Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:38:22.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2020

Matthew M. Taylor
Matthew M. Taylor
Affiliation:
American University, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Decadent Developmentalism
The Political Economy of Democratic Brazil
 , pp. 304 - 354
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abers, Rebecca and Keck, Margaret. 2013. Practical Authority: Agency and Institutional Change in Brazilian Water Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramovay, Pedro. 2018. Author interview with Abramovay, former National Secretary of Justice, Ministry of Justice, July 13.Google Scholar
Abranches, Sérgio. 1988. “Presidencialismo de coalizão: o dilema institucional brasileiro.” Dados, 31: 5–38.Google Scholar
Abranches, Sérgio. 1999. “Reforma regulatória: conceitos, experiências e recomendações.” Revista do Serviço Público, April–June, 19–51.Google Scholar
Abranches, Sérgio. 2016. “Clientelismo, petróleo e corrupção no presidencialismo de coalizão.” Ecopolítica. March 17. sergioabranches.com.brGoogle Scholar
Abranches, Sérgio. 2018. Presidencialismo de coalizão: raízes e evolução do modelo político brasileiro. São Paulo: Editora Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
Abreu, Marcelo de Paiva. 2007. “A quem beneficiam as políticas públicas no Brasil? Uma visão de longo prazo.” Working Paper Departamento de Economia, PUC-Rio 554.Google Scholar
Abreu, Marcelo de Paiva. 2015. “Autarkic Obsession: A Long-term View of Brazil in the World Economy.” Paper presented at Princeton-USP conference on the International Politics of Economic Globalization and Emerging Market Economies, March 19–20.Google Scholar
Abreu, Mariana Piaia. 2019. “Structure of Control in Financial Networks: An Application to the Brazilian Stock Market.” Physica A, 522: 302–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrucio, Fernando Luiz. 2018. “Uma breve história da educação como política pública no Brasil.” In Dalmon, Danilo Leite, Siqueira, Caetano, and Braga, Felipe Michel (eds.), Políticas educacionais no Brasil: o que podemos aprender com casos reais de implementação?, 37–58. São Paulo: Edições SM.Google Scholar
Abu-El-Haj, Jawdat. 2016. “Brazilian Left Bonapartism and the Rise of Finance Capital: A critique of the Internal-Bourgeoisie Thesis.” Latin American Perspectives, 43: 207–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afonso, José Roberto, R. 2010. Responsabilidade fiscal no Brasil: uma memória da lei. FGV Projetos. June 24, 2015. http://fgvprojetos.fgv.br/publicacao/responsabilidade-fiscal-uma-memoria-da-leiGoogle Scholar
Afonso, José Roberto, R. 2013. “A economia política da reforma tributária: o caso brasileiro.” September. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars.Google Scholar
Afonso, José Roberto, R., Araújo, Eliana Cristina, and Fajardo, Bernardo Guelber. 2016. “The Role of Fiscal and Monetary Policies in the Brazilian Economy: Understanding Recent Institutional Reforms and Economic Changes.” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 62: 41–55.Google Scholar
Afonso, José Roberto, R., Soares, Julia Moraes, and de Castro, Kleber Pacheco. 2013. “Avaliação da estrutura e do desempenho do sistema tributário brasileiro: livro branco da tributação brasileira.” Banco Interamericano de Desenvolvimento, Documento para discussão #IDB-DP–265.Google Scholar
Estado, Agência. 2007. “Para Lula, usineiros são heróis mundiais.” March 20.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod K. and Espach, Ralph. 2004. “Diverging Trade Strategies in Latin America: A Framework for Analysis.” In Aggarwal, Vinod K., Espach, Ralph, and Tulchin, Joseph S. (eds.), The Strategic Dynamics of Latin American Trade, 3–36. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Agosín, Manuel. 2012. Author interview with Agosín, Dean of the School of Economics and Business, Universidad de Chile, June 7.Google Scholar
Alencar, Carlos Higino Ribeiro de and Gico, Ivo Jr. 2011. “Corrupção e Judiciário: a (in)eficácia do sistema judicial no combate à corrupção.” Revista Direito GV, 7, 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almeida, Acir dos Santos. 2018. “Governo presidencial condicionado: delegação e participação legislativa na Câmara dos Deputados.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos.Google Scholar
Almeida, Frederico de. 2014. “As elites da Justiça: instituições, profissões e poder na política da justiça brasileira.” Revista de Sociologia e Política, 22: 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almeida, Daniel B. de Castro and Jayme Jr, Frederico G. 2008. “Bank Consolidation and Credit Concentration in Brazil (1995–2004).” CEPAL Review, 95: 155–71.Google Scholar
Almeida, Isis and Kassai, Lucia. 2013. “Brazil crushing sugar to ethanol with caps on fuel prices.” Bloomberg News, December 19.Google Scholar
Almeida, Mansueto. 2009. “Desafios da real política industrial brasileira no século XXI.” IPEA Texto para Discussão 1452.Google Scholar
Almeida, Mansueto. 2013a. “Padrões de política industrial: a velha, a nova e a brasileira.” In Bacha, Edmar and Bolle, Monica de (eds.), O futuro da industria no Brasil, 273–94. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.Google Scholar
Almeida, Mansueto. 2013b. “O problema da carga tributária no Brasil.” Blogpost of November 20. mansueto.wordpress.com, February 12, 2015.Google Scholar
Almeida, Maria Hermínia Tavares de. 1996. “Pragmatismo por necessidade: os rumos da reforma econômica no Brasil.” Dados, 39: 213–34.Google Scholar
Almeida, Maria Hermínia Tavares de. 2005. “Recentralizando a federação?” Revista de Sociologia e Política, 24: 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almeida, Rodolfo and Zanlorenssi, Gabriel. 2017. “A trajetória do preço de combustível no Brasil nos últimos 17 anos.” Nexo, October 16.Google Scholar
Almeida, Mansueto, Lima-Oliveira, Renato, and Schneider, Ben Ross. 2012. “Industrial Policy and State Owned Enterprises in Brazil: BNDES and Petrobras.” Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Alston, Lee J., Marcus, André Melo, Bernardo, Mueller, and Pereira, Carlos. 2016. Brazil in Transition: Beliefs, Leadership, and Institutional Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Amable, Bruno. 2003. The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amable, Bruno. 2016. “Institutional Complementarities in the Dynamic Comparative Analysis of Capitalism.” Journal of Institutional Economics, 12: 79–103.Google Scholar
Amable, Bruno and Palombarini, Stefano. 2009. “A Neorealist Approach to Institutional Change and the Diversity of Capitalism.” Socio-Economic Review, 7: 123–43.Google Scholar
Amann, Edmund and Baer, Werner. 2009. “The Macroeconomic Record of the Lula Administration, the Roots of Brazil’s Inequality, and Attempts to Overcome Them.” In Love, Joseph L. and Baer, Werner (eds.), Brazil under Lula: Economy, Politics, and Society under the Worker-President, 27–46. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amann, Edmund and Barrientos, Armando. 2016. “Introduction: Is There a Brazilian ‘Development’ Model?” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 62: 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amann, Edmund, Werner, Baer, Thomas, Trebat, and Lora, Juan Villa. 2016. “Infrastructure and its Role in Brazil’s Development Process.” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 62: 66–73.Google Scholar
Ames, Barry. 1995. “Electoral Strategy under Open-List Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science, 39: 406–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Barry. 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amsden, Alice H. 1989. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
Amsden, Alice H. 1991. “Diffusion of Development: The Late-Industrializing Model and Greater East Asia.” American Economic Review, 81: 282–6.Google Scholar
Amsden, Alice H. 2001. The Rise of “the Rest”: Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrezo, Andrea Fernandes and Lima, Iran Siqueira. 1999. Mercado financeiro: aspectos históricos e conceituais. São Paulo: Pioneira.Google Scholar
Aninat, Augusto. 2012. Author interview with Augusto Aninat, retired ambassador, former director of international economic relations, Universidad de Chile, June 5.Google Scholar
Aoki, Masahiko. 1994. “The Contingent Governance of Teams: Analysis of Institutional Complementarity.” International Economic Review, 34: 657–76.Google Scholar
Aoki, Masahiko. 2001. Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aoki, Masahiko. 2013. “Historical Sources of Institutional Trajectories in Economic Development: China, Japan and Korea Compared.” Socio-Economic Review, 11: 233–63.Google Scholar
Aranovich, Tatiana de Campos. 2007. “Estratégia Nacional de Combate à Corrupção e à Lavagem de Dinheiro: o Estado organizado contra o crime organizado.” Revista de Política Públicas e Gestão Governamental, 6: 117–45.Google Scholar
Arantes, Rogério Bastos. 1997. Judiciário e política no Brasil. São Paulo: IDESP.Google Scholar
Arantes, Rogério Bastos. 2005. “Constitutionalism, the Expansion of Justice and the Judicialization of Politics in Brazil.” In Sieder, Rachel, Schjolden, Line, and Angell (eds.), Alan, The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America, 231–62. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Arantes, Rogério Bastos. 2011. “The Federal Police and the Ministério Público.” In Power, Timothy J. and Taylor, Matthew M. (eds.), Corruption and Democracy in Brazil: The Struggle for Accountability, 184–217. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Arantes, Rogério Bastos, Loureiro, Maria Rita, Couto, Cláudio, and Marco Antonio, Carvalho Teixeira. 2010. “Controles democráticos sobre a administração pública no Brasil: Legislativo, Tribunais de Contas, Judiciário e Ministério Público.” In Loureiro, Maria Rita, Abrucio, Fernando Luiz, and Pacheco, Regina Silvia (eds.), Burocracia e política no Brasil: desafios para o Estado democrático no século XXI, 109–47. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV.Google Scholar
Araújo, Felipe Dantas de. 2012. “Uma análise da Estratégia Nacional Contra a Corrupção e a Lavagem de Dinheiro (ENCCLA) por suas diretrizes.” Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas, Brasília, 2: 53–82.Google Scholar
Araújo, Victor, Silotto, Graziele, and Cunha, Lucas Rodrigues. 2015. “Capital politico e financiamento eleitoral no Brasil: uma análise empírica da estratégia das empresas na alocação de recursos de campanha.” Teoria & Sociedade, 23: 126–58.Google Scholar
Arbix, Glauco and Martin, Scott B.. 2010. “Beyond Developmentalism and Market Fundamentalism in Brazil: Inclusionary State Activism without Statism.” Global Legal Studies Center and the Center for World Affairs and the Global Economy, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Arbix, Glauco, Salerno, Mario Sérgio, Amaral, Guilherme, and Lins, Leonardo Melo. 2017. “Avanços, equívocos e instabilidade das políticas de inovação no Brasil.” Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 109 (November): 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arguelhes, Diego Werneck and Hartmann, Ivar A.. 2017. “Timing Control without Docket Control: How Individual Justices Shape the Brazilian Supreme Court’s Agenda.” Journal of Law and Courts, 5: 105–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arguelhes, Diego Werneck and Ribeiro, Leandro Molhano. 2018. “Ministrocracia: o Supremo Tribunal individual e o processo democrático brasileiro.” Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 37: 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armijo, Leslie Elliott. 2005. “Mass Democracy: The real reason that Brazil ended inflation?” World Development, 3: 2013–27.Google Scholar
Armijo, Leslie Elliott. 2017. “The Public Bank Trilemma: Brazil’s New Developmentalism and the BNDES.” In Kingstone, Peter R. and Power, Timothy J. (eds.), Democratic Brazil Divided, 230–47. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Armijo, Leslie Elliott and Kearney, Christine A.. 2008. “Does Democratization Alter the Policy Process? Trade Policymaking in Brazil.” Democratization, 15: 991–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armijo, Leslie Elliott and Rhodes, Sybil D.. 2017. “Explaining Infrastructure Underperformance in Brazil: Cash, Political Institutions, Corruption, and Policy Gestalts.” Policy Studies, 38: 231–47.Google Scholar
Arretche, Marta. 2002. “Federalismo e relações intergovernamentais no Brasil: a reforma de programas sociais.” Dados, 45: 431–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arretche, Marta. 2004. “Toward a Unified and More Equitable System: Health Reform in Brazil.” In Kaufman, Robert and Nelson, Joan (eds.), Crucial Needs, Weak Incentives, 155–88. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Arretche, Marta. 2009. “Continuidades e descontinuidades da Federação Brasileira: de como 1988 facilitou 1995.” Dados, 52: 377–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arretche, Marta. 2013. “Demos-Constraining or Demos-Enabling Federalism? Political Institutions and Policy Change in Brazil.” Journal of Politics in Latin America, 5: 133–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arruda de Almeida, Mônica and Zagaris, Bruce. 2015. “Political Capture in the Petrobras Scandal: The Sad Tale of an Oil Giant.” The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 39: 87–99.Google Scholar
Augustinis, Viviane Franco de. 2011. “Gestão em redes para a construção de políticas públicas: um estudo sobre as atividades de prevenção e repressão à lavagem de dinheiro no Brasil.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Fundação Getulio Vargas-RJ.Google Scholar
Avelino, George, Biederman, Ciro, and Fisch, Arthur. 2017. “A corrida armamentista nas eleições brasileiras.” CEPESP-FGV, June 13. https://cepesp.wordpress.com/2017/06/13/a-corrida-armamentista-nas-eleicoes-brasileiras/Google Scholar
Bacha, Edmar Lisboa. 2016. “Abre-te, Brasil.” Valor Econômico, September 9.Google Scholar
Baer, Werner and Coes, Donald V. 2006. “The Impact of Politics on Fiscal Behavior: The Case of Brazil.” Economia Aplicada, 10: 25–40.Google Scholar
Baerresen, Donald W., Carnoy, Martin, and Grunwald, Joseph. 1965. Latin American Trade Patterns. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Baird, Marcelo Fragano. 2012. “O lobby na regulação da propaganda de alimentos da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária – Anvisa.” Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Department of Political Science, Universidade de São Paulo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, Marcelo Fragano and Ivan Filipe de Almeida, Lopes Fernandes. 2014. “Flying in Clear Skies: Technical Arguments Influencing Anac Regulations.” Brazilian Political Science Review, 8: 70–92.Google Scholar
Bairoch, Paul. 1972. “Free trade and European Economic Development in the 19th Century.” European Economic Review, 3: 211–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Andy. 2003. “Why Is Trade Reform So Popular in Latin America? A Consumption-Based Theory of Trade Policy Preferences.” World Politics, 55: 423–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Andy. 2009. The Market and the Masses in Latin America: Policy Reform and Consumption in Liberalizing Economies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Balán, Manuel. 2011. “Competition by Denunciation: The Political Dynamics of Corruption Scandals in Argentina and Chile.” Comparative Politics, 43: 459–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balbachevsky, Elizabeth and Sampaio, Helena. 2017. “Brazilian Postsecondary Education in the 21st Century: A Conservative Modernization.” In Altbach, Philip G., Reisberg, Liz, and de Wit, Hans (eds.), Responding to Massification: Differentiation in Postsecondary Education Worldwide, 155–65. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
Baldocchi, Gabriel. 2014. “O Plano Brasil Maior ficou bem menor.” Istoé Dinheiro, October 17.Google Scholar
Ban, Cornel. 2013. “Brazil’s Liberal Neo-Developmentalism: New Paradigm or Edited Orthodoxy.” Review of International Political Economy, 20: 298–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banco Central do Brasil. 2018. “Relatório de economia bancária.” www.bcb.gov.br/publicacoes/relatorioeconomiabancariaGoogle Scholar
Bandeira-de-Mello, Rodrigo. 2015. “Financiamento de campanha não esgota a relação entre empresas e governo.” O Estado de S. Paulo, April 8.Google Scholar
Bandeira-de-Mello, Rodrigo, Marcon, Rosilene, and Alberton, Anete. 2008. “Drivers of Discretionary Firm Donations in Brazil.” Brazilian Administration Review, 5: 275–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, Fernando de Holanda. 2006. “The Contagion Effect of Public Debt on Monetary Policy: The Brazilian Experience.” Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 26: 231–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, Filho, Fernando de Holanda. 2012. “An Estimation of the Underground Economy in Brazil.” FGV working paper.Google Scholar
