Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:14:31.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - On Evidential Inferences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2022

Edited by
Jordi Ferrer Beltrán  and
Carmen Vázquez
Jordi Ferrer Beltrán
Affiliation:
Universitat de Girona
Carmen Vázquez
Affiliation:
Universitat de Girona
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Evidential Legal Reasoning
Crossing Civil Law and Common Law Traditions
 , pp. 123 - 214
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Aberdein, A. (2010). Virtue in Argument. Argumentation, 24, 165–79.Google Scholar
Aberdein, A. (2014). In Defense of Virtue: The Legitimacy of Agent-Based Argument Appraisal. Informal Logic, 34(1), 77–93.Google Scholar
Aikin, S. F. and Casey, J. P. (2016). Straw Men, Iron Men and Argumentative Virtue. Topoi, 35(2), 431–40.Google Scholar
Aikin, S. F. and Clanton, J. C. (2010). Developing Group Deliberative Virtues. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 27(4), 409–24.Google Scholar
Alcoff, L. M. (2010). Epistemic Identities. Episteme, 7(2), 128–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaya, A. (2018). The Virtue of Judicial Humility. Jurisprudence, 9(1), 97–107.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. (2012). Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions. Social Epistemology, 26(2), 163–73.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. H., (2005). Arguments that Backfire, in D. Hitchcock, D. Far, (eds.), The Uses of Argument, OSSA, Hamilton, 58–65.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. H. (2007). Virtue Epistemology and Argumentation Theory, in Hanse, H. V. et al. (eds.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground, OSSA, Windsor, 1–9.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. H. (2009). Keeping an Open Mind and Having a Sense of Proportion as Virtues in Argumentation. Cogency, 1(2), 49–64.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. H. (2017). The Virtuous Troll: Argumentative Virtues in the Age of Technologically Enhanced Argumentative Pluralism. Philosophy and Technology, 30(2), 179–89.Google Scholar
Cooper, N. (1994). The Intellectual Virtues. Philosophy, 69(270), 459–69.Google Scholar
Cordell, S. (2017). Group Virtues: No Great Leap Forward with Collectivism. Res Publica, 23(1), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, V. (2012). The Ethics of Argumentation. Informal Logic, 32(2), 222–41.Google Scholar
De Bruin, B. (2013). Epistemic Virtues in Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 583–95.Google Scholar
Fricker, M. (2010a). Can There Be Institutional Virtues?, in Szabo, T. and Hawthorne, J. (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 235–52.Google Scholar
Fricker, M., (2010b). Replies to Alcoff, Goldberb, and Hookway on Epistemic Injustice. Episteme, 7(2), 164–78.Google Scholar
Gensollen, M. (2017). El lugar de la teoría de la virtud argumentativa en la teoría de la argumentación contemporánea, Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación, 15, 41–59.Google Scholar
Harden Fritz, J. M. (2018). Communication Ethics and Virtue, in Snow, N. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Virtue, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, P. (2009). Judicial Character and does It Matter. Constitutional Commentary, 26, 96–167.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking Fast and Slow, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Karpowitz, C. F. and Mendelberg, T. (2007). Groups and Deliberation. Swiss Political Science Review, 13(4), 645–62.Google Scholar
Lahroodi, R. (2007). Collective Epistemic Virtues. Social Epistemology, 21(3), 281–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luskin, R. C., Sood, G., Fishkin, J. S., and Hahn, K. S. (2017). Deliberative distortions? Homogenization, polarization, and domination in small group deliberations. Unpublished manuscript from the Center for Deliberative Democracy, available at: https://cdd.stanford.edu/mm/2017/07/luskin-deliberative-distortions.pdf.Google Scholar
Montmarquet, A. J. (1993). Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. C. and West, R. (2015). Natural Epistemic Defects and Corrective Virtues. Synthese, 192(8), 2557–76.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. C. and Wood, W. J. (2007). Intellectual Virtues, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. L. and Church, I. M. (2015). When Cognition Turns Vicious: Heuristics and Biases in Light of Virtue Epistemology, Philosophical Psychology, 28(8), 1095–113.Google Scholar
Simon, D. (2004). A Third View of the Black Box: Cognitive Coherence in Legal Decision-Making, The University of Chicago Law Review, 71, 511–86.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (2009). What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (2000). Deliberative Trouble? Why Groups Go to Extremes, The Yale Law Journal, 110(1), 71–119.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (2008). Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. and Hastie, R. (2015). Wiser: Getting Beyond Groupthink to Make Group Smarter, Cambridge: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
