Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:24:04.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2021

Emilija Leinarte
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Functional Responsibility of International Organisations
The European Union and International Economic Law
, pp. 251 - 261
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Alvarez, JE, International Organizations as Law-Makers (Oxford University Press 2010)Google Scholar
Amerasinghe, CF, Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organizations (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzilotti, D, Corso Di Diritto Internazionale (3rd edn, Rome 1928)Google Scholar
Bagwell, K and Staiger, RW, The Economics of the World Trading System (MIT Press 2002)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, E and Downs, GW, Between Fragmentation and Democracy: The Role of National and International Courts (Cambridge University Press 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnitcha, J, Lauge, P and Waibel, M, The Political Economy of the International Investment Regime (Oxford University Press 2017)Google Scholar
Burton, W, Burtons Legal Thesaurus 5th Edition: Over 10,000 Synonyms, Terms, and Expressions Specifically Related to the Legal Profession (5th edn, McGraw-Hill Education 2013)Google Scholar
Clapman, A, (ed), European Community Law, Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law (Martinus Nijhoff 1991)Google Scholar
Craig, P and de Búrca, G, EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (6th edn, Oxford University Press 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (8th edn, Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar
Crawford, J, State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge University Press 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremona, M, External Relations of the EU and the Member States: Competence, Mixed Agreements, International Responsibility, and Effects of International Law (European University Institute 2006)Google Scholar
Delgado Casteleiro, A, The International Responsibility of the European Union: From Competence to Normative Control (Cambridge University Press 2016)Google Scholar
Dolmans, MJFM, Problems of Mixed Agreements: Division of Powers Within the EEC and the Rights of Third Parties (Asser Instituut 1985)Google Scholar
Dolzer, R and Schreuer, C, Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Z, The International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge University Press 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eeckhout, P, EU External Relations Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2011)Google Scholar
Garner, B, A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 1996)Google Scholar
Goldsmith, JL and Posner, EA, The Limits of International Law (Oxford University Press 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, CD, Judicial Remedies in International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1987)Google Scholar
Groux, J and Manin, P, The European Communities in the International Order (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 1985)Google Scholar
Heliskoski, J, Mixed Agreements as a Technique for Organizing the International Relations of the European Community and Its Member States (Kluwer Law International 2001)Google Scholar
Hirsch, M, The Responsibility of International Organizations Toward Third Parties: Some Basic Principles (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1995)Google Scholar
Klabbers, J, An Introduction to International Institutional Law (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2009)Google Scholar
Klabbers, J, Treaty Conflict and the European Union (Cambridge University Press 2009)Google Scholar
Klabbers, J, An Introduction to International Organizations Law (Cambridge University Press 2015)Google Scholar
Kuijper, PJ, The Law of EU External Relations Cases, Materials, and Commentary on the EU as an International Legal Actor (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2015)Google Scholar
Macleod I, Hendry, ID and Hyett, S, The External Relations of the European Communities (Oxford University Press 1996)Google Scholar
Newcombe, A and Paradell, L, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties. Standards of Treatment (Kluwer Law International 2009)Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, D and Schermers, HG (eds), Mixed Agreements (Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers 1983)Google Scholar
Paparinskis, M, The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment (Oxford University Press 2013)Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, Optimal Protection of International Law: Navigating between European Absolutism and American Voluntarism (Cambridge University Press 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, EA and Sykes, AO, Economic Foundations of International Law (Harvard University Press 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salacuse, JW, The Law of Investment Treaties (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2015)Google Scholar
