Gabriella, and Lockwood, Natalie J., ‘Earthquakes and Wars’, in May, Larry and Edenberg, Elisabeth (eds.), Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 178–216.Google Scholar
Boas, Gideon, Bischoff, James L., and Reid, Natalie L., International Criminal Law Practitioner Library, Volume I: Forms of Responsibility in International Criminal Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel, and Crook, John R., ‘Symposium: The ILC’s State Responsibility Articles. Introduction and Overview’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 773–791.Google Scholar
Bollecker-Stern, Brigitte, Le préjudice dans la théorie de la responsabilité internationale (Editions A. Paris: Pedone, 1973).Google Scholar
Bonafè, Beatrice I., The Relationship between State and Individual Responsibility for International Crimes (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonafè, Beatrice I., ‘Reassessing Dual Responsibility for International Crimes’ (2016) 73 Seqüênica (Florianópolis) 19–36.Google Scholar
Boon, Kirsten E., ‘The Law of Responsibility: A Response to Fragmentation?’ (2012) 25 Global Business and Development Law Journal 395–407.Google Scholar
Boon, Kristen E., ‘Are Control Tests Fit for the Future: The Slippage Problem in Attribution Doctrines’ (2014) 15 Melbourne Journal of International Law 330–377.Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin, ‘The “Minimum” Standard of the Treatment of Aliens’ (1939) 33 Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting 51–63.Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin, ‘International Law and International Organization’ (1947) 41 American Journal of International Law 106–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchard, Edwin M., ‘Theoretical Aspects of the International Responsibility of States’ (1929) Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 223–250.Google Scholar
Bosco, David, ‘The International Criminal Court and Crime Prevention: Byproduct or Conscious Goal?’ (2010–2011) 19 Michigan State Journal of International Law 163–200.Google Scholar
Boyle, Alan, ‘Liability for Injurious Consequences of Acts Not Prohibited by International Law’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), Oxford Commentaries on International Law: The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 95–104.Google Scholar
Boyle, Alan, and Chinkin, Christine, The Making of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Boyle, Alan E., ‘State Responsibility and International Liability for Injurious Consequences of Acts Not Prohibited by International Law: A Necessary Distinction?’ (1990) 39 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Alan E., ‘Globalising Environmental Liability: The Interplay of National and International Law’ (2005) 17 Journal of Environmental law 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, State Responsibility: Part I (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law (4th ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, Principles of International Law (6th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, ‘State Responsibility and the International Court of Justice’, in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia and Sarooshi, Dan (eds.), Issues of State Responsibility before International Judicial Institutions (Oxford and Portland, OR: Bloomsbury, 2004), pp. 11–18.Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, ‘International Legal Accountability through the Lens of the Law of State Responsibility’ (2005) XXXVI Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 21–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke-White, William, ‘Proactive Complementarity: The International Criminal Court and National Courts in the Rome System of International Justice’ (2008) 49 Harvard International Law Journal 53–108.Google Scholar
Canç, ado Trindade, Antônio Augusto, ‘Complementarity between State Responsibility and Individual Responsibility for Grave Violations of Human Rights: The Crime of State Revisited’, in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005), pp. 253–269.Google Scholar
Cane, Peter, Responsibility in Law and Morality (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2002).Google Scholar
Caron, David D., ‘The Basis of Responsibility: Attribution and Other Trans-Substantive Rules’, in Lillich, Richard B. and Magraw, Daniel Barstow (eds.), The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: Its Contribution to the Law of State Responsibility (New York: Transnational Publishers, 1998), pp. 109–184.Google Scholar
Caron, David D., ‘The ILC Articles on State Responsibility: The Paradoxical Relationship between Form and Authority’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 857–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassesse, Antonio, ‘On the Current Trends towards Criminal Prosecution and Punishment of Breaches of International Humanitarian Law’ (1998) 9 European Journal of International Law 2–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, International Criminal Law (2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, International Law (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Cesar, Sylvia, ‘Privatization of Water: Evaluating Its Performance in the Developing World’ (2019) 90 Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, Jonathan I., ‘Universal International Law’ (1993) 87 American Journal of International Law 529–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, Jonathan I., ‘Editorial Comments: International Criminal Court and the Role of Domestic Courts’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law 120–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve, ‘The WTO’s Problematic “Last Resort” Against Noncompliance’ (2002) 57 The Swiss Review of International Economic Relations 409–440.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Handler Chayes, Antonia, The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chideu Moghalu, Kingsley, ‘Image and Reality of War Crimes Justice: External Perceptions of the International Criminal Court for Rwanda’ (2002) 26 Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 21.Google Scholar
Chinen, Mark, ‘Complexity Theory and the Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions of State Responsibility’ (2014) 25 European Journal of International Law 703–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinkin, Christine, ‘A Critique of the Public/Private Dimension’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinkin, Christine, ‘The Continuing Occupation: Issues of Joint and Several Liability and Effective Control’, in Shiner, Phil and Williams, Andrew (eds.), The Iraq War and International Law (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2008), pp. 161–183.Google Scholar
Christenson, Gordon A., ‘The Doctrine of Attribution in State Responsibility’, in Lillich, R. B. (ed.), International Law of State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1983), pp. 321–360.Google Scholar
Christenson, Gordon A., ‘Attributing Conduct to the State: Is Anything New?’ (1990) 84 ASIL Proceedings 51–59.Google Scholar
Churchill, Robin R., and Lowe, Alan Vaughan, The Law of the Sea (2nd ed., Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Clapham, Andrew, ‘The Question of Jurisdiction under International Criminal Law over Legal Persons: Lessons from the Rome Conference on an International Criminal Court’, in Kamminga, Menno and Zia-Zarifi, S. (eds.), Liability of Multinational Corporations Under International Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000), pp. 139–195.Google Scholar
Clapham, Andrew, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Clapham, Andrew, ‘Extending International Criminal Law beyond the Individual to Corporations and Armed Opposition Groups’ (2008) 6 Journal of International Criminal Justice 899–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Lisa, ‘Global Health Public-Private Partnerships: Better Protecting Against Disease but Creating a Gap in Responsibility under International Law’ (2009) XX Finnish Yearbook of International Law 349–372.Google Scholar
Clarkson, Christopher M. V., Understanding Criminal Law (4th ed., London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2005).Google Scholar
Coffee, Jr., John C., ‘“No Soul to Damn: No Body to Kick”: An Unscandalized Inquiry into the Problem of Corporal Punishment’ (1980–1981) 79 Michigan Law Review 386–459.Google Scholar
Colandrea, Valerio, ‘On the Power of the European Court of Human Rights to Order Specific Non-monetary Measures: Some Remarks in Light of Assanidze, Broniowski and Sejdovic Cases’ (2007) 7 Human Rights Law Review 396–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condorelli, Luigi, ‘Les attentats du 11 septembre et leurs suites: où va le droit?’ (2001) 105 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 829–848.Google Scholar
Conetti, Giorgio, ‘State’s Crime and Individuals’ Crimes: What Relationship?’ in Politi, Mauro and Nesi, Giuseppe (eds.), The Rome Statute of the ICC: A Challenge to Impunity (Dartmouth, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001), pp. 131–133.Google Scholar
Contreras-Garduño, Diana, ‘Defining Beneficiaries of Collective Reparations: The Experience of the IACtHR’ (2012) 4 Amsterdam Law Forum 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Kate, ‘No Liability, No Protocol’, in Bail, Christoph, Falkner, Robert and Marquard, Helen (eds.), The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment & Development (London: Earthscan Publications, 2002), pp. 371–384.Google Scholar
Côté, Luc, ‘Independence and Impartiality’, in Reydams, Luc, Wouters, Jan and Ryngaert, Cedric (eds.), International Prosecutors (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 319–415.Google Scholar
Cottereau, Gilles, ‘Système juridique et notion de responsabilité’, in Société française pour le droit international (ed.), La responsabilité dans le système international: Colloque du mans (Paris: Pedone, 1991), pp. 3–90.Google Scholar
Crawford, James, ‘Responsibility to the International Community as a Whole’ (2001) 8 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 303–322.Google Scholar
Crawford, James, ‘The ILC’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts: A Retrospect’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 874–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James, ‘International Law as an Open System’, in Crawford, James (ed.), International Law as an Open System: Selected Essays (London: Cameron May, 2002), pp. 17–38.Google Scholar
Crawford, James, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Crawford, James, ‘Responsibility of States and Non-State Actors’, Speech at the Biennial Conference of the Japanese Association of International Law, Tokyo, 14 May 2005.Google Scholar
Crawford, James, ‘International Crimes of States’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 405–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James, ‘Investment Arbitration and the ILC Articles on State Responsibility’ (2010) 25 ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal 127–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James, ‘The System of International Responsibility’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James, ‘Responsibility for Breaches of Commmunitarian Norms: An Appraisal of Article 48 of the ILC Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts’, in Fastenrath, Ulrich et al. (eds.), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Bruno Simma (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 224–240.Google Scholar
Crawford, James, ‘The International Court of Justice and the Law of State Responsibility’, in Tams, Christian J. and Sloan, James (eds.), The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 71–86.Google Scholar
Crawford, James, State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James, Grant, Thomas, and Messineo, Francesco, ‘Towards an International Law of Responsibility: Early Doctrine’, in Chazournes, Laurence Boisson de and Kohen, Marcelo (eds.), International Law and the Quest for Its Implementation: Liber Amicorum Vera Gowlland-Debbas (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010), pp. 377–402.Google Scholar