Suroweicki, J. (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds: Why Many Are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economics, Societies and Nations, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Talisse, R. B. (2007). Why Democrats Need the Virtues, in Goodman, L. E. and Talisse, R. B. (eds.), Aristotle’s Politics Today, Albany: State University of New York Press, 45–52.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, L. (1996). Virtues of the Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Allen, R. J. and Pardo, M. (2007). The Problematic Value of Mathematical Models of Evidence, The Journal of Legal Studies, 36 (1), 107–40.Google Scholar
Allen, R. J. (1992). The Evolution of Hersay Rule to a Rule of Admission, Minnesota Law Review, 76, 797–812.Google Scholar
Allen, R. J. (1994). Factual Ambiguity and Theory of Evidence, Northwestern Law Review, 88, 604–34.Google Scholar
Allen, R. J. (2014). Burdens of Proof, Law, Probability and Risk, 13(3–4), 195–219.Google Scholar
Allen, R. J. (2016). The Hearsay Rule as a Rule of Admission Revisited, Fordham Law Review, 84, 1395–405.Google Scholar
Anderson, T., Twining, W. and Schum, D. A. (2005). Analysis of Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, S. (1996). Exemplary Reasoning: Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Rational Force of Legal Argument by Analogy, Harvard Law Review, 109(5): 923–1028.Google Scholar
Brewer, S. (1998). Scientific Expert Testimony and Intellectual Due Process, Yale Law Journal, 107: 1535–681.Google Scholar
Brewer, S. (2017). The Logocratic Conception of Evidence as Argument. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Bulygin, E. (2015). Essays in Legal Philosophy. Bernal Pulido, C., Huerta Ochoa, C., Mazzarese, T., Moreso, J. J., Navarro, P. E. and Paulson, S. L., eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burks, A. W. (1949). Icon, Index, and Symbol, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 9 (4), 673–89.Google Scholar
Canale, D. and Tuzet, G. (2009). The A Simili Argument: An Inferentialist Setting, Ratio Juris, 22 (4), 499–509.Google Scholar
Capone, A. and Poggi, F. (2016). Pragmatics and Law. Philosophical Perspectives. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capone, A. and Poggi, F. (2017). Pragmatics and Law. Practical and Theoretical Perspectives. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Chisholm, R. M. (1977). Theory of Knowledge, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Coffa, J. A. (1991). The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap. To the Vienna Station. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. J. (1977). The Probable and the Provable. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Combs, N. A. (2010). Fact-Finding without Facts: The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations of International Criminal Convictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
CP, Collected Papers of C.S. Peirce C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss (vols. 1–6) and A. Burks (vols. 7–8), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931–58. (References by volume and paragraph number).Google Scholar
Dahlman, C. (2017). Unacceptable Generalizations in Arguments on Legal Evidence, Argumentation, 31 (1), 83–99.Google Scholar
Damaška, M. (1997). Evidence Law Adrift. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrer, J. (2005). Prueba y verdad en el derecho, 2nd ed. Madrid: Marcial Pons.Google Scholar
Ferrer, J. (2007). La valoración racional de la prueba. Madrid: Marcial Pons.Google Scholar
Frank, J. (1949). Courts on Trial. Myth and Reality in American Justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Gascón, M. (2010). Los hechos en el derecho. Bases argumentales de la prueba, 3rd ed. Madrid: Marcial Pons.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. (2005). Evidence. In Golding, M. P. and Edmundson, W. A. (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 163–75.Google Scholar
Haack, S. (2004a). Truth and Justice, Inquiry and Advocacy, Science and Law, Ratio Juris, 17, 15–26.Google Scholar
Haack, S. (2004b). Epistemology Legalized: Or, Truth, Justice, and the American Way, The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 49, 43–61.Google Scholar