Steinbach, A, EU Liability and International Economic Law (Hart Publishing 2017)Google Scholar
Trachtman, JP, The Economic Structure of International Law (Harvard University Press 2008)Google Scholar
Vandevelde, KJ, United States Investment Treaties: Policy and Practice (Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers 1992)Google Scholar
Allen, BE, ‘The Use of Non-Pecuniary Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement: Lessons for Arbitral Practitioners’, in Schneide, Michael E and Knoll, Joachim (eds), ASA Special Series No. 30: Performance as a Remedy: Non-monetary Relief in International Arbitration (JurisNet, LLC 2011)Google Scholar
Allott, P, ‘Adherence to and Withdrawal from Mixed Agreements’, in O’Keeffe, David and Schermers, Henry G (eds), Mixed Agreements (Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers 1983)Google Scholar
Barros, AS, ‘6 Responsibility, 6.3 Matthews v United Kingdom, ECtHR, App. No. 24833/94, 18 February 1999’, in Ryngaert, Cedric and others (eds), Judicial Decisions on the Law of International Organizations (Oxford University Press 2016)Google Scholar
Barros, AS, Ryngaert, C and Wouters, J, ‘Member States, International Organizations and International Responsibility’, in Barros, Ana Sofia, Ryngaert, Cedric and Wouters, Jan (eds), International Organizations and Member State Responsibility: Critical Perspectives (Brill Nijhoff 2017)Google Scholar
Bleckmann, A, ‘The Mixed Agreements of the EEC in Public International Law’, in O’Keeffe, David and Schermers, Henry G (eds), Mixed Agreements (Liability for mixed agreements 1983)Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S, ‘Should the Teeth Be Pulled? An Analysis of WTO Sanctions’, in Kennedy, Daniel LM and Southwick, James D (eds), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec (Cambridge University Press 2002)Google Scholar
Cortés Martín, JM, ‘European Exceptionalism in International Law? The European Union and the System of International Responsibility’, in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed), Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2013)Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, ‘A European Law of International Responsibility? The Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations and the European Union’, in Kosta, Vicky, Skoutaris, Nikos and Tzevelekos, Vassilis (eds), The EU Accession to the ECHR (Hart Publishing 2014)Google Scholar
Delgado Casteleiro, A and Larik, J, ‘The “Odd Couple”: The Responsibility of the EU at the WTO’, in Evans, Malcolm and Koutrakos, Panos (eds), The International Responsibility of the European Union: European and International Perspectives (Hart Publishing 2013)Google Scholar
Denza, E, ‘Responsibility of the EU in the Context of Investment’, in Evans, Malcolm and Koutrakos, Panos (eds), The International Responsibility of the European Union: European and International Perspectives (Hart Publishing 2013)Google Scholar
Eeckhout, P, ‘The EU and Its Member States in the WTO: Issues of Responsibility’, in Bartels, Lorand and Ortino, Federico (eds), Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System (Oxford University Press 2006)Google Scholar
Ehlermann, CD, ‘Mixed Agreements: A List of Problems’, in O’Keeffe, David and Schermers, Henry G (eds), Mixed Agreements (Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers 1983)Google Scholar
Evans, M and Okawa, P, ‘Approaches to Responsibility in International Courts’, in Koutrakos, Panos and Eeckhout, Piet (eds), The International Responsibility of the European Union: European and International Perspectives (Hart Publishing 2013)Google Scholar
Flett, J, ‘The Practice of Shared Responsibility in Relation to The World Trade Organization and the European Union and Its Member States in the WTO’, in Nollkaemper, André and Plakokefalos, Ilias (eds), The Practice of Shared Responsibility in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2016)Google Scholar
Fry, JD, ‘Attribution of Responsibility’, in Nollkaemper, André and Plakokefalos, Ilias (eds), Principles of Shared Responsibility in International Law: An Appraisal of the State of the Art (Cambridge University Press 2014)Google Scholar
Gaja, G, ‘Some Reflections on the European Community’s International Responsibility’, in Schermers, Henry G, Heukels, Ton and Mead, Philip (eds), Non-Contractual Liability of the European Communities (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1988)Google Scholar
Gaja, G, ‘The European Community’s Rights and Obligations under Mixed Agreements’, in O’Keeffe, David and Schermers, Henry G (eds), Mixed Agreements (Kluwer Law & Taxation Publishers 1983)Google Scholar
Gazzini, T, ‘States and Foreign Investment: A Law of the Treaties Perspective’, in Shahleza, Lalani and Lazo, Rodrigo Polanco (eds), The Role of the State in Investor-State Arbitration (Brill Nijhoff 2015)Google Scholar
