Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:41:18.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Dismissing the Jury

Mixed Courts and Lay Participation in Norway

from Part III - Challenges to Lay Participation in Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2021

Sanja Kutnjak Ivković
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Shari Seidman Diamond
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Valerie P. Hans
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Nancy S. Marder
Affiliation:
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Get access

Summary

This chapter argues that contemporary debates about the constitution and expansion of mixed courts in Norway reveal a tension in attitudes toward lay participation in the legal system. On the one hand, lawyers and laypersons in Norway evince confidence that professional legal actors can effectively collaborate with jurors to reach verdicts. On the other hand, both laypersons and attorneys worry that when it comes to the prosecution of some crimes – particularly sex crimes – laypersons cannot be relied upon to do justice. After offering an overview of Norway’s shifting jury system, the chapter argues that judicial interventions in the jury system have contributed to its gradual loss of legitimacy. Drawing on empirical research, I argue that critiques of rape prosecutions have both amplified and sharpened the stakes of critiques of lay participation more broadly, though – at least for the moment – mixed courts of lay and professional judges are perceived to remedy the shortcomings of all-layperson juries.

Type
Chapter
Information
Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed Courts
A Global Perspective
, pp. 197 - 217
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amietta, S. A. (2011). Governance in Córdoba’s mixed tribunal: A study on microphysics of power. Oñati Socio‐Legal Series, 1(1), 423. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1735502Google Scholar
Bergoglio, M. I. (2017). Ten years of mixed tribunals in Argentina. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2987942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, H. R. (2011). Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. 5th ed. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press. https://bibdata.princeton.edu/bibliographic/6734220Google Scholar
Burd, K., & Hans, V. P. (2018). Reasoned verdicts: Oversold? Cornell International Law Journal, 51, 319360.Google Scholar
Casper, G., & Zeisel, H. (1972). Lay judges in the German criminal courts. Journal of Legal Studies, 1, 135191. www.jstor.org/stable/724014Google Scholar
Edwards, J., Haugerud, A., & Parikh, S. (2017). Introduction: The 2016 Brexit referendum and Trump election. American Ethnologist, 44, 195200. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12467Google Scholar
Elden, J. C. (2017, May 7). Når Riksadvokaten svikter oss [When the attorney general fails us]. Dagbladet. www.dagbladet.no/kultur/nar-riksadvokaten-svikter-oss/61174889Google Scholar
Fiva, H. (2006). In other words: A study of interpreting and power in Oslo. [Master’s thesis, University of Oslo]. www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/16528Google Scholar
Foss, A. B. (2015, May 12). Stortinget fjerner juryen fra rettssalen [Parliament removes the jury from the courtroom]. Aftenposten. www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/Stortinget-fjerner-juryen-fra-rettssalen-8015604.htmlGoogle Scholar
Foss, M. T. (2011). Juryordningen: Rollefordelingen mellom fagdommere og lekdommere [The jury system: The distinction between the roles of professional judges and laymen]. [Master’s thesis, University of Tromsø].Google Scholar
Gullestad, M. (1992). The art of social relations: Essays on culture, social action and everyday life in modern Norway. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Hemsedal saken [Hemsedal case] (2016, July 7). No. LB-2015–85818, Borgarting lagmannsrett [Borgarting Court of Appeal].Google Scholar
Huuse, C., Røed, R., & Hansen, F. (2016, April 8). Tre menn frifunnet for gjengvoldtekt: Andrea Voll Voldum: De har tatt fra meg noe jeg aldri får tilbake [Three men acquitted of gang rape: Andrea Voll Voldum: “They have taken something from me that I’ll never get back”]. VG. www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/i/K5lK6/tre-menn-frifunnet-for-gjengvoldtekt-andrea-voll-voldum-de-har-tatt-fra-meg-noe-jeg-aldri-faar-tilbakeGoogle Scholar
Jimeno-Bulnes, M. (2011). Jury selection and jury trial in Spain: Between theory and practice. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 1(9). http://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/viewFile/165/124Google Scholar