Ho, H. L. (1999). A Theory of Hearsay, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 19, 403–19.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. D. and Summers, S. J. (2012). The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence. Beyond the Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. A. (1980). Naming and Necessity, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. (2008). Learning from Words. Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, L. (2006). Truth, Error, and Criminal Law. An Essay in Legal Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McJohn, S. M. (1993). On Uberty: Legal Reasoning by Analogy and Peirce’s Theory of Abduction, Willamette Law Review, 29, 191–235.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Misak, C. J. (1995). Verificationism. Its History and Prospects. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Misak, C. J. (2017). James on Religious Experience, Philosophical Inquiries, 5, 63–74.Google Scholar
Nance, D. A. (1988). The Best Evidence Principle, Iowa Law Review, 73, 227–97.Google Scholar
Pardo, M. S. and Allen, R. J. (2008). Juridical Proof and the Best Explanation, Law and Philosophy, 27, 223–68.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1975). Mind, Language and Reality. Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1953). From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1969). Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1970). Philosophy of Logic, 2nd ed. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1976). The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, 2nd ed. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1934). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge, 1959.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. (1964). Introduction to Logic. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, P. and Zuckerman, A. (2010). Criminal Evidence, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1912). The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. (2003). Profiles, Probabilities, and Stereotypes. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Short, T. L. (2007). Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, A. (2005). Foundations of Evidence Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Summers, R. S. (1999). Formal Legal Truth and Substantive Truth in Judicial Fact-Finding – Their Justified Divergence in Some Particular Cases, Law and Philosophy, 18, 497–511.Google Scholar
Taruffo, M. (1992). La prova dei fatti giuridici. Milano: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Tuzet, G. (2016). La prova ragionata, Analisi e diritto, vol. 2016, 127–61.Google Scholar
Twining, W. (1984). Evidence and Legal Theory, Modern Law Review, 47, 261–83.Google Scholar
Twining, W. (2006). Rethinking Evidence. Exploratory Essays, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wigmore, J. H. (1913). The Principles of Judicial Proof Boston MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations Anscombe, G. E. M. and Rhees, R., eds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Notes for Lectures on ‘Private Experience’ and ‘Sense Data’, The Philosophical Review, 77, 275–320.Google Scholar

Selected Bibliography

Ferrer Beltrán, J. (2007). La valoración racional de la prueba, Madrid; Barcelona; Buenos Aires: Marcial Pons.Google Scholar
Frosini, B. V. (2002). La prove statistiche nel processo civile e nel processo penale, Milán: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Garbolino, P. (2014). Probabilità e logica della prova, Milan: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
González Lagier, D. (2005). Quaestio Facti, Ensayos sobre prueba, causalidad y acción, Lima; Bogotá: Palestra.Google Scholar
Green, M. D., Freedman, D. M. and Gordis, L. (2011). Reference Guide on Epidemiology, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, 3rd ed., Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.Google Scholar
Haack, S. (2014). Evidence Matters. Science, Proof and Truth in the Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaye, D. H. and Freedman, D. (2011). Reference Guide on Statistics, in Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, 3rd ed., Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.Google Scholar
MacCrimmon, M. and Tillers, P. eds. (2002). The Dynamics of Judicial Proof. Computation, Logic, and Common Sense, Heidelberg; New York: Physica Verlag.Google Scholar
Nieva Fenoll, J. (2010). La valoración de la prueba, Madrid; Barcelona; Buenos Aires: Marcial Pons.Google Scholar
Taruffo, M. (2009). La semplice verità. Il giudice e la costruzione dei fatti, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Taruffo, M. (2012). La prova nel processo civile, Milan: Giuffre.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Tuzet, G. (2013). Filosofia della prova giuridica, Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore.Google Scholar
Twining, W. (2006). Rethinking Evidence. Exploratory Essays, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Allen, R. J. and Pardo, M. S. (2019). Relative Plausibility and Its Critics, International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 23 (1–2), 5–59.Google Scholar
