Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:56:11.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Navigating in a Post-Quantum Legal Design Landscape

from IV - Where Legal Design Goes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2024

By
Katri Nousiainen  and
Joonas Keski-Rahkonen
Edited by
Miso Kim ,
Dan Jackson  and
Jules Rochielle Sievert
Miso Kim
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
Dan Jackson
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
Jules Rochielle Sievert
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
Get access

Summary

We are entering into a brave new world of quantum technologies. This quantum impetus on society will also cause a system reformation in the legal arena. Here, we dissect and analyze what this quantum leap of the legal sphere contains. Furthermore, we present a pragmatic road map to find a path through an uncharted legal design landscape toward a prosperous quantum future.

Keywords

quantum computingquantum technologyquantum ethics
Type
Chapter
Information
Legal Design
Dignifying People in Legal Systems
 , pp. 355 - 369
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, George A. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, no. 3 (August): 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amit, Raphael, and Zott, Christoph. 2012. “Creating Value through Business Model Innovation.” MIT Sloan Management Review 53, no. 3 (Spring): 41–49. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/creating-value-through-business-model-innovation/.Google Scholar
Atik, Jeffery, and Jeutner, Valentin. 2021. “Quantum Computing and Computational Law.” Law, Innovation and Technology 13, no. 2 (September): 302–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2021.1977216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autio, Erkko et al. 2014. “Entrepreneurial Innovation: The Importance of Context.” Research Policy 43, no. 7 (September): 1097–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Barton, Thomas D., Berger-Walliser, Gerlinde, and Haapio, Helena. 2013. “Visualization: Seeing Contracts for What They Are and What They Could Become.” Journal of Law, Business & Ethics 19, no. 47 (January): 47–63. Social Science Research Network (SSRN).Google Scholar
Barzel, Yoram. 1982. “Measurement Cost and the Organization of Markets.” The Journal of Law & Economics 25, no. 1 (April): 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1086/467005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beales, Howard, Craswell, Richard, and Salop, Steven C.. 1981. “The Efficient Regulation of Consumer Information.” The Journal of Law & Economics 24, no. 3 (December): 491–539. https://doi.org/10.1086/466997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertolucci, Seth and Jones, Isabel, hosts. “Quantum-Computing.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal Podcast, August 23, 2022. Podcast, website, 38:44, https://btlj.org/2022/08/berkeley-technology-law-journal-podcast-quantum-computing/.Google Scholar
Block, Joern H., Fisch, Christian O., and van Praag, Mirjam. 2017. “The Schumpeterian Entrepreneur: a Review of the Empirical Evidence on the Antecedents, Behaviour and Consequences of Innovative Entrepreneurship.” Industry and Innovation 24, no. 1 (January): 61–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1216397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brem, Alexander, Maier, Maximilian, and Wimschneider, Christine. 2016. “Competitive Advantage Through Innovation: The Case of Nespresso.” European Journal of Innovation Management 19, no. 1 (January): 133–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2014-0055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Tim. 2008. “Design Thinking.” Harvard Business Review, June. https://hbr.org/2008/06/design-thinking.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido. 1968. “Transaction Costs, Resource Allocation and Liability Rules: A Comment.” The Journal of Law & Economics 11, no. 1 (April): 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1086/466644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CFI. 2022. “Transaction Costs.” Last modified February 19, 2022. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/economics/transaction-costs/.Google Scholar
Chen, Janet, Lu, Su-I, and Vekhter, Dan. n.d. “Axelrod’s Tournament.” Stanford University. Accessed February 17, 2023. https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/courses/soco/projects/1998-99/game-theory/axelrod.html.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert, and Ulen, Thomas. 2004. Law and Economics. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Cusumano, Michael A. 2010. Staying Power: Six Enduring Principles for Managing Strategy and Innovation in an Uncertain World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dam, Rikke, and Siang, Teo. 2018. “What is Design Thinking and Why Is It So Popular?” Interaction Design Foundation. www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/what-is-design-thinking-and-why-is-it-so-popular.Google Scholar