Jordal, P. (2011). Juryutvalget (Norges offentlige utredninger) [The Committee on Juries (Norwegian Official Reports)]. Departementenes servicesenter Informasjonsforvaltning. Oslo.Google Scholar
Kutnjak Ivković, S. (2007). Exploring lay participation in legal decision-making: Lessons from mixed tribunals. Cornell International Law Journal, 40, 429454.Google Scholar
Letvik, T. (2015). Grunnloven kunne berget juryordningen [The Constitution could have saved the jury system]. Juristkontakt(5). www.juristkontakt.no/i/2015/5/juko-2015- 05-19Google Scholar
Lov om endringer i straffeprosessloven mv. [Law about changes in Criminal Procedure Act (Nor.)] (2017), § 332. https://lovdata.no/dokument/LTI/lov/2017-06-16-58Google Scholar
Machura, S. (2016). Understanding the German mixed tribunal. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie: The German Journal of Law and Society, 36(2), 273302. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfrs-2016-0022Google Scholar
Mathisen, G. (2015, July 30). Forsvarerne gir opp jurykampen [The defenders give up the jury fight]. Advokaten. www.advokatbladet.no/2015/07/forsvarerne-gir-opp-jurykampen/Google Scholar
Murschetz, V. (2009). The US jury system: An insight from a civil lawyer’s perspective. In Grabher, G. M. & Gamper, A, (Eds.), Legal narratives (pp. 159174). Vienna: Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978–3-211–92818-9_8Google Scholar
Nygard, L.-J. (2010). Juryen for fall: Demokrati og rettssikkerhet [The jury before a fall: Democracy and legal certainty]. Oslo: Unipub.Google Scholar
Offit, A. (2016). Peer review: Navigating uncertainty in the United States jury system. UC Irvine Law Review, 2(6), 169206.Google Scholar
Offit, A.(2018). The jury is out: An ethnographic study of lay participation in the Norwegian legal system. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 41, 231246. https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12268Google Scholar
Olsen, T. (2016, August 5). Derfor kunne voldtektssaken i Hemsedal ende med frifinnelse [Why the rape case in Hemsedal could end in acquittal]. Aftenposten. www.aftenposten.no/norge/Derfor-kunne-voldtektssaken-i-Hemsedal-ende-med-frifinnelse-601454b.htmlGoogle Scholar
Olsson, S. V. (2019, January 28). Fagdommerne avviste juryens kjennelse: Hele saken må opp på nytt [The professional judges rejected the jury’s verdict: The whole case must be retried]. NRK. www.nrk.no/norge/fagdommerne-avviste-juryens-kjennelse-_-hele-saken-ma-opp-pa-nytt-1.14398128Google Scholar
Provine, D. M. (1986). Judging credentials: Nonlawyer judges and the politics of professionalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Roudik, P. (2011, November 9). Georgia: Courts with jurors established nationwide. Global Legal Monitor, Library of Congress. www.loc.gov/law/foreign-news/article/georgia-courts-with-jurors-established-nationwideGoogle Scholar
Rundberget, A. (2017, February 3). Juryordningen: En symbolsak står for fall [The jury system: A symbolic issue comes before the fall]. Meninger. www.adressa.no/meninger/2017/02/03/Juryordningen-–-en-symbolsak-står-for-fall-14156152.eceGoogle Scholar
Sandvær, H. (2016, August 8). Meddommere i Hemsedal-saken trues: Er bekymret for rettssikkerheten [Lay judges in Hemsedal case threatened: Are anxious about the rule of law]. VG. www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/i/Xy1GE/meddommere-i-hemsedal-saken-trues-er-bekymret-for-rettssikkerhetenGoogle Scholar
Scherr, C. (2015). Chasing democracy: The development and acceptance of jury trials in Argentina. University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 47, 316353.Google Scholar
Sigurd, S. (2016, August 9). Tidligere ordfører anmeldt for voldstrusler i Hemsedal-saken [Former mayor reported for violent threats in Hemsedal case]. NRK. www.nrk.no/trondelag/tidligere-ordforer-anmeldt-for-voldstrusler-i-hemsedal-saken-1.13080448Google Scholar
Sulland, F. (2016). Juridiske tungvektere med forskjellig syn [Legal heavyweights with different views]. Juristkontakt 5.Google Scholar
Skeie, J. (1939). Den norske straffeprosess [The Norwegian criminal procedure]. Oslo: Olaf Norlisforlag.Google Scholar
Skjevestad, H. (2016). Vil ha to fagdommere og fem lekdommere [Will have two professional judges and five lay judges]. Advokatforeningen Bladet. www.advokatbladet.no/2016/10/gar-inn-for-to-fagdommere-og-fem-lekdommereGoogle Scholar
Straffeprosessloven [Criminal Procedure Act (Nor.)]. 1981 Kap. 21 § 275, Kap. 22 § 276. https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1981-05-22-25/KAPITTEL_5-4#KAPITTEL_5-4Google Scholar
Belgium, Taxquet v., App. No. 926/05 (Eur. Ct. H.R., November 16, 2010). www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=hearings&w=92605_21102009&language=langGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×