Bastos, Márcio Thomaz. 2012. “Uma estratégia de longo prazo para o Estado brasileiro.” In Ricardo Andrade Saadi, Biasoli, Roberto, and da Cunha, Ana Paula (eds.), ENCCLA: Estratégia Nacional de Combate à Corrupção e à Lavagem de Dinheiro: 10 anos de organização do Estado brasileiro contra o crime organizado, 32–3. Brasília: Ministério da Justiça.Google Scholar
Batista, Henrique Gomes and Ruben, Berta. 2015. “Governo revela que há 480 entidades sindicais milionárias.” O Globo, August 25.Google Scholar
Batista, Mariana. 2012. “Mecanismos de participação e atuação de grupos de interesse no processo regulatório brasileiro: o caso da Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica (Aneel).” Revista de Administração Pública, 46: 969–92.Google Scholar
Baumann, Renato. 2009. “The Geography of Brazilian External Trade: Right Option for a BRIC?” Paper presented at Conference on The Political Economy of Trade Policy in the BRICS. New Orleans, LA, March 27–28.Google Scholar
Baumann, Renato. 2012. Author interview with Baumann, trade specialist and researcher at IPEA, Brasília, May 22.Google Scholar
Bechara, Fábio Ramazzini. 2019. Author Interview with Bechara, senior prosecutor at the São Paulo Ministério Público and law professor at Mackenzie University, São Paulo, April 23.Google Scholar
Bekerman, Marta and Dulcich, Federico. 2017. “Análisis comparativo de la Zona Franca de Manaos y el área aduanera especial de Tierra del Fuego.” Economia e Sociedade, 26: 751–91.Google Scholar
Belisário, Adriano. 2017. “Mapeamento inédito mostra que doações legais da Odebrecht beneficiaram 1.087 candidatos desde 2002.” The Intercept Brasil, September 26. https://theintercept.com/2017/09/26/mapeamento-inedito-mostra-que-doacoes-legais-da-odebrecht-beneficiaram-1-087-candidatos-desde-2002Google Scholar
Benevides, Maria Vitória. 1976. Governo Kubitschek: desenvolvimento econômico e estabilidade política. São Paulo: Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Benites, Afonso. 2020. “Centrão já administra 73 bilhões de reais no Governo Bolsonaro.” El País, May 22.Google Scholar
Bersch, Katherine S. 2016. “The Merits of Problem-Solving over Powering: Governance Reform in Brazil and Argentina.” Comparative Politics, 48: 205–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bersch, Katherine S. 2019. When Democracies Deliver: Governance Reform in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bersch, Katherine, Praça, Sérgio, and Taylor, Matthew M.. 2017a. “State Capacity and Bureaucratic Autonomy Within National States: Mapping the Archipelago of Excellence in Brazil.” In Centeno, Miguel Angel, Kohli, Atul, and Yashar, Deborah (eds.), State Building in the Developing World, 157–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bersch, Katherine, Praça, Sérgio, and Taylor, Matthew M.. 2017b. “State Capacity, Bureaucratic Politicization, and Corruption in the Brazilian State.” Governance, 30: 105–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertão, Naiara Infante and Ana Clara Costa. 2014. “O problema do etanol não é só a Petrobras – mas a produtividade.” Veja, August 23.Google Scholar
Bezerra, Jocildo and Tiago, V. Cavalcanti, de V.. 2009. “Brazil’s Lack of Growth.” In Love, Joseph L. and Baer, Werner (eds.), Brazil under Lula: Economy, Politics, and Society under the Worker-President, 67–89: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish N. 1982. “Directly Unproductive, Profit-Seeking (DUP) Activities.” Journal of Political Economy, 90: 988–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielschowsky, Ricardo. 1988. Pensamento econômico brasileiro: o ciclo ideológico do desenvolvimentismo. 5th ed. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto.Google Scholar
Biglaiser, Glen. 2009. “The Internationalization of Ideas in Argentina ’s Economics Profession.” In Montecinos, Verónica and Markoff, John (eds.), Economists in the Americas, 63–99. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Biglaiser, Glen and Karl, DeRouen. 2006. “Economic Reforms and Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review, 41: 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2003. “Structures Do Not Come with An Instruction Sheet: Interests, Ideas, and Progress in Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics, 1: 695–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark and Spruyt, Hendrik. 2003. “Our Past as Prologue: Introduction to the Tenth Anniversary Issue of the Review of International Political Economy.” Review of International Political Economy, 10: 607–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bôas, Bruno Villas. 2018. “Brazil’s Demographic Dividend Ends Earlier than Expected.” Valor International, July 26.Google Scholar
Boas, Taylor C., Daniel Hidalgo, F, and Richardson, Neal P.. 2014. “The Spoils of Victory: Campaign Donations and Government Contracts in Brazil.” The Journal of Politics, 76: 415–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boletim Estatístico de Pessoal, 2017. www.planejamento.gov.br/secretarias/upload/Arquivos/servidor/publicacoes/boletim_estatistico_pessoal/2017/bep-dezembro–2017Google Scholar
Bolle, Monica Baumgarten de. 2015. “Do Public Development Banks Hurt Growth? Evidence from Brazil.” Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief, Number PB15-16, September.Google Scholar
Bolle, Monica Baumgarten de. 2016. Como matar a borboleta-azul: uma crônica da era Dilma. Rio de Janeiro: Intrínseca.Google Scholar
Bonomo, Diego. 2012. Author interview with Diego Bonomo, US-Brazil Chamber of Commerce, January 26.Google Scholar
Bonvecchi, Alejandro. 2015. “Review: ‘Melo and Pereira, Making Brazil Work’.” Perspectives on Politics, 13: 901–2.Google Scholar
Bonvecchi, Alejandro and Scartascini, Carlos. 2014. “The Organization of the Executive Branch in Latin America: What We Know and What We Need to Know.” Latin American Politics & Society, 56: 144–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boschi, Renato, (ed.). 2011. Variedades de capitalismo, política e desenvolvimento na América Latina. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Boschi, Renato. 2018. “State Capabilities as a Challenge to Public Policy.” In Castro, Ana Célia and Filgueiras, Fernando (eds.), The State in the 21st Century, 337–67. Brasília: ENAP.Google Scholar
Botelho, Svetlana Vasco, Haspar. 2015. “Análise da política industrial recente: sugestões de uma agenda para o Brasil.” Unpublished B.A. Thesis, Department of Economics, Universidade de Brasília.Google Scholar
Bourdoukan, Adla Youssef. 2009. “O bolso e a urna: financiamento político em perspectiva comparada.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Bouzas, Roberto. 2012. Interview. Author interview with Roberto Bouzas, Professor, Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires, June 19.Google Scholar
Boyer, Robert. 2007. “Capitalism Strikes Back: Why and What Consequences for Social Sciences?” Revue de la Régulation, 1. journals.openedition.org/regulation/2142Google Scholar
Braga, Maria do Socorro and Pimentel, Jairo Jr. 2011. “Os partidos políticos brasileiros realmente não importam?” Opinião Pública, 17: 271–303.Google Scholar
Bragon, Ranier. 2019. “Contra mote de campanha, Bolsonaro mantém troca de favores com Congresso.” Folha de S. Paulo, July 1.Google Scholar
Brandão, Gildo Marçal. 2001. “Idéias e intelectuais: modos de usar.” Lua Nova, 54: 25–34.Google Scholar
Bremmer, Ian. 2010. The End of the Free Market. New York: Portfolio.Google Scholar
Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos. 2003. “The 1995 Public Management Reform in Brazil: Reflections of a Reformer.” In Schneider, Ben Ross and Heredia, Blanca (eds.), Reinventing Leviathan: The Politics of Administrative Reform in Developing Countries, 89–112. University of Miami: North-South Center Press.Google Scholar
Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos. 2011. “From Old to New Developmentalism in Latin America.” In Ocampo, José Antonio and Ros, Jaime (eds.), Handbook of Latin American Economics, 108–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos. 2016. “Reflecting on New Developmentalism and Classical Developmentalism.” Review of Keynesian Economics, 4: 331–52.Google Scholar
Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos. 2017. The Political Construction of Brazil: Society, Economy, and State Since Independence. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos. 2019. “40 anos de desindustrialização.” Jornal do Economista, May.Google Scholar
Bretas, Valéria. “Em 3 décadas, STF só condenou 16 políticos por corrupção.” Revista Exame. September 22, 2015.Google Scholar
Brey, Nathanael Kusch, Camilo, Silvio Parodi Oliveira, Marcon, Rosilene, and de-Mello, Rodrigo Bandeira. 2014. “Conexões políticas em estruturas de propriedade: o governo como acionista em uma análise descritiva.” Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 15: 98–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, James and Tullock, Gordon. 1962. The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bulmer-Thomas, Victor. 1994. The Economic History of Latin America since Independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burges, Sean W. 2017. Brazil in the World: The International Relations of a South American Giant. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Ines. 2012. Author interview with Ines Butler, Chief Researcher, Instituto de Estudios sobre la Realidad Argentina y Latinoamericana (IERAL), Fundación Mediterránea, Buenos Aires, June 12.Google Scholar
Câmara dos Deputados. 2011. Diário da Câmara dos Deputados, October. https://goo.gl/LcWkmPGoogle Scholar
Câmara, Cristina and Lima, Ronaldo. 2000. “Histórica das ONGs/AIDS e sua contribuição no campo das lutas sociais.” Cadernos Abong, 28: 29–74.Google Scholar
Campante, Filipe R. and Quoc-Anh, Do. 2014. “Isolated Capital Cities, Accountability and Corruption: Evidence from US States.” American Economic Review, 104: 2456–81.Google Scholar
Campbell, John L. 2010. “Institutional Reproduction and Change.” In Morgan, Glenn, Campbell, John L., Crouch, Colin, Pedersen, Ove Kaj, and Whitley, Richard (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis, 87–117. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campello, Daniela. 2015. The Politics of Market Discipline in Latin America: Globalization and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Campos, André Gambier. 2016. “Sindicatos no Brasil: o que esperar no futuro próximo?” IPEA Texto para Discussão 2262.Google Scholar
Campos, Mauro Macedo. 2009. “Democracia, partidos e eleições: os custos do sistema partidário-eleitoral no Brasil.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Google Scholar
Canêdo-Pinheiro, Mauricio. 2013. “Experiencias comparadas de politica industrial no pos-guerra: lições para o Brasil.” In Fernando, Veloso, Pedro Cavalcanti, Ferreira, Fábio, Giambiagi, and Samuel de, Abreu Pessôa (eds.), Desenvolvimento econômico: uma perspectiva brasileira, 381–404. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Campus Elsevier.Google Scholar
Canello, Júlio. 2016. “Judicializando a Federação? O Supremo Tribunal Federal e os atos normativos estaduais.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ).Google Scholar
Canuto, Otaviano. 2018. “Benefits and Costs of Opening Brazil’s Foreign Trade,” Center for Macroeconomics and Development, August 8.Google Scholar
Canuto, Otaviano, Cavallari, Matheus, and Reis, José Guilherme. 2013. “The Brazilian Competitiveness Cliff.” Economic Premise (The World Bank Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Network), 105: 1–8.Google Scholar
Canuto, Otaviano, Fleischhaker, Cornelius, and Schellekens, Philip. 2015. “The Curious Case of Brazil’s Closedness to Trade.” VOX: CEPR’s Policy Portal, January 11. www.voxeu.org/article/brazil-s-closedness-tradeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, Adalberto. 2016. “Informality and Public Policies to Overcome It. The Case of Brazil.” Sociologia & Antropologia, 6: 321–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, Eliana. 2009. “A Brief History of Trade Policies in Brazil: From ISI, Export Promotion and Import Liberalization to Multilateral and Regional Agreements.” Paper prepared for the conference on “The Political Economy of Trade Policy in the BRICS,” New Orleans, LA, March.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Eliana and Helwege, Ann. 2000 [1992]. “Import Substitution Industrialization.” In Frieden, Jeffry A., Pastor, Manuel Jr., and Tomz, Michael (eds.), Modern Political Economy and Latin America: Theory and Policy, 155–64. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. 1975. Autoritarismo e democratização. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique and Faletto, Enzo. 1973 [1967]. Dependência e desenvolvimento na América Latina: ensaio de interpretação sociológica. 8th ed. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.Google Scholar
Cardozo, José Eduardo. 2012. “ENCCLA 10 anos: o mapa e a bússola.” In Ricardo Andrade Saadi, Biasoli, Roberto, da Cunha, Ana Paula (eds.),ENCCLA: Estratégia Nacional de Combate à Corrupção e à Lavagem de Dinheiro: 10 anos de organização do Estado brasileiro contra o crime organizado, 9–10. Brasília: Ministério da Justiça.Google Scholar
Carey, John M. 2000. “Parchment, Equilibria, and Institutions.” Comparative Political Studies, 33: 735–61.Google Scholar
Carneiro, Mariana. 2017. “Gasto com pesquisa na indústria automotiva caiu no Inovar-Auto.” Folha de S. Paulo, December 21.Google Scholar
Carneiro, Mariana and Wiziack, Julio. 2019. “Guedes trava batalha com Sistema S para assumir entidades e seu Caixa.” Folha de S. Paulo, March 31.Google Scholar
Carney, Michael, Gedajlovic, Eric, and Yang, Xiaohua. 2009. “Varieties of Asian Capitalism: Toward an Institutional Theory of Asian Enterprise.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25: 361–80.Google Scholar
Carney, Richard W. 2016. “Varieties of Hierarchical Capitalism: Family and State Market Economies in Asia.” The Pacific Review, 29: 137–63.Google Scholar
Carrasco, Vinicius and de Mello, João Manoel Pinho. 2015. “Leis da oferta, a conta do subsídio à exportação de serviços de construção.” Revista Exame, June 18.Google Scholar
Carson, Lindsey D. and Prado, Mariana Mota. 2016. “Using Institutional Multiplicity to Address Corruption as a Collective Action Problem: Lessons from the Brazilian Case. ” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 62: 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartier-Bresson, Jean. 1997. “Corruption Networks, Transaction Security and Illegal Social Exchange.” In Heywood, Paul (ed.), Political Corruption, 47–60. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Carvalho, Fernando J. Cardim de. 2016. “Looking into the Abyss? Brazil at the Mid-2010s.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 39: 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, José Murilo de. 2002. 3rd ed. Cidadania no Brasil: o longo caminho. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.Google Scholar
Carvalho, Laura. 2018. Valsa brasileira: do boom ao caos econômico. São Paulo: Todavia, Kindle edition.Google Scholar
Casado, José, Nogueira, Danielle, Ordoñez, Ramona, and Bruno, Rosa. 2016. “Aparelhamento de fundos de pensão afeta 500 mil aposentados.” G1, February 21.Google Scholar
Casanova, Lourdes and Kassum, Julian. 2014. The Political Economy of an Emerging Global Power: In Search of the Brazil Dream. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Cassin, Richard L. 2018. “Petrobras Smashes the Top Ten List (and We Explain Why).” The FCPA Blog, September 28. https://fcpablog.comGoogle Scholar
Castro, Marcus Faro de. 1997a. “The Courts, Law, and Democracy in Brazil.” International Social Science Journal, 49: 241–52.Google Scholar
Castro, Marcus Faro de. 1997b. “O Supremo Tribunal Federal e a judicialização da política.” Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 12: 147–56.Google Scholar
Cavalcante, Pedro and Lotta., Gabriela (eds.). 2015. Burocracia de médio escalão: perfil, trajetória e atuação. Brasília: ENAP.Google Scholar
Centeno, Miguel A. and Silva, Patricio. 1998. “The Politics of Expertise in Latin America: Introduction.” In Centeno, Miguel A. and Silva, Patricio (eds.), The Politics of Expertise in Latin America, 1–12. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CEPESP (Centro de Estudos em Política e Economia do Setor Público, FGV). 2019. “Os custos da campanha eleitoral no Brasil.” Fundação Getulio Vargas, May 14.Google Scholar
CGU (Controladoría Geral da União). 2016. “Relatório de acompanhamento das punições expulsivas aplicadas a estatutários no âmbito da administração pública federal.” www.cgu.gov.br/assuntos/atividade-disciplinar/relatorios-de-punicoes-expulsivas/arquivos/consolidado-por-ano-2003-a-2016.pdfGoogle Scholar
Chagas, Cláudia. 2012. “ENCCLA – A integração necessária.” In Ricardo Andrade Saadi, Biasoli, Roberto, and da Cunha, Ana Paula (eds.), ENCCLA: Estratégia Nacional de Combate à Corrupção e à Lavagem de Dinheiro: 10 anos de organização do Estado brasileiro contra o crime organizado, 44–5. Brasília: Ministério da Justiça.Google Scholar