Amaya, A. (2015). The Tapestry of Reason, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Amaya, A. (2009). Inference to the Best Explanation, in Kaptein, H., Prakken, H. and Verheij, B. (eds.), Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories and Logic, Burlington: Ashgate, 135–59.Google Scholar
Ames, R. T. (2011) Confucian Role Ethics. A Vocabulary, Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Ames, R. T. and Rosemont, H. Jr. (1998). The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation, New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1825). A Treatise on Judicial Evidence, Dumont, E. ed., London: J. W. Paget.Google Scholar
Brindley, E. (2011). Moral Autonomy and Individual Sources of Authority in the Analects, Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 38 (2), 257–73.Google Scholar
Bronaugh, R. (1998). Is There a Duty to Confess?, American Philosophical Association Newsletter, 98, 86–7.Google Scholar
Chan, J. (1997). Hong Kong, Singapore, and ‘Asian Values’: An Alternative View, Journal of Democracy, 8 (2), 35–48.Google Scholar
Chan, S. K. (2000a). Cultural Issues and Crime, Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 12: 1–25.Google Scholar
Chan, S. K. (2000b). Rethinking the Criminal Justice System of the Singapore for the 21th Century, in Singapore Academy of Law, The Singapore Conference: Leading the Law and Lawyers into the New Millennium @2020, Singapore: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Chan, S. K. (1996). The Criminal Process – The Singapore Model, Singapore Law Review, 17: 433–503.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. J. (1977). The Probable and the Provable, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dolinko, D. (1986). Is There a Rationale for the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination?, UCLA Law Review, 33, 1063–148.Google Scholar
Donagan, A. (1984). The Right Not to Incriminate Oneself, Social Philosophy and Policy, 1 (2): 137–48.Google Scholar
Friendly, H. J. (1968). The Fifth Amendment Tomorrow: The Case for Constitutional Change, University of Cincinnati Law Review, 37 (4): 671–726.Google Scholar
Gerstein, R. S. (1979a). The Self-Incrimination Debate in Great Britain, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 27 (1), 81–114.Google Scholar
Gerstein, R. S. (1979b). The Demise of Boyd: Self-Incrimination and Private Papers in the Burger Court, UCLA Law Review, 27 (2), 343–97.Google Scholar
Gerstein, R. S. (1971). Punishment and Self-Incrimination, American Journal of Jurisprudence, 16, 84–94.Google Scholar
Gerstein, R. S. (1970). Privacy and Self-Incrimination, Ethics, 80 (2), 87–101.Google Scholar
Green, M. S. (1999). The Privilege’s Last Stand: The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination and the Right to Rebel Against the State, Brooklyn Law Review, 65 (3), 627–716.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, R. K. (1981). Silence as a Moral and Constitutional Right, William and Mary Law Review, 23 (1), 15–71.Google Scholar
Griffiths, J. (1970). Ideology in Criminal Procedure or a Third ‘Model’ of the Criminal Process, The Yale Law Journal, 79 (3), 359–417.Google Scholar
Ho, H. L. (2015). The Legal Concept of Evidence, Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, in https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evidence-legal/.Google Scholar
Ho, H. L. (2013). The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination and Right of Access to a Lawyer. A Comparative Assessment, Singapore Academy Law Journal, 25, 826–46.Google Scholar
Ho, H. L. (2012). ‘National Values on Law and Order’ and the Discretion to Exclude Wrongfully Obtained Evidence, Journal of Commonwealth Criminal Law, 2012, 232–56.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1640). Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, Tonnies, F., ed., 1889, London: Simpkin, Marshall.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan, Oakeshott, M. ed., New York: Touchstone, 1962.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W. N. (1913). Some Fundamental Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, The Yale Law Journal, 23 (1), 16–59.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W. N. (1917). Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, The Yale Law Journal, 26 (8), 710–70.Google Scholar
Jayasuriya, K. (1999). Corporatism and Judicial Independence Within Statist Legal Institutions in East Asia, in Jayasuriya, K. (ed.), Law, Capitalism and Power in Asia: The Rule of Law and Legal Institutions, London-New York: Routledge, 173–204.Google Scholar
Kane, P. V. (1977). History of Darmaśāstra (Ancient and Mediœval Religious and Civil Law in India), Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.Google Scholar
Lee, K. Y. (1990). Address by the Honourable the Prime Minister, Mr. Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 2, 155–60.Google Scholar