Granvik, L, ‘Incomplete Mixed Environmental Agreements of the Community and the Principle of Bindingness’, in Koskenniemi, Martti (ed), International Law Aspects of the European Union (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1998)Google Scholar
Hindelang, S, ‘Restitution and Compensation – Reconstructing the Relationship in Investment Treaty Law’, in Rainer, Hofmann and Christian, Tams (eds), International Investment Law and General International Law: From Clinical Isolation to Systemic Integration? (Nomos 2011)Google Scholar
Hobér, K, ‘Remedies in Investment Disputes’, in Bjorklund, Andrea K, Laird, A Ian and Ripinsky, Sergei (eds), Remedies in International Investment Law: Emerging Jurisprudence of International Investment Law (BIICL 2009)Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, F, ‘Institutional Aspects of Global Trade Governance from an EU Perspective’, in Van Vooren, Bart, Blockmans, Steven and Wouters, Jan (eds), The EU’s Role in Global Governance (Oxford University Press 2013)Google Scholar
Hudec, RA, ‘Broadening the Scope of Remedies in the WTO Dispute Settlement’, in Weiss, Friedl (ed), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues & Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts & Tribunals (Cameron May 2000)Google Scholar
Klabbers, J, ‘Presumptive Personality: The European Union in International Law’, in Koskenniemi, Martti (ed), International Law Aspects of the European Union (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1998)Google Scholar
Kornhauser, LA, ‘Incentives, Compensation, and Irreparable Harm’, in Nollkaemper, André and Jacobs, Dov (eds), Distribution of Responsibilities in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2015)Google Scholar
Kuijper, PJ, ‘International Responsibility from Mixed Agreements’, in Hillion, Christophe and Koutrakos, Panos (eds), Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and its Member States in the World (Hart Publishing 2010)Google Scholar
Kuijper, PJ and Paasivirta, E, ‘EU International Responsibility and Its Attribution: From the Inside Looking Out’, in Evans, Malcolm and Koutrakos, Panos (eds), The International Responsibility of the European Union: European and International Perspectives (Hart Publishing 2013)Google Scholar
Marín Durán, G, ‘The EU and Its Member States in WTO Dispute Settlement: A “Competence Model,” or a Case Apart, for Managing International Responsibility?’, in Cremona, Marise, Thies, Anne and Wessel, Ramses A (eds), The EU and International Dispute Settlement (Hart Publishing 2016)Google Scholar
Messineo, F, ‘Attribution of Conduct’, in Nollkaemper, André and Plakokefalos, Ilias (eds), Principles of Shared Responsibility in International Law: An Appraisal of the State of the Art (Cambridge University Press 2014)Google Scholar
Morris, D, ‘The Regulatory State and the Duty of Consistency’, in Lalani, Shahleza and Lazo, Rodrigo Polanco (eds), The Role of the State in Investor-State Arbitration (Brill Nijhoff 2015)Google Scholar
Neframi, E, ‘International Responsibility of the European Community and of Member States under Mixed Agreements’, in Cannizzaro, Enzo (ed), The European Union as An Actor in International Relations (Kluwer Law International 2002)Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A, ‘Joint Responsibility between the EU and Member States for Non-Performance of Obligations under Multilateral Environmental Agreements’, in Morgera, Elisa (ed), The External Environmental Policy of the European Union (Cambridge University Press 2012)Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A, ‘Introduction’, in Nollkaemper, André and Plakokefalos, Ilias (eds), Principles of Shared Responsibility in International Law: An Appraisal of the State of the Art (Cambridge University Press 2014)Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A and Jacobs, D, ‘Introduction: Mapping the Normative Framework for the Distribution of Shared Responsibility’, in Nollkaemper, André and Jacobs, Dov (eds), Distribution of Responsibilities in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, PM, ‘Mixity from the Outside: The Perspective of a Treaty Partner’, in Hillion, Christophe and Koutrakos, Panos (eds), Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and Its Member States in the World (Hart Publishing 2010)Google Scholar
Paulsson, J and Douglas, Z, ‘Arbitrating Foreign Investment Disputes: Procedural and Substantive Legal Aspects’, in Horn, Norbert (ed), Indirect Expropriation in Investment Treaty Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 2004)Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, Jackson, JH and Sykes, AO, ‘The Calculation and Design of Trade Retaliation in Context: What Is the Goal of Suspending WTO Obligations?’, in Bown, Chad P and Pauwelyn, Joost (eds), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cambridge University Press 2010)Google Scholar
