Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:01:44.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Truth Finding and the Mirage of Inquisitorial Process

from Part II - Convergences between Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2022

By
Adrian A. S. Zuckerman
Edited by
Jordi Ferrer Beltrán  and
Carmen Vázquez
Jordi Ferrer Beltrán
Affiliation:
Universitat de Girona
Carmen Vázquez
Affiliation:
Universitat de Girona
Get access

Summary

My argument is that it is impossible for a judge to both provide unrepresented and poorly qualified litigants with meaningful legal assistance while at the same time avoiding impartiality. The English system of civil justice offers poor access to litigants of limited means. This has been the case for a long time, but the problem has become even more serious since the abolition of legal aid in civil cases and there it is now urgent to address it. The strategy that seems to appeal to the legislator favours procedures that can be conducted without the involvement of professional advocates, of inquisitorial proceedings. This strategy is misconceived. While there is much to be said for simplifying the litigation system through use of technology, online resources and other labour-saving measures, there is no substitute for adversarial process.

Keywords

Adversarial processunrepresented litigantsEnglish systemlitigation system
Type
Chapter
Information
Evidential Legal Reasoning
Crossing Civil Law and Common Law Traditions
 , pp. 71 - 83
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Briggs, Lord Justice (2013), Chancery Modernisation Review: Final Report, available in: www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/CMR/cmr-final-report-dec2013.pdf.Google Scholar
Bornhorst, F., Ichino, A., Schlag, K. and Winter, E. (2004). Trust and Trustworthiness Among Europeans: South-North Comparison, available at www.researchgate.net/publication/5009344_Trust_and_Trustworthiness_Among_Europeans_South-North_Comparison.Google Scholar
Charness, G., Rigotti, L. and Rustichini, A. (2007). Individual Behavior and Group Membership. American Economic Review 97(4), 1340–52.Google Scholar
Ehud, G. (2004). Overcorrection, Geo. LJ, 93, 241.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. and Summers, S. (2012). The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence: Beyond the Common Law and Civil Law Traditions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layton, A. and Mercer, H., eds. (2004). European Civil Practice, 2nd ed., London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
Lind, A., Thibaut, J. and Walker, L. (1976). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Effect of Adversary and Inquisitorial Processes on Bias in Legal Decision Making. Virginia Law Review, 64(2), 271–83.Google Scholar
Plous, S. (1993). The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making, New York: Mcgraw Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Schul, Y. and Goren, H. (1997). When Strong Evidence Has Less Impact than Weak Evidence: Bias, Adjustment, and Instructions to Ignore. Social Cognition 15(2), 133–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shayo, M. and Zussman, A. (2011). Judicial Ingroup Bias in the Shadow of Terrorism, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(3), 1447–84.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., and Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×