Davis, Frederick B. 1944. “Fundamental Factors of Comprehension in Reading.” Psychometrika 9 (September): 185–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeSteno, David, Breazeal, Cynthia, Frank, Robert H., Pizarro, David, Baumann, Jolie, Dickens, Leah, and Lee, Jin Joo. 2012. “Detecting the Trustworthiness of Novel Partners in Economic Exchange.” Psychological Science 23, no. 12 (December): 1549–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612448793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erdem, Tülin, and Swait, Joffre. 1998. “Brand Equity as a Signaling Phenomenon.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 7, no. 2 (January): 131–57. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genesereth, Michael R. 2021. “Contract Definition Language.” Stanford Law School Blogs: CodeX (blog), April 7. https://law.stanford.edu/2021/04/07/contract-definition-language/.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Richard. 2006. “Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where Are We in the Competition – Innovation Debate?” Innovation Policy and the Economy 6, no. 6 (August): 159–215. https://doi.org/10.1086/ipe.6.25056183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagan, Margaret. 2018. “A Human-Centered Design Approach to Access to Justice: Generating New Prototypes and Hypotheses for Interventions to Make Courts User-Friendly.” Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality 6, no. 2 (May): 199–239. www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijlse/vol6/iss2/2?utm_source=www.repository.law.indiana.edu%2Fijlse%2Fvol6%2Fiss2%2F2&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages.Google Scholar
Hagan, Margaret. 2021. “Introduction to Design Thinking for Law.” In Legal Informatics, edited by Katz, Daniel Martin, Dolin, Ron, and Bommarito, Michael J., 155–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Nicole P. 2000. “An Examination of the ‘Sustainable Competitive Advantage’ Concept: Past, Present, and Future.” Academy of Marketing Science Review 2000, no. 4 (January): 1–16. ProQuest.Google Scholar
IDEO.org. 2015. The Field Guide to Human-Centered Design. 1st ed. https://design-kit-production.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/Field_Guides/Field+Guide+to+Human-Centered+Design_IDEOorg_English.pdf?utf8=✓&_method=patch&authenticity_token=QZRbnzBBPY3M%2FCd3xeDx424iAXgVkgcTAi74f6cW4pU%3D&resource%5Btitle%5D=&resource%5Bsubtitle%5D=&resource%5Bauthor%5D=&resource%5Babout%5D=.Google Scholar
Ireland, R. Duane, and Webb, Justin W.. 2007. “Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating Competitive Advantage through Streams of Innovation.” Business Horizons 50, no. 1 (January–February): 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2006.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffries, F. L., and Reed, R.. 2000. “Trust and Adaptation in Relational Contracting.” The Academy of Management Review 25, no. 4 (October): 873–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/259212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeutner, Valentin. 2021. “The Quantum Imperative: Addressing the Legal Dimension of Quantum Computers.” Morals & Machines 1, no. 1 (April): 52–59. Social Science Research Network (SSRN).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Daniel Martin, Dolin, Ron, and Bommarito, Michael J., eds. 2021. Legal Informatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Janice M., Betjemann, Rebecca S., and Olson, Richard K.. 2008. “Reading Comprehension Tests Vary in the Skills They Assess: Differential Dependence on Decoding and Oral Comprehension.” Scientific Studies of Reading 12, no. 3 (July): 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430802132279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiessling, Timothy S. 2004. “Entrepreneurship and Innovation: Austrian School of Economics to Schumpeter to Drucker to Now.” The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship 9, no. 1 (January): 80–91.Google Scholar
Larson, Andrea. 1992. “Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships.” Administrative Science Quarterly 37, no. 1 (March): 76–104. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenberg, Siegwart. 2000. “It Takes Both Trust and Lack of Mistrust: The Workings of Cooperation and Relational Signaling in Contractual Relationships.” Journal of Management and Governance 4, no. 1–2 (March): 11–34. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009985720365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E.. 2001. “What Happened to Property in Law and Economics?” Yale Law Journal 111, no. 2 (November): 357–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/797592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nousiainen, Katri. (2024). “Legal Design in Negotiation.” Legal Business World no.3. Last accessed 5/23/2024. https://www.legalbizworld.com/_files/ugd/b30d31_6c2d06eb5db64c40adc3725d3f1bc45b.pdf.Google Scholar
Nousiainen, Katri and Ortega, Catalina P.. (2024). “Dark Patterns in Law and Economics Framework.” 36 Loyola. Consumer Law Review. 90. Available at: https://lawecommons.luc.edu/lclr/vol36/iss1/4.Google Scholar
Nousiainen, Katri. 2020. “What Have I Signed? Do I Really Understand the Contract?” Contracting Excellence Journal, September 12. https://journal.iaccm.com/contracting-excellence-journal/what-have-i-signed-do-i-really-understand-the-contract.Google Scholar