Chaia, Vera and Teixeira, Marco Antonio. 2001. “Democracia e escândalos políticos.” São Paulo em Perspectiva, 15: 62–75.Google Scholar
Chaisty, Paul, Cheeseman, Nic, and Power, Timothy J.. 2018. Coalitional Presidentialism in Comparative Perspective: Minority Presidents in Multiparty Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Ha-Joon. 1994. The Political Economy of Industrial Policy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chang, Ha-Joon. 1999. “The Economic Theory of the Developmental State.” In Woo-Cumings, Meredith (ed.), The Developmental State, 182–99. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Ha-Joon. 2002. Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Cheibub, José A., Przeworski, Adam, and Saiegh, Sebastian M.. 2004. “Government Coalitions and Legislative Success under Presidentialism and Parliamentarism.” British Journal of Political Science, 34: 565–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claessens, Stijn, Feijen, Erik, and Laeven, Luc. 2008. “Political Connections and Access to Finance: The Role of Campaign Contributions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 88: 554–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coatsworth, John H. 2005. “Structures, Endowments, and Institutions in the Economic History of Latin America.” Latin American Research Review, 40: 126–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Codato, Adriano and Cavalieri, Marco. 2015. “Diretores do Banco Central do Brasil nos governos Cardoso, Lula e Dilma: uma radiografia dos seus backgrounds educacionais.” Newsletter: The Observatory of Social and Political Elites of Brazil, 2: 5.Google Scholar
Codato, Adriano and Franz, Paulo. 2018. “Ministros-técnicos e ministros-políticos nos governos do PSDB e do PT.” Revista de Administração Pública, 52: 776–96.Google Scholar
Cohen, Michael D., March, James, and Olsen, Johan P.. 1972. “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, Seth Stevens. 2013. “Searching for Institutional Solutions to Industrial Policy Challenges: A Case Study of the Brazilian Development Bank.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Comin, Alexandre. 1998. De volta para o futuro: política e reestruturação industrial no setor automobilístico nos anos 1990. São Paulo: Anablume.Google Scholar
Coronel, Daniel Arruda, Campos, Antônio Carvalho, de Azevedo, André Filipe Zago, and Fátima Marília Andrade de Carvalho. 2011. “Impactos da política de desenvolvimento produtivo na economia brasileira: uma análise de equilíbrio geral computável.” Pesquisa e Planejamento Econômico, 41: 337–65.Google Scholar
Coronel, Daniel Arruda, de Azevedo, André Filipe Zago, and Campos, Antônio Carvalho. 2014. “Política industrial e desenvolvimento econômico: a reatualização de um debate histórico.” Revista de Economia Política, 34: 103–18.Google Scholar
Corrêa, Izabela Moreira. 2011. “Sistema de integridade: avanços e agenda de ação para a administração pública federal.” In Avritzer, Leonardo and Filgueiras, Fernando, (eds.), Corrupção e sistema político no Brasil, 163–90. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Civilização Brasileira.Google Scholar
Correa, Paulo, Melo, Marcus, Mueller, Bernardo, and Pereira, Carlos. 2008. “Regulatory Governance in Brazilian Infrastructure Industries.” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48: 202–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrêa, Victor, José Marcelo, de Castro, and Cláudia Souza, Passador. 2017. “Policy of Ethanol in Brazil: Current Scenario and Research Agenda.” Revista Capital Científico, 15. revistas.unicentro.br/index.php/capitalcientifico/article/viewFile/4775/3441Google Scholar
Coslovsky, Salo, Pires, Roberto, and Bignami, Renato. 2017. “Resilience and Renewal: The Enforcement of Labor Laws in Brazil.” Latin American Politics and Society, 59: 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, Sérgio, Fritz, Barbara, and Martina, Sproll. 2015. “Dilma 2.0: From Economic Growth with Distribution to Stagnation and Increasing Inequalities?” LASA Forum, Summer 2015: Vol XLVI, Issue 3.Google Scholar
Coutinho, Diogo R., de Melo Mesquita, Clarissa Ferreira, and Maria Virginia Nabuco do Amaral Mesquita Nasser. 2019. “Empresas estatais entre serviços públicos e atividades econômicas.” Revista Direito GV, 15: 1–23.Google Scholar
Coutinho, Luciano. 2010. “A construção dos fundamentos para o crescimento sustentável da economia brasileira.” In Além, Ana Cláudia and Giambiagi, Fabio (eds.), O BNDES em um Brasil em transição, 17–38. Rio de Janeiro: BNDES.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2001. “The Institutional Determinants of Economic Policy Outcomes.” In Haggard, Stephan and McCubbins, Mathew D. (eds.), Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy, 21–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
CPDOC. 2009. “Lei de Responsabilidade Fiscal.” Verbete Temático. Faculdade Getúlio Vargas. www.fgv.br/cpdoc/acervo/dicionarios/verbete-tematico/lei-de-responsabilidade-fiscalGoogle Scholar
Crisostomo, Vicente Lima, Iturriaga, Felix Javier Lopez, and Gonzalez, Eleuterio Vallelado. 2014. “Financial Constraints for Investment in Brazil.” International Journal of Managerial Finance, 10: 73–92.Google Scholar
Crisp, Brian F., Desposato, Scott W., and Kanthak, Kristin. 2011. “Legislative Pivots, Presidential Powers, and Policy Stability.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 27: 426–52.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 2005. “Three meanings of complementarity,” in edited “Dialogue on ‘Institutional complementarity and political economy,’” between Colin Crouch, Wolfgang Streeck, Robert Boyer, Bruno Amable, Peter A. Hall, and Gregory Jackson. Socio-Economic Review, 3: 359–82.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 2010. “Complementarity.” In Campbell Glenn Morgan, John L., Colin, Crouch, Ove, Kaj Pedersen, and Richard, Whitley (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis, 117–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cruz, Claúdia Ferreira and Afonso, Luís Eduardo. 2018. “Fiscal Management and Pillars of the Fiscal Responsibility Law in Brazil: Evidence in Large Municipalities.” Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 52: 126–48.Google Scholar
Cruz, Valdo. 2018. “Bolsonaro enquadra Paulo Guedes e gera apreensão no mercado.” G1, September 20.Google Scholar
Cunha, Paulo Roberto and Neli Aparecida, de Mello-Théry. 2017. “Financiamento privado de campanha eleitoral: o agronegócio bancando a queda do Código Florestal brasileiro de 1965.” Guaju: Revista Brasileira de Desenvolvimento Territorial Sustentável, 3: 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cypher, James M. 2015. “Emerging Contradictions of Brazil’s Neo-Developmentalism: Precarious Growth, Redistribution, and Deindustrialization.” Journal of Economic Issues, 49: 617–48.Google Scholar
Cysne, Rubens Penha and Carlos Thadeu de F. Gomes. 2017. “Brasil: o custo do atraso no equacionamento da questão fiscal.” Revista de Economia Política, 37: 704–18.Google Scholar
D’Araújo, Maria Celina. 1982. O segundo governo Vargas (1951–54). Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores.Google Scholar
Da Ros, Luciano. 2010. “Judges in the Formation of the Nation State: Professional Experiences, Academic Background, and Geographic Circulation of Members of the Supreme Courts of Brazil and the United States.” Brazilian Political Science Review, 4: 102–30.Google Scholar
Da Ros, Luciano. 2014. “Mayors in the Dock: Judicial Responses to Local Corruption.” Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
Da Ros, Luciano and Taylor, Matthew M.. 2019a. “Kickbacks, Crackdown, and Backlash: Legal Accountability in the Lava Jato Investigation.” Paper presented at seminar on “Política y derecho en América Latina: Nuevas preguntas, viejos desafíos,” Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia, October 25–26.Google Scholar
Da Ros, Luciano and Taylor, Matthew M.. 2019b. “Juízes eficientes, Judiciário ineficiente no Brasil pós-1988.” Revista BIB, 89: 1–31.Google Scholar
Dallagnol, Deltan. 2017. A luta contra a corrupção: a Lava Jato e o futuro de um país marcado pela impunidade. São Paulo: Primeira Pessoa.Google Scholar
Dargent, Eduardo. 2014. “Determinantes internacionales de la capacidad de las agencias estatales.” Apuntes, 41: 9–40.Google Scholar
Dargent, Eduardo. 2015. Technocracy and Democracy in Latin America: The Experts Running Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dargent, Eduardo, Lotta, Gabriela, Mejía, José Antonio, and Moncada, Gilberto. 2018. Who Wants to Know?: The Political Economy of Statistical Capacity in Latin America. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Datz, Giselle. 2013. “Brazil’s Pension Fund Developmentalism.” Competition and Change, 17: 111–28.Google Scholar
De Bonis, Daniel. 2015. “Politicisation of the Federal Civil Service in Brazil: An Empirical Assessment.” The Public Sphere, 3: 4–15.Google Scholar
De Bonis, Daniel. 2016. “Lógicas de recrutamento de elites dirigentes: padrões de mudança e continuidade no governo federal brasileiro.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Fundação Getulio Vargas.Google Scholar
De Bonis, Daniel and Pacheco, Regina S. 2010. “Nem político nem burocrata: o debate sobre o dirigente público.” In Abrucio, Fernando Luiz, Loureiro, Maria Rita, and Pacheco, Regina S. (eds.), Burocracia e política no Brasil: desafios para o Estado democrático no século XXI, 273–295. São Paulo: FGV.Google Scholar
De Gregorio, José. 2009. “Implementation of Inflation Targets in Emerging Markets.” In Hammond, Gill, Kanbur, Ravi, and Prasad, Eswar (eds.), Monetary Policy Frameworks for Emerging Markets, 40–59. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
De Toni, Jackson. 2014. “Dez anos da política industrial: conquistas e desafios a superar.” Carta Capital, April 2, 2014.Google Scholar
Deeg, Richard. 2007. “Complementarity and institutional change in capitalist systems.” Journal of European Public Policy, 14: 611–30.Google Scholar
Deeg, Richard and Jackson, Gregory. 2007. “The State of the Art: Towards a More Dynamic Theory of Capitalist Variety.” Socio-Economic Review, 5: 149–79.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G.. 2002. Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DIAP. 2011. “Bancadas informais no Congresso Nacional em 2011.” Radiografia do Novo Congresso 2011/2015, Brasília: DIAP 2011.Google Scholar
Diaz-Alejandro, Carlos F. 1984. “Latin America in the 1930s.” In Rosemary, Thorp (ed.), Latin America in the 1930s: The Role of the Periphery in World Crisis, 17–49. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Dieguez, Consuelo. 2013. “Colheita amarga.” Revista piauí, 78: 18–24.Google Scholar
Dieguez, Consuelo. 2014. Bilhões e lágrimas: a economia brasileira e seus atores. São Paulo: Portfolio-Penguin.Google Scholar
Diniz, Eli. 2010. “Estado, variedades de capitalismo e desenvolvimento em países emergentes.” Desenvolvimento em Debate, 1: 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diniz, Eli. 2011. “Depois do neoliberalismo: rediscutindo a articulação Estado e desenvolvimento no novo milênio.” In Boschi, Renato (ed.), Variedades de capitalismo, política e desenvolvimento na América Latina, 31–55. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Diniz, Eli and Boschi, Renato. 2000. “Globalização, herança corporativa e a representação dos interesses empresariais: novas configurações no cenário pós-reformas.” In Boschi, Renato, Diniz, Eli, and Santos, Fabiano (eds.), Elites políticas e econômicas no Brasil contemporâneo: a desconstrução da ordem corporativa e o papel do Legislativo no cenário pós-reformas, 15–90. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Konrad Adenauer.Google Scholar
Donaghy, Maureen. 2011. “Do Participatory Governance Institutions Matter? Municipal Councils and Social Housing Programs in Brazil.” Comparative Politics, 44: 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doner, Richard F. and Ramsay, Ansil. 2000. “Rent-seeking and Economic Development in Thailand.” In Khan, Mushtaq H. and Jomo, Kwame Sundaram (eds.), Rents, Rent-seeking and Economic Development: Theory and Evidence in Asia, 145–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doner, Richard F. and Schneider, Ben Ross. 2016. “The Middle-Income Trap: More Politics than Economics.” World Politics, 68: 608–44.Google Scholar
Dowbor, Mónika. 2009. “Da inflexão pré-constitucional ao SUS municipalizado.” Lua Nova 78: 185–222.Google Scholar
Doyle, David. 2014. “The Political Economy of Policy Volatility in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society, 56: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, William. 2001. “The Lost Decades: Developing Countries’ Stagnation in Spite of Policy Reform 1980–1998.” Journal of Economic Growth, 6: 135–57.Google Scholar
Economist, . 1995. “A Survey of Brazil: Half-empty or Half-full?” April 29.Google Scholar
Egan, Patrick J. W. 2015. “Crawling Up the Value Chain: Domestic Institutions and Non-Traditional Foreign Direct Investment in Brazil, 1990–2010.” Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 35: 156–74.Google Scholar
Engelmann, Fabiano and Mâncio Bandeira, Júlia Veiga Vieira. 2017. “A construção da autonomia política do Judiciário na América Latina: Um estudo comparativo entre Argentina, Brasil, Chile, Colômbia e Venezuela.” Dados, 60: 903–36.Google Scholar
Ernst & Young Global Fraud Survey. 2016. www.ey.com/gl/en/services/assurance/fraud-investigation–dispute-services/ey-global-fraud-survey-2016Google Scholar
Escorel, Sarah. 2008. “História das políticas de saúde no Brasil de 1964 a 1990: do golpe militar à reforma sanitária.” In Gianovella, Lígia Escorel, Sarah, Costa Lobato, Lenaura de Vasconcelos, Carvalho de Noronha, José, and de Carvalho, Antonio Ivo (eds.), Políticas e sistema de saúde no Brasil, 385–434. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz.Google Scholar
Escorel, Sarah, Dilene Raimundo, do Nascimento, and Flavio, Coelho Edler. 2005. “As origens da reforma sanitária e do SUS.” In Lima, Nísia Trindade, Gerschman, Silvia, Edler, Flavio Coelho, and Suárez, Julio Manuel (eds.), Saúde e democracia: história e perspectivas do SUS, 59–81. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter B. 1979. Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Peter B. 1992. “The State as Problem and Solution: Predation, Embedded Autonomy, and Adjustment.” In Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert R. (eds.), The Politics of Economic Adjustment, 139–91. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter B. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter B. and Rauch, James E.. 1999. “Bureaucracy and Growth: A Cross-National Analysis of the Effects of ‘Weberian’ State Structures on Economic Growth.” American Sociological Review, 64: 748–65.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter B. and Rauch, James E.. 2000. “Bureaucratic Structure and Bureaucratic Performance in Less Developed Countries.” Journal of Public Economics, 75: 49–71.Google Scholar
Fagnani, Eduardo. 2018. “Introdução: A reforma tributária necessária.” In Fagnani, Eduardo (ed.), A reforma tributária necessária, 13–42. São Paulo: ANFIP/FENAFISCO/Plataforma Política Social.Google Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G. 2010. “Infiltrating the State: The Evolution of Health Care Reforms in Brazil, 1964–1988.” In Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen (eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, 38–62. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Faoro, Raymundo. 2001 [1975]. Os donos do poder: formação do patronato político brasileiro. 3rd ed. Porto Alegre: Editora Globo.Google Scholar
Feenstra, Robert C., Inklaar, Robert, and Timmer, Marcel P. (2015), “The Next Generation of the Penn World Table.” American Economic Review, 105: 3150–82. www.ggdc.net/pwtGoogle Scholar
Fenwick, Tracy B. 2009. “Avoiding Governors: The Success of Bolsa Família.” Latin American Research Review, 44: 102–31.Google Scholar
Fenwick, Tracy B. 2010. “The Institutional Feasibility of National-Local Policy Collaboration: Insights from Brazil and Argentina.” Journal of Politics in Latin America, 2: 155–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, Leticia and Manoel, Ventura. 2017. “Capital estrangeiro na Embraer é muito ‘bem-vindo,’ disse Temer.” O Globo, December 22.Google Scholar
Ficker, Sandra Kuntz. 2005. “From Structuralism to the New Institutional Economics: The Impact of Theory on the Study of Foreign Trade in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review, 40: 145–62.Google Scholar
FIESP. 2017. “Panorama da indústria de transformação brasileira.” 14th ed., June 30. https://goo.gl/aUNqnWGoogle Scholar