Proulx, V-J, ‘An Uneasy Transition? Linkages between the Law of State Responsibility and the Law Governing the Responsibility of International Organizations’, in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed), Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie (Martinus N, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2013)Google Scholar
Rosas, A, ‘Mixed Union – Mixed Agreements’, in Koskenniemi, Martti (ed), International Law Aspects of the European Union (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1997)Google Scholar
Rosas, A, ‘The European Union and Mixed Agreements’, in Dashwood, Alan and Hillion, Christophe (eds), The General Law of E. C. External Relations (Sweet & Maxwell 2000)Google Scholar
Schütze, R, ‘Federalims and Foreign Affairs: Mixity as a (Inter)National Phenomenon’, in Hillion, Christophe and Koutrakos, Panos (eds), Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and its Member States in the World (Hart Publishing 2010)Google Scholar
Shaffer, G and Ganin, D, ‘Extrapolating Purpose from Practice: Rebalancing or Inducing Compliance’, in Bown, Chad P and Pauwelyn, Joost (eds), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cambridge University Press 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, PB, ‘Comparative Taxation Procedure and Tax Enforcement, in Schill, Stephan W. (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press 2010)Google Scholar
Talmon, S, ‘Responsibility of International Organizations: Does the European Community Require Special Treatment?’, in Ragazzi, Maurizio (ed), International Responsibility Today (Martinus Nijhoff 2005)Google Scholar
Tietje, C and Kampermann, K, ‘Taxation and Investment: Constitutional Law Limitations on Tax Legislation in Context’, in Schill, Stephan W (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press 2010)Google Scholar
Timmermans, CWA, ‘Organizing Joint Participation of E.C. and Member States’, in Dashwood, Alan and Hillion, Christophe (eds), The General Law of E. C. External Relations (Sweet & Maxwell 2000)Google Scholar
Titi, C, ‘Aspects of the EU’s Responsibility in International Investment Disputes’, in Cremona, Marise, Thies, Anne and Wessel, Ramses (eds), The European Union and the International Dispute Settlement (Hart Publishing 2017)Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C, ‘Liability for Mixed Agreements’, in O’Keeffe, David and Schermers, Henry G (eds), Mixed Agreements (Kluwer Law & Taxation Publishers 1983)Google Scholar
Weiler, JHH, ‘The External Legal Relations of Non-Unitary Actors’, in O’Keeffe, David and Schermers, Henry G (eds), Mixed agreements (Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers 1983)Google Scholar
Wessel, RA and Dekker, IF, ‘Identities of States in International Organizations’, in Barros, Ana Sofia, Ryngaert, Cedric and Wouters, Jan (eds), International organizations and member state responsibility : critical perspectives (Brill Nijhoff 2017)Google Scholar
Wittich, S, ‘International Investment Law’, in Nollkaemper, André and Plakokefalos, Ilias (eds), The Practice of Shared Responsibility in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2017)Google Scholar
Yannaca-Small, K, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’, in Yannaca-Small, Katia (ed), Arbitration under International Investment Agreements: A Guide to the Key Issues (Oxford University Press 2010)Google Scholar
Ahlborn, C, ‘The Rules of International Organizations and the Law of International Responsibility’ (2011) 8 International Organizations Law Review 2, 397Google Scholar
Bartels, L, ‘Procedural Aspects of Shared Responsibility in the WTO Dispute Settlement System’ (2013) 4 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, L, ‘The UK’s Status in the WTO after Brexit’ [2016] Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2841747Google Scholar
Benvenisti, E, ‘Democracy Captured: The Mega-Regional Agreements and the Future of Global Public Law’ (2016) 23 Constellations 1, 58Google Scholar
Björklund, M, ‘Responsibility in the EC for Mixed Agreements – Should Non-Member Parties Care?’ (2001) 70 Nordic Journal of International Law 3, 373Google Scholar
Brimeyer, BL, ‘Bananas, Beef, and Compliance in the World Trade Organization : The Inability of the WTO Dispute Settlement Process to Achieve Compliance from Superpower Nations’ (2001) 10 Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 1, 133Google Scholar
Castellanos-Jankiewicz, L, ‘Causation and International State Responsibility’ (2012) 7 SHARES Research Paper 7Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S, ‘Rethinking WTO Trade Sanctions’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law 4, 792Google Scholar
