Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:36:38.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Convergences between Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2022

Edited by
Jordi Ferrer Beltrán  and
Carmen Vázquez
Jordi Ferrer Beltrán
Affiliation:
Universitat de Girona
Carmen Vázquez
Affiliation:
Universitat de Girona
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Evidential Legal Reasoning
Crossing Civil Law and Common Law Traditions
 , pp. 51 - 122
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Allen, R. (2010a). Relevancy and Admissibility, Evidence Science, 18, 375–82.Google Scholar
Allen, R. (2010b). The Relationships among Evidence Law, Procedural Law and Substantive Law, Evidence Science, 18, 750–60.Google Scholar
Anderson, T., Schum, D. and Twining, W. (2005). Analysis of Evidence, 2nd ed., Cambridge, New York, etc.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baosheng, Z. (2014). Evidence Law, 2nd ed., China University of Political Science and Law of Beijing.Google Scholar
Baosheng, Z. (2018). Evidence Law, 3rd ed., China University of Political Science and Law of Beijing.Google Scholar
Baosheng, Z. and Yang, Ping (2018). Rethinking Chinese Evidence Theories and Reconstructing System of Evidence: A Thread for the Pearls of Chinese Evidence, Frontiers of Law in China, 1, vol. 13.Google Scholar
Baosheng, Z., Zhong, Zhang and Hongqi, Wu (2016). China Justice Index Report, China University of Political Science and Law of Beijing.Google Scholar
Bergland, D. (1973). Value Analysis in the Law of Evidence, Western State University Law Review, 1, 162 ff.Google Scholar
Bian, J. and Shigui, Tan (2014). Law of Evidence, 3rd ed., Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law.Google Scholar
Chen, R. (2013). Visible Justice, Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. (2003). Convergence and Departure of Legal Facts and Objective Facts: A New Perspective on History of Evidence System, 8 Journal of the National Procurators College.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. (2010). The Law of Evidence, Beijing: Renmin University of China Press.Google Scholar
Fan, C. (2012). The Law of Evidence, 5th ed., Beijing: Law Press China.Google Scholar
Garner, B. ed. (2004). Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th ed., St. Paul, Minneapolis: Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar
Habermas, J., (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. William Rehg translator, 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hao, Li (2004). On Finding Legal Truth Exemplified by Civil Procedures, Law and Social Development, 3.Google Scholar
Jiahong, H. and Weiping, Zhang (2011). Concise Evidence Law, Beijing: Renmin University of China Press.Google Scholar
Jianwei, Z. (2014). Essence of Evidence Law, Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Jingui, P. (2012). The Law of Evidence, Beijing: Law Press China.Google Scholar
Lukai, C. and Shiqiang, Cai (2017). Examination of Evidence in Cases of the Uncertainty of Source of Drugs, People’s Justice, 17.Google Scholar
Norwood Russell, Hanson (1965). Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science, The Syndics of Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peng, Y. (2015). On Fact, Guangxi: Guangxi Normal University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (2002). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Qing, Y. (2013). Procedural Evidence Law, Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Shen, D. (2013a). How Should We Prevent Miscarriages of Justice, People’s Court.Google Scholar
Shen, D. (2013b). On In Dubio Pro Reo, China Legal Science, 5.Google Scholar
Song, Y. (2003) Principles of Criminal Procedure, Beijing: Law Press China.Google Scholar
Stein, A. (2005). Foundations of Evidence Law, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tugendhat, E. (1982). Traditional and Analytical Philosophy. Corner, P. A. translator, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Twining, W. (1985). Theories of Evidence: Bentham and Wigmore, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, J. (2013). New Trends of Criminal Evidence Law in China, Beijing: Law Press China.Google Scholar
Weiguang, S. (1993). The Comprehensive Design of Scientific Knowledge, Beijing: Jinlin Renmin Press.Google Scholar
Wigmore, J. (1935). A Student Textbook of the Law of Evidence. In Black´s Law Dictionary, 8th ed., St Paul: Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1974). Tractatus Logico Philosophicus, 2nd ed., Pears, D. and McGuinnes, B. F. trans., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wu, G. (2010). The Law of Evidence, Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.Google Scholar
Yue Lin, J. (2011). On Knowledge, Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar

References

Briggs, Lord Justice (2013), Chancery Modernisation Review: Final Report, available in: www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/CMR/cmr-final-report-dec2013.pdf.Google Scholar
Bornhorst, F., Ichino, A., Schlag, K. and Winter, E. (2004). Trust and Trustworthiness Among Europeans: South-North Comparison, available at www.researchgate.net/publication/5009344_Trust_and_Trustworthiness_Among_Europeans_South-North_Comparison.Google Scholar
Charness, G., Rigotti, L. and Rustichini, A. (2007). Individual Behavior and Group Membership. American Economic Review 97(4), 1340–52.Google Scholar
Ehud, G. (2004). Overcorrection, Geo. LJ, 93, 241.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. and Summers, S. (2012). The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence: Beyond the Common Law and Civil Law Traditions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Layton, A. and Mercer, H., eds. (2004). European Civil Practice, 2nd ed., London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
Lind, A., Thibaut, J. and Walker, L. (1976). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Effect of Adversary and Inquisitorial Processes on Bias in Legal Decision Making. Virginia Law Review, 64(2), 271–83.Google Scholar
Plous, S. (1993). The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making, New York: Mcgraw Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Schul, Y. and Goren, H. (1997). When Strong Evidence Has Less Impact than Weak Evidence: Bias, Adjustment, and Instructions to Ignore. Social Cognition 15(2), 133–55.Google Scholar
Shayo, M. and Zussman, A. (2011). Judicial Ingroup Bias in the Shadow of Terrorism, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(3), 1447–84.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., and Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

References

Damaška, M. (1997). Evidence Law Adrift, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Donatsch, A. and Cavegn, C. (2008). Ausgewählte Fragen zum Beweisrecht nach der schweizerischen Strafprozessordnung, ZStrR, 126, 158–66.Google Scholar
Gless, S. (2014). Art 141 N 72, in Niggli, M. A., Heer, M. and Wiprächtiger (eds.), H., Basler Kommentar, Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung/Jugendprozessorndung, 2nd ed., Basel, Helbling and Lichtenhahn, 2014.Google Scholar
Häring, D. (2009). Verwertbarkeit rechtswidrig erlangter Beweise gemäss schweizerische Strafprozessordnung – alter Zopf oder substanzielle Neuerungen?, ZStrR 127, 225–48.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. and Summers, S. (2012). The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence: Beyond the Common Law and Civil Law Traditions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. and Summers, S. (2013). Confrontation with Strasbourg: UK and Swiss Approaches to Criminal Evidence, Criminal Law Review, 60 (2), 115–31.Google Scholar
Schünemann, B. (2000). Der Richter im Strafverfahren als manipulierter Dritter? Zur empirischen Bestätigung von Perseveranz- und Schulterschlusseffekt. 3 Strafverteidiger 159–65.Google Scholar
Summers, S. (2014). Observing Criminal Trials, in Anderson, R., Chalmers, J. and MacLeod, J. (eds.), Glasgow Tercentenary Essays: 300 Years of the School of Law, Edinburgh: Avizandum Publishing, 217–32.Google Scholar
Summers, S. and Studer, D. (2016). Fairness im Strafverfahren? Eine empirische Untersuchung, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht, 134 (1), 45–72.Google Scholar
Summers, S., Garland, L. and Studer, D. (2016). Das Recht auf Verteidigung – Anspruch und Wirklichkeit, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht, 134(2), 133–70.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. (2010). Are Juries Fair?, Ministry of Justice Research Series 1/10 www.justice.gov.uk/publications/research.htm.Google Scholar
Wohlers, W. (2014). Art 141 N 19ff, in Donatsch, A., Hansjakob, T. and Lieber (eds.), V., Kommentar zur Schweizerischen Strafprozessordnung, 2nd ed., Zurich: Schulthess.Google Scholar

References

Dennis, I. (2020). The Law of Evidence, 6th ed., London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
Giannoulopoulos, D. (2016). Strasbourg Jurisprudence, Law Reform and Comparative Law: A Tale of the Right to Custodial Legal Assistance in Five Countries. Human Rights Law Review, 16(1), 103–12.Google Scholar
Goss, R. (2017). Out of Many, One? Strasbourg’s Ibrahim Decision on Article 6, Modern Law Review, 80(6), 1137–50.Google Scholar
Hoyano, L. (2014). What Is Balanced on the Scales of Justice? In Search of the Essence of the Right to a Fair Trial. Criminal Law Review, 1, 4–29.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. and Roberts, P. (2012). Criminal Evidence and Human Rights: Reimagining Procedural Traditions, London: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. (2005). The Effect of Human Rights on Criminal Evidentiary Processes: Towards Convergence, Divergence or Realignment. Modern Law Review, 68(5), 737–64.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. (2016). Responses to Salduz: Procedural Tradition, Change and the Need for Effective Defence. Modern Law Review, 79(6), 987–1018.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. and Roberts, P. (2018). Beyond Common Law Evidence: Reimagining, and Reinvigorating, Evidence Law as Forensic Science, in Brown, D. and Turner, J., eds., Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. and Summers, S. (2012). The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. and Summers, S. (2013). Confrontation with Strasbourg: UK and Swiss Approaches to Criminal Evidence. Criminal Law Review, 60(2), 115–31.Google Scholar
Pivarty, A. (2018). The Right to Custodial Legal Assistance in Europe: In Search for the Rationales. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 26(1), 62–98.Google Scholar
Roberts, P. and Zuckerman, A. (2010) Criminal Evidence, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spano, R. (2017). Terrorism and Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, 6th Annual Lecture of the Human Rights Law Centre’s International Humanitarian Unit, University of Nottingham, 10 March 2017.Google Scholar
Swift, E. (2000). One Hundred Years of Evidence Law Reform: Thayer’s Triumph. California Law Review, 88, 2439–76.Google Scholar
Thayer, J. B. (1898). A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at Common Law, Boston: Little-Brown.Google Scholar
Trechsel, S. (2005). Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trechsel, S. (2018). The Character of the Right to a Fair Trial, in Jackson, J. and Summers, S., eds., Obstacles to Fairness in Criminal Proceedings: Individual Rights and Institutional Forms, London: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Wigmore, J. H. (1904). A Treatise on the System of Evidence in Trial at Common Law, 1st ed., Boston: Little-Brown.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×