Crawford, James, and Olleson, Simon, ‘The Nature and Forms of International Responsibility’, in Evans, Malcolm D. (ed.), International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 451–477.Google Scholar
Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, and Olleson, Simon, ‘Preface’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. v–vii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James, and Watkins, Jeremy, ‘International Responsibility’, in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 283–298.Google Scholar
Creutz, Katja, Transnational Privatised Security: The Erik Castrén Institute Research Reports 19/2006 (Helsinki: The Erik Castrén Institute, 2006).Google Scholar
Creutz, Katja, ‘The Problem of Regulation and the Role of the International Criminal Court’, in Mandrup, Thomas (ed.), Privatisation of Security: The Concept, Its History and Its Contemporary Application (Copenhagen: Conference Proceedings, Royal Danish Defence College, 2012), pp. 63–81.Google Scholar
Creutz, Katja, ‘International Responsibility and Problematic Law-making’, in Liivoja, Rain and Petman, Jarna (eds.), International Law-making: Essays in Honour of Jan Klabbers (Oxon: Routledge, 2014), pp. 171–189.Google Scholar
Cronin-Furman, Kate, ‘Managing Expectations: International Criminal Trials and the Prospects for Deterrence of Mass Atrocities’ (2013) International Journal of Transitional Justice 434–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cryer, Robert, Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity and the International Criminal Law Regime (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cryer, Robert, ‘International Criminal Law vs State Sovereignty: Another Round?’ (2006) European Journal of International Law 979–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cupido, Marjolein, ‘Common Purpose Liability versus Joint Perpetration: A Practical View on the ICC’s Hierarchy of Liability Theories’ (2016) 29 Leiden Journal of International Law 897–915.Google Scholar
Cutler, Claire, Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahan, Yossi, Lerner, Hanna, and Milman-Sivan, Fain, ‘Shared Responsibility and the International Labour Organization’ (2012–2013) 34 Michigan Journal of International Law 675–743.Google Scholar
Damaska, Mirjan, ‘What Is the Point of International Criminal Justice?’ (2008) 83 Chicago-Kent Law Review 329–365.Google Scholar
Darcy, Shane, Collective Responsibility and Accountability under International Law (Leiden: Brill, 2007).Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, Jean, ‘The Foundations of the International Legal Order’ (2007) XVIII Finnish Yearbook of International Law 219–255.Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, Jean, Nollkaemper, André, Plakokefalos, Ilias, and Ryngaert, Cedric, ‘Sharing Responsibility between Non-State Actors and States in International Law: Introduction’ (2015) 62 Netherlands International Law Review 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawidowicz, Martin, Third-Party Countermeasures in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Aréchaga, Jiménez, ‘International Law in the Past Third of a Century’ (1978) 159 Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law 1–343.Google Scholar
DeFrancia, Cristian, ‘Due Process in International Criminal Courts: Why Procedure Matters’ (2001) 87 Virginia Law Review 1381–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de La Fayette, Louise Angélique, ‘International Liability for Damage to the Environment’, in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Ong, David M. and Merkouris, Panos (eds.), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 2010), pp. 320–360.Google Scholar
de Sadeleer, Nicolas, ‘The Polluter-pays Principle in EU Law–Bold Case Law and Poor Harmonisation’, in Voigt, Christina, Backer, Inge Lorange, and Fauchald, Ole Kristian (eds.), Pro Natura: Festskrift til Hans Christian Bugge (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2012), pp. 405–419.Google Scholar
Desierto, Diane A., ‘Rawlsian Fairness and International Arbitration’ (2015) 36 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 939–993.Google Scholar
de Than, Claire, and Shorts, Edwin, International Criminal Law and Human Rights (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2003).Google Scholar
de Vattel, Emmerich, The Law of Nations: Or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (1st published in 1758, trans. Chitty, Joseph, Philadelphia: T. and J. W. Johnson, 1839).Google Scholar
DeWitt Dickinson, Edwin, ‘The Analogy between Natural Persons and International Persons in the Law of Nations’ (1917) 26 The Yale Law Journal 564–591.Google Scholar
Dixon, Martin, Textbook on International Law (7th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominicé, Christian, ‘La question de la double responsabilité de l’Etat et de son agent’, in Yakpo, Emile and Boumedra, Tahar (eds.), Liber Amicorum Mohammed Bedjaoui (The Hague, London, Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1999), pp. 143–157.Google Scholar
Dominicé, Christian, ‘Attribution of Conduct to Multiple States and the Implication of A State in the Act of Another State’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 281–289.Google Scholar
Dror, Yehezkel, ‘Values and the Law’ (1957) 17 The Antioch Review 440–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drumbl, Mark, ‘Collective Violence and Individual Punishment: The Criminality of Mass Atrocity’ (2005) 99 Northwestern University Law Review 539–610.Google Scholar
Drumbl, Mark, Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drumbl, Mark, ‘Collective Responsibility and Postconflict Justice’, in Isaacs, Tracy and Vernon, Richard (eds.), Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 23–60.Google Scholar
Dugard, John, ‘Diplomatic Protection’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 1051–1071.Google Scholar
Dunn, Frederick S., ‘International Law and Private Property Rights’ (1928) 28 Columbia Law Review 166–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Frederick S., The Protection of Nationals: A Study in the Application of International Law (New York: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1932).Google Scholar
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, La responsabilité internationale des États pour les dommages d’origine technologique et industrielle (Paris: Éditions A. Pedone, 1976).Google Scholar
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘International Law of State Responsibility: Revolution or Evolution?’ (1989) 11 Michigan Journal of International Law 105–128.Google Scholar
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘Dionisio Anzilotti and the Law of International Responsibility of States’ (1992) 3 European Journal of International Law 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Droit International Public (5th ed., Paris: Dalloz, 2000).Google Scholar
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘A General Stocktaking of the Connections between the Multilateral Dimension of Obligations and Codification of the Law of Responsibility’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 1053–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘International Criminal Responsibility of the Individual and International Responsibility of the State’, in Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paolo and Jones, John R. W. D. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary (Volume II) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 1085–1099.Google Scholar
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘Some Reflections on Contemporary International Law and the Appeal to Universal Values: A Response to Martti Koskenniemi’ (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘The Deficiencies of the Law of State Responsibility Relating to Breaches of “Obligations Owed to the International Community as a Whole”: Suggestions for Avoiding the Obsolescence of Aggravated Responsibility’, in Cassesse, Antonio (ed.), Realizing Utopia: The Future of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 210–226.Google Scholar
Dutheil De La Rochere, Jaqueline, ‘La Convention sur l’internationalisation de l’espace’ (1967) 13 Annuaire francais de droit international 607–647.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Clyde, ‘The Responsibility of the State for the Protection of Foreign Officials’ (1925) 19 American Journal of International Law 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, Clyde, Responsibility of States in International Law (New York: The New York University Press, 1928).Google Scholar
Eagleton, Clyde, ‘Measure of Damages in International Law’ (1929–1930) 39 Yale Law Journal 52–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Mark E., ‘The International Criminal Court and Its Implication for Domestic Law and National Capacity-Building’ (2002) 15 Florida Journal of International Law 215–242.Google Scholar
Erskine, Toni, ‘Kicking Bodies and Damning Souls: The Danger of Harming “Innocent” Individuals While Punishing “Delinquent” States’, in Isaacs, Tracy and Vernon, Richard (eds.), Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 261–286.Google Scholar
Evans, Malcolm, ‘State Responsibility and the European Convention on Human Rights: Role and Realm’, in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia and Sarooshi, Dan (eds.), Issues of State Responsibility before International Judicial Institutions (Oxford and Portland, OR: Bloomsbury, 2004), pp. 139–160.Google Scholar
Farell, Norman, ‘Attributing Criminal Liability to Corporate Actors: Some Lessons from the International Tribunals’ (2010) 8 Journal of International Criminal Justice 873–894.Google Scholar
Farer, Tom J., ‘Restraining the Barbarians: Can International Criminal Law Help?’ (2000) 22 Human Rights Quarterly 90–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrall, Jeremy, United Nations Sanctions and the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Faure, Michael, ‘Concluding Remarks’, in Faure, Michael (ed.), Deterrence, Insurability, and Compensation in Environmental Liability. Future Developments in the European Union (Wien: Springer, 2003), pp. 331–343.Google Scholar
Faure, Michael, and Grimeaud, David, ‘Financial Assurance Issues of Environmental Liability’, in Faure, Michael (ed.), Deterrence, Insurability, and Compensation in Environmental Liability: Future Developments in the European Union (Wien: Springer, 2003), pp. 7–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, Michael, and Nollkaemper, André, ‘International Liability as an Instrument to Prevent and Compensate for Climate Change’ (2007) 43 A Stanford Journal of International Law 123–179.Google Scholar
Favre, Antoine, ‘Fault as an Element of the Illicit Act’ (1963–1964) 52 Georgetown Law Journal 555–570.Google Scholar
Feller, Abraham H., ‘The Mexican Claims Commissions’ (1933–1934) 19 Iowa Law Review 225–230.Google Scholar
Finch, George A., ‘The Nuremberg Trial and International Law’ (1947) 41 American Journal of International Law 20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Hollis, Duncan B., ‘Constructing Norms for Global Cybersecurity’ (2016) 110 American Journal of International Law 425–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kirsten J., ‘The Distinct Character of International Crime: Theorizing the Domain’ (2009) 8 Contemporary Political Theory 44–67.Google Scholar
Fisse, Brent, and Braithwaite, John, ‘The Allocation of Responsibility for Corporate Crime: Individualism, Collectivism and Accountability’ (1986–1988) 11 Sydney Law Review 468–513.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, ‘International Responsibility and Liability’, in Bodansky, Daniel, Brunnée, Jutta and Hey, Ellen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 1010–1035.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Malgosia A., ‘International Environmental Law as a Special Field’, in Barnhoorn, L. A. N. M. and Wellens, Karel C. (eds.), Diversity in Secondary Rules and the Unity of International Law (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995), pp. 181–226.Google Scholar
