Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 November 2023
Abstract
This chapter deals with the social organization of chemical laboratories, in particular the hierarchy of laboratory workers and the relationship between professors and technicians. This study focuses on two major chemical departments of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, namely Imperial College London (and its predecessors) and the University of Heidelberg. This pairing allows us to explore the differences (and similarities) between laboratories in England and Germany. Over time, the hierarchy of chemical laboratories has become flatter as relationships between the teaching staff, students, and technicians have become more socially equal.
Keywords: hierarchy, technicians, stratification, Heidelberg University, Imperial College
Introduction
When I wrote my book The Matter Factory about the physical aspects of the chemical laboratory, I relied very largely on pictorial evidence for two reasons. Archival evidence is limited and there is hardly any laboratory of the nineteenth century (or earlier) which remains in the same state as it was when it was built. Unfortunately, this approach does not work for the social organization of laboratories. While there are group photographs of the staff in university chemical laboratories, they are almost invariably limited to faculty and postgraduate students. A few may include the head technician and/or the superintendent, but almost none will compass all the non-academic staff. This is also largely true of the staff lists found in university yearbooks, which also tend not to list temporary or non-salaried staff. Some information can be gleaned from individual histories of the laboratories and from autobiographies, but it is usually scanty.
The Sociologist’s View
The social structure of the chemical laboratory has been studied, not surprisingly, by sociologists. In Laboratory Life, Bruno Latour and his co-author Steve Woolgar acknowledge the complex group dynamics in the laboratory, but their main concern is with scientific creditability (as measured by citations), and hence their focus is on the dynamics between different scientists who are seen as entrepreneurs dealing in credit rather than capital. They note that technicians intensely seek credit but usually cannot get it owing to the lack of academic qualifications, and they are poorly paid; hence their main concern is their salary, and there is a high turnover in technicians.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.