Figueiredo, Argelina Cheibub. 2001. “Instituições e política no controle do Executivo.” Dados, 44: 689–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueiredo, Argelina Cheibub and Limongi, Fernando. 1999. Executivo e legislativo na nova ordem constitucional. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, Argelina Cheibub and Limongi, Fernando. 2002. “Incentivos eleitorais, partidos e política orçamentária.” Dados, 45: 303–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueiredo, Fernanda Odilla Vasconcellos de. 2019. “Oversee and Punish: Understanding the Fight Against Corruption Involving Government Workers in the Federal Executive Branch in Brazil.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Social Science and Public Policy, King’s College London.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fiori, José Luis. 1992. “The Political Economy of the Developmentalist State in Brazil.” CEPAL Review, 47: 173–86.Google Scholar
Fishlow, Albert. 2011. Starting Over: Brazil since 1985. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Fleischer, David. 2002. “Corruption in Brazil: Defining, Measuring, and Reducing.” Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
Fleischer, David. 2017. Brazil Focus, July 1.Google Scholar
Flexor, Georges and Karina, Kato. 2011. “As difíceis relações entre o governo e os usineiros.” Carta Maior, June 13.Google Scholar
Paulo, Folha de S.. 1996. “Ex-deputado liberou Centrão.” January 29.Google Scholar
Paulo, Folha de S.. 2016. “Obsoleta e excludente.” August 7.Google Scholar
Paulo, Folha de S.. 2017a. “Ideologia nacional.” April 7.Google Scholar
Paulo, Folha de S.. 2017b. “A sombra do Leviatã.” May 8.Google Scholar
Paulo, Folha de S.. 2017c. “Tabu estatal.” December 29.Google Scholar
Paulo, Folha de S.. 2018a. “Sem fim, sem fins.” January 9.Google Scholar
Paulo, Folha de S.. 2018b. “Aécio na Justiça,” April 17.Google Scholar
Paulo, Folha de S.. 2018c. “Com reeleição abaixo de 50%, Câmara terá renovação recorde.” October 9.Google Scholar
Paulo, Folha de S.. 2019a. “Leía a íntegra do discurso de Bolsonaro na cerimônia de posse no Congresso.” January 1.Google Scholar
Paulo, Folha de S.. 2019b. “Datafolha aponta que apoio à privatização cresce com Bolsonaro, mas ainda é minoritário.” September 9.Google Scholar
Fraga, Arminio. 2004. “Latin America since the 1990s: Rising from the Sickbed?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18: 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraga, Arminio, Goldfajn, Ilan, and Minella, André. 2003. “Inflation Targeting in Emerging Market Economies.” NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 18: 365–400.Google Scholar
France, Guilherme de Jesus. 2017. “A evolução da legislação brasileira contra a corrupção.” In Mohallem, Michael Freitas and Ragazzo, Carlos Emmanuel Joppert (eds.), Diagnóstico institucional: primeiros passos para um Plano Nacional Anticorrupção, 39–70. Rio de Janeiro: Escola de Direito do Rio de Janeiro da Fundação Getulio Vargas.Google Scholar
Frassão, Caroline de Souza. 2016. “Lobby e proteção da indústria: uma análise do Plano Brasil Maior.” Paper presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the ANPOCS.Google Scholar
Freire, Vinicius Torres. 2018. “Amanhã é dia de cair na real.” Folha de S. Paulo, October 28.Google Scholar
Freitas, Andréa. 2012. “Migração partidária na Câmara dos Deputados de 1987 a 2009.” Dados, 55: 951–86.Google Scholar
Freitas, Vladimir de. 2014. “The Role of Regulatory Agencies.” Environmental Policy and Law, 44: 552–61.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffrey. 1991. Debt, Development, and Democracy: Modern Political Economy and Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Thomas L. 1999. The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization. New York: Farrar, Straus Giroux.Google Scholar
Furtado, Celso. 1978 (2nd ed.). Economic Development of Latin America: Historical Background and Contemporary Problems. Suzette Macedo (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Furtado, Celso. 1984. Cultura e desenvolvimento em época de crise. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
G1. 2015. “Estaleiro Mauá, RJ, fechas as portas por causa de questões financeiras.” July 3.Google Scholar
G1. 2019a. “Discursos de Bolsonaro.” January 1.Google Scholar
G1. 2019b. “BNDES divulga lista como os 50 maiores clientes do banco.” January 18.Google Scholar
Galvão, Jane. 2000. “AIDS no Brasil: a agenda de construção de uma epidemia.” Rio de Janeiro: Associação Brasileira Interdisciplinar de AIDS.Google Scholar
Galvin, Daniel J. 2012. “The Transformation of Political Institutions: Investments in Institutional Resources and Gradual Change in National Party Committees.” Studies in American Political Development, 26: 50–70.Google Scholar
Garcia, Felipe, Adolfo Sachsida e Alexandre Xavier Ywata de Carvalho. 2018. “Impacto da desoneração da folha de pagamento sobre o emprego: novas evidências.” IPEA Texto para Discussão 2357.Google Scholar
Garcia, Mauricio and Filho., Helio Gastaldi April 2007. “A participação do Estado brasileiro na sociedade: percepções da população em relação ao processo de privatização.” Paper presented at the First Latin American Congress on Public Opinion, Uruguay.Google Scholar
Garcia-Escribano, Mercedes, Goes, Carlos, and Karpowicz, Izabela. 2015. “Filling the Gap: Infrastructure Investment in Brazil.” IMF Working Paper.Google Scholar
Gaspar, Malu. 2014. Tudo ou nada: Eike Batista e a verdadeira história do Grupo X, 4th ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Record.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1990. “Building State Autonomy in Brazil, 1930–1964.” Comparative Politics, 22: 217–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1994. Politician’s Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gerchmann, Léo. 2000. “TCU contesta Regime Automotivo do NE.” Folha de S. Paulo, September 3.Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Giambiagi, Fabio. 2008. “18 anos de política fiscal no Brasil: 1991/2008.” Economia Aplicada, 12: 535–80.Google Scholar
Giambiagi, Fabio and Pinheiro, Armando Castelar. 2012. Além da euforia: riscos e lacunas do modelo brasileiro de desenvolvimento. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Gibson, Christopher L. 2017. “The Consequences of Movement Office-Holding for Health Policy Implementation and Social Development in Urban Brazil.” Social Forces, 96: 751–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gielow, Igor. 2019. “Brasileiro rejeita privatização, diz Datafolha.” Folha de S. Paulo, January 5.Google Scholar
Gill, Indermit and Kharas, Homi, together with Bhattasali, Deepak, Brahmbhatt, Milan, Datt, Gaurav, Haddad, Mona, Mountfield, Edward, Tatucu, Radu, and Vostroknutova, Ekaterina. 2007. An East Asian Renaissance: Ideas for Economic Growth. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Godoy, Marcelo and Bramatti, Daniel. 2017. “Desde 2013, prisões por corrupção cresceram 288%.” O Estado de S. Paulo, June 25.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith. 1993. Ideas, Interests, and American Trade Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O.. 1993. “Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework.” In Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O. (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, 3–30. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez, Eduardo J. 2014. “What Reverses Decentralization? Failed Policy Implementation, Civic Supporters, or Central Bureaucrats’ expertise? The Case of Brazil’s AIDs Program.” Administration & Society, 46: 929–59.Google Scholar
Gómez-Mera, Laura. 2007. “Macroeconomic Concerns and Intrastate Bargains: Explaining Illiberal Policies in Brazil’s Automobile Sector.” Latin American Politics & Society, 49: 113–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, Maetê Pedroso. 2012. “O ciclo da política nacional de concessão de benefícios tributários (2003–2010).” Unpublished M.A. thesis, Departamento de Ciência Política, Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Gootenberg, Paul. 2004. “Between a Rock and a Softer Place: Reflections on some Recent Economic History of Latin America.” Latin American Research Review, 39: 239–52.Google Scholar
Gorter, Harry de, Drabik, Dusan, Kliauga, Erika M., and Timilsina, Govinda R.. 2013. “An Economic Model of Brazil’s Ethanol-Sugar Markets and Impacts of Fuel Policies.” The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 6524.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter. 1986. Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gouvêa, Gilda Portugal, Figueiredo. 1994. Burocracia e elites burocráticas no Brasil. São Paulo: Paulicéia.Google Scholar
Gozetto, Andréa Oliveira, Cristina and Thomas, Clive S.. 2014. “Interest Groups in Brazil: A New Era and Its Challenges.” Journal of Public Affairs, 14: 212–39.Google Scholar
Gragnolati, Michele, Lindelow, Magnus, and Couttolenc, Bernard. 2013. Twenty Years of Health System Reform in Brazil: An Assessment of the Sistema Único de Saúde. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Lawrence. 1968. Civil Service Reform in Brazil: Principles versus Practice. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1978. “Threshold Models of Collective Behavior.” American Journal of Sociology, 83: 1420–43.Google Scholar
Grindle, Merilee S. 2012. Jobs for the Boys: Patronage and the State in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Guandalini, Giuliano. 2006. “Por que o Brasil não cresce como a China e a Índia?” Veja, August 16: 86–94.Google Scholar
Guerriero, Ian Ramalho. 2012. “Formulação e avaliação de política industrial e o caso da PDP.” 2012. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Guimarães, Alexandre Queiroz. 2005. “Historical Institutionalism and Economic Policymaking – Determinants of the Pattern of Economic Policy in Brazil, 1930–1960.” Bulletin of Latin American Research, 24: 527–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization, 46: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan. 2018. Developmental States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert R.. 1992. “Institutions and Economic Adjustment.” In Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert R. (eds.), The Politics of Economic Adjustment, 3–40. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert R.. 2008. Development, Democracy, and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia and Eastern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. 1996. Traditional Politics and Regime Change in Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. 2016. “Brazil’s Accountability Paradox.” Journal of Democracy, 27: 119–28.Google Scholar
Hagopian, Frances, Carlos, Gervasoni, and Juan, Andrés Moraes. 2009. “From Patronage to Program: The Emergence of Party-Oriented Legislators in Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies, 42: 360–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Michael M. 2009. “The Labor Policies of the Lula Government.” In Love, Joseph L. and Baer, Werner (eds.), Brazil under Lula: Economy, Politics, and Society under the Worker-President, 151–65. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 1989. “Conclusion: The Politics of Economic Ideas.” In Hall, Peter A. (ed.), The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations, 361–91. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Daniel W., Gingerich. 2009. “Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy.” British Journal of Political Science, 39: 449–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Thelen, Kathleen. 2009. “Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism.” Socio-Economic Review, 7: 7–34.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter E. and Soskice, David. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Dominik, Jara-Figueroa, Cristian, Guevara, Miguel, Simoes, Alex, and Hidalgo, César A. 2016. “The Structural Constraints of Income Inequality in Latin America.” Integration & Trade Journal, 40: 70–85.Google Scholar
Haydu, Jeffrey. 1998. “Making Use of the Past: Time Periods as Cases to Compare and as Sequences of Problem Solving.” American Journal of Sociology, 104: 339–71.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh. 1978. “Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment.” In King, Anthony (ed.), The New American Political System. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Heredia, Blanca and Schneider, Ben Ross. 2003. “The Political Economy of Administrative Reform in Developing Countries.” In Schneider, Ben Ross and Heredia, Blanca (eds.), Reinventing Leviathan: The Politics of Administrative Reform in Developing Countries, 1–29. University of Miami: North-South Center Press.Google Scholar
Hermann, Jennifer. 2010. “Development Banks in the Financial-Liberalization Era: The Case of BNDES in Brazil.” CEPAL Review, 100: 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Sean and Pereira, Claudiney. 2014. “The Effects of Brazil’s Taxation and Social Spending on the Distribution of Household Income.” In Nora Lustig, Carola Pessino, and John Scott (eds.), “The Redistributive Impact of Taxes and Social Spending in Latin America.” Special Issue, Public Finance Review, 42: 346–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiroi, Taeko. 2013. “Governability and Accountability in Brazil: Dilemma of Coalitional Presidentialism.” The Journal of Social Science, 75: 39–59.Google Scholar
Hiroi, Taeko. 2016. “Malapportionment and Redistribution in the Brazilian Congress.” Paper presented at the 2016 Meeting of the Brazilian Studies Association. Providence, Rhode Island.Google Scholar
Hiroi, Taeko and Lucio, Rennó. 2016. “Agenda Setting and Gridlock in a Multi-Party Coalitional Presidential System: The Case of Brazil.” In Alemán, Eduardo and Tsebelis, George (eds.), Legislative Institutions and Lawmaking in Latin America, 62–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1968. “The Political Economy of Import Substituting Industrialization in Latin America.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82: 1–32.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1987. “On the Political Economy of Latin American Development.” Latin American Research Review, 22: 7–36.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1981. Essays in Trespassing: Economics to Politics and Beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1989. “How the Keynesian Revolution was Exported from the United States and Other Comments.” In Hall, Peter A. (ed.), The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations, 347–59. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn. 2011. “The Politics of Comparatively Good Times: Brazil in the Global Financial Crisis.” Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn. 2017. “Environmental Politics in Brazil the Cross-Pressures of Democracy, Development, and Global Projection.” In Kingstone, Peter R. and Power, Timothy J. (eds.), Democratic Brazil Divided, 97–112. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn and Montero, Alfred P.. 2013. “The Renewed Developmental State: The National Development Bank and the Brazil Model.” The Journal of Development Studies, 49: 1484–99.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Florian and Bentes, Fernando R. N. M. 2008. “Accountability for Social and Economic Rights in Brazil.” In Gauri, Varun and Brinks, Daniel M. (eds.), Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World, 100–45. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, Márcio, Gurgel, Angelo, Cerqueira, Claudia, et al. 2019. “Zona Franca de Manaus: impactos, efetividade e oportunidades.” São Paulo: FGV-EESP (Fundação Getulio Vargas - Escola de Economia de São Paulo). https://eesp.fgv.br/sites/eesp.fgv.br/files/estudos_fgv_zonafranca_manaus_abril_2019v2.pdfGoogle Scholar
Holston, James. 2008. Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Horch, Dan. 2015. “In Good Times or Bad, Brazilian Banks Profit.” The New York Times, August 13.Google Scholar
Hornbeck, J. F. 2006. “Brazilian Trade Policy and the United States.” Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service Report for Congress.Google Scholar
Hundt, David and Uttam, Jitendra. 2017. Varieties of Capitalism in Asia: Beyond the Developmental State. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchcroft, Paul and Kuhonta, Erik Martinez. 2018. “Upending the ‘Rules of the Game’: Toward Greater Clarity in the Conceptualization of Institutions.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, 29 August–1 September.Google Scholar
IMF Data Mapper. 2019. “Government expenditure, percent of GDP.” www.imf.org/external/datamapper/datasetsGoogle Scholar
Instituto Paulo Montenegro. 2018. “INAF Brasil 2018: resultados preliminares.” https://goo.gl/NhpKkvGoogle Scholar
IPSOS Public Affairs. 2007. “Pulso Brasil: Estadão.”Google Scholar
IPSOS Public Affairs. 2015. “Estudio sobre la coyuntura política y la complejidad cultural Argentina 2015.”Google Scholar
