Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:03:26.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - Performance Assessment Using Standardized Data Sets: The PERFORMS Scheme in Breast Screening and Other Domains

from Part IV - Clinical Performance Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2018

By
Yan Chen  and
Alastair Gale
Edited by
Ehsan Samei  and
Elizabeth A. Krupinski
Ehsan Samei
Affiliation:
Duke University Medical Center, Durham
Elizabeth A. Krupinski
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques , pp. 328 - 342
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American College of Radiology (2017). www.acraccreditation.org/~/media/ACRAccreditation/Documents/Mammography/Requirements.pdf?la=en (accessed November 2, 2017).Google Scholar
Boyd, N.F., Rommens, J.M., Vogt, K., Lee, V., Hopper, J.L., Yaffe, M.J., Paterson, A.D. (2005). Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol, 6, 798–780.Google Scholar
Burns, F.G. (2011). An Independent External Review of the Breast Screening Unit at East Lancashire NHS Trust. Burnley, UK: East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. (2010). Intelligent computing applications based on eye gaze: their role in mammographic interpretation training. PhD thesis, Loughborough University, UK.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Gale, A.G., Evanoff, M. (2013). Does routine breast screening practice over-ride display quality in reporting enriched test sets? Proc SPIE Med Imag, 8673, 86730v.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., James, J.J., Turnbull, A.E., Gale, A.G. (2015). The use of lower resolution viewing devices for mammographic interpretation: implications for education and training. Eur J Radiol, 25, 3003–3008.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Dong, L., Nevisi, H., Gale, A.G. (2016). The international use of PERFORMS mammographic test sets. In: Tingberg, A., Lång, K., Timberg, P. (eds.) Breast Imaging: 13th International Workshop, IWDM 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Geneva, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 130–135.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., James, J., Dong, L., Gale, A.G. (2017). Measuring performance in the interpretation of chest radiographs – a pilot study. Clin Radiol, 72, 230–235.Google Scholar
Cowley, H.C., Gale, A.G. (1997). Time of day effects on mammographic film reading performance. Proc SPIE Med Imag, 3036, 212–221.Google Scholar
Cowley, H.C., Gale, A.G. (1999). Breast cancer screening: comparison of radiologists’ performance in a self-assessment scheme and in actual breast screening. Proc SPIE Med Imag, 3663, 157–168.Google Scholar
Darker, I.T., Chen, Y., Gale, A.G. (2011). Health professionals’ agreement on density judgements and successful abnormality identification within the UK breast screening programme. Proc SPIE Med Imag, 7966, 796604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, L., Chen, Y., Gale, A.G., Chakraborty, D.P. (2012). A potential method to identify poor breast screening performance? Proc SPIE Med Imag, 8318, 831819.Google Scholar
Esserman, L., Cowley, H., Eberle, C., Kirkpatrick, A., Chang, S., Berbaum, K., Gale, A.G. (2002). Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships. J Natl Cancer Inst, 94, 369–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Findlay, J.M., Gilchrist, I.D. (2003). Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Forrest, A.P.M. (1986). Report to the Health Ministers of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Gale, A.G. (1997). Human response to visual stimuli. In: Hendee, W., Wells, P. (eds.) Perception of Visual Information. New York, NY: Springer Verlag, pp. 127–147.Google Scholar
Gale, A.G. (2003). PERFORMS – a self-assessment scheme for radiologists in breast screening. Semin Breast Dis, 6, 148–152.Google Scholar
Gale, A.G., Walker, G.E. (1991). Design for performance: quality assessment in a national breast screening programme. In: Lovesay, E. (ed.) Ergonomics – Design for Performance 1991. London, England: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Gale, A.G., Roebuck, E.J., Riley, P., Worthington, B.S. (1987). Computer aids to mammography diagnosis. Br J Radiol, 60, 887–891.Google Scholar
Garland, L.H. (1949). On the scientific evaluation of diagnostic procedures. Radiology, 52, 309–328.Google Scholar
Krupinski, E.A. (1996). Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms. Acad Radiol, 3, 137–144.Google Scholar
Krupinski, E.A., Berbaum, K.S. (2010). Does reader visual fatigue impact interpretation accuracy? Proc SPIE Med Imag, 7627, 762701.Google Scholar
Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., Carmody, D. (1978). Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision making in pulmonary nodule detection. Invest Radiol, 13, 175–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Health Service. (2017). https://digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB23376 (accessed November 2, 2017).Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and Reality. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Nevisi, H., Dong, L., Chen, Y., Gale, A.G. (2017). How quickly do breast screeners learn their skills? Proc SPIE Med Imag, 10136, 101360D.Google Scholar
Royal College of Radiologists. (1990). Quality Assurance Guidelines for Radiologists. London, UK: Royal College of Radiologists.Google Scholar
Scott, H.J., Gale, A.G (2005). Breast screening: when is a difficult case truly difficult and for whom? Proc SPIE Med Imag, 5749, 557–565.Google Scholar
Scott, H.J., Gale, A.G., Wooding, D.S. (2004). Breast screening technologists: does real-life case volume affect performance? Proc SPIE Med Imag, 5372, 399–406.Google Scholar
Scott, H.J., Evans, A., Gale, A.G., Murphy, A., Reed, J. (2009). The relationship between real life breast screening and an annual self-assessment scheme. Proc SPIE Med Imag, 7263, E1–E9.Google Scholar
Sickles, E.A., D’Orsi, C.J., Bassett, L.W., et al. (2013). ACR BI-RADS mammography. In: ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology.Google Scholar
Tang, Q., Dong, L., Chen, Y., Gale, A.G. (2017). The implementation of an AR (augmented reality) approach to support mammographic interpretation training – an initial feasibility study. Proc SPIE Med Imag, 10136, 1013604.Google Scholar
Yerushalmy, J. (1969). The statistical assessment of the variability in observer perception and description of roentgenographic pulmonary shadows. Radiol Clin N Am, 1, 381–390.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×