Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:35:04.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - EU merger policy

from Part II - The role of environmental protection in EU competition law and policy in practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2011

Suzanne Kingston
Affiliation:
University College Dublin
Get access

Summary

Introduction: a role for environmental considerations in the EU's merger regime?

Prima facie, there is less scope for taking environmental considerations into account in applying the EU's merger regime than with other areas of EU competition law. This is essentially because, despite the transition in Regulation 139/2004 (the ‘Merger Regulation’) to the test of whether a concentration would significantly impede effective competition (the SIEC test), the Commission has been clear that, in practice, one of the primary forms of competitive harm in the case of concentrations remains the creation or strengthening of a dominant position (the dominance test). This means that, where a proposed concentration will create or strengthen a dominant position – a test that is based solely on whether economic power is significantly increased – the possibilities of nonetheless concluding that the SIEC test is not satisfied are few. Nonetheless, they are not non-existent, and in this sense the current Merger Regulation offers greater possibilities for integration than its 1989 predecessor, which relied solely on the dominance test. This chapter will examine the ways in which it might be argued that environmentally beneficial concentrations do not satisfy the SIEC test.

Overview

The Merger Regulation provides for a variety of factors to be taken into account in assessing whether a proposed concentration is compatible with the common market, i.e., whether the concentration would ‘significantly impede effective competition’. Some of these are set out in Article 2, headed ‘Appraisal of concentrations’, though this is not an exhaustive list.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Levy, N.‘The EU's SIEC Test Five Years On: Has It Made a Difference?’ 2010 6 European Competition Journal211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motta, M.Competition Policy: Theory and PracticeCambridgeCambridge University Press 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Gronden, J.Vries, S.‘Independent Competition Authorities in the EU’ 2006 2 Utrecht Law Review32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leary, T.‘The Essential Stability of Merger Policy in the United States’ 2002 70 Antitrust Law Journal105Google Scholar
Luescher, C.‘Efficiency Considerations in European Merger Control – Just Another Battle Ground for the European Commission, Economists and Competition Lawyers?’ 2004 European Competition Law Review 7Google Scholar
Theeuwes, J.‘An Economic Analysis of the New Regulation 139/2004’ 2005 32 Legal Issues of European Integration209Google Scholar
Williamson, O.‘Economics as an Antitrust Defense: The Welfare Tradeoffs’ 1968 58 American Economic Review407Google Scholar
Gerard, D.‘Merger Control Policy: How to Give Meaningful Consideration to Efficiency Claims?’ 2003 40 Common Market Law Review1367Google Scholar
Kocmut, M.‘Efficiency Considerations and Merger Control – Quo Vadis, Commission?’ 2006 27 European Competition Law Review19Google Scholar
Neven, D.Röller, L.-H.‘Consumer Surplus Versus Welfare Standard in a Political Economy Model of Merger Control’ 2005 23 International Journal of Industrial Organization829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J.‘Environmental Research Joint Ventures among Manufacturers’ 1996 11 Review of Industrial Organization655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundtland, G.Our Common FutureOxfordOxford University Press 1987Google Scholar
Elhauge, E.Geradin, D.Global Competition Law and EconomicsOxfordHart Publishing 2007Google Scholar
Kroes, N.‘Competition Policy and the Crisis – The Commission's Approach to Banking and Beyond’ 2010 1 Competition Policy Newsletter3Google Scholar
Sindico, F.‘Climate Change: A Security (Council) Issue?’ 2007 1 Carbon and Climate Law Review29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Rompuy, B.‘Implications for the Standard of Proof in EC Merger Proceedings: Bertelsmann and Sony Corporation of America v. Impala’ 2008 29 European Competition Law Review608Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • EU merger policy
  • Suzanne Kingston, University College Dublin
  • Book: Greening EU Competition Law and Policy
  • Online publication: 05 November 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511758522.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • EU merger policy
  • Suzanne Kingston, University College Dublin
  • Book: Greening EU Competition Law and Policy
  • Online publication: 05 November 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511758522.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • EU merger policy
  • Suzanne Kingston, University College Dublin
  • Book: Greening EU Competition Law and Policy
  • Online publication: 05 November 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511758522.015
Available formats
×