Istoé. 2018. “Seis meses após reforma trabalhista, arrecadação de sindicatos desaba 88%.” June 4.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben. 2005. Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, John Kurt. 1995. “Much Ado about Ideas: The Cognitive Factor in Economic Policy.” World Politics, 47: 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Rhys. 1991. “The Political Economy of Industrialization: A Comparison of Latin American and East Asian Newly Industrializing Countries.” Development and Change, 22: 197–231.Google Scholar
Jobim, Nelson A. and Luciano Inácio, de Souza. 2018. “A regulamentácão do lobby: análise comparada entre América Latina, Brasil e Estados Unidos.” In Seligman, Milton and Mello, Fernando (eds.), Lobby desvendado: democracia, políticas públicas e corrupção no Brasil contemporâneo, 45–66. Rio de Janeiro: Record.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jota. 2019. “Pesquisa de opinião nacional, 300 Dias de Bolsonaro.” October 29–November 2.Google Scholar
Judd, Elizabeth. 2011. “O Momento Mágico: Managing Public Affairs in Brazil.” Washington, DC: Foundation for Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 1992. “External Influence, Conditionality, and the Politics of Adjustment.” In Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert R. (eds.), The Politics of Economic Adjustment, 89–138. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Stephen B. 2013. Globalization and Austerity Politics in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpowicz, Izabela and Soto, Mauricio. 2018. “Rightsizing the Public Sector Wage Bill.” In Spilimbergo, Antonio and Srinivasan, Krishna (eds.), Brazil: Boom, Bust, and the Road to Recovery, 223–40. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Kasahara, Yuri. 2011. “A regulação do setor financeiro brasileiro: uma análise exploratória das relações entre Estado e setor privado.” In Boschi, Renato (ed.), Variedades de capitalismo, política e desenvolvimento na América Latina, 194–227. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Kastner, Tássia. 2019. “Para XP, eventual mudança na diretoria, promovida pelo governo, seria prejudicial à companhia.” Folha de S. Paulo, January 29.Google Scholar
Kasznar, Istvan Karoly and Ivandro de, Almeida Oliveira. 2019. “The Effect of the Participation of Financial Companies in Non-Financial Companies in Brazil.” Cadernos Ebape.br, 17: 212–28.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Herbert. 1956. “Emerging Conflicts in the Doctrines of Public Administration.” American Political Science Review, 50: 1057–73.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert R. 1990. “How Societies Change Developmental Models or Keep Them: Reflections on the Latin American Experience in the 1930s and the Postwar World.” In Gereffi, Gary and Wyman, Donald L. (eds.), Manufacturing Miracles: Paths of Industrialization in Latin America and East Asia, 110–38. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Khan, Mushtaq H. 2000a. “Rents, Efficiency and Growth.” In Khan, Mushtaq H. and Jomo, Kwame Sundaram (eds.), Rents, Rent-seeking and Economic Development: Theory and Evidence in Asia, 21–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Khan, Mushtaq H. 2000b. “Rent-seeking as Process.” In Khan, Mushtaq H. and Jomo, Kwame Sundaram (eds.), Rents, Rent-seeking and Economic Development: Theory and Evidence in Asia, 70–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, Mushtaq H. and Jomo, Kwame Sundaram. 2000. “Introduction.” In Khan, Mushtaq H. and Jomo, Kwame Sundaram (eds.), Rents, Rent-seeking and Economic Development: Theory and Evidence in Asia, 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khanna, Tarun and Yafeh, Yishay. 2007. “Business Groups in Emerging Markets: Paragons or Parasites?” Journal of Economic Literature, 45: 331–72.Google Scholar
Kharas, Homi and Kohli, Harinder. 2011. “What is the Middle Income Trap, Why Do Countries Fall into It, and How Can It Be Avoided?” Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 3: 281–9.Google Scholar
Kingstone, Peter R. 1999. Crafting Coalitions for Reform: Business Preferences, Political Institutions, and Neoliberal Reform in Brazil. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Kingstone, Peter R. 2000. “Muddling Through Gridlock: Economic Policy Performance, Business Responses, and Democratic Sustainability.” In Kingstone, Peter R. and Power, Timothy J. (eds.), Democratic Brazil: Actors, Institutions and Processes, 185–203. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Kingstone, Peter R. 2001. “Why Free Trade ‘Losers’ Support Free Trade: Industrialists and the Surprising Politics of Trade Reform in Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies, 34: 986–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingstone, Peter R. 2011. The Political Economy of Latin America: Reflections on Neoliberalism and Development. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingstone, Peter R. and Power, Timothy J. (eds.). 2017. Democratic Brazil Divided. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Herbert S. and Francisco, Vidal Luna. 2019. Feeding the World: Brazil’s Transformation into a Modern Agricultural Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klüger, Elisa. 2018. “Mapping the Inflections in the Policies of the Brazilian National Economic and Social Development Bank During the Nineties and Two Thousands within Social Spaces and Networks.” Historical Social Research-Historische Sozialforschung, 43: 274–302.Google Scholar
Kohli, Atul. 2004. State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koske, Isabell, Wanner, Isabelle, Bitetti, Rosamaria, and Barbiero, Omar. 2015. “The 2013 update of the OECD’s database on product market regulation: Policy insights for OECD and non-OECD countries.” OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1200.Google Scholar
Kröger, Markus. 2012. “Neo-Mercantilist Capitalism and Post-2008 Cleavages in Economic Decision-making Power in Brazil.” Third World Quarterly, 33: 887–901.Google Scholar
Krueger, Anne O. 1974. “The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society.” The American Economic Review, 64: 291–303.Google Scholar
Krueger, Anne O. 1990. “Government Failures in Development.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4: 9–23.Google Scholar
Kuran, Timur. 1991. “Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolutions of 1989.” World Politics, 44: 7–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurlantzick, Joshua. 2016. State Capitalism: How the Return of Statism is Transforming the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Marcus J. 2013. Latin American State Building in Comparative Perspective: Social Foundations of Institutional Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
LaForge, Gordon. 2017. “The Sum of Its Parts: Coordinating Brazil’s Fight Against Corruption, 2003–2016.” Innovations for Successful Societies, Princeton University. http://successfulsocieties.princeton.eduGoogle Scholar
Lamberson, P. J. and Page, Scott E.. 2012. “Tipping Points.” SFI Working Paper 2012–02-002. Santa Fé Institute.Google Scholar
Lamounier, Bolivar. 1992. “Estrutura institucional e governabilidade na década de 1990.” In Reis Velloso, João Paulo dos (ed.), O Brasil e as reformas políticas, 24–47. Rio de Janeiro: Editora José Olympia.Google Scholar
Lamounier, Bolivar. 1994. “Brazil at an Impasse.” Journal of Democracy, 5: 72–87.Google Scholar
Lamounier, Bolívar. 1996. “Brazil: The Hyperactive Paralysis Syndrome.” In Domínguez, Jorge I. and Lowenthal, Abraham F. (eds.), Constructing Democratic Governance: South America in the 1990s, 166–87. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lamounier, Bolivar. 2005. Da Independência a Lula: dois séculos de política brasileira. São Paulo: Augurium Editora.Google Scholar
Landim, Raquel and Anaïs, Fernandes. 2018. “Boeing fica com 80% da divisão de jatos comerciais da Embraer por US $ 3,8 bi.” Folha de S. Paulo, July 5.Google Scholar
Latin News. 2018. “Brazil: Petrobras wins out over politics.” Weekly Report, 17 May.Google Scholar
Lazzarini, Sérgio G. 2010. Capitalismo de laços: os donos do Brasil e suas conexões. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier–Campus.Google Scholar
Lazzarini, Sérgio G. 2018. “Percepções sobre propostas de privatização: análise preliminar com dados brasileiros.” Mimeo, São Paulo: INSPER, August.Google Scholar
Lazzarini, Sérgio G., Lima, Thiago, and Makhoul, Pedro. 2017. “Como aumentar a atração do capital privado para projetos de infraestrutura no Brasil?” In Affonso Celso, Pastore (ed.), Infraestrutura: eficiência e ética, 235–61. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lazzarini, Sérgio G., Musacchio, Aldo, Mello, Rodrigo Bandeira-de-, and Marcon, Rosilene. 2015. “What Do Development Banks Do? Evidence from Brazil, 2002–2009.” World Development, 66: 237–53.Google Scholar
Leahy, Joe. 2011. “Brazil: Credit to Redeem.” Financial Times, July 12.Google Scholar
Leahy, Joe. 2015. “BNDES: Lender of First Resort for Brazil’s Tycoons.” Financial Times, January 11.Google Scholar
Leal, Leila. 2015. “As desonerações tributárias concedidas ao setor privado e seus impactos sobre os trabalhadores.” Brasil de Fato, January 15. https://goo.gl/hxLVfyGoogle Scholar
Leff, Nathaniel. 1968. Economic Policy-Making and Development in Brazil 1947–1964. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gerhard and Schmitter, Philippe C. (eds.). 1982. Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Leite, Cristiane Kerches, da Silva. 2005. “O processo de ordenamento fiscal no Brasil na década de 1990 e a Lei de Responsabilidade Fiscal.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of São Paulo.Google Scholar
Lemos, Leany B. and Power, Timothy J.. 2013. “Determinantes do controle horizontal em parlamentos reativos: o caso do Brasil (1988–2005).” Dados, 56: 383–412.Google Scholar
Lemos, Leany Barreiro, Pederiva, João Henrique, and Marcelino, Daniel. 2010. “Porque dinheiro importa: dinâmica das contribuições eleitorais para o Congresso Nacional em 2002 e 2006.” Opinião Pública, 16: 366–93.Google Scholar
Lengyel, Miguel. 2012. Interview. Author interview with Lengyel, Director, FLACSO Argentina, June 21.Google Scholar
Levcovitz, Silvio. 2017. “A corrupção e a atuação da Justiça Federal brasileira: 1991–2014.” Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Unicamp.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Lima, Jr., Olavo, Brasil de. 2000. “Presidential Elections: Centrality, Context and Implications.” Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, Special Issue 1: 53–72.Google Scholar
Lima, Mario Sergio. 2019. “An Economy on the Rocks? No Sweat for Brazil’s Bust-Proof Banks.” Bloomberg, May 26.Google Scholar
Limoeiro, Danilo and Schneider, Ben Ross. 2017. “State-Led Innovation: SOEs, Institutional Fragmentation and Policy Making in Brazil.” MIT-IPC Working Paper 17–004, September.Google Scholar
Limongi, Fernando. 2019. “Presidencialismo do desleixo: o modo Bolsonaro de governar.” Revista piauí, 158: 40–3.Google Scholar
Limongi, Fernando and Cortez, Rafael. 2010. “As eleições de 2010 e o quadro partidário.” Novos Estudos, 88: 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1994. “Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference?” In Linz, Juan J. and Valenzuela, Arturo (eds.), The Failure of Presidential Democracy, 3–90. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lisboa, Marcos de Barros and Zeina, Abdel Latif. 2013. “Democracy and Growth in Brazil.” Insper Working Paper WPE 311.Google Scholar
Londoño, Ernesto. 2017. “Brazilian Lawmakers Reject Bribery Prosecution of President Michel Temer.” New York Times, August 2.Google Scholar
Lopez, Felix Garcia, Bugarin, Maurício, and Bugarin, Karina. 2014. “Rotatitividade nos cargos de confiança da Administração Federal brasileira (1999–2013).” Revista do Serviço Público, 65: 439–61.Google Scholar
Loureiro, Maria Rita. 1997. Os economistas no governo: gestão econômica e democracia. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV.Google Scholar
Loureiro, Maria Rita. 2001. “Instituições, política e ajuste fiscal.” Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 16: 75–96.Google Scholar
Loureiro, Maria Rita. 2009. “Economists in the Brazilian Government: From Developmentalist State to Neoliberal Policies.” In Montecinos, Verónica and Markoff, John (eds.), Economists in the Americas, 100–41. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Loureiro, Maria Rita. 2010. “Democracia e políticas públicas: o papel da burocracia e dos partidos politicos.” In de Sá e Silva, Fabio, Lopez, Felix Garcia, and Pires, Roberto Rocha C. (eds.), Estado, instituições e democracia: democracia, 305–36. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Loureiro, Maria Rita and Abrucio, Fernando. 1999. “Política e burocracia no presidencialismo brasileiro: o papel do Ministério da Fazenda no primeiro governo Fernando Henrique Cardoso.” Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 14, 69–89.Google Scholar
Loureiro, Maria Rita and Abrucio, Fernando. 2004. “Política e reformas fiscais no Brasil recente.” Revista de Economia Política, 24: 50–72.Google Scholar
Loureiro, Maria Rita, Abrucio, Fernando Luiz, and Pacheco, Regina Silvia (eds.). 2010. Burocracia e política no Brasil: desafios para o Estado democrático no século XXI. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV.Google Scholar
Love, Joseph L. 1996. “Economic Ideas and Ideologies in Latin America since 1930.” In Bethell, Leslie (ed.), Ideas and Ideologies in Twentieth Century Latin America, 207–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Love, Joseph L. 2005. “The Rise and Decline of Economic Structuralism in Latin America: New Dimensions.” Latin American Research Review, 40: 100–25.Google Scholar
Love, Joseph L. 2009. “The Lula Government in Historical Perspective.” In Love, Joseph L. and Baer, Werner (eds.), Brazil under Lula: Economy, Politics, and Society under the Worker-President, 305–15. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucon, Oswaldo and Goldemberg, José. 2009. “Crise financeira, energia e sustentabilidade no Brasil.” Estudos Avancados, 23: 121–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Francisco Vidal and Klein, Herbert S.. 2006. Brazil since 1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lustig, Nora. 2016. “Domestic Resource Mobilization and the Poor.” Background paper for Expert Group Meeting: “Strategies for eradicating poverty to achieve sustainable development for all.” June 1–3. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/egms/docs/2016/Poverty-SDGs/NoraLustig-paper.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyne, Mona M. 2005. “Parties as Programmatic Agents: A Test of Institutional Theory in Brazil.” Party Politics, 11: 193–216.Google Scholar
Lyne, Mona M. 2015. “Rethinking the Political Economy of Import Substitution Industrialization in Brazil: A Clientelist Model of Development Policymaking.” Latin American Politics and Society, 57: 75–98.Google Scholar
Macedo, Fausto. 2011. “Manifesto ataca anistia para dinheiro repatriado.” O Estado de S. Paulo, March 22.Google Scholar
Macedo, Fausto and Ricardo, Brandt. 2015. “Lava Jato completa um ano com parte dos processos na etapa final.” O Estado de S. Paulo, March 15.Google Scholar
Madruga, Antenor. 2012. “Origens da ENCCLA.” In Andrade Saadi, Ricardo, Biasoli, Roberto, and da Cunha, Ana Paula (eds.), ENCCLA: Estratégia Nacional de Combate à Corrupção e à Lavagem de Dinheiro: 10 anos de organização do Estado brasileiro contra o crime organizado. Brasília: Ministério da Justiça.Google Scholar
Magnin, Eric. 2018. “Research Note: Varieties of Capitalism and Sustainable Development: Institutional Complementarity Dynamics or Radical Change in the Hierarchy of Institutions.” Journal of Economic Issues LII, 4: 1143–58.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society, 29: 507–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maia, João M. E. and Taylor, Matthew M.. 2015. “The Brazilian Liberal Tradition and the Global Liberal Order.” In Stuenkel, Oliver and Taylor, Matthew M. (eds.), Brazil on the Global Stage: Power, Ideas, and the Liberal International Order, 35–56. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1993. “Brazilian Party Underdevelopment in Comparative Perspective.” Political Science Quarterly, 107: 677–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1995. “Brazil: Weak Parties, Feckless Democracy.” In Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R. (eds.), Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, 354–98. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, Power, Timothy J., and Bizzarro, Fernando. 2017. “The Uneven Institutionalization of a Party System: Brazil.” In Mainwaring, Scott (ed.), Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse, 164–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maisonnave, Fabiano. 2019. “Tem toda essa riqueza e vai viver só de diferença de impostos?, questiona Guedes sobre Zona Franca.” Folha de São Paulo, July 25.Google Scholar
Malan, Pedro S. 1986. “Relações econômicas internacionais do Brasil (1945–1964).” In Fausto, Boris (ed.), História geral da civilização brasileira, 51–106. São Paulo: Difel.Google Scholar