Chayes, A, ‘The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation’ (1976) 89 Harvard Law Review 7, 1281Google Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘Revising the Draft Articles on State Responsibility’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 435Google Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘The ILC’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts: A Retrospect’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 4, 874Google Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘The Current Political Discourse Concerning International Law’ (2018) 81 Modern Law Review 1, 1Google Scholar
Davey, WJ, ‘Compliance Problems in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2009) 42 Cornell International Law Journal 1, 119Google Scholar
Demirkol, B, ‘Remedies in Investment Treaty Arbitration (2015) 6 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2, 229Google Scholar
DiMascio, N and Pauwelyn, J, ‘Nondiscrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin?’ (2008) 102 American Journal of International Law 1, 48Google Scholar
Dimopoulos, A, ‘The Common Commercial Policy after Lisbon: Establishing Parallelism between Internal and External Economic Relations’ (2008) 4 Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy 101Google Scholar
Douglas, Z, ‘International Responsibility for Domestic Adjudication: Denial of Justice Deconstructed’ (2014) 63 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 3, 867Google Scholar
Eagleton, C, ‘The Responsibility of States in International Law’ (1928) 22 American Political Science Review 4, 1004Google Scholar
Fairley, SH, ‘Internal Accountability for Provincial Violations of Canada’s International Obligations: Lessons from Abitibi’ (2012) 53 Canadian Business Law Journal 31Google Scholar
George, CC, ‘What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International Law?’ (1962) 38 British Yearbook of International Law 307Google Scholar
Gonzalez, MP, ‘Les Organisations Internationales et Le Droit de La Responsabilité’ (1998) 92 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 63Google Scholar
Gray, C, ‘The Choice between Restitution and Compensation’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 2, 413423Google Scholar
Guido, C and Melamed, DA, ‘Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral’ (1972) 85 Harvard Law Review 1089Google Scholar
Guzman, AT, ‘The Cost of Credibility: Explaining Resistance to Interstate Dispute Resolution Mechanisms’ (2002) 31 Journal of Legal Studies 303Google Scholar
Heliskoski, J, ‘Joint Competence of the European Community and Its Member States and the Dispute Settlement Practice of the World Trade Organization’ (1999–2000) 2 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 80Google Scholar
Higgins, R, ‘The Legal Consequences for Member States of the Non-Fulfilment by International Organizations of Their Obligations toward Third Parties’, Yearbook of the Institute of International Law (Paris), part I (Session of Lisbon, Preparatory works) (1995) Available at: www.idi-iil.org/app/uploads/2017/06/1995_lis_02_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hoekman, B and Mavroidis, PC, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement, Transparency and Surveillance’ (2000) 30 World Economy 527Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, F, ‘Litigating against the European Union and Its Member States – Who Responds under the ILC’s Draft Articles on International Responsibility of International Organizations?’ (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, OW, ‘The Path of the Law’ (1897) 10 Harvard Law Review 457Google Scholar
Jackson, JH, ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding—Misunderstandings on the Nature of Legal Obligation’ (1997) 91 American Journal of International Law 60Google Scholar
Kleimann, D, ‘Reading Opinion 2/15 : Standards of Analysis, the Court’s Discretion, and the Legal View of the Advocate General’ (2017) 23 EUI RSCAS 138Google Scholar
Koers, A, ‘Participation of the European Economic Community in a New Law of the Sea Convention (1979) 73 American Journal of International Law 426Google Scholar
Kuijper, PJ, ‘Amsterdam Center for International Law: Introduction to the Symposium on Responsibility of International Organizations and of (Member) States: Attributed or Direct Responsibility or Both?’ (2010) 7 International Organizations Law Review 9Google Scholar
Kuijper, PJ, ‘Attribution – Responsibility – Remedy. Some Comments on the EU in Different International Regimes’ [2014] Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2405028Google Scholar
Lévesque, C, ‘Les Rôles et Responsabilités Des Provinces Canadiennes Dans Le Cadre de Procédures d’arbitrage Entre Investisseurs et États Fondées Sur Des Traités Économiques’ (2015) 28 Revue québécoise de droit international 107155Google Scholar
Malacrida, R, ‘Towards Sounder and Fairer WTO Retaliation: Suggestions for Possible Additional Procedural Rules Governing Members’ Preparation and Adoption of Retaliatory Measures’ (2008) 42 Journal of World Trade 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, PC, ‘Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between Rock and a Hard Place’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law 763Google Scholar