Leng, R. (2001). Silence Pre-trial, Reasonable Expectations and the Normative Distortion of Fact-Finding, International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 5 (4), 240–56.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. D. E. (1988). Bentham and the Right of Silence, The Bentham Newsletter, 12, 37–42.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. D. E. (1990). Bentham’s View of the Right of Silence, Current Legal Problems, 43 (1), 135–57.Google Scholar
Packer, H. (1964). Two Models of the Criminal Process, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 113 (1), 1–68.Google Scholar
Packer, H. (1968). The Limits of the Criminal Sanction, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, M. (2017). Constitutional Dialogue and the Rule of Law, Hong Kong Law Journal, 47, 505–24.Google Scholar
Quirk, H. (2017). The Rise and Fall of the Right of Silence, Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ristroph, A. (2009). Respect and Resistance in Punishment Theory, California Law Review, 97 (2), 601–32.Google Scholar
Roberts, P. and Zuckerman, A. (2010). Criminal Evidence, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosemont, H. Jr. (2015). Against Individualism. A Confucian Rethinking of the Foundations of Morality, Politics, Family and Religion, London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Rosemont, H. Jr. and Ames, R. T. (2016). Confucian Role Ethics. A Moral Vision for the 21st Century, Taipei: National Taiwan University Press.Google Scholar
Rosemont, H. Jr. and Ames, R. T. (2008). Family Reverence as the Source of Consummatory Conduct, Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 7 (1), 9–19.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. (2008a). On the Supposed Jury-Dependence of Evidence Law, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 155 (1), 165–202.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. (2008b). In Defense of Rule-Based Evidence Law: And Epistemology Too, Episteme, 5 (3), 295–305.Google Scholar
Shanmugam, K. (2012). The Rule of Law in Singapore, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, Dec. 2012, 357–65.Google Scholar
Sim, M. (2015). Why Confucius’ Ethics Is a Virtue Ethics, in Besser-Jones, L. and Slote, M. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Virtue Ethics, New York-London: Routledge: 63–76.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (2018). When Does Evidence Suffice for Conviction?, Mind, 127 (508), 1193–218.Google Scholar
Tan, Y. L. (2005). Criminal Procedure, Vol. 2, Singapore: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
Thomas III, G. C. and Leo, R. A. (2012). Confessions of Guilt, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (1981). A Right to Do Wrong, Ethics, 92 (1), 21–39.Google Scholar

References

Allen, R. J. (1986). A Reconceptualization of Civil Trials, Boston University Law Review, 66, 401–37.Google Scholar
Allen, R. J., (1991a). The Nature of Juridical Proof, Cardozo Law Review, 373, 413–20.Google Scholar
Allen, R. J. (1991b). On the Significance of Batting Averages and Strikeout Totals: A Clarification of the ‘Naked Statistical Evidence’ Debate, the Meaning of ‘Evidence,’ and the Requirement of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt, Tulane Law Review, 65, 1093–110.Google Scholar
Allen, R. J. (2016). The Nature of Juridical Proof: Probability as a Tool in Plausible Reasoning, The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 21(1–2), 133–42.Google Scholar
Bein, D. (1993). Preparatory Offences, Israel Law Review, 27(1–2), 185–212.Google Scholar
Blackstone, W. (1769). Commentaries on the Laws of England, London, 352Google Scholar
Brook, J. (1985). The Use of Statistical Evidence of Identification in Civil Litigation: Well-Worn Hypotheticals, Real Cases, and Controversy, St. Louis University Law Journal, 29, 293–352.Google Scholar
Capra, D. and Richter, L. (2018). Character Assassination: Amending Federal Rule of Evidence 404(B) to Protect Criminal Defendants, Columbia Law Review, 118(3), 769–832.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. (1979). Causal Laws and Effective Strategies, Noûs, 13(4), 419–37.Google Scholar
Cheng, E. K. (2013). Reconceptualizing the Burden of Proof, Yale Law Journal, 122, 1254–79.Google Scholar
Clermont, K. M. (2012). Aggregation of Probabilities and Illogic, Georgia Law Review, 47, 165–80.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. J. (1977) The Probable and the Provable, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Eels, E. (1991). Probabilistic Causality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fennell, L. A. (2018). Accidents and Aggregates, William and Mary Law Review, 59, 2371–445.Google Scholar
Ferzan, K. K. (2011). Inchoate Crimes at the Prevention/Punishment Divide, San Diego Law Review, 48(4), 1273–98.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, M. O. and Fairley, W. B. (1970). A Bayesian Approach to Identification Evidence, Harvard Law Review, 83(3), 489–517.Google Scholar
