Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T07:17:13.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constraints on the Bulge Formation Timescale from Stellar Populations

from Part 3 - The Timescales of Bulge Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2010

R.M. Rich
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1562, USA
C. Marcella Carollo
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Henry C. Ferguson
Affiliation:
Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore
Rosemary F. G. Wyse
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
Get access

Summary

Within recent years, there has been a confluence of data that favors a large age for the bulges of the Milky Way and M31. A short formation timescale is required by the similarity in ages between the bulge and the old, metal-rich globular clusters. Detailed abundances of bulge giants are consistent with a short enrichment timescale. The bulge of M31 is similarly old and even more metal-rich than the Galactic bulge. There appears to be a strong connection between the M31 bulge and the halo, as metal-rich giants are found in M31 out to great distances. The stellar populations data support a rapid bulge formation timescale, perhaps even less than 1 Gyr.

Introduction

“We must conclude, then, that in the central region of the Andromeda Nebula we have a metal-poor Population II, which reaches −3m for the brightest stars, and that underlying it there is a very much denser sheet of old stars, probably something like those in M67 or NGC 6752. We can be certain that these are enriched stars, because the cyanogen bands are strong, and so the metal/hydrogen ration is very much closer to what we observe in the Sun and in the present interstellar medium than to what is obwserved for Population II. And the process of enrichment probably has taken very little time. After the first generation of stars has formed, we can hardly speak of a ‘generation’, because the enrichment takes place so soon, and there is probably very little time difference.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×