Meinhard, H, ‘The ECJ’s Opinion 1/94 on the WTO – No Surprise, but Wise?’ (1995) 6 European Journal of International Law 245Google Scholar
Miller, D, ‘Distributing Responsibilities’ (2001) 9 Journal of Political Philosophy 453Google Scholar
Newcombe, A, ‘The Boundaries of Regulatory Expropriation in International Law’ (2005) 20 ICSID Review-FILJ 157Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A, ‘The European Community and International Environmental Co-Operation: Legal Aspects of External Community Powers (1987) 14 Legal Issues of European Integration 55Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A and Jacobs, D, ‘Shared Responsibility in International Law: A Concept Paper’ (2001) ACIL Research Paper No 2011–07 (SHARES Series)Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A and Jacobs, D, ‘Shared Responsibility in International Law: A Conceptual Framework’ (2013) 34 Michigan Journal of International Law 359Google Scholar
Noyes, JE and Smith, BD, ‘State Responsibility and the Principle of Joint and Se Veral Liability’ (1988) 13 Yale Journal of International Law 225Google Scholar
Paasivirta, E, ‘Responsibility of a Member State of an International Organization: Where Will It End? Comments on Article 60 of the ILC Draft on the Responsibility of International Organizations’ (2010) 7 International Organizations Law Review 49Google Scholar
Paparinskis, M, ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility’ (2013) 24 European Journal of International Law 617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paparinskis, M, ‘Investors’ Remedies under EU Law and International Investment Law’ (2016) 17 Journal of World Investment & Trade 919Google Scholar
Pescatore, P, ‘Opinion 1/94 on “Conclusion” of the WTO Agreements: Is There an Escape from a Programmed Disaster’ (1999) 36 Common Market Law Review 387Google Scholar
Plakokefalos, I, ‘Causation in the Law of State Responsibility and the Problem of Overdetermination: In Search of Clarity’ (2015) 26 European Journal of International Law 471Google Scholar
Puig, V, ‘Scope of the New Exclusive Competence of the European Union with Regard to Foreign Direct Investment’ (2013) 40 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 133Google Scholar
Shapiro, C, ‘Property Rules vs. Liability Rules for Patent Infringement’ [2016] Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2775307 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2775307Google Scholar
Sloane, RD and Reisman, M, ‘Indirect Expropriation and Its Valuation in the BIT Generation’ (2003) 73 British Yearbook of International Law 115Google Scholar
Sykes, AO and Schwartz, WF, ‘The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the WTO/ GATT System’ (2002) 31 Journal of Legal Studies 179Google Scholar
Temple, L, ‘The Ozone-Layer Convention: A New Solution to the Question of Community Participation in “Mixed” International Agreements’ (1986) 23 Common Market Law Review 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtman, JP, ‘Building the WTO Cathedral’ [2006] Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=815844 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.815844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Aaken, A, ‘To Do Away with International Law? Some Limits to “The Limits of International Law”’ (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law 289Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Towards a Comprehensive European International Investment Policy, COM (2010), 343Google Scholar
Eagleton, C, ‘International Organization and the Law of Responsibility’, Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law 76 (Brill 1950), 316Google Scholar
Leinarte, E, ‘International Responsibility of the European Union: From Competence to Normative Control by Casteleiro, Andrés Delgado (Book Review) (2017) 42 European Law Review 6Google Scholar
Leinarte, E, ‘EU Liability and International Economic Law’ by Steinbach, Armin (Book Review) (2018) European Law Review 280281Google Scholar
Pusztai, DM, ‘Causation in the Law of State Responsibility’ (PhD book, University of Cambridge 2017)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Emilija Leinarte, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Functional Responsibility of International Organisations
  • Online publication: 09 December 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108979085.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Emilija Leinarte, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Functional Responsibility of International Organisations
  • Online publication: 09 December 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108979085.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Emilija Leinarte, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Functional Responsibility of International Organisations
  • Online publication: 09 December 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108979085.012
Available formats
×