Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:54:54.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Accentedness and Acoustic Features

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2021

Edited by
Ratree Wayland
Ratree Wayland
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Second Language Speech Learning
Theoretical and Empirical Progress
 , pp. 335 - 396
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentais, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42(4), 529–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–345.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Robb, M., Gilbert, H., & Lerman, J. (2001). Vowel production by Mandarin speakers of English. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 15(6), 427–440.Google Scholar
Chun, D. M. (2002). Discourse intonation in L2: From theory and research to practice (Vol. 1). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Clopper, C., & Pisoni, D. B. (2004). Homebodies and army brats: Some effects of early linguistic experience and residential history on dialect categorization. Language Variation and Change, 16, 31–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, K., & Beckman, M. (1983). Production and perception of the voicing contrast in Indian and American English. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory, 1(7790), 108.Google Scholar
de Mareüil, P. B., & Vieru-Dimulescu, B. (2006). The contribution of prosody to the perception of foreign accent. Phonetica, 63(4), 247–267.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W. (1987). Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 67–83.Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, J. M., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3099–3111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, B. H., & Jun, S. A. (2011). The effect of age on the acquisition of second language prosody. Language and Speech, 54(3), 387–414.Google Scholar
Kang, K. H., & Guion, S. G. (2006). Phonological systems in bilinguals: Age of learning effects on the stop consonant systems of Korean-English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(3), 1672–1683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, O. (2010). Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38(2), 301–315.Google Scholar
Kang, O., Vo, S. C. T., & Moran, M. K. (2016). Perceptual judgments of accented speech by listeners from different first language backgrounds. TESL-EJ, 20(1), n1.Google Scholar
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20(3), 527–565.Google Scholar
Major, R. C. (1987). English voiceless stop production by speakers of Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 197–202.Google Scholar
Maxwell, O., & Fletcher, J. (2009). Acoustic and durational properties of Indian English vowels. World Englishes, 28(1), 52–69.Google Scholar
McCullough, E. A. (2013). Acoustic correlates of perceived foreign accent in non-native English. PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J. (1993). Productions of English vowels by native speakers of Arabic: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Language and Speech, 36(1), 39–66.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2001). Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech the role of speaking rate. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(4), 451–468.Google Scholar
Riney, T. J., & Takagi, N. (1999). Global foreign accent and voice onset time among Japanese EFL speakers. Language Learning, 49(2), 275–302.Google Scholar
Schirra, R. E. (2012). Attitudes toward Korean-accented and Korean American English. MA thesis, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Shah, A. (2002). Temporal characteristics of Spanish-accented English: Acoustic measures and their correlation with accented ratings. PhD dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Shimizu, K. (2011, August). A study on VOT of initial stops in English produced by Korean, Thai and Chinese speakers as L2 learners. In ICPhS (pp. 1818–1821).Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2006). Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Van Els, T., & De Bot, K. (1987). The role of intonation in foreign accent. The Modern Language Journal, 71(2), 147–155.Google Scholar
Wayland, R. (1997). Non-native production of Thai: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Applied Linguistics, 18(3), 345–373.Google Scholar

