Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:59:23.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

Gheorghe Tecuci
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
David A. Schum
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Dorin Marcu
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Mihai Boicu
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Get access

Summary

WHAT IS EVIDENCE?

You might think that a section with this title is silly or unnecessary since everyone knows what evidence is. However, matters are not quite that simple since the term evidence is not so easy to define and its use often arouses controversy, especially in the field of intelligence analysis. One problem with definition of evidence is that several other terms are often used synonymously with it, when in fact there are distinctions to be made among these terms that are not always apparent. Quite unnecessary controversy occurs since some believe that the term evidence arises and has meaning only in the field of law. We will start with discussing these matters, since evidence is the foundation of all intelligence analyses.

We are actually not assisted very much in defining evidence by consulting a dictionary. For example, look at the Oxford English Dictionary under the term evidence and you will be led in a circle; evidence is ultimately defined as being evidence.

A variety of terms are so often used as synonyms for the term evidence: data, items of information, facts, and knowledge. When examined carefully, there are some valid and important distinctions to be made among these terms. First, consider the terms data and items of information. There are untold trillions of data or items of information in existence that will almost certainly never become evidence in any intelligence analysis or in most other inferences either. Here's a datum or item of information for you: Professor Schum has a long and steep driveway in front of his house that makes shoveling snow off of it very difficult in the winter. Can you think of any intelligence analysis problem in which this datum could become evidence? About the only matter in which this datum could become interesting evidence involves the question: Why did Schum and his wife, Anne, ever purchase this house in the first place? As we will discuss, data or items of information only become evidence when their relevance is established regarding some matter to be proved or disproved.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Evidence
  • Gheorghe Tecuci, George Mason University, Virginia, David A. Schum, George Mason University, Virginia, Dorin Marcu, George Mason University, Virginia, Mihai Boicu, George Mason University, Virginia
  • Book: Intelligence Analysis as Discovery of Evidence, Hypotheses, and Arguments
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316388488.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Evidence
  • Gheorghe Tecuci, George Mason University, Virginia, David A. Schum, George Mason University, Virginia, Dorin Marcu, George Mason University, Virginia, Mihai Boicu, George Mason University, Virginia
  • Book: Intelligence Analysis as Discovery of Evidence, Hypotheses, and Arguments
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316388488.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Evidence
  • Gheorghe Tecuci, George Mason University, Virginia, David A. Schum, George Mason University, Virginia, Dorin Marcu, George Mason University, Virginia, Mihai Boicu, George Mason University, Virginia
  • Book: Intelligence Analysis as Discovery of Evidence, Hypotheses, and Arguments
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316388488.005
Available formats
×