Fletcher, George P., ‘The Storrs Lectures: Liberals and Romantics at War: The Problem of Collective Guilt’ (2001–2002) 111 Yale Journal of International Law 1499–1573.Google Scholar
Fletcher, George P., Romantics at War: Glory and Guilt in the Age of Terrorism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Focarelli, Carlo, ‘International Law and Third-party Countermeasures in the Age of Global Instant Communication’ (2016) 29 Questions of International Law 17–24.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas, Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas, ‘Individual Criminal Liability and Collective Civil Responsibility: Do They Reinforce or Contradict One Another?’ (2007) 6 Washington University Global Studies Law Review 567–573.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., ‘Legitimacy in the International System’ (1988) 82 American Journal of International Law 705–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon, The Morality of Law (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. ‘Law as an Instrument of Social Control and Law as a Facilitation of Human Interaction’ (1975) Brigham Young University Law Review 89–96.Google Scholar
Fyrnys, Markus, ‘Expanding Competences by Judicial Lawmaking: The Pilot Judgment Procedure of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 1231–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, Sanford E., ‘The Polluter-Pays Principle: From Economic Equity to Environmental Ethos’ (1991) 26 Texas International Law Journal 463–496.Google Scholar
Gaja, Giorgio, ‘Positivism and Dualism in Dionisio Anzilotti’ (1992) 3 European Journal of International Law 123–138.Google Scholar
Garcia, Frank J., ‘Globalization and the Theory of International Law’ (2005) 11 International Legal Theory 9–26.Google Scholar
García Amador, F. V., ‘State Responsibility in the Light of New Trends of International Law’ (1955) 49 American Journal of International Law 339–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Amador, Francisco V., Sohn, Louis B., and Baxter, Richard R., Recent Codification of the Law of State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1974).Google Scholar
Garland, David, ‘Sociological Perspectives on Punishment’ (1991) 14 Crime and Justice 115–165.Google Scholar
Gattini, Andrea, ‘A Return Ticket to Communitarisme, Please’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 1181–1199.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Michael J., ‘Is Enforcement Necessary for Effectiveness? A Model of the International Criminal Law Regime’ (2006) 60 International Organization 935–967.Google Scholar
Goebel, Jr., Julius, ‘The International Responsibility of States for Injuries Sustained by Aliens on Account of Mob Violence, Insurrections and Civil Wars’ (1914) 8 American Journal of International Law 802–852.Google Scholar
Goldie, L. F. E., ‘Liability for Damage and the Progressive Development of International Law’ (1965) 14 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1189–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldmann, Matthias, ‘Implementing the Rome Statute in Europe: From Sovereign Distinction to Convergence in International Criminal Law’ (2005) XVI Finnish Yearbook of International Law 5–29.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack, ‘The Self-Defeating International Criminal Court’ (2003) 70 University of Chicago Law Review 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L., and Posner, Eric A., The Limits of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Goodwin-Gill, Guy S., ‘State Responsibility and the “Good Faith” Obligation in International Law’, in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia and Sarooshi, Dan (eds.), Issues of State Responsibility before International Judicial Institutions (Oxford and Portland, OR: Bloomsbury, 2004), pp. 75–104.Google Scholar
Gordon, Gregory S., ‘The Trial of Peter von Hagenbach: Reconciling History, Historiography and International Criminal Law’, in Heller, Kevin Jon and Simpson, Gerry (eds.), The Hidden Histories of War Crimes Trials (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 13–49.Google Scholar
Gowlland-Debbas, Vera, ‘Security Council Enforcement Actions and Issues of State Responsibility’ (1994) 43 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 55–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Christine, ‘The Different Forms of Reparation: Restitution’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 589–597.Google Scholar
Green, Leslie, ‘Introduction’, in Hart, H. L. A. (ed.), The Concept of Law (1st published 1961, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Griebel, Jörn, and Plücken, Milan, ‘New Developments Regarding the Rules of Attribution? The International Court of Justice’s Decision in Bosnia v. Serbia’ (2008) 21 Leiden Journal of International Law 601–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gros Espiell, Héctor, ‘International Responsibility of the State and Individual Criminal Responsibility in the International Protection of Human Rights’, in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005), pp. 151–160.Google Scholar
Grossman, Claudio, and Bradlow, Daniel D., ‘Are We Being Propelled Towards A People-Centered Transnational Legal Order’ (1993–1994) 9 American University Journal of International Law and Policy 1–26.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, De jure belli ac pacis libri tres (1625) (trans. Kelsey, Francis W., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925).Google Scholar
Guha Roy, S. N., ‘Is the Law of Responsibility of States for Injuries to Aliens A Part of Universal International Law?’ (1961) 55 American Journal of International Law 863–891.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T., ‘Saving Customary International Law’ (2005) 27 Michigan Journal of International Law 115–176.Google Scholar
Hafner, Gerhard, ‘Accountability of International Organizations’ (2003) 97 American Society of International Law Proceedings 236–237.Google Scholar
Hall, Christopher Keith, ‘The First Proposal for a Permanent International Criminal Court’ (1998) International Review of the Red Cross 57–74.Google Scholar
Hall, William Edward, A Treatise on International Law (8th ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924).Google Scholar
Hart, Jr., Henry M., ‘The Aims of the Criminal Law’ (1958) 23 Law and Contemporary Problems 401–441.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., Law, Liberty and Morality (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Gordon, ‘Punishment and Deterrence: The Educative, Moralizing, and Habituating Effects’ (1969) Wisconsin Law Review 550–565.Google Scholar
Heathcote, Sarah, ‘Necessity’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 491–501.Google Scholar
Heffter, August Wilhelm, Le droit international public de L’Europe (trans. Bergson, Jules, Paris: Cotillon, 1857).Google Scholar
Heikkilä, Mikaela, International Criminal Tribunals and Victims of Crime: A Study of the Status of Victims before International Criminal Tribunals and of Factors Affecting This Status (Turku: Åbo Akademi University, 2004).Google Scholar
Heikkilä, Mikaela, Coping with International Atrocities through Criminal Law. A Study into the Typical Features of International Criminality and the Reflection of These Traits in International Criminal Law (Turku: Åbo Akademi University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., and Wuerth, Ingrid, Custom in the Age of Soft Law (Working Paper).Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., and Wuerth, Ingrid B., ‘Customary International Law: An Instrument Choice Perspective’ (2016) 37 Michigan Journal of International Law 563–609.Google Scholar
Henzelin, Marc, Heiskanen, Veijo, and Mettraux, Guénaël, ‘Reparations to Victims before the International Criminal Court: Lessons from International Mass Claims Processes’ (2006) 17 Criminal Law Forum 317–344.Google Scholar
Hessbruegge, Jan Arno, ‘The Historical Development of the Doctrines of Attribution and Due Diligence in International Law’ (2004) 36 New York University Journal of International Law & Politics 265–306.Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems & Progress: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘Issues of State Responsibility before the International Court of Justice’, in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia and Sarooshi, Dan (eds.), Issues of State Responsibility before International Judicial Institutions (Oxford and Portland, OR: Bloomsbury, 2004), pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Hillebrecht, Courtney, ‘The Deterrent Effect of the International Criminal Court: Evidence from Libya’ (2016) 42 International Interactions 616–643.Google Scholar
Hobe, Stephan, ‘The Era of Globalisation as a Challenge to International Law’ (2001– 2002) 40 Duquesne University Law Review 655–665.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Claudia, Learning in Modern International Society: On the Cognitive Problem Solving Abilities of Political Actors (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2008).Google Scholar
Holland, Thomas Erskine, Studies in International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1898).Google Scholar
Huang, Zhxiong, ‘The Attribution Rules in the ILC Articles on State Responsibility: A Preliminary Assessment on Their Application in Cyber Operation’ (2014) 14 Baltic Yearbook of International Law 41–54.Google Scholar
Hudson, Manley O., International Tribunals: Past and Future (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace & Brookings Institute, 1944).Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian, ‘Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics’ (1999) 53 International Organization 379–408.Google Scholar
Isaacs, Tracy, ‘Introduction’, in Isaacs, Tracy and Vernon, Richard (eds.), Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert H., ‘Opening Statement before the International Military Tribunal (1945)’, reproduced in May, Larry and Brown, Jeff (eds.), Philosophy of Law: Classic and Contemporary Readings (Malden and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), pp. 435–440.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Kyle Rex, ‘Doing Business with the Devil: The Challenges of Prosecuting Corporate Officials Whose Business Transactions Facilitate War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity’ (2005) 56 Air Force Law Review 167–232.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Ruth, and McEvoy, Kieran, ‘State Crime by Proxy and Juridical Othering’ (2005) 45 British Journal of Criminology 504–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessberger, F., and Geneuss, J., ‘Down the Drain or Down to Earth? International Criminal Justice under Pressure’ (2013) 11 Journal of International Criminal Justice 501–503.Google Scholar
Jessup, Philip C., ‘Responsibility of States for Injuries to Individuals’ (1946) 46 Columbia Law Review 903–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jinks, Derek, ‘State Responsibility for the Acts of Private Armed Groups’ (2003) 4 Chicago Journal of International Law 83–95.Google Scholar
Jo, Hyeran, and Simmons, Beth A., ‘Can the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity?’ (2016) 70 International Organization 443–475.Google Scholar
Johnston, Douglas M., ‘Functionalism in the Theory of International Law’ (1988) 26 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 3–60.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Rachael Lorna, ‘State Responsibility: A Concerto for Court, Council and Committee’ (2008) 37 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 63–118.Google Scholar
Jones, Annika, ‘Seeking International Criminal Justice in Syria’ (2013) 89 International Law Studies 802–816.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Nina H. B., The Responsibility of States for International Crimes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Nina H. B., ‘Criminality of Organizations under International Law’, in Nollkaemper, André and van der Wilt, Harmen (eds.), System Criminality in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 201–221.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Margo, ‘Using Collective Interests to Ensure Human Rights: An Analysis of the Articles on State Responsibility’ (2004) 79 New York University Law Review 1902–1933.Google Scholar