References

Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. R. (2003). The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(3), 1600–1610.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2016). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0. 23) [Computer software].Google Scholar
Chen, Y. (2007). A comparison of Spanish produced by Chinese L2 learners and native speakers – an acoustic phonetics approach. Urbana: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Cui, R., & van Heuven, V. J. J. P. (2011). Mutual intelligibility of English vowels by Chinese dialect speakers. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences XVII (pp. 544–548). Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). A robust method to study stress “deafness.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(3), 1606–1618.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2010). Limits on bilingualism revisited: Stress “deafness” in simultaneous French–Spanish bilinguals. Cognition, 114(2), 266–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress “deafness”: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106(2), 682–706.Google Scholar
Grabe, E., Rosner, B. S., García-Albea, J. E., & Zhou, X. (2003). Perception of English intonation by English, Spanish, and Chinese listeners. Language and Speech, 46(4), 375–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 28(4), 267–283.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C., & Radboud, U. (2014). On the intonation of tonal varieties of English. In The Oxford handbook of world Englishes (pp. 569–598). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hardman, J. (2014). Accentedness and intelligibility of Mandarin-accented English for Chinese, Koreans and Americans (Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics No. 5).Google Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R., Smith, B. L., Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. R. (2008). The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for native speakers of Mandarin: Production and perception of English word-final voicing contrasts. Journal of Phonetics, 36(4), 664–679.Google Scholar
Lee, J. K., & Xue, X. (2011). The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for listeners (ISIB-L): The case of English liquids. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 3(1), 51–65.Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012).Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, G., & Mok, P. P. K. (2015). Interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for Mandarin: Is it from shared phonological knowledge or exposure to accented speech. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Retrieved from www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0509.pdfGoogle Scholar
Mennen, I. (2015). Beyond segments: Towards a L2 intonation learning theory. In Prosody and language in contact (pp. 171–188). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97.Google Scholar
Ortega-Llebaria, M., & Colantoni, L. (2014). L2 English intonation: Relations between form-meaning associations, access to meaning and L1 transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 331–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, C. L., & Dalby, J. (2005). Forced-choice analysis of segmental production by Chinese-accented English speakers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 306–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, L. E., & Rafiqzad, K. (1979). English for cross-cultural communication: The question of intelligibility. Tesol Quarterly, 13, 371–380.Google Scholar
Wang, H. (2007). English as a lingua franca: Mutual intelligibility of Chinese, Dutch and American speakers of English. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics (LOT).Google Scholar
Wang, H., & van Heuven, V. J. (2015). The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit as bias toward native-language phonology. i-Perception, 6(6).Google Scholar
Xie, X., & Fowler, C. A. (2013). Listening with a foreign-accent: The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit in Mandarin speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 41(5), 369–378.Google Scholar