Malloy, James. (ed.). 1977. Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Mancuso, Wagner Pralon. 2003. “Construindo leis: os construtores e as concessões de serviços.” Lua Nova, 58: 61–87.Google Scholar
Mancuso, Wagner Pralon. 2004. “O lobby da indústria no Congresso Nacional: empresariado e política no Brasil contemporâneo.” Dados, 47: 505–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancuso, Wagner Pralon. 2007. “O empresariado como ator político no Brasil: balanço da literatura e agenda de pesquisa.” Revista Sociologia e Política, 28: 131–46.Google Scholar
Mancuso, Wagner Pralon. 2015. “Investimento eleitoral no Brasil: balanço da literatura (2001–2012) e agenda de pesquisa.” Revista Sociologia e Política, 23: 155–83.Google Scholar
Mancuso, Wagner Pralon and Oliveira, Amâncio Jorge. 2006. “Abertura econômica, empresariado e política: os planos doméstico e internacional.” Lua Nova, 69: 147–72.Google Scholar
Mancuso, Wagner Pralon and Moreira, Davi Cordeiro. 2013. “Benefícios tributários valem a pena? Um estudo de formulação de políticas públicas.” Revista de Sociologia e Política, 21: 107–21.Google Scholar
Mancuso, Wagner Pralon and Speck, Bruno Wilhelm. 2014. “Financiamento de campanhas e prestação de contas.” Cadernos Adenauer XV, 1: 134–50.Google Scholar
Mancuso, Wagner Pralon and Speck, Bruno Wilhelm. 2015. “Financiamento empresarial na eleição para deputado federal (2002–2010): determinantes e consequências.” Teoria & Sociedade, 23: 1–23.Google Scholar
Mancuso, Wagner Pralon, Gonçalves, Maitê Pedroso, and Mencarini, Fabrizio. 2010. “Colcha de retalhos: a política de concessão de benefícios tributários ao empresariado no Brasil (1988–2006).” In Mancuso, Wagner Pralon, Maria Leopoldi, Antonieta Parahyba, and Iglecias, Wagner (eds.), Estado, empresariado e desenvolvimento no Brasil: novas teorias, novas trajetórias, 213–37. São Paulo: Editora de Cultura.Google Scholar
Mancuso, Wagner Pralon, Horochovski, Rodrigo Rossi, and Camargo, Neilor Fermino. 2016. “Empresários e financiamento de campanhas na eleição presidencial brasileira de 2014.” Teoria e Pesquisa, 25: 38–64.Google Scholar
Marchetti, Vitor. 2008. “Poder Judiciário e competição política no Brasil: uma análise das decisões do TSE e do STF sobre as regras eleitorais.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Marchetti, Vitor and Cortez, Rafael. 2009. “A judicialização da competição política: o TSE e as coligações eleitorais.” Opinião Pública, 15: 422–50.Google Scholar
Marenco, dos Santos, André, Luiz and Luciano, Da Ros. 2017. “Além do presidencialismo de coalizão: agendas de pesquisa da ciência política brasileira.” Unpublished working paper, Universidade Federal de Santa Caterina.Google Scholar
Mares, David R. and Trinkunas, Harold A.. 2016. Aspirational Power: Brazil on the Long Road to Global Influence. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Markwald, Ricardo. 2005. “The Political Economy of Foreign Trade Policy: The Brazilian Case.” In Bouzas, Roberto (ed.), Domestic Determinants of National Trade Strategies: A Comparative Analysis of Mercosur Countries, Mexico and Chile, 85–143. Paris: Obreal-Chaire Mercosur Sciences Po.Google Scholar
Marques, Hugo. 2003. “Banestado: Investigacao sem recursos.” Jornal do Brasil, June 20.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathie Jo and Swank, Duane. 2012. The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth, and Equality. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martins, Luciano. 1985. Estado capitalista e burocracia no Brasil pós-64. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Martone, Celso L. 1993. “O conceito brasileiro de moeda.” Braudel Papers, 4: 1–8.Google Scholar
Mattei, Lauro and Pereira, Anthony W.. 2015. “Dilemmas of Brazilian Economic Development in the Twenty-First Century.” In Pereira, Anthony, Mattei, Lauro, and LaCouteur, Amanda (eds.), The Brazilian Economy Today: Toward a New Socio-Economic Model?, 1–25. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mattos, César. 2013. “O que é o Plano Brasil Maior?” Brasil: Economia e Política. www.brasil-economia-governo.org.br/2013/10/23/o-que-e-o-plano-brasil-maiorGoogle Scholar
Máximo, Wellton. 2011. “Plano Brasil Maior deve tornar mais difícil equilíbrio fiscal em 2012, diz ex-secretário de Política Econômica.” Agência Brasil, August 6.Google Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay. 2019a. Building Participatory Institutions in Latin America: Reform Coalitions and Institutional Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay. 2019b. “The Origins of Strong Institutional Design: Policy Reform and Participatory Institutions in Brazil’s Health Sector.” Comparative Politics, 51: 275–94.Google Scholar
McCann, Bryan. 2008. The Throes of Democracy: Brazil since 1989. Nova Scotia, Canada: Fernwood Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, Andrew S. 2004. Neopluralism: The Evolution of Political Process Theory. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
McGuire, James W. 2010. Wealth, Health, and Democracy in East Asia and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, James W. 2012. “Social Policies in Latin America: Causes, Characteristics and Consequences.” In Kingstone, Peter and Yashar, Deborah J. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Latin American Politics, 200–23. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McKay, Ben, Sauer, Sérgio, Richardson, Ben, and Herre, Roman. 2016. “The Political Economy of Sugarcane Flexing: Initial Insights from Brazil, Southern Africa and Cambodia.” The Journal of Peasant Studies, 43: 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMenamin, Iain. 2012. “If Money Talks, What Does It Say?: Varieties of Capitalism and Business Financing of Parties.” World Politics, 64: 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuerry, Elizabeth. 2001. “Managed Care for Brazil’s Banks.” Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review, 86: 27–44.Google Scholar
Medeiros, Marcelo and Souza, Pedro. 2013. “Gasto público, tributos e desigualdade de renda no Brasil.” IPEA Texto para Discussão 1844.Google Scholar
Medeiros, Marcelo, Pedro Herculano Guimarães Ferreira, de Souza, and Fábio Ávila, de Castro. 2015. “A estabilidade da desigualdade de renda no Brasil, 2006 a 2012: estimativa com dados do imposto de renda e pesquisas domiciliares.” Ciência e Saúde Coletiva, 20: 971–86.Google Scholar
Medialdea, Bibiana. 2013. “Brazil: An Economy Caught in a Financial Trap (1993–2003).” Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 33: 427–45.Google Scholar
Mello, Eduardo and Spektor, Matias. 2018. “Brazil: The Costs of Multiparty Presidentialism.” Journal of Democracy, 29: 113–27.Google Scholar
Mello, Patricia Campos. 2014. “Política de Dilma está quebrando o etanol, diz presidente de entidade.” Folha de S. Paulo, April 14.Google Scholar
Melo, Carlos Ranulfo. 2006. “Sistema partidário, presidencialismo e reforma política no Brasil.” In Soares, Glaúcio and Rennó, Lucio R. (eds.), Reforma política: lições da história recente, 157–75. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV.Google Scholar
Melo, Carlos. 2018. “Relaçoes governamentais: significado, funcionamento e problemas da democracia no Brasil.” In Seligman, Milton and Mello, Fernando (eds.), Lobby desvendado: democracia, políticas públicas e corrupção no Brasil contemporâneo, 147–82. Rio de Janeiro: Record.Google Scholar
Melo, Carlos Rafael Câmara, Ranulfo. 2012. “Estrutura da competição pela presidência e consolidação do sistema partidário no Brasil.” Dados, 55: 71–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melo, Liana. 2019. “Economistas do Real analisam desafio de retomar crescimento.” Revista Época, June 27.Google Scholar
Melo, Marcus André. 2016. “Crisis and Integrity in Brazil.” Journal of Democracy, 27: 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melo, Marcus Andre and Pereira, Carlos. 2013. Making Brazil Work: Checking the President in a Multiparty System. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Melo, Marcus André, Armando, Barrientos, and Coelho, André Canuto. 2014. “Taxation, Redistribution and the Social Contract in Brazil.” IRIBA Working Paper: 11.Google Scholar
Mendes, Marcos. 2014. Inequality, Democracy and Growth in Brazil: A Country at the Crossroads of Economic Development. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mendonça, Ricardo. 2015. “Crise do PT ameaça trajetória de queda da desigualdade, diz pesquisadora.” Folha de S. Paulo, June 7.Google Scholar
Mettenheim, Kurt Eberhart. 2005. “Commanding Heights: Para uma sociologia política dos bancos federais brasileiros.” Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 20: 47–66.Google Scholar
Mettenheim, Kurt Eberhart. 2010. Federal Banking in Brazil: Policies and Competitive Advantages. London: Pickering & Chatto Publishers.Google Scholar
Mettenheim, Kurt Eberhart and Freire de Lima, Maria Fernanda. 2014. “Monetary Channels of Social Inclusion: A Case Study of Basic Income and the Caixa Econômica Federal in Brazil.” Revista de Administração Pública, 48: 1451–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaud, Etienne. 2015. “Driving up the Local Content of Brazilian Cars: Inovar-Auto and Supply Chain Strategy.” Brazil Works Briefing Paper.Google Scholar
Michener, Greg. 2010. “The Surrender of Secrecy: The Emergence of Strong Access to Information Laws in Latin America.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas – Austin.Google Scholar
Michener, Gregory and Mohallem, Michael Freitas. 2020. “A transparência piorou no governo Bolsonaro?” Folha de S. Paulo, March 1.Google Scholar
Milanez, Bruno and Santos, Rodrigo S. P.. 2015. “Topsy-Turvy Neo-Developmentalism: An Analysis of the Current Brazilian Model of Development.” Revista de Estudios Sociales, 53: 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minella, Ary Cesar. 2007. “Maiores bancos privados no Brasil: um perfil econômico e sociopolítico.” Sociologias, 9: 100–25.Google Scholar
da Fazenda, Ministério, Secretaria de Acompanhamento Econômico. 2017. “Efeito redistributivo da política fiscal no Brasil.” Brasília. www.fazenda.gov.br/centrais-de-conteudos/publicacoes/boletim-de-avaliacao-de-politicas-publicas/arquivos/2017/efeito_redistributivo_12_2017.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ministério, da Fazenda. 2018. “Dívida pública federal: Plano Anual de Financiamento 2018.” Brasília: Secretaria do Tesouro Nacional, número 18 (Janeiro). https://bit.ly/2wVm2O4Google Scholar
Ministério, da Fazenda. 2019. “3º Orçamento de Subsídios da União,” Ministério da Fazenda, Secretaria de Avaliação de Políticas Públicas, Planejamento, Energia e Loteria. www.economia.gov.br/central-de-conteudos/publicacoes/boletim-subsidios/arquivos/2019/3o-orcamento-subsidios-da-uniao.pdf/viewGoogle Scholar
Ministério do Planejamento. 2014. “Perfil das empresas estatais federais.” www.planejamento.gov.br/assuntos/empresas-estatais/publicacoes/perfil-das-empresas-estatais/perfil-das-empresas-estatais-2013Google Scholar
Ministry of Health of Brazil. Secretariat for Health Surveillance. 2017. “Responding to HIV and Zika in Brazil.” April. www.iasociety.org/Web/WebContent/File/EduFundBrazil_11Presentation_AdeleSchwartzBenzaken.pdfGoogle Scholar
Miranda, Rodrigo Nunes de. 2013. “Zona Franca de Manaus: desafios e vulnerabilidades.” Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas do Senado: Textos para Discussão 126. www12.senado.leg.br/publicacoes/estudos-legislativos/tipos-de-estudos/textos-para-discussao/td-126-zona-franca-de-manaus-desafios-e-vulnerabilidadesGoogle Scholar
Modenesi, André de Melo and Modenesi, Rui Lyrio. 2012. “Quinze anos de rigidez monetária no Brasil pós-Plano Real: uma agenda de pesquisa.” Revista de Economia Política, 32: 389–411.Google Scholar
Molina, Oscar and Rhodes, Martin. 2002. “Corporatism: The Past, Present, and Future of a Concept.” Annual Review of Political Science, 5: 305–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montecinos, Verónica and Markoff, John. 2009. “Epilogue: A Glance Beyond the Neoliberal Moment.” In Montecinos, Verónica and Markoff, John (eds.), Economists in the Americas, 309–30. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montecinos, Verónica, Markoff, John, and Álvarez-Rivadulla, María José. 2009. “Economists in the Americas: Convergence, Divergence and Connection.” In Montecinos, Verónica and Markoff, John (eds.), Economists in the Americas, 1–62. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteiro Lobato, José Renato, Bento. 1933. “O país da tavolagem.” In Antevéspera: reações mentais dum ingênuo [Ebooks Brasil, 2003]. São Paulo: Cia. Editora Nacional. www.ebooksbrasil.org/adobeebook/antevespera.pdfGoogle Scholar
Montero, Alfred P. 1998. “State Interests and the New Industrial Policy in Brazil: The Case of the Privatization of Steel, 1990–1994.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 40: 27–62.Google Scholar
Montero, Alfred P. 2000. “Devolving Democracy? Political Decentralization and the New Brazilian Federalism.” In Kingstone, Peter R. and Power, Timothy J. (eds.), Democratic Brazil: Actors, Institutions and Processes, 58–76. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Montero, Alfred P. 2001. “Decentralizing Democracy: Spain and Brazil in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Politics, 33: 149–69.Google Scholar
Montero, Alfred P. 2014a. Brazil: Reversal of Fortune. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Montero, Alfred P. 2014b. “Why Developmentalism Persists in Democratic Brazil.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Latin American Studies Association.Google Scholar
Moraes, Márcia Azanha Ferraz Dias de and David, Zilberman. 2014. Production of Ethanol from Sugarcane in Brazil. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moraes, Wallace dos Santos de. 2014. “Petismo e Chavismo: variedades de capitalismo e de regulação trabalhista no Brasil e na Venezuela.” Dados, 57: 359–97.Google Scholar
Morais, Lecio and Saad-Filho., Alfredo 2012. “Neo-Developmentalism and the Challenges of Economic Policy-Making under Dilma Rousseff.” Critical Sociology, 38: 789–98.Google Scholar
Morck, Randall, Wolfenzon, Daniel, and Yeung, Bernand. 2005. “Corporate Governance, Economic Entrenchment, and Growth.” Journal of Economic Literature, XLIII: 655–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreira, Mauricio M. 2009. “Brazil’s Trade Policy: Old and New Issues.” IDB Working Paper Series, #IDB-WP-139.Google Scholar
Morgan, Glen, Whitely, Richard, and Moen, Eli (eds.). 2005. Changing Capitalisms? Complementarities, Contradictions and Capability Development in an International Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Marc. 2017. “Falling Inequality beneath Extreme and Persistent Concentration: New Evidence for Brazil Combining National Accounts, Surveys and Fiscal Data, 2001–2015.” WID. world Working Paper Series No. 2017/12.Google Scholar
Moro, Sérgio Fernando. 2018. “Preventing Systemic Corruption in Brazil.” Daedalus, 147: 157–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Movimento Brasil Competitivo. 2018. “Histórico.” May 24. www.mbc.org.br/portal/historicoGoogle Scholar
Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina. 2015. The Quest for Good Governance: How Societies Develop Control of Corruption. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Musacchio, Aldo and Lazzarini, Sérgio G. 2014. Reinventing State Capitalism: Leviathan in Business, Brazil and Beyond. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najberg, Sheila. 1989. “Privatização de recursos públicos: Os empréstimos do sistema BNDES ao setor privado nacional com correção monetária parcial.” Unpublished M.A. Thesis. Rio de Janeiro: Economics Department, PUC-Rio.Google Scholar
Napolitano, Giuliana. 2018. “Banco Central autoriza compra da XP pelo Itaú, mas com restrições.” Revista Exame, August 10.Google Scholar
Newman, Gray. 2016. “Was it ALL her fault? An Economist re-examines Brazil’s Crisis.” Americas Quarterly, September 30.Google Scholar
Nicolau, Jairo. 2002. “Como controlar o representante? Considerações sobre as eleições para a Câmara de Deputados no Brasil.” Dados, 45: 219–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolau, Jairo. 2017. Representantes de quem: os (des)caminhos do seu voto da urna à Câmara dos Deputados. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.Google Scholar
Nobre, Marcos. 2010. “O fim da polarização.” Revista piauí, 51. piaui.folha.uol.com.br/materia/o-fim-da-polarizacaoGoogle Scholar
Nóbrega, Mailson da. 2005. O futuro chegou: Instituições e desenvolvimento no Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Globo.Google Scholar
Nóbrega, Mailson da and Loyola, Gustavo. 2006. “The Long and Simultaneous Construction of Fiscal and Monetary Institutions.” In Lourdes, Sola and Laurence, Whitehead (eds.), Statecrafting Monetary Authority: Democracy and Financial Order in Brazil, 57–84. Oxford: Centre for Brazilian Studies.Google Scholar