Kaul, Hans-Peter, ‘Developments at the International Criminal Court. Construction Site for More Justice: The International Criminal Court after Two Years’ (2005) 99 American Journal of International Law 370–384.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, ‘Théorie du droit international public’ (1953–III) 84 Recueil des cours 1–204.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law (3rd printing, Clark: The Lawbook Exchange Ltd, 1959).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State (1st published 1945, trans. Wedberg, Anders, Clark: Lawbook Exchange, 2007).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan, ‘The Stages of the Decline of the Public/Private Division’ (1981–1982) 130 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1349–1357.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Kevin C., ‘A Critical Appraisal of Criminal Deterrence Theory’ (1983–1984) 88 Dickinson Law Review 1–13.Google Scholar
Kerbat, Yann, ‘Interaction between the Forms of Reparation’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 573–587.Google Scholar
Kersten, Mark, ‘A Little Less Isolated and a Lot More Troubling: Ban Ki-moon meets Bashir’, 5 September 2012, Justice in Conflict, justiceinconflict.org/2012/09/05/a-little-less-isolated-and-a-lot-more-troubling-ban-ki-moon-meets-bashir/ (accessed 10 June 2015).Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, and Donaldson, Megan, ‘From Bilateralism to Publicness in International Law’, in Fastenrath, Ulrich, Geiger, Rudolf and Khan, Daniel-Erasmus et al. (eds.), From Bilateralism to Community Interests: Essays in Honour of Judge Bruno Simma (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 79–89.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Stefan, ‘Relative Normativity and the Constitutional Dimension of International Law: A Place for Values in the International Legal System’ (2004) 5 German Law Journal 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, Philippe, Holmes, John T., and Johnson, Mora, ‘International Tribunals and Courts’, in Malone, David M. (ed.), The UN Security Council: From the Cold War to the 21st Century (London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2004), pp. 281–294.Google Scholar
Kiss, Alexandre, ‘L’accident de Tchernobyl: ses consequences au point de vue du Droit international’ (1986) 32 Annuaire français de droit international 139–152.Google Scholar
Kiss, Alexandre, ‘State Responsibility and Liability for Nuclear Damage’ (2006) 35 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 67–83.Google Scholar
Kiss, Alexandre, and Shelton, Dinah, International Environmental Law (2nd ed., Ardsley, New York: Transnational Publishers, 2000).Google Scholar
Kiss, Alexandre, and Shelton, Dinah, ‘Strict Liability in International Environmental Law’, in Ndiaye, Tafsir Malick and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), Law of the Sea, Environmental Law and Settlement of Disputes: Liber Amicorum Judge Thomas A. Mensah (Leiden: Brill, 2007), pp. 1131–1151.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, ‘Just Revenge? The Deterrence Argument in International Criminal Law’ (2001) XII Finnish Yearbook of International Law 249–267.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, ‘Reflections on Soft International Law in a Privatized World’ (2005) XVI Finnish Yearbook of International Law 313–328.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, ‘Compliance Procedures’, in Bodansky, Daniel, Brunnée, Jutta and Hey, Ellen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 995–1009.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, ‘Constitutionalism and the Making of International Law: Fuller’s Procedural Natural Law’ (2008) 5 NoFo 84–112.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, ‘Setting the Scene’, in Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne and Ulfstein, Geir (eds.), The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, ‘Law, Ethics and Global Governance: Accountability in Perspective’ (2013) 11 New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 309–321.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, ‘Responsibility of States and International Organisations in the Context of Cyber Activities with Special Reference to NATO’, in Ziolkowski, Katharina (ed.), Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace: International Law, International Relations and Diplomacy (Tallinn: NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence, 2013), pp. 485–506.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, ‘Book Review on André Nollkaemper and Dov Jacobs (eds.), Distribution of Responsibilities in International Law’ (2016) 27 European Journal of International Law 541–551.Google Scholar
Kleffner, Jann K., ‘The Collective Accountability of Organized Armed Groups for System Crimes’, in Nollkaemper, André and van der Wilt, Harmen (eds.), System Criminality in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 238–269.Google Scholar
Klein, Pierre, ‘Responsibility for Serious Breaches of Obligations Deriving from Peremptory Norms of International Law and United Nations Law’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 1241–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinlein, Thomas, ‘The Language of Public International Law’, in Société Française pour le droit international (ed.), Droit international et diversité des cultures juridiques (Paris: Pedone, 2008), pp. 199–208.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, The International Law of State Responsibility: An Introduction (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopela, Sophia, ‘Civil and Criminal Liability as Mechanisms for the Prevention of Oil Pollution: The Erika Case’ (2011) 20 Review of the European Community & International Environmental Law 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korhonen, Outi, and Selkälä, Toni, ‘Theorizing Responsibility’, in Orford, Anne and Hoffmann, Florian (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on the Theory of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 844–861.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, Valtion kansainvälinen vastuu yksityisen toiminnan aiheuttamasta kansainvälisestä ympäristövahingosta, Kansainvälisoikeudellinen päälaudaturkirjoitus (Turku: Turun Yliopisto, 1981).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘International Liability for Transfrontier Pollution Damage’ (1990) 2 International Environmental Affairs. A Journal for Research and Policy 309–316.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘The Politics of International Law’ (1990) 1 European Journal of International Law 4–32.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Ison-Beltin siltariita’ (1992) 8 Lakimies 1300–1332.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Hierarchy in International Law: A Sketch’ (1997) 8 European Journal of International Law 566–582.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Solidarity Measures: State Responsibility as a New International Order?’ (2001) 72 British Yearbook of International Law 337–356.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Between Impunity and Show Trials’ (2002) 6 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 1–35.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Hersch Lauterpacht and the Development of International Criminal Law’ (2004) 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice 810–825.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (reissue with new epilogue, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘International Law in Europe: Between Tradition and Renewal’ (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law. Report of the Study Group of the International law Commission, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682 (13 April 2006).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics’ (2007) 1 The Modern Law Review 1–30.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Doctrines of State Responsibility’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 45–51.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, The Politics of International Law (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Humanity’s Law by Ruti G. Teitel’ (2012) 26 Ethics & International Law 395–398.Google Scholar
Kozma, Julia, Nowak, Manfred, and Scheinin, Martin, A World Court of Human Rights: Consolidated Statute and Commentary (Vienna, Graz: Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 2010).Google Scholar
Kramer, Matthew H., ‘On the Moral Status of the Rule of Law’ (2004) 63 Cambridge Law Journal 65–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Claus, ‘L’organe de facto en droit international public, réflexions sur l’imputation à l’Etat de l’acte d’un particulier à la lumière des développements récents’ (2001) 105 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 93–144.Google Scholar
Krieg, Andreas, and Rickli, Jean-Marc, Surrogate Warfare: The Transformation of War in the Twenty-first Century (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico, ‘International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the Shaping of the International Legal Order’ (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 369–408.Google Scholar
Ku, Julian, and Nzelibe, Jide, ‘Do International Criminal Tribunals Deter or Exacerbate Humanitarian Atrocities?’ (2006) 84 Washington University Law Review 777–833.Google Scholar
Kyriakakis, Joanna, ‘Australian Prosecution of Corporations for International Crimes. The Potential of the Commonwealth Criminal Code’ (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice 809–826.Google Scholar
Laithier, Lucie, ‘Private Codification Efforts’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 53–59.Google Scholar
Langlet, David, Prior Informed Consent and Hazardous Trade. Regulating Trade in Hazardous Goods at the Intersection of Sovereignty, Free Trade and Environmental Protection (Alphen aan den Rejin: Kluwer Law International, 2009).Google Scholar
Lanovoy, Vladyslav, Complicity and its Limits in the Law of International Responsibility (Oxford and Portland, OR: Bloomsbury, 2016).Google Scholar
Lanovoy, Vladyslav, ‘The Use of Force by Non-state Actors and the Limits of Attribution of Conduct’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 563–585.Google Scholar
Lasok, David, ‘The Eichmann Trial’ (1962) 11 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 355–374.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, International Law: Collected Papers, Vol. 1, General Works (ed. Lauterpacht, Elihu) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law (first published by Longmans, Green and Co. Ltd: London, 1927, North Haven: Archon Books, 1970).Google Scholar
Lee, Edward G., and Sproule, D. W., ‘Liability for Damage Caused by Space Debris: The Cosmos 954 Claim’ (1988) 26 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 273–279.Google Scholar
Lefeber, René, Transboundary Environmental Interference and the Origins of State Liability (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996).Google Scholar
Lehnardt, Chia, ‘Private Military Companies and State Responsibility’, in Chesterman, Simon and Lehnardt, Chia (eds.), From Mercenaries to Market (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 139–157.Google Scholar
Lehnardt, Chia, ‘Individual Liability of Private Military Personnel under International Criminal Law’ (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 1015–1034.Google Scholar
Lehto, Marja, International Responsibility for Terrorist Acts: A Shift towards More Indirect Forms of Responsibility (Rovaniemi: Lapland University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Lehto, Marja, Indirect Responsibility for Terrorist Acts. Redefinition of the Concept of Terrorism Beyond Violent Acts (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010).Google Scholar
Lesaffer, Randall, ‘Argument from Roman Law in Current International Law’ (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 25–58.Google Scholar