References

Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42(4), 529–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Guion, S. G., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics, 32(2), 233–250.Google Scholar
Baese-Berk, M. M., Bradlow, A. R., & Wright, B. A. (2013). Accent-independent adaptation to foreign accented speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(3), EL174–EL180.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumann, S., & Winter, B. (2018). What makes a word prominent? Predicting untrained German listeners’ perceptual judgments. Journal of Phonetics, 70, 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.2. 18) [Computer software]. Retrieved from www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106(2), 707–729.Google Scholar
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 41, 5–32.Google Scholar
Brunellière, A., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2013). The speakers’ accent shapes the listeners’ phonological predictions during speech perception. Brain and Language, 125(1), 82–93.Google Scholar
Dellwo, V. (2006). Rhythm and speech rate: A variation coefficient for∆ C. In Karnowski, P & Szigeti, I (Eds.), Language and language-processing (pp. 231–241). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3125–3134.Google Scholar
Floccia, C., Butler, J., Goslin, J., & Ellis, L. (2009). Regional and foreign accent processing in English: Can listeners adapt? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38(4), 379–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon-Salant, S., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Fitzgibbons, P. J., & Schurman, J. (2010). Short-term adaptation to accented English by younger and older adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(4), EL200–EL204. doi:10.1121/1.3486199Google Scholar
Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Liu, S. H., & Yeni-Komshian, G. H. (2000a). Age of learning effects on the duration of sentences produced in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(2), 205–228.Google Scholar
Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., & Loftin, J. D. (2000b). The effect of L1 use on pronunciation in Quichua-Spanish bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 28(1), 27–42.Google Scholar
Idemaru, K., & Guion, S. G. (2008). Acoustic covariants of length contrast in Japanese stops. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 38(2), 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idemaru, K., & Holt, L. L. (2011). Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(6), 1939–1956.Google Scholar
Idemaru, K., Wei, P., & Gubbins, L. (2019). Acoustic sources of accent in second language Japanese speech. Language and Speech, 62(2), 333–357.Google Scholar
Kang, K. H., & Guion, S. G. (2008). Clear speech production of Korean stops: Changing phonetic targets and enhancement strategies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(6), 3909–3917.Google Scholar
Kang, O. (2010). Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38(2), 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenth, R. (2016). Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69(1), 1–33. doi:10.18637/jss.v069.i01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lev-Ari, S., & Keysar, B. (2010). Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1093–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, R. D. (2017). Exploratory reports: A new article type for Cortex. Cortex, 96, A1–A4.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2011). The foundations of accent and intelligibility in pronunciation research. Language Teaching, 44(3), 316–327.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2015). A prospectus for pronunciation research in the 21st century: A point of view. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 1(1), 11–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, G. E., Guion-Anderson, S., Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2011). A one-year longitudinal study of English and Japanese vowel production by Japanese adults and children in an English-speaking setting. Journal of Phonetics, 39(2), 156–167.Google Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2000). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 75, AD3–AD30.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
Roettger, T. B., Winter, B., & Baayen, H. (2019). Emergent data analysis in phonetic sciences: Towards pluralism and reproducibility. Journal of Phonetics, 73, 1–7.Google Scholar
Ryan, E. B., Carranza, M. A., & Moffie, R. W. (1977). Reactions toward varying degrees of accentedness in the speech of Spanish-English bilinguals. Language and Speech, 20(3), 267–273.Google Scholar
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(2), 217–240.Google Scholar
Sereno, J., Lammers, L., & Jongman, A. (2016). The relative contribution of segments and intonation to the perception of foreign-accented speech. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(2), 303–322.Google Scholar
Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., Højsgaard, S., Fox, J., Lawrence, M. A., Mertens, U., & Love, J. (2016). afex: Analysis of Factorial Experiments (R package Version 0.16-1). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afexGoogle Scholar
Strobl, C., Malley, J., & Tutz, G. (2009). An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods, 14(4), 323.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. R., & Kendall, T. (2015). NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite. Retrieved from http://lingtools.uoregon.edu/norm/norm1Google Scholar
Tomaschek, F., Hendrix, P., & Baayen, R. H. (2018). Strategies for addressing collinearity in multivariate linguistic data. Journal of Phonetics, 71, 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2006). Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2012). Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 905–916.Google Scholar
United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs, Population Divisions. (2017). International Migration Report 2017: Highlights (Report No. ST/ESA/SER.A/404). New York: Author.Google Scholar
Urberg-Carlson, K., Munson, B., & Kaiser, E. (2009). Gradient measures of children’s speech production: Visual analog scale and equal appearing interval scale measures of fricative goodness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(4), 2529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Engen, K. J., & Peelle, J. E. (2014). Listening effort and accented speech. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 577.Google Scholar
Venditti, J. J. (2005). The J_ToBI model of Japanese intonation. In Jun, S.-A. (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 172–200). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wayland, R. (1997). Non-native production of Thai: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Applied Linguistics, 18(3), 345–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L., & Mattys, S. L. (2007). Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics, 35(4), 501–522.Google Scholar
Wickham, H. (2017). stringr: Simple, Consistent Wrappers for Common String Operations (R package Version 1.2.0). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stringrGoogle Scholar
Wickham, H., Hester, J., & Romain, F. (2017). readr: Read Rectangular Text Data (R package Version 1.1.1). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readrGoogle Scholar
Wickham, H., Romain Francois, L., Müller, K., & Müller, H. (2017). dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation (R package Version 0.7.2). Retrieved from https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=dplyrGoogle Scholar
Winters, S., & O’Brien, M. G. (2013). Perceived accentedness and intelligibility: The relative contributions of F0 and duration. Speech Communication, 55(3), 486–507.Google Scholar
Wright, M. N., & Ziegler, A. (2015). ranger: A fast implementation of random forests for high dimensional data in C++ and R. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.04409.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×