Nogueira, José Ricardo, Siqueira, Rozane Bezerra, and Luna, Carlos Feitosa. 2015. “Taxation, Inequality and the Illusion of the Social Contract in Brazil.” Revista Pesquisa & Debate, 26: 190–209.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, Edson. 1997. A gramática política no Brasil: clientelismo e insulamento burocrático. 2003 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editor.Google Scholar
Nunes, Rodrigo M. 2015. “The Politics of Sentencing Reform in Brazil: Autonomous Bureaucrats, Constrained Politicians and Gradual Policy Change.” Journal of Latin American Studies, 47: 121–48.Google Scholar
Nunn, Amy. 2009. The Politics and History of AIDS Treatment in Brazil. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
NUPPS-ABJ (Núcleo de Estudos de Políticas Públicas da Universidade de São Paulo and Associação Brasileira de Jurimetria). 2019. “Justiça criminal, impunidade e prescrição.” Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Justiça.Google Scholar
Paulo, O Estado de S.. 2011. “Fiasco do Brasil Maior.” September 7.Google Scholar
Paulo, O Estado de S.. 2013. “Ibope: Dilma e Marina têm empate técnico no segundo turno.” July 18.Google Scholar
Paulo, O Estado de S.. 2014. “Efetivo da Polícia Federal aumentou no atual governo.” September 27.Google Scholar
Paulo, O Estado de S.. 2016. “Fórum pede para Senado resgatar projeto original.” December 3.Google Scholar
Globo, O. 2017. “Joesley pede para nomear president da Vale em troca de dinheiro a Aécio.” May 23.Google Scholar
Globo, O. 2018a. “País tem em vigor 11 leis que deveriam impedir a crise fiscal.” January 15.Google Scholar
Globo, O. 2018b. “Indústria tem menor participação no PIB desde os anos 1950.” March 5.Google Scholar
OECD. 2016. “Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Results from PISA 2015 – Brazil.” www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-Brazil.pdfGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2017a. “Brazil.” In Education at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2017-74-enGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2017b. “Brazil: Follow-up to the Phase 3 Report and Recommendations.” February. www.oecd.org/corruption/anti-bribery/Brazil-Phase-3-Written-Follow-Up-Report-ENG.pdfGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, Ivan Machado, Tiago. 2011. “Determinantes sistêmicos e domésticos da política comercial externa brasileira: uma análise das estratégias de negociação comercial do Brasil (1995–2010).” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation in Administration, Universidade Federal da Bahia.Google Scholar
Oliveira, Ivan Machado, Tiago. 2012. Author Interview with Oliveira, trade specialist and research at IPEA, Brasília, May 22.Google Scholar
Oliveira, Ivan, Pedro da, Motta Veiga, Sandra, Polónia Rios, and Fernando, Ribeiro. 2019. The Political Economy of Trade Policy in Brazil. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Oliveira, Vanessa Elias de. 2009. “Poder Judiciário: árbitro dos conflitos constitucionais entre estados e União.” Lua Nova, 78: 223–50.Google Scholar
Oliveira, Vanessa Elias de and Noronha, Lincoln N. T.. 2011. “Judiciary-Executive Relations in Policy Making: The Case of Drug Distribution in the State of São Paulo.” Brazilian Political Science Review, 5: 10–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivieri, Cecília. 2007. “Política, burocracia e redes sociais: as nomeações para o alto escalão do Banco do Brasil.” Revista de Sociologia e Política, 29: 147–68.Google Scholar
Olivieri, Cecília. 2010. A lógica política do controle interno: o monitoramento das políticas públicas no presidencialismo brasileiro. São Paulo: Annablume Editora.Google Scholar
Onuki, Janina. 2010. “Interesses comerciais brasileiros na América do Sul.” Cadernos Adenauer, 11: 90–6.Google Scholar
Paduan, Roberta. 2016. Petrobras: uma história de orgulho e vergonha. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva.Google Scholar
Paes de Barros, Ricardo and Coutinho, Diana. 2014. “As relações entre escolaridade e mercado de trabalho.” Revista Pátio, March 20. https://loja.grupoa.com.br/revista-patio/artigo/10170/as-relacoes-entre-escolaridade-e-mercado-de-trabalho.aspxGoogle Scholar
Palermo, Vicente. 2000. “Como se governa o Brasil? O debate sobre instituições políticas e gestão de governo.” Dados, 43: 521–57.Google Scholar
Palermo, Vicente. 2016. “Brazilian Political Institutions: An Inconclusive Debate.” Brazilian Political Science Review, 10: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pareto, Vilfredo. 1972 [1906]. Manual of Political Economy. Translated by Ann S. Schwier. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Pargendler, Mariana. 2016. “Governing State Capitalism: The Case of Brazil.” In Liebman, Benjamin L. and Milhaupt, Curtis J. (eds.), Regulating the Visible Hand?: The Institutional Implications of Chinese State Capitalism, 377–402. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paula, Germano Mendes de and Ana Paula Avellar. 2008. “Reforms and Infrastructure Regulation in Brazil: The Experience of ANTT and ANTAQ.” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48: 237–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavão, Nara. 2015. “Failures of Electoral Accountability for Corruption: Brazil and Beyond.” Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Payne, J. Mark, Daniel, Zovatto G., and Díaz, Mercedes Mateo. 2007. Democracies in Development: Politics and Reform in Latin America. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Campos, Pedreira, Henrique, Pedro. 2014. “Estranhas catedrais”: as empreiteiras brasileiras e a ditadura civil-militar, 1964–1988. Rio de Janeiro: Editora da UFF.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, Josué Alfredo. 2018. “Gastos (benefícios) tributários.” Brasília: Instituição Fiscal Independente, Nota Técnica No. 17.Google Scholar
Pereira, Anthony W. 2016. “Is the Brazilian State ‘Patrimonial’?” Latin American Perspectives, 43: 135–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, Carlos and Mueller, Bernardo. 2002. “Comportamento estratégico em presidencialismo de coalizão: as relações entre Executivo e Legislativo na elaboração do orçamento Brasileiro.” Dados, 45: 265–301.Google Scholar
Pereira, Carlos and Lucio, Rennó. 2001. “O que é que o reeleito tem? Dinâmicas político-institucionais locais e nacionais nas eleições de 1998 para a Câmara dos Deputados.” Dados, 44: 323–62.Google Scholar
Pereira da Costa, Katarina and Veiga, Pedro da Motta. 2011. “O Brasil frente à emergência da África: comércio e política comercial.” Textos Cindes 24.Google Scholar
Pessanha, Charles. 2009. “Controle externo: a função esquecida do Legislativo.” In O sociólogo e as políticas públicas: ensaios em homenagem a Simon Schwartzman. Schwartzman, Felipe F., Schwartzman, Isabel F., Schwartzman, Luisa F., and Schwartzman, Michel L. (eds.), 243–58. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getúlio Vargas.Google Scholar
Pessôa, Samuel. 2011. “O contrato social da redemocratização.” In Bacha, Edmar Lisboa and Schwartzman, Simon (eds.), Brasil: a nova agenda social, 204–12. Rio de Janeiro: LTC.Google Scholar
Pessôa, Samuel. 2015. “Ainda não caiu a ficha.” Folha de São Paulo, June 21.Google Scholar
Pessôa, Samuel. 2019. “O Pibinho e o conflito distributivo.” Folha de S. Paulo, June 2.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review, 94: 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pires, Roberto and Gomide, Alexandre. 2014. “Burocracia, democracia e políticas públicas: arranjos institucionais de políticas de desenvolvimento.” IPEA Texto para Discussão 1940.Google Scholar
Pochmann, Marcio and Anselmo Luís, dos Santos. 1998. “Encargos sociais no Brasil: uma nova abordagem metodológica e seus resultados.” Cadernos do CESIT (Texto para discussão n. 26). www.cesit.net.br/cesit/images/stories/26Cadernos doCESIT.pdfGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1957. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
John., Polga-Hecimovich 2019. “Ideologia versus capacidade: Dilma Rousseff, as Forças Armadas e o Programa de Aceleração do Crescimento.” In Santana, Luciana (ed.), Instituições, comportamento político e democracia, 33–60. Alagoas: Editora Universidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL).Google Scholar
Polga-Hecimovich, John and Trelles, Alejandro. 2016. “The Organizational Consequences of Politics: A Research Agenda for the Study of Bureaucratic Politics in Latin America.” Latin American Politics & Society, 58: 56–79.Google Scholar
Polícia Federal. 2014a. “Termo de Colaboração No. 01, Paulo Roberto Costa.” Superintendência Regional no Estado do Paraná, August 29.Google Scholar
Polícia Federal. 2014b. “Termo de Colaboração No. 73, Paulo Roberto Costa.” Superintendência Regional no Estado do Paraná, September 11.Google Scholar
Polícia Federal. 2017. “Estatística de Operações.” July. www.pf.gov.br/imprensa/estatistica/operacoesGoogle Scholar
Pontes, Jorge and Anselmo, Márcio. 2019. Crime.gov: quando corrupção e governo se misturam. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro. 2012. “Institutions and Development: A Conceptual Reanalysis.” In Portes, Alejandro and Smith, Lori D. (eds.), Institutions Count: Their Role and Significance in Latin American Development, 1–23. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Porto, Mauro P. 2011. “The Media and Political Accountability.” In Timothy J., Power and Taylor, Matthew M. (eds.), Corruption and Democracy in Brazil: The Struggle for Accountability, 103–26. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Porzecanski, Arturo C. 2015. “Brazil’s Place in the Global Economy.” In Stuenkel, Oliver and Taylor, Matthew M. (eds.), Brazil on the Global Stage: Power, Ideas, and the Liberal International Order, 143–62. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Possebom, Vítor. 2017. “Free Trade Zone of Manaus: An Impact Evaluation using the Synthetic Control Method.” Revista Brasileira de Economia, 71: 217–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, Timothy J. 2010. “Optimism, Pessimism, and Coalitional Presidentialism: Debating the Institutional Design of Brazilian Democracy.” Bulletin of Latin American Research, 29: 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, Timothy J. and Doctor, Mahrukh. 2004. “Another Century of Corporatism? Continuity and Change in Brazilian Corporatist Structures.” In Howard, J. Wiarda, (ed.), Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America, Revisited, 218–41. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Power, Timothy J. and Taylor, Matthew M.. 2011. Corruption and Democracy in Brazil: The Struggle for Accountability. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Power, Timothy J. and Zucco, Cesar. 2008. “Estimating Ideology of Brazilian Legislative Parties, 1990–2005: A Research Communication.” Latin American Research Review, 44: 218–46.Google Scholar
Power, Timothy J. and Zucco, Cesar. 2011. O Congresso por ele mesmo: autopercepções da classe política brasileira. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Praça, Sérgio. 2013. Corrupção e reforma orçamentária no Brasil 1987–2008. São Paulo: Anna Blume.Google Scholar
Praça, Sérgio and Taylor, Matthew M.. 2014. “Inching toward Accountability: The Evolution of Brazil’s Anticorruption Institutions, 1985–2010.” Latin American Politics & Society, 56: 27–48.Google Scholar
Praça, Sérgio, Freitas, Andréa, and Hoepers, Bruno. 2011. “Political Appointments and Coalition Management in Brazil, 2007–2010.” Journal of Politics in Latin America, 3: 141–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prado, Maria Clara, R. M. do. 2005. A real história do Real. São Paulo: Record.Google Scholar
Prado, Mariana Mota. 2008. “Challenges and Risks of Creating Independent Regulatory Agencies: A Cautionary Tale from Brazil.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 141: 435.Google Scholar
Prado, Mariana Mota and Trebilcock, Michael J.. 2018. Institutional Bypasses: A Strategy to Promote Reforms for Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prado, Mariana Mota, Schapiro, Mario G., and Coutinho, Diogo R.. 2016. “The Dilemmas of the Developmental State: Democracy and Economic Development in Brazil.” Law and Development Review, 9: 369–410.Google Scholar
Prado, Viviane Muller. 2019. “Enforcing Insider Trading Law: The Brazilian Experience.” Mimeo, Fundação Getulio Vargas Law School.Google Scholar
Prebisch, Raúl. 1949. The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems. Lake Success, NY: United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America.Google Scholar
Prebisch, Raúl. 1963. “Toward a Dynamic Development Policy for Latin America.” New York: United Nations. repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/14892Google Scholar
Presidência da República. 2011, “Discurso da Presidenta da República, Dilma Rousseff, durante cerimônia de entrega do navio Celso Furtado.” November 25. www.biblioteca.presidencia.gov.brGoogle Scholar
Prillaman, William C. 2000. The Judiciary and Democratic Decay in Latin America: Declining Confidence in the Rule of Law. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Puttomatti, Giulia da Cunha Fernades. 2002. “Os dois anos de implementação da lei de responsabilidade fiscal no Brasil: avanços e desafios.” VII Congresso Internacional do CLAD sobre a Reforma do Estado e da Administração Pública. Painel: Ética como instrumento de gestão. October. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/CLAD/clad0044115.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ramos, Alberto. 2015. Presentation at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC, September 9.Google Scholar
Ramos, Pedro. 2011. “Financiamentos subsidiados e dívidas de usineiros no Brasil: uma história secular e … atual?” História Econômica & História de Empresas, XIV: 7–32.Google Scholar
Ramos, Pedro. 2016. “Trajetória e situação atual da agroindústria canavieira do Brasil e do mercado de álcool carburante.” In Rosa dos Santos, Gesmar (ed.), Quarenta anos de etanol em larga escala no Brasil: desafios, crises e perspectivas, 47–82. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Atual, Rede Brasil. 2011. “Dilma entrega navio Celso Furtado com defesa de distribuição de renda.” November 25. http://www.redebrasilatual.com.br/economia/2011/11/dilma-entrega-navio-celso-furtado-com-defesa-de-distribuicao-de-rendaGoogle Scholar
Reinert, Erik S. 2007. How Rich Countries Got Rich … and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor. New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers.Google Scholar
Reis, Bruno P. W. 2018. “Um réquiem para os partidos? Sistema partidário no Brasil, daqui para o futuro.” Journal of Democracy em Português, 7: 49–88.Google Scholar
Rennó, Lúcio R. and Cabello, Andrea. 2010. “As bases do Lulismo: a volta do personalismo, realinhamento ideológico ou não alinhamento?” Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 25: 39–60.Google Scholar
Resende, Antônio Vieira. 2000. “A política industrial do Plano Real.” Texto para Discussão. Belo Horizonte: UFMG/Cedeplar.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2015. “Petrobras takes $17 billion charge in wake of scandal, promises ‘normality’.” April 22.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2017. “Brazil likely to limit cuts to local content requirements in oil contracts.” December 11.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2018. “Com apostas em etanol, usinas do Brasil ampliam investimentos em produção.” December 3.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2019. “Brazil unlikely to privatize state power firm Eletrobras – Senate leader.” September 19.Google Scholar
Rich, Jessica A. J. 2013. “Grassroots bureaucracy: Intergovernmental Relations and Popular Mobilization in Brazil’s AIDS Policy Sector.” Latin American Politics and Society, 55: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, Jessica A. J. 2019. State-Sponsored Activism: Bureaucrats and Social Movements in Democratic Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rich, Jessica A. J. and Gómez, Eduardo J.. 2012. “Centralizing Decentralized Governance in Brazil.” Publius, 42: 636–61.Google Scholar
Ricupero, Bernardo. 2007. Sete lições sobre as interpretações do Brasil. São Paulo: Alameda.Google Scholar
Rizzo, Alana and Velasco, Joel. 2018. “As empresas conseguem migrar do crony capitalism para práticas íntegras de interação com o governo?” In Seligman, Milton and Mello, Fernando (eds.), Lobby desvendado: democracia, políticas públicas e corrupção no Brasil contemporâneo, 183–208. Rio de Janeiro: Record.Google Scholar
Rochabrun, Marcelo. 2019. “Boeing drops Embraer name from Brazil commercial jet division.” Reuters, May 23.Google Scholar
Rochabrun, Marcelo. 2020. “Embraer and Boeing’s $4.2 Billion Deal Ruled Out Pandemic as Pretext to Cancel.” Reuters, April 30.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Antonio Gustavo. 2012. “ENCCLA 10 anos.” In Ricardo Andrade Saadi, Biasoli, Roberto, and da Cunha, Ana Paula (eds.), ENCCLA: Estratégia Nacional de Combate à Corrupção e à Lavagem de Dinheiro: 10 anos de organização do Estado brasileiro contra o crime organizado, 69–70. Brasília: Ministério da Justiça.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Fernando. 2013. “Dilma cresce e oposição encolhe, aponta Datafolha.” Folha de S. Paulo, November 30.Google Scholar