Lewis, Margaret K., ‘An Analysis of State Responsibility for the Chinese-American Airplane Collision Incident’ (2002) 77 New York University Law Review 1404–1441.Google Scholar
Lillich, Richard B., ‘The Current Status of the Law of State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens’, in Lillich, Richard B. (ed.), International Law of State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1983), pp. 1–61.Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, ‘The Functionality of Conceptual Terms in International Law and International Legal Discourse’ (2013/2014) 6 European Journal of Legal Studies 27–50.Google Scholar
Louka, Elli, International Environmental Law: Fairness, Effectiveness, and World Order (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Lowe, Vaughan, ‘The Iraq Crisis: What Now?’ (2003) 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 859–871.Google Scholar
Lu, Catherine, ‘The International Criminal Court as an Institution of Moral Regeneration: Problems and Prospects’, in Harrington, Joanna, Milde, Michael and Vernon, Richard (eds.), Bringing Power to Justice? The Prospects of the International Criminal Court (Montreal & Kingston: McGill’s-Queen University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Luban, David, ‘State Criminality and the Ambition of International Criminal Law’, in Isaacs, Tracy and Vernon, Richard (eds.), Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 61–91.Google Scholar
Maison, Rafaëlle, La responsabilité individuelle pour crime d’État en droit international public (Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2004).Google Scholar
Malanczuk, Peter, Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law (7th revised ed., London and New York: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar
Mälksoo, Lauri, ‘State Responsibility and the Challenge of the Realist Paradigm: The Demand of Baltic Victims of Soviet Mass Repressions for Compensation from Russia’ (2003) 3 Baltic Yearbook of International Law 57–76.Google Scholar
Margulies, Peter, ‘Sovereignty and Cyber Attacks: Technology’s Challenge to the Law of State Responsibility’ (2013) 14 Melbourne Journal of International Law 1–24.Google Scholar
Marks, Stephen P., ‘Tying Prometheus Down: The International Law of Human Genetic Manipulation’ (2002) 3 Chicago Journal of International Law 115–136.Google ScholarPubMed
Marks, Susan, ‘State-Centrism, International Law and the Anxieties of Influence’ (2006) 19 Leiden Journal of International Law 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marston Danner, Allison, ‘The Nuremberg Industrialist Prosecutions and Aggressive War’ (2005–2006) 46 Virginia Journal of International Law 651–676.Google Scholar
Mason, Michael, ‘Transnational Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage: Examining Changing Spatialities of Environmental Liability’, LSE Research Papers in Environmental and Spatial Analysis, no 69 (2002), Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK, 1–24.Google Scholar
Mason, Michael, ‘Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage: Examining the Evolving Scope for Environmental Compensation in the International Regime’ (2003) 27 Marine Policy 1–12.Google Scholar
Matsui, Yoshiro, ‘The Transformation of the Law of State Responsibility’, in Provost, René (ed.), State Responsibility in International Law (Dartmouth: Ashgate, 2002), pp. 3–63.Google Scholar
Mayer, Benoit, ‘Climate Change Reparations and the Law and Practice of State Responsibility’ (2017) 7 Asian Journal of International Law 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAuliffe, Pádraig, ‘Suspended Disbelief? The Curious Endurance of the Deterrence Rationale in International Criminal Law’ (2012) 10 New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 227–262.Google Scholar
McAuliffe, Padraig, ‘From Watchdog to Workhorse: Explaining the Emergence of the ICC’s Burden-sharing Policy as an Example of Creeping Cosmopolitanism’ (2014) 13 Chinese Journal of International Law 259–296.Google Scholar
McAuliffe, Pádraig, and Schwöbel-Patel, Christine, ‘Disciplinary Matchmaking. Critics of International Criminal Law Meet Critics of Liberal Peacebuilding’ (2018) 16 Journal of International Criminal Justice 985–1009.Google Scholar
McDougal, Myres S., Lasswell, Harold D., and Chen, Lung-Chu, Human Rights and World Public Order (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
McDougal, Myres S., Lasswell, Harold D., and Vlasic, Ivan A., Law and Public Order in Space (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963).Google Scholar
McDougal, Myres S., and Schlei, Norbert A., ‘The Hydrogen Bomb Tests in Perspective: Lawful Measures for Security’ (1954–1955) 64 Yale Law Journal 648–710.Google Scholar
McRae, Ben, ‘Entry into Force of the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage: Opening the Umbrella’ (2015) Nuclear Law Bulletin 7–25.Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric, ‘Epilogue to an Endless Debate: The International Criminal Court’s Third Party Jurisdiction and the Looming Revolution of International Law’ (2001) 12 European Journal of International Law 247–268.Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric, ‘Accountability and Ethics’, in Reydams, Luc, Wouters, Jan and Ryngaert, Cedric (eds.), International Prosecutors (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 416–487.Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric, ‘Globalization’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric, ‘State Responsibility for Aggression: A Human Rights Approach’ (2017) 58 Harvard International Law Online Journal 62–65.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor, ‘State Responsibility for Violations of Human Rights’ (1989) 83 American Society of International Law Proceedings 372–385.Google Scholar
Meyer, Zach, ‘Private Commercialization of Space in an International Regime: A Proposal for a Space District’ (2010) 30 Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 241–261.Google Scholar
Milanović, Marko, and Papić, Tatjana, ‘As Bad as It Gets: The European Court of Human Rights’s Behrami and Saramati Decision and General International Law’ (2009) 58 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 267–297.Google Scholar
Miller, Justin, ‘Criminal Law – An Agency for Social Control’ (1934) 43 Yale Law Review 691–715.Google Scholar
Mohr, Manfred, ‘The ILC’s Distinction between “International Crimes” and “International Delicts” and Its Implications’, in Spinedi, Marina and Simma, Bruno (eds.), United Nations Codification of State Responsibility (New York: Oceana Publications, 1987), pp. 115–141.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans, ‘Positivism, Functionalism, and International Law’ (1940) 34 American Journal of International Law 260–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Madeleine, ‘High Crimes and Misconceptions: The ICC and Non-State Parties’ (2001) 64 Law & Contemporary Problems 13–66.Google Scholar
Morss, John R., International Law as the Law of Collectives: Toward a Law of People (Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2013).Google Scholar
Mosoti, Victor, ‘In Our Own Image, Not Theirs: Damages as an Antidote to the Remedial Deficiencies in the WTO Dispute Settlement Process; A View from Sub-Saharan Africa’ (2001) 19 Boston University International Law Journal 231–256.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel, ‘Towards Instrumentalism at the International Criminal Court’ (2014) 39 Yale Journal of International Law 55–65.Google Scholar
Mujezinović Larsen, Kjetil, ‘Attribution of Conduct in Peace Operations: The “Ultimate Authority and Control” Test’ (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 509–531.Google Scholar
Müller, Andreas Th., and Stegmiller, Ignaz, ‘Self-Referrals on Trial. From Panacea to Patient’ (2010) 8 Journal of International Criminal Justice 1267–1294.Google Scholar
Müller, Daniel, ‘The Work of García Amador on State Responsibility for Injury Caused to Aliens’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 69–74.Google Scholar
Murphy, Liam, ‘International Responsibility’, in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 299–315.Google Scholar
Mussa, Cerina Banu Issufo, Vossenaar, René, and Nakisisa Waniala, Nimrod, ‘Eastern and Southern Africa: The Experience of Kenya, Mozambique, The United Republic of Tanzania and Uganda’, in Jha, Veena (ed.), Environmental Regulation and Food Safety: Studies of Protection and Protectionism (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2005), pp. 103–144.Google Scholar
Nakatani, Kazuhiro, ‘Diplomacy and State Responsibility’, in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005), pp. 37–47.Google Scholar
Nerlich, Volker, ‘Core Crimes and Transnational Business Corporations’ (2010) 8 Journal of International Criminal Justice 895–908.Google Scholar
Nieminen, Katja, ‘The Rules of Attribution and the Private Military Contractors at Abu Ghraib: Private Acts or Public Wrongs?’ (2006) XV Finnish Yearbook of International Law 289–319.Google Scholar
Nissel, Alan T., ‘The Duality of State Responsibility’ (2013) 44 Columbia Human Rights Law Review 793–858.Google Scholar
Nissel, Tzvika Alan, A History of State Responsibility: The Struggle for International Standards (1870–1960) (Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2016).Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, ‘Concurrence between Individual Responsibility and State Responsibility in International Law’ (2003) 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 615–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, ‘Cluster-litigation in Cases of Transboundary Environmental Harm’, in Faure, Michael and Ying, Song (eds.), China and International Environmental Liability: Legal Remedies for Transboundary Pollution (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2008), pp. 11–37.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, ‘Towards Public Responsibility in International Law’, conference presentation at Global Constitutionalism: Process and Substance, Kandersteg, 17–19 January 2008.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, ‘Constitutionalization and the Unity of the Law of International Responsibility’ (2009) 16 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 535–563.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, ‘State Responsibility for International Crimes: A Review of Principles of Reparation’, in Constantinides, Aristotle and Zaikos, Nikos (eds.), The Diversity of International Law: Essays in Honour of Professor Kalliopi K. Koufa (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009), pp. 487–518.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, ‘Procedural Aspects of Shared Responsibility in International Adjudication. Introduction’ (2013) 4 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, and Jacobs, Dov, ‘Shared Responsibility in International Law: A Conceptual Framework’ (2012–2013) 34 Michigan Journal of International Law 359–438.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, and Jacobs, Dov (eds.), Distribution of Responsibilities in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, and Jacobs, Dov, ‘Introduction: Mapping the Normative Framework’, in Nollkaemper, André and Jacobs, Dov (eds.), Distribution of Responsibilities in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, and Plakokefalos, Ilias (eds.), Principles of Shared Responsibility in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, and Plakokefalos, Ilias (eds.), The Practice of Shared Responsibility in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, and van der Wilt, Harmen, ‘Conclusions and Outlook’, in Nollkaemper, André and van der Wilt, Harmen (eds.), System Criminality in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 338–353.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, and van der Wilt, Harmen, ‘Preface’, in Nollkaemper, André and van der Wilt, Harmen (eds.), System Criminality in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. vii–viii.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André, and van der Wilt, Harmen, (eds.), System Criminality in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Nolte, Georg, ‘From Dionisio Anzilotti to Roberto Ago: The Classical International Law of State Responsibility and the Traditional Primacy of a Bilateral Conception of Inter-state Relations’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 1033–1098.Google Scholar