Nousiainen, Katri. 2021. “General Theory of Legal Design in Law and Economics Framework of Commercial Contracting.” Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation 5, no. 4 (December): 247–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/20555636211061611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nousiainen, Katri. 2022a. “Legal Design in Commercial Contracting and Business Sustainability: New Legal Quality Metrics Standards.” Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation 6, no. 2 (June): 137–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/20555636221138972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nousiainen, Katri. 2022b. “The Application of Legal Design to Complex System Theory on Commercial Contracting within Law and Economics Framework.” Proceedings of the 25th International Legal Informatics Symposium IRIS 2022, February 22–23, 2022. Vienna, Austria: Austrian Computer Society.Google Scholar
Nousiainen, Katri and Keski-Rahkonen, Joonas. (2022). “Legal Business In The Post-Quantum Society.” Legal Business World. Issue 6. Last accessed 5/23/2024. https://www.legalbizworld.com/post/legal-business-in-the-post-quantum-society.Google Scholar
Nousiainen, Katri and Keski-Rahkonen, Joonas. (2023). “Uncharted Legal Design Landscape Towards a Bright Quantum Future.” Harvard Journal of Law and Technology JOLT Digest. Last accessed 5/23/2024. https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/a-roadmap-for-navigating-the-uncharted-legal-design-landscape-towards-a-bright-quantum-future.Google Scholar
Nousiainen, Katri; Keski-Rahkonen, Joonas; McDonald, Tim; Feldmann, Sascha. (2022) “Towards Society of Quantum Tomorrow” ANZCompuLawJl 6; 94 Computers & Law, Article 6.Google Scholar
Passera, Stefania. 2018. “Flowcharts, Swimlanes, and Timelines: Alternatives to Prose in Communicating Legal–Bureaucratic Instructions to Civil Servants.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 32, no. 2 (April): 229–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917746459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ring, Peter Smith, and van de Ven, Andrew H.. 1994. “Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships.” The Academy of Management Review 19, no. 1 (January): 90–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/258836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1961. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1952. “The General Economist.” In Wesley Clair Mitchell: The Economic Scientist, 321–40. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1989. Essays: On Entrepreneurs, Innovations, Business Cycles, and the Evolution of Capitalism, edited by Clemence, Richard V.. New Brunswick, NJ: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 2009. Can Capitalism Survive? Creative Destruction and the Future of the Global Economy. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Scott, Robert E. 2006. “Anticipating Litigation in Contract Design.” The Yale Law Journal 115, no. 4 (January): 814–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/20455639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Robert E., and Triantis, George G.. 2005. “Incomplete Contracts and the Theory of Contract Design.” Case Western Reserve Law Review 56, no. 1 (Fall): 187–201.Google Scholar
Sledzik, Karol. 2013. “Knowledge Based Economy in a Neo-Schumpeterian Point of View.” Equilibrium (Toruń) 8, no. 4 (December): 67–77. https://doi.org/10.12775/EQUIL.2013.027.Google Scholar
Smith, Henrik. 2006. “Modularity in Contracts: Boilerplate and Information Flow.” Michigan Law Review 104, no. 5 (March): 1175–222.Google Scholar
Stanford University. 2012. “A Design Thinking Process: Mechanical Engineering Design ME113.” https://web.stanford.edu/class/me113/d_thinking.html.Google Scholar
Triantis, George G. 2013. “Improving Contract Quality: Modularity, Technology, and Innovation in Contract Design.” Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance 18, no. 2 (June): 177–214. Social Science Research Network (SSRN).Google Scholar
US Department of State. 2000. “Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies.” https://1997-2001.state.gov/global/arms/np/mtcr/000322_wassenaar.html.Google Scholar
Van Slyke, David M. 2000. “Collaboration and Relational Contracting.” In The Collaborative Public Manager, edited by O’Leary, Rosemary and Bingham, Lisa Blomgren, 137–56. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
von Hayek, Friedrich A. 1985. New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Spencer. 2021. “Contracts as Systems.” The Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 45, no. 2 (March): 219–78. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3687773.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver. 1979. “Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations.” The Journal of Law & Economics 22, no. 2 (October): 233–61. https://doi.org/10.1086/466942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Oliver, and Masten, Scott, eds. 1999. The Economics of Transaction Costs. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Woolthuis, Rosalinde Klein, Hillebrand, Bas, and Nooteboom, Bart. 2005. “Trust, Contract and Relationship Development.” Organization Studies 26, no. 6 (June): 813–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605054594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Suzanne. 2013. “Transaction Cost Economics.” In Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility, edited by Idowu, Samuel O., Capaldi, Nicholas, Zu, Liangrong, and Das Gupta, Ananda, 2547–52. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×