Fisher, T. (2012). Conviction Without Conviction, Minnesota Law Review, 96, 833–85.Google Scholar
Goluboff, R. L. (2016). Vagrant Nation: Police Power, Constitutional Change, and the Making of the 1960s, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Good, I. J. (1961). A Causal Calculus I-II, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 11(44), 305–18.Google Scholar
Harel, A. and Porat, A. (2009). Aggregating Probabilities Across Cases: Criminal Responsibility for Unspecified Offenses, Minnesota Law Review, 94, 261–310.Google Scholar
Hessick, C. B. (2011). Disentangling Child Pornography from Child Sex Abuse, Washington University Law Review, 88(4), 853–902.Google Scholar
Hessick, C. B., ed. (2016). Refining Child Pornography Law Crime, Language, and Social Consequences, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kaye, D. H. (1979a). Naked Statistical Evidence, Yale Law Journal, 89(3), 601–11.Google Scholar
Kaye, D. H. (1979b). The Paradox of the Gatecrasher and Other Stories, Arizona State Law Journal, 1979 (1), 101–10.Google Scholar
Laudan, L. (2006). Truth, Error, and Criminal Law: An Essay in Legal Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lempert, R. O. and Saltzburg, S. A., et al. (2014). A Modern Approach to Evidence, St. Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Leubsdorf, J. (2016). The Surprising History of the Preponderance Standard of Civil Proof, Florida Law Review, 67(5), 1569–618.Google Scholar
Levmore, S. (2001). Conjunction and Aggregation, Michigan Law Review, 99(4), 723–56.Google Scholar
Mendlow, G. S. (2018). Why Is It Wrong to Punish Thoughts?, Yale Law Journal, 127(8), 2342–86.Google Scholar
Moss, S. (2018). Probabilistic Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nance, D. A. (2016). The Burdens of Proof – Discriminatory Power, Weight of Evidence, and Tenacity of Belief, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, J. O. (2006). Quantifying the Standard of Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: A Comment on Three Comments, Law, Probability and Risk, 5(3–4), 267–9.Google Scholar
Papineau, D. (1985). Probabilities and Causes, Journal of Philosophy, 82(2), 57–74.Google Scholar
Porat, A. and Posner, E. A. (2012). Aggregation and Law, Yale Law Journal, 122(2), 1–69.Google Scholar
Redmayne, M. (1999). A Likely Story!, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 19(4), 659–72.Google Scholar
Rosen, D. (1978). In Defence of a Probabilistic Theory of Causality, Philosophy of Science, 45(4), 604–13.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. (1980). Probabilistic Causality, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 1980(2), 25–37.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. (2003). Profiles, Probabilities, and Stereotypes, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. (2011). Bentham on Presumed Offenses, Utilitas, 23(4), 363–79.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. (2015). On the Distinction Between Speech and Action, Emory Law Journal, 65(2), 427–54.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. and Zeckhauser, R. (1996). On the Degree of Confidence for Adverse Decisions, The Journal of Legal Studies, 25(1), 27–52.Google Scholar
Shaviro, D, (1989). Statistical-Probability Evidence and the Appearance of Justice, Harvard Law Review, 103(2), 530–54.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. (1970). A Probabilistic Theory of Causality, Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. R. (2013). Symbol and Substance: Effects of California’s Three Strikes Law on Felony Sentencing, Law and Society Review, 47(1), 37–71.Google Scholar
Tapper, C. and Cross, R. (2010). Cross and Tapper on Evidence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. J. (1986). Rights, Restitution, and Risk: Essays, in Moral Theory, Parente, W. ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tribe, L. H. (1971). Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process, Harvard Law Review, 84(6), 1329–93.Google Scholar
Volokh, A. (1997). N Guilty Men, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 146(1), 173–216.Google Scholar
Wansley, M. (2013). Scaled Punishments, New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 309–63.Google Scholar
Westen, P. and Ow, E. (2007). Reaching Agreement on When Jurors Must Agree, New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(2), 153–209.Google Scholar
Williams, G. (1979). The Mathematics of Proof, Criminal Law Review, 1979(2), 340–54.Google Scholar
Wright, E. F., Maceachern, L., Stoffer, E. and Macdonald, N. (1996). Factors Affecting the Use of Naked Statistical Evidence of Liability, The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(6), 677–88.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×