Nolte, Georg, and Aust, Helmut Philipp, ‘Equivocal Helpers – Complicit States, Mixed Messages and International Law’ (2009) 58 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1–30.Google Scholar
Norrie, A., ‘“Simulacra of morality”? Beyond the Ideal/Actual Antinomies of Criminal Justice’, in Duff, Antony (ed.), Philosophy and Criminal Law: Principle and Critique (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 101–155.Google Scholar
Noyes, John E., and Smith, Brian D., ‘State Responsibility and the Principle of Joint and Several Liability’ (1988) 13 Yale Journal of International Law 225–267.Google Scholar
Ohlin, Jens David, ‘Three Conceptual Problems with the Doctrine of Joint Criminal Enterprise’ (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice 69–90.Google Scholar
Okowa, Phoebe, State Responsibility for Transboundary Air Pollution in International Law (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Okowa, Phoebe, ‘State and Individual Responsibility in Internal Conflicts: Contours of an Evolving Relationship’ (2009) 20 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 143–188.Google Scholar
Olleson, Simon, ‘Attribution in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2016) 31 ICSID Review 457–483.Google Scholar
Ormerod, David, Smith and Hogan Criminal Law (12th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Osaka, Eri, ‘Corporate Liability, Government Liability, and the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster’ (2012) 21 Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 433–459.Google Scholar
Osiel, Mark J., ‘In Defense of Liberal Show Trials–Nuremberg and Beyond’, in Mettraux, Guénaël (ed.), Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trial (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 704–725.Google Scholar
Paddeu, Federica, ‘To Convene or Not to Convene? The Future Status of the Articles on State Responsibility: Recent Developments’ (2018) 21 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 83–123.Google Scholar
Palojärvi, Pia, A Battle in the Bits and Bytes: Computer Network Attacks and the Law of Armed Conflict. The Erik Castrén Institute Research Reports 27/2009 (Helsinki: The Erik Castrén Institute, 2009).Google Scholar
Paparinskis, Martins, ‘Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness in International Investment Law’ (2016) 31 ICSID Review 484–503.Google Scholar
Parlett, Kate, ‘The Application of the Rules on Countermeasures in Investment Claims. Visions and Realities of International Law as an Open System’, in Chinkin, Christine and Baetens, Freya (eds.), Sovereignty, Statehood and State Responsibility: Essays in Honour of James Crawford (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 389–405.Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas, ‘From Territoriality to Functionality: Towards a Legal Methodology’, in Dekker, Ige F. and Wouter G., Werner (eds.), Governance and International Legal Theory (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2004), pp. 59–96.Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas, ‘Reciprocity Revisited’, in Fastenrath, Ulrich, Geiger, Rudolf, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus et al. (eds.), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Judge Bruno Simma (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 113–137.Google Scholar
Paulus, Andreas, ‘Whether Universal Values can Prevail over Bilateralism and Reciprocity’, in Cassese, Antonio (ed.), Realizing Utopia: The Future of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 89–104.Google Scholar
Paust, Jordan J., ‘My Lai and Vietnam: Norms, Myths and Leader Responsibility’ (1972) 57 Military Law Review 99–187.Google Scholar
Payne, Christian, ‘International Law Cannot Keep Up with Cyber-Criminals’, World Economic Forum, 25 February 2019, www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/02/why-international-law-is-failing-to-keep-pace-with-technology-in-preventing-cyber-attacks/ (accessed 20 May 2019).Google Scholar
Pellet, Alain, ‘Can a State Commit a Crime? Definitely, Yes!’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 425–434.Google Scholar
Pellet, Alain, ‘Les Articles de la C.D.I. sur la responsabilité de l’État pour fait internationalement illicite. Suite-et fin?’ (2002) 48 Annuaire francais de droit international 1–23.Google Scholar
Pellet, Alain, ‘The ILC’s Articles on State Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts and Related Texts’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 75–94.Google Scholar
Pellet, Alain, ‘The Definition of Responsibility in International Law’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), Oxford Commentaries on International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
Pellet, Alain, ‘Responsibility of States in Cases of Human-Rights or Humanitarian-law Violations’, in Crawford, James, Koroma, Abdul B., Mahmoudi, Said and Pellet, Alain (eds.), The International Legal Order: Current Needs and Possible Responses. Essays in Honour of Djamchid Momtaz (Leiden and Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2017), pp. 230–251.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, ‘International Dispute Settlement: A Network of Cooperational Duties’ (2003) 14 European Journal of International Law 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Anne, ‘Membership in Global Constitutional Community’, in Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne and Ulfstein, Geir (eds.), The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 153–262.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, ‘The Merits of Global Constitutionalism’ (2009) 16 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillimore, Robert, Commentaries upon International Law (3rd ed., London: Butterworths, 1879).Google Scholar
Pierik, Roland, ‘Shared Responsibility in International Law. A Normative-Philosophical Analysis’, in Nollkaemper, André and Jacobs, Dov (eds.), Distribution of Responsibilities in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 36–61.Google Scholar
Pitea, Cesare, ‘The Legal Status of NGOs in Environmental Non-Compliance Procedures: An Assessment of Law and Practice’, in Dupuy, Pierre-Marie and Vierucci, Luisa (eds.), NGOs in International Law: Efficiency in Flexibility? (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008), pp. 181–203.Google Scholar
Plakokefalos, Ilias, ‘The Use of Force by Non-state Actors and the Limits of Attribution of Conduct: A Reply to Vladyslav Lanovoy’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 587–593.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric, and Sykes, Alan O., ‘An Economic Analysis of State and Individual Responsibility under International Law’ (2007) 9 American Law and Economics Review 72–134.Google Scholar
Postema, Gerald J., ‘Custom in International Law: A Normative Practice Account’, in Perreau-Saussine, Amanda and Murphy, James Bernard (eds.), The Nature of Customary Law: Legal Historical and Philosophical Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 279–306.Google Scholar
Powles, Steven, ‘Joint Criminal Enterprise: Criminal Liability by Prosecutorial Ingenuity and Judicial Creativity?’ (2004) 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice 606–619.Google Scholar
Prost, Mario, ‘Hierarchy and the Sources of International Law: A Critique’ (2017) 39 Houston Journal of International Law 285–330.Google Scholar
Proulx, Vincent-Joël, Transnational Terrorism and State Accountability: A New Theory of Prevention (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2012).Google Scholar
Proulx, Vincent-Joël, ‘An Uneasy Transition? Linkages between the Law of State Responsibility and the Law Governing the Responsibility of International Organizations’, in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2013), pp. 109–120.Google Scholar
Proulx, Vincent-Joël, Institutionalizing State Responsibility: Global Security and UN Organs (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Proulx, Vincent-Joël, ‘The Marshall Islands Judgments and Multilateral Disputes at the World Court: Whither Access to International Justice?’ (2017) 111 AJIL Unbound 96–101.Google Scholar
Proulx, Vincent-Joël, ‘The World Court’s Jurisdictional Formalism and Its Lost Market Share: The Marshall Islands Decisions and the Quest for a Suitable Dispute Settlement Forum for Multilateral Disputes’ (2017) 30 Leiden Journal of International Law 925–946.Google Scholar
Proulx, Vincent-Joël, ‘International Civil Individual Responsibility and the Security Council: Building the Foundations of a General Regime’ (2019) 40 Michigan Journal of International Law 215–287.Google Scholar
Provost, René (ed.), State Responsibility in International Law (Dartmouth: Ashgate, 2002).Google Scholar
Quéneudec, Jean-Pierre, La responsabilité internationale de l’État pour les fautes personelles de ses agents (Paris: Pichon et Durand-Auzias, 1966).Google Scholar
Radetzki, Marcus, and Radetzki, Marian, ‘Private Arrangements to Cover Large-Scale Liabilities Caused by Nuclear and Other Industrial Catastrophes’ (2000) 25 The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 180–195.Google Scholar
Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005).Google Scholar
Ralph, Jason, ‘International Society, the International Criminal Court and US Foreign Policy’ (2005) 31 Review of International Studies 27–44.Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven R., ‘The Schizophrenias of International Criminal Law’ (1998) 33 Texas International Law Journal 237–256.Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven R., ‘The International Criminal Court and the Limits of Global Judicialization’ (2003) 38 Texas International Law Journal 445–454.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘The Rule of Law and Its Virtue’, in Raz, Joseph (ed.), The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970), pp. 210–229.Google Scholar
Recalde Vela, Maria Jose, ‘Statelessness at the United Nations Compensation Commission’, Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion, Statelessness Working Paper Series No. 2015/03, December 2015.Google Scholar
Redgwell, Catherine, ‘The Wrong Trousers: State Responsibility and International Environmental Law’, in Evans, Malcolm and Koutrakos, Panos (eds.), The International Responsibility of the European Union: European and International Perspectives (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2013), pp. 257–274.Google Scholar
Reid, Natalie L., ‘Bridging the Conceptual Chasm: Superior Responsibility as the Missing Link between State and Individual Responsibility in International Law’ (2005) 18 Leiden Journal of International Law 795–828.Google Scholar
Reis, Tarcísio Hardman, Compensation for Environmental Damages under International Law: The Role of the International Judge (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2011).Google Scholar
Reisman, Michael W., ‘Legal Responses to Genocide and Other Massive Violations of Human Rights’ (1996) 59 Law & Contemporary Problems 75–80.Google Scholar
Reuter, Paul, ‘Principes de droit international public’ (1961–II) 103 Receuil des Cours Annuaire de Droit International 425.Google Scholar
Reuter, Paul, Droit International Public (Paris: Dalloz, 1973).Google Scholar
Reuter, Paul, ‘Trois observations sur le codification de la responsabilité international des Etats pour fait illicite’ (1991) Le droit international au service de la paix, de la justice et du développement. Etudes dédiées à la mémoire de Michel Virally 389–398.Google Scholar
Reydams, Luc, ‘Universal Jurisdiction over Atrocities in Rwanda: Theory and Practice’ (1996) 4 European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 18–47.Google Scholar
Roach Anleu, Sharyn L., ‘The Role of Civil Sanctions in Social Control: A Socio-Legal Examination’ (1998) 9 Crime Prevention Studies 21–43.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea, ‘Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: Reconciliation’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law 757–791.Google Scholar
Romero Philips, Christen, ‘The International Criminal Court & Deterrence. A Report to the Office of Global Criminal Justice, U.S. Department of State’, Stanford Law School: Law & Policy Lab, June 2016.Google Scholar
Root, Elihu, ‘The Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad’ (1910) 4 American Journal of International Law 517–528.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Friedrich, ‘Collective Reparations for Victims of Armed Conflicts’ (2010) 92 International Review of the Red Cross 731–746.Google Scholar
Rosenstock, Robert, ‘The ILC and State Responsibility’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 792–797.Google Scholar
Roth, Kenneth, ‘Africa Attacks the International Criminal Court’, New York Review of Books, 6 February 2014.Google Scholar
Roucounas, Emmanuel, ‘Non-State Actors: Areas of International Responsibility in Need of Further Exploration’, in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005), pp. 391–404.Google Scholar
Sabahi, Borzu, Compensation and Restitution in Investor-State Arbitration: Principles and Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Sachariew, Kamen, ‘The Definition of Thresholds of Tolerance of Transboundary Environmental Injury Under International Law: Development and Present Status’ (1990) 37 Netherlands International Law Review 193–206.Google Scholar
Sadat, Leila Nadya, The International Criminal Court and the Transformation of International Law: Justice for the New Millennium (Ardsley, New York: Transnational Publishers, 2002).Google Scholar
Sadat, Leila Nadya, ‘The Legacy of the ICTY: The International Criminal Court’ (2003) 37 New England Law Review 1073–1080.Google Scholar
Sadat, Leila Nadya, ‘The French Experience’, in Cherif Bassiouni, M. (ed.), International Criminal Law: Volume III. International Enforcement (3rd ed., Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 329–358.Google Scholar
Sadat, Leila Nadya, (ed.), Seeking Accountability for the Unlawful Use of Force (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Sadat, Leila Nadya, and Carden, Richard S., ‘The New International Criminal Court: An Uneasy Revolution’ (1999–2000) 88 Georgetown Law Journal 381–474.Google Scholar
Saland, Per, ‘International Criminal Law Principles’, in Lee, Roy S. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999), pp. 189–216.Google Scholar
Sands, Philippe, Principles of International Environmental Law (2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Schabas, William A., An Introduction to the International Criminal Court (3rd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Schabas, William A., War Crimes and Human Rights: Essays on the Death Penalty, Justice and Accountability (London: Cameron May, 2008).Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, ‘The Quasi-Judicial Rôle of the Security Council and the General Assembly’ (1964) 58 American Journal of International Law 960–965.Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, ‘The Emergence of International Environmental Law’ (1991) 44 Journal of International Affairs 457–493.Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, International Law in Theory and Practice (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1991).Google Scholar
Scheffer, David J., ‘Milosevic, Killing Fields, and “Kangaroo” Courts: Symposium on an Emerging International Criminal Justice System. Should the United States Join the International Criminal Court?’ (2002) 9 University of California Davis Journal of International Law & Policy 45–52.Google Scholar
Schense, Jennifer, and Carter, Linda (eds.), Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: The Deterrent Effect of International Criminal Tribunals (Brussels: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2017).Google Scholar
Schmalenbach, Kirsten, ‘Dispute Settlement’, in Klabbers, Jan and Wallendahl, Åsa (eds.), Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011), pp. 251–284.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N. (ed.), Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., and Vihul, Liis, ‘Proxy Wars in Cyberspace: The Evolving International Law of Attribution’ (2014) 1 Fletcher Security Review 53–72.Google Scholar
Schoen, Paul, Die völkerrechtliche Haftung der Staaten aus unerlaubten Handlungen, Ergänzungsheft 2, zur Zeitschrift für Völkerrecht Band X (Breslau: J. U. Kern’s Verlag, 1917).Google Scholar
Schwartz, Priscilla, ‘The Polluter-Pays Principle’, in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Ong, David M. and Merkouris, Panos (eds.), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 2010), pp. 243–261.Google Scholar
Scobbie, Iain, ‘The Invocation of Responsibility for the Breach of “Obligations under Peremptory Norms of General International Law”’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 1201–1220.Google Scholar
Scott, Sterling, ‘Codification of State Responsibility in International Law: A Review and Assessment’ (1985) 9 ASILS International Law Journal 1–36.Google Scholar
Scovazzi, Tullio, ‘Some Remarks on International Responsibility in the Field of Environmental Protection’, in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005), pp. 209–222.Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah, ‘Protecting Human Rights in a Globalized World’ (2002) 25 Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 273–322.Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah, ‘Righting Wrongs: Reparations in the Articles on State Responsibility’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 833–856.Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah, ‘Normative Hierarchy in International Law’ (2006) 100 American Journal of International Law 291–323.Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah, Remedies in International Human Rights Law (2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Shiju, M. V., ‘Standard of Liability under the Cartagena Protocol’, in Raju, K. D. (ed.), Genetically Modified Organisms: Emerging Law and Policy in India (New Delhi: Teri Press, 2007), pp. 79–91.Google Scholar
Short, Nicola, ‘The Role of NGOs in the Ottawa Process to Ban Landmines’ (1999) 4 International Negotiation 481–500.Google Scholar
Sicilianos, Linos-Alexander, ‘The Classification of Obligations and the Multilateral Dimension of the Relations of International Responsibility’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 1127–1145.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, ‘Bilateralism and Community Interest in the Law of State Responsibility’, in Dinstein, Yoram (ed.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity: Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne (Dordrecht: Martinus Njihoff Publishers, 1989), pp. 821–844.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, ‘From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International Law’ (1994–VI) 250 Receuil des Cours 217–384.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, ‘Universality of International Law from the Perspective of a Practitioner’ (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 265–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simma, Bruno, and Pulkowski, Dirk, ‘Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law’ (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law 483–529.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, and Pulkowski, Dirk, ‘Leges Speciales and Self-Contained Regimes’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 139–163.Google Scholar
Simpson, Gerry, Law, War & Crime: War Crimes Trials and the Reinvention of International Law (Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Skouteris, Thomas, ‘The Vocabulary of Progress in Interwar International Law: An Intellectual Portrait of Stelios Seferiades’ (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 823–856.Google Scholar
Skouteris, Thomas, The Notion of Progress in International Law Discourse (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Sloane, Robert, ‘The Expressive Capacity of International Punishment: The Limits of National Law Analogy and the Potential of International Criminal Law’ (2007) 43 Stanford Journal of International Law 39–94.Google Scholar
Sloane, Robert D., ‘On the Use and Abuse of Necessity in the Law of State Responsibility’ (2012) 106 American Journal of International Law 447–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeulers, Alette, ‘Punishing the Enemies of All Mankind’ (2008) 21 Leiden Journal of International Law 971–993.Google Scholar
Smeulers, Alette, and van Niekerk, Sander, ‘Abu Ghraib and the War on Terror – A Case Against Donald Rumsfeld?’ (2009) 51 Crime, Law and Social Change 327–349.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack, and Vinjamuri, Leslie, ‘Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice’ (2003/2004) 28 International Security 5–44.Google Scholar
Sohn, Louis B., and Baxter, Richard, ‘Responsibility of States for Injuries to the Economic Interests of Aliens’ (1961) 55 American Journal of International Law 545–584.Google Scholar
Soltau, Friedrich, Fairness in International Climate Change Law and Policy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Sorel, Jean-Marc, ‘The Concept of “Soft Responsibility”?’ in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 165–171.Google Scholar
Sotaniemi, Anna, ‘Elements of the Nordic Practice: The Nordic Countries in Co-ordination’ (2003) 72 Nordic Journal of International Law 521–535.Google Scholar
Spijkers, Otto, ‘What’s Running the World: Global Values, International Law and the United Nations’ (2009–2010) 4 Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Rights Law 67–87.Google Scholar
Stacy, Helen, ‘Criminalizing Culture’, in May, Larry and Hoskins, Zachary (eds.), International Criminal Law and Philosophy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 75–90.Google Scholar
Stockburger, Peter Z., ‘Control and Capabilities Test: Toward a New Lex Specialis Governing State Responsibility for Third Party Cyber Incidents’, in Roigas, H., Jakschis, R., Lindström, L. and Minárik, T. (eds.), Defending the Core, 9th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (Tallinn: NATO CCD COE Publications, 2017), pp. 149–162.Google Scholar
Strandberg, Hugo, Escaping My Responsibility. Investigations into the Nature of Morality (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2009).Google Scholar
Stromseth, Jane, ‘Justice on the Ground: Can International Criminal Courts Strengthen Domestic Rule of Law in Post-Conflict Societies?’ (2009) 1 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 89–97.Google Scholar
Strupp, Karl, Das völkerrechtliche Delikt (Stuttgart: W. Karlhammer, 1920).Google Scholar
Strupp, Karl, Éléments du droit international public universel, européen et americain (2nd ed., Paris: Les Éditions Internationales, 1930).Google Scholar
Suganami, Hidemi, The Domestic Analogy and World Order Proposals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Swart, Bert, ‘Modes of International Criminal Liability’, in Cassese, Antonio (ed.), The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 82–93.Google Scholar
Székely, Alberto, ‘“General Principles” and “Planned Measures” Provisions in the International Law Commission’s Draft Articles on the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses: A Mexican Point of View’ (1992) 3 Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy 93–101.Google Scholar
Tallgren, Immi, ‘We Did It? The Vertigo of Law and Everyday Life at the Diplomatic Conference on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court’ (1999) 12 Leiden Journal of International Law 683–707.Google Scholar
Tallgren, Immi, ‘La Grande Illusion’ (2002) 15 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 297–316.Google Scholar
Tallgren, Immi, ‘The Sense and Sensibility of International Criminal Law’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 561–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallgren, Immi, and Skouteris, Thomas, ‘Editors’ Introduction’, in Tallgren, Immi and Skouteris, Thomas (eds.), The New Histories of International Criminal Law: Retrials (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Talmon, Stefan, ‘A Plurality of Responsible Actors: International Responsibility for Acts of the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq’, in Shiner, Phil and Williams, Andrew (eds.), The Iraqi War and International Law (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2008), pp. 185–230.Google Scholar
Tams, Christian, ‘Unity and Diversity in the Law of State Responsibility’, in Zimmerman, Andreas and Hoffmann, Rainer (eds.), Unity and Diversity in International Law. Proceedings of an International Symposium of the Kiel Walther Schücking Institute of International Law November 4–7, 2004 (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2006), pp. 435–458.Google Scholar
Tams, Christian J., Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Tams, Christian J., ‘The Use of Force against Terrorists’ (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 359–397.Google Scholar
Tams, Christian J., ‘Individual States as Guardians of Community Interests’, in Fastenrath, Ulrich, Geiger, Rudolf, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus et al. (eds.), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Judge Bruno Simma (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 379–405.Google Scholar
Tams, Christian J., ‘Law-making in Complex Processes: The World Court and the Modern Law of State Responsibility’, in Chinkin, Christine and Baetens, Freya (eds.), Sovereignty, Statehood and State Responsibility: Essays in Honour of James Crawford (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 287–306.Google Scholar
Tams, Christian J., and Asteriti, Alessandra, ‘Erga Omnes, Jus Cogens and Their Impact on the Law of Responsibility’, in Evans, Malcolm and Koutrakos, Panos (eds.), International Responsibility of the European Union: European and International Perspectives (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2013), pp. 163–188.Google Scholar
Tasioulas, John, ‘Customary International Law and the Quest for Global Justice’, in Perreau-Saussine, Amanda and Murphy, James Bernard (eds.), The Nature of Customary Law: Legal Historical and Philosophical Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 307–335.Google Scholar
Templeton, Jessica, and Kohler, Pia, ‘Implementation and Compliance under the Minamata Convention on Mercury’ (2014) 23 Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 211–220.Google Scholar
Teubner, Günther, ‘The Invisible Cupola: From Causal to Collective Attribution in Ecological Liability’ (1994–1995) 16 Cardozo Law Review 429–464.Google Scholar
Thirlway, H. W. A, International Customary Law and Codification (Leiden: A.W Sijthoff, 1972).Google Scholar
Tietenberg, Thomas H., Emissions Trading: An Exercise in Reforming Pollution Policy (Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Inc., 1985).Google Scholar
Tiewul, S. Azadon, ‘International Law and Nuclear Test Explosions on the High Seas’ (1974–1975) 8 Cornell International Law Journal 45–70.Google Scholar
Togas, Marie-Louise, ‘La responsabilité internationale d’État pour le fait d’entreprises militaires privées’ (2008) 45 Annuaire Canadien de droit international 97–130.Google Scholar
Tomuschat, Christian, ‘The Complementarity of International Treaty Law, Customary International Law, and Non-Contractual Lawmaking: Comment by Christian Tomuschat’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger and Röber, Volken (eds.), Developments of International Law in Treaty Making (Berlin: Springer, 2005), pp. 401–408.Google Scholar
Tomuschat, Christian, ‘Global Warming and State Responsibility’, in Hestermeyer, Holger, Matz-Lück, Nele, Seibert-Fohr, Anja and Vöneky, Silja (eds.), Law of the Sea in Dialogue (Heidelberg: Springer, 2011), pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
Tondini, Matteo, ‘Coalitions of the Willing’, in Nollkaemper, André and Plakokefalos, Ilias (eds.), The Practice of Shared Responsibility in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 701–732.Google Scholar
Townsend, Gregory, ‘State Responsibility for Acts of De Facto Agents’ (1997) 14 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 635–678.Google Scholar
Trachtman, Joel P., ‘Reports of the Death of Treaty Are Premature, but Customary International Law May Have Outlived Its Usefulness’ (2014) 108 AJIL Unbound 36–40.Google Scholar
Trapp, Kimberley, State Responsibility for International Terrorism: Problems and Prospects (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triffterer, Otto, ‘The Preventive and Repressive Function of the International Criminal Court’, in Politi, Mauro and Nesi, Giuseppe (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Challenge to Impunity (Ashgate: Aldershot, 2001), pp. 137–175.Google Scholar
Ulfstein, Geir, ‘Reflections on Institutional Design – Especially Treaty Bodies’, in Klabbers, Jan and Wallendahl, Åsa (eds.), Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 2011), pp. 431–447.Google Scholar
Ulfstein, Geir, Marauhn, Thilo, and Zimmerman, Andreas, ‘Introduction’, in Ulfstein, Geir, Marauhn, Thilo and Zimmerman, Andreas (eds.), Making Treaties Work: Human Rights, Environment and Arms Control (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
van Aaken, Anne, ‘Fragmentation of International Law: The Case of International Investment Law’ (2006) XVII Finnish Yearbook of International Law 91–130.Google Scholar
van Aaken, Anne, ‘Shared Responsibility in International Law: A Political Economy Analysis’, in Nollkaemper, André and Jacobs, Dov (eds.), Distribution of Responsibilities in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 153–191.Google Scholar
van der Wilt, Harmen, ‘Corporate Criminal Responsibility for International Crimes: Exploring the Possibilities’ (2013) 12 Chinese Journal of International Law 43–77.Google Scholar
van der Wilt, Harmen, ‘Sreberenica: On Joint Criminal Enterprise, Aiding and Abetting and Command Responsibility’ (2015) 62 Netherlands International Law Review 229–241.Google Scholar
van Sliedregt, Elies, The Criminal Responsibility of Individuals for Violations of International Humanitarian Law (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2003).Google Scholar
van Sliedregt, Elies, ‘Joint Criminal Enterprise as a Pathway to Convicting Individuals for Genocide’ (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice 184–207.Google Scholar
Veitch, Scott, Law and Irresponsibility. On the Legitimation of Human Suffering (Oxon: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007).Google Scholar
Venzke, Ingo, ‘Public Interests in the International Court of Justice – A Comparison between Nuclear Arms Race (2016) and South West Africa (1966)’ (2017) 111 AJIL Unbound 68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeer-Künzli, Annemarieke, ‘As If: The Legal Fiction in Diplomatic Protection’ (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law 37–68.Google Scholar
Vermeer-Künzli, Annemarieke, ‘A Matter of Interest: Diplomatic Protection and State Responsibility Erga Omnes’ (2007) 56 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 553–581.Google Scholar
Villalpando, Santiago, ‘Codification Light: A New Trend in the Codification of International Law at the United Nations’ (2013) 8 Anuário Brasileiro de Direito Internacional 117–156.Google Scholar
Visscher, Charles, La responsabilité des États (Leiden, Lugduni Batavorum: Brill, 1924).Google Scholar
Voigt, Christina, ‘State Responsibility for Climate Change Damages’ (2008) 77 Nordic Journal of International Law 1–22.Google Scholar
von Jhering, Rudolf, Das Schuldmoment im römischen Privatrecht: Eine Festchrift (Giessen: E. Roth, 1867).Google Scholar
von Martens, Georg Friedrich, Causes célèbres du droit des gens. Tome premier (Leipzig and Ponthieu: F. A. Brockhaus, 1827).Google Scholar
Voyiakis, Emmanuel, ‘International Law and the Objectivity of Value’ (2009) 22 Leiden Journal of International Law 51–78.Google Scholar
Waibel, Michael, ‘The Diplomatic Channel’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 1085–1097.Google Scholar
Walker, Nigel, Punishment, Danger and Stigma: The Morality of Criminal Justice (Totowa: Barnes and Noble Books, 1980).Google Scholar
Wang, Hui, ‘Transboundary Vessel-Source Marine Pollution – International Legal Framework and Its Application to China’, in Faure, Michael and Ying, Song (eds.), China and International Environmental Liability: Legal Remedies for Transboundary Pollution (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008), pp. 64–106.Google Scholar
Wang, Hui, Civil Liability for Marine Oil Pollution Damage: A Comparative and Economic Study of the International, US and Chinese Compensation Regimes (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2011).Google Scholar
Watts, Sir Arthur, ‘The Art of Apology’, in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005), pp. 107–116.Google Scholar
Weil, Prosper, ‘Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?’ (1983) 77 American Journal of International Law 413–442.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H., Cassese, Antonio, and Spinedi, Marina (eds.), International Crimes of States: A Critical Analysis of the ILC’s Draft Article 19 on State Responsibility (Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 1988).Google Scholar
Weiss Brown, Edith, ‘The Rise or the Fall of International Law’ (2000) 69 Fordham Law Review 345–372.Google Scholar
Werksman, Jacob, ‘Compliance and Transition: Russia’s Non-Compliance Tests the Ozone Regime’ (1996) 56 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 750–773.Google Scholar
White, Nigel D., ‘Responses of Political Organs to Crimes by States’, in Nollkaemper, André and van der Wilt, Harmen (eds.), System Criminality in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 314–337.Google Scholar
Willisch, Jan, State Responsibility for Technological Damage in International Law (Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 1987).Google Scholar
Wippman, David, ‘Atrocities, Deterrence, and the Limits of International Justice’ (1999) 23 Fordham International Law Journal 473–488.Google Scholar
Wittich, Stephan, ‘Punitive Damages’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Olleson, Simon (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 667–675.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian, Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Pertractatum (1764) (1st published 1750, trans. Drake, Joseph H., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1934).Google Scholar
Wolfrum, Rüdiger, ‘State Responsibility for Private Actors: An Old Problem of Renewed Relevance’, in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005), pp. 423–434.Google Scholar
Xue, Hanqin, Transboundary Damage in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Yarwood, Lisa, State Accountability under International Law: Holding States Accountable for a Breach of Jus Cogens Norms (London and New York: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Yihdego, Zeray, and Rieu-Clarke, Alistair, ‘An Exploration of Fairness in International Law through the Blue Nile and GERD’ (2016) 41 Water International 528–549.Google Scholar
Zemanek, Karl, ‘Does the Prospect of Incurring Responsibility Improve the Observance of International Law’, in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005), pp. 125–134.Google Scholar
Zorzetto, Silvia, ‘The Lex Specialis Principle and Its Uses in Legal Argumentation: An Analytical Inquire’ (2012–2013), Eunomia. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad 61–87.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Katja Creutz
  • Book: State Responsibility in the International Legal Order
  • Online publication: 08 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108637367.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Katja Creutz
  • Book: State Responsibility in the International Legal Order
  • Online publication: 08 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108637367.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Katja Creutz
  • Book: State Responsibility in the International Legal Order
  • Online publication: 08 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108637367.010
Available formats
×