Rodriguez Neto, Eleutério, Temporão, José Gomes, and Escorel, Sarah. 2003. Saúde: promessa e limites da Constituicão. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1996. “Understanding Economic Policy Reform.” Journal of Economic Literature, 34: 9–41.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2004. “Getting Institutions Right.” Unpublished manuscript. http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~drodrik/papers.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2007. One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roett, Riordan. 1978. Brazil: Politics in a Patrimonial Society. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Roett, Riordan. 2011. The New Brazil. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Rohter, Larry. 2010. Brazil on the Rise: The Story of a Country Transformed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rojas, Shunko. 2013. “Understanding Neo-Developmentalism in Latin America: New Industrial Policies in Brazil and Colombia.” In Trubek, David M., Garcia, Helena Alviar, Coutinho, Diogo R., and Santos, Alvaro (eds.), Law and the New Developmental State: The Brazilian Experience in Latin American Context, 65–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero, Simon. 2012. “As Growth Ebbs, Brazil Powers Up Its Bulldozers.” New York Times, June 22.Google Scholar
Rosales, Osvaldo. 2004. “Chile ’s Multidimensional Trade Policy.” In Aggarwal, Vinod K., Espach, Ralph, and Tulchin, Joseph S. (eds.), The Strategic Dynamics of Latin American Trade, 3–36. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenn, Keith S. 2014. “Recent Important Decisions by the Brazilian Supreme Court.” The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 45: 297–334.Google Scholar
Rosillo-Calle, Frank and Luis, A.B. Cortez. 1998. “Towards ProÁlcool II—a review of the Brazilian Bioethanol Programme.” Biomass and Bioenergy, 14: 115–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossignolo, Darío. 2012. “Estimación de la recaudación potencial del impuesto a la renta en América Latina.” CEPAL: Série Macroeconomia del Desarrollo, 120. www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/5353-estimacion-la-recaudacion-potencial-impuesto-la-renta-america-latinaGoogle Scholar
Rotberg, Robert I. 2017. The Corruption Cure: How Citizens and Leaders can Combat Graft. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo. 2011. “Anti-corruption: The Indirect ‘Big Bang’ Approach.” Review of International Political Economy, 18: 228–50.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 2008. “Introduction: Embedding Global Markets.” In Ruggie (ed.), John Gerard, Embedding Global Markets: An Enduring Challenge, 1–9. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Sá e Silva, Fábio de and Trubek, David. 2018. “Legal Professionals and Development Strategies: Corporate Lawyers and the Construction of the Telecoms Sector in Brazil (1980s–2010s).” Law & Social Inquiry, 43: 915–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saadi, Ricardo Andrade. 2012. “ENCCLA: uma estratégia de Estado.” In Ricardo Andrade Saadi, Biasoli, Roberto, and da Cunha, Ana Paula (eds.), ENCCLA: Estratégia Nacional de Combate à Corrupção e à Lavagem de Dinheiro: 10 anos de organização do Estado brasileiro contra o crime organizado, 15. Brasília: Ministério da Justiça.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul. 1988. “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein.” Policy Sciences, 21: 129–68.Google Scholar
Sachsida, Adolfo. 2017. “Introdução.” In Sachsida, Adolfo (ed.), Tributação no Brasil: estudos, ideias e propostas, 9–10. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Sáez, Raúl E. 2007. “Hacia el libre comercio: treinta años de apertura comerical en Chile.” In Jank, Marcos Sawaya and Silber, Simão Davi (eds.), Políticas comerciais comparadas: desempenho e modelos organizacionais, 231–72. Sao Paulo: Singular.Google Scholar
Salerno, Mario Sergio and Daher, Talita. 2006. Política Industrial, Tecnológica e de Comércio Exterior (PITCE ): balanço e perspectivas. Brasília: ABDI.Google Scholar
Salgado, Lucia Helena. 2003. “Agências regulatórias na experiência brasileira: um panorama do atual desenho institucional.” IPEA Texto para Discussão 941.Google Scholar
Salles, Fernanda Cimini, Chiarini, Tulio, Rapini, Marcia Siqueira, and Silva, Leandro Alves. 2017. “Domestic Businesses, Multinationals and the State: An Essay on the Dynamics Underpinning the ‘Low-Innovation Trap’ in Brazil.” Paper presented at the 15th Globelics International Conference, Athens, Greece, October 11–13.Google Scholar
Samuels, David J. 1999. “Incentives to Cultivate a Party Vote in Candidate-Centric Electoral Systems: Evidence from Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies, 32: 487–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David. 2001. “Money, Elections, and Democracy in Brazil.” Latin American Politics and Society, 43: 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David. 2002. “Pork-Barreling Is Not Credit-Claiming or Advertising: Campaign Finance and the Sources of the Personal Vote in Brazil.” The Journal of Politics, 64: 845–63.Google Scholar
Samuels, David and Mainwaring, Scott. 2004. “Strong Federalism, Constraints on the Central Government, and Economic Reform in Brazil.” In Gibson, Edward L. (ed.), Federalism and Democracy in Latin America, 85–129. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Santana, Carlos Vieira, Henrique. 2011. “Conjuntura crítica, legados institucionais e comunidades epistêmicas: limites e possibilidades de uma agenda de desenvolvimento no Brasil.” In Boschi, Renato (ed.), Variedades de capitalismo, política e desenvolvimento na América Latina, 121–63. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Sant’Ana, Jéssica. 2019. “Governo anuncia pacotão de concessões: 59 ativos e expectative de atrair R$1.6 trilhão.” Gazeta do Povo, May 8.Google Scholar
Santos, Fabiano and Vilarouca, Márcio Grijó. 2008. “Political Institutions and Governability from FHC to Lula.” In Kingstone, Peter and Power, Timothy (eds.), Democratic Brazil Revisited, 57–80. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Santos, Gesmar Rosa dos. 2016. “Introdução.” In Rosa dos Santos, Gesmar (ed.), Quarenta anos de etanol em larga escala no Brasil: desafios, crises e perspectivas, 11–16. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Santos, Gesmar Rosa dos, Eduardo de Freitas Vian, Carlos, Assis Shikida, Pery Francisco, and Belik, Walter. 2016. “Apontamentos e diretrizes para políticas públicas.” In dos Santos, Gesmar Rosa (ed.), Quarenta anos de etanol em larga escala no Brasil: desafios, crises e perspectivas, 283–304. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Santos, Gesmar Rosa Eduardo Afonso, dos Pery Francisco, Garcia Darcy Jacob, Assis Shikida Júnior, Rissardi. 2016. “Trajetória e situação atual da agroindústria canavieira do Brasil e do mercado de álcool carburante.” In Rosa, Gesmar dos Santos (ed.), Quarenta anos de etanol em larga escala no Brasil: desafios, crises e perspectivas, 17–46. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
Santos, Luiz Alberto dos. 2007. “Regulamentação das atividades de lobby e seu impacto sobre as relações entre politicos, burocratas e grupos de interesse no ciclo de políticas públicas – análise comparativa dos Estados Unidos e Brasil.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade de Brasília, Instituto de Ciências Sociais.Google Scholar
Santos, Luiz Alberto dos. 2009. “Burocracia profissional e a livre nomeação para cargos de confiança no Brasil e nos EUA.” Revista do Serviço Público, 60: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Rafael Liza, Alexandre di, Miceli da Silveira, and Lucas Ayres, Barros. 2012. “Board Interlocking in Brazil: Directors’ Participation in Multiple Companies and Its Effect on Firm Value and Profitability.” Latin American Business Review, 13: 1–28.Google Scholar
Santos, Wanderley Guilherme dos. 1978. Ordem burguesa e liberalismo político. São Paulo: Duas Cidades.Google Scholar
Sargent, Thomas J. and Wallace, Neil. 1981. “Some Unpleasant Monetarist Arithmetic.” Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 5: 1–17.Google Scholar
Schapiro, Mario G. 2013a. “Ativismo estatal e industrialismo defensivo: instrumentos e capacidades na política industrial brasileira.” IPEA Texto para Discussão 1856.Google Scholar
Schapiro, Mario G. 2013b. “O que a política industrial pode aprender com a política monetária?” Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 96: 117–30.Google Scholar
Schapiro, Mario G. 2016. “Discricionariedade desenvolvimentista e controles democráticos: uma tipologia dos desajustes.” Revista Direito GV, 12: 311–44.Google Scholar
Schapiro, Mario G. 2017. “O estado pastor e os incentivos tributários no setor automotivo.” Revista de Economia Política, 37: 437–55.Google Scholar
Schapiro, Mario G. and Taylor, Matthew M.. 2020. “The Political Economy of Brazil’s Enigmatic Central Bank, 1988–2018.” In Yagci, Mustafa (ed.), The Political Economy of Central Banking in Emerging Economies, 168–81. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scheffer, Mário and Bahia, Lígia. 2011. “Representação política e interesses particulares na saúde: o caso do financiamento de campanhas eleitorais pelas empresas de planos de saúde no Brasil.” Interface (Botucatu), 15: 947–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, Clóvis. 2015. “Payroll Tax Reduction in Brazil: Effects on Employment and Wages.” In ISS Working Paper Series. Erasmus University: International Institute of Social Studies.Google Scholar
Schick, Allen. 2018. Comments at workshop on “The Challenges of the Contemporary Administrative State: Brazil and the United States in Comparative Perspective.” Workshop of the Escola Nacional de Administração Pública and Woodrow Wilson Center, Washington, DC, May 23.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Rogério, Carneiro, Leandro Piquet, and Kuschnir, Karina. 1999. “Estratégias de campanha no horário gratuito de propaganda eleitoral em eleições proporcionais.” Dados 42, 277–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1971. Interest Conflict and Political Change in Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1982. “Reflections on Where the Theory of Neo-Corporatism Has Gone and Where the Praxis of Neo-Corporatism May Be Going.” In Lehmbruch, Gerhard and Schmitter, Philippe C. (eds.), Patterns of Corporatist Policy Making, 259–79. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. and Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 1979. Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. 1991. Politics within the State: Elite Bureaucrats and Industrial Policy in Authoritarian Brazil. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. 1999. “The Desarrollista State in Brazil and Mexico.” In Woo-Cumings, Meredith (ed.), The Developmental State, 276–305. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. 2004. Business Politics and the State in Twentieth-Century Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. 2009. “Big Business in Brazil: Leveraging National Endowments and State Support for International Expansion.” In Brainard, Lael and Martínez-Diáz, Leonardo (eds.), Brazil as an Economic Superpower? Understanding Brazil’s Changing Role in the Global Economy, 159–86. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. 2010. “Business Politics in Latin America: Patterns of Fragmentation and Centralization.” In Coen, David, Grant, Wyn, and Wilson, Graham (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business and Government, 307–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. 2013. Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America: Business, Labor, and the Challenges of Equitable Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schrank, Andrew and Kurtz, Marcus J.. 2005. “Credit Where Credit Is Due: Open Economy Industrial Policy and Export Diversification in Latin America and the Caribbean.” Politics & Society, 33: 671–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schvarzer, Jorge. 2004. “Poder político-social, condições de mercado e mudança estrutural.” In Sallum, Brasilio Jr. (ed.), Brasil e Argentina hoje: política e economia, 15–46. Bauru, SP: Edusc.Google Scholar
Schwartsman, Alexandre. 2018. “Mercado se ilude com promessa de programa econômico liberal de Bolsonaro.” Folha de S. Paulo, October 17.Google Scholar
Schwartsman, Hélio. 2017. “Estado capturado.” Folha de S. Paulo, June 14.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Roberto. 1973. “As ideias fora do lugar.” Estudos CEBRAP, 3: 150–61.Google Scholar
Secretaria do Tesouro Nacional. 2015. Resultado do Tesouro Nacional. June 23. www.tesouro.fazenda.gov.br/resultado-do-tesouro-nacionalGoogle Scholar
Seligman, Milton and Bandeira, Mateus Affonso. 2018. “O propósito das relações governamentais: principais questões e alguns dilemas.” In Seligman, Milton and Mello, Fernando (eds.), Lobby desvendado: democracia, políticas públicas e corrupção no Brasil contemporâneo, 227–44. Rio de Janeiro: Record.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory and Michelle Ratton, Sanchez Badin. In press. “Building Legal Capacity and Adapting State Institutions in Brazil.” In Shaffer, Gregory (ed.), Emerging Powers and the World Trading System: The Past and Future of International Economic Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Carey, John M.. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Haggard, Stephan. 2001. “Institutions and Public Policy in Presidential Systems.” In Haggard, Stephan and McCubbins, Mathew D. (eds.), Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy, 64–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sicsú, João. 2002. “Expectativas inflacionárias no regime de metas de inflação: uma análise preliminar do caso brasileiro.” Economia Aplicada, 6: 703–11.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1988. “The Influence of Raúl Prebisch on Economic Policy-Making in Argentina, 1950–1962.” Latin American Research Review, 23: 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1991. Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Silva, Alexandre Manoel, A. da and Siqueira, Rozane Bezerra. 2012. “Existe ilusão fiscal no Brasil?” IPEA Desafios do Desenvolvimento, 9: 43–6.Google Scholar
Silva, Eliane. 2019. “Crise segue, e 23% das usinas de etanol e açúcar estão paradas nesta safra.” UOL Notícias, April 19.Google Scholar
Silva, Willis Pereira da. 2012. “Estratégia consensual.” In Ricardo Andrade Saadi, Biasoli, Roberto, and da Cunha, Ana Paula (eds.), ENCCLA: Estratégia Nacional de Combate à Corrupção e à Lavagem de Dinheiro: 10 anos de organização do Estado brasileiro contra o crime organizado, 80–1. Brasília: Ministério da Justiça.Google Scholar
Singer, Hans W. 1950. “The Distribution of Gains between Investing and Borrowing Countries.” The American Economic Review, 40: 473–85.Google Scholar
Skidmore, Thomas E. 1973. “Politics and Economic Policy-making in Authoritarian Brazil, 1937–71.” In Stepan, Alfred (ed.), Authoritarian Brazil, 2–46. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Skidmore, Thomas E. 1999. Brazil: Five Centuries of Change. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Quinn and Bernardes, Olavo Franco. 2013. “Mechanisms of Control on the Circulation of Foreign Capital, Products and People in Brazil.” The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 44: 219–58.Google Scholar
Snow, Peter G. and Wynia, Gary W.. 1990. (3rd ed). “Argentina: Politics in a Conflict Society.” In Wiarda, Howard J. and Kline, Herbert F. (eds.), Latin American Politics and Development, 249–82. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
de Lima, Soares, Regina, Maria. 1990. “A economia política da política externa brasileira: uma proposta de análise.” Contexto Internacional, 12: 7–27.Google Scholar
de Lima, Soares, Regina, Maria. 1994. “Ejes analíticos y conflictos de paradigmas en la política externa brasileira.” America Latina/Internacional, 1: 27–46.Google Scholar
de Lima, Soares, Regina, Maria. 2005. “A política externa brasileira e os desafios da cooperação Sul-Sul.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 48: 24–59.Google Scholar
de Lima, Soares, Regina, Maria and Hirst, Mônica. 2006. “Brazil as an Intermediate State and Regional Power: Action, Choice and Responsibilities.” International Affairs 82: 21–40.Google Scholar
Soares, Sergei. 2016. “People, Productivity, and Policy: Product Growth Perspective in the Medium and Long Run in Brazil.” CGD Policy Paper 088, Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
Soares, Sergei. 2017. “Pessoas, produtividade e políticas.” Novos Estudos Cebrap, 107: 36.Google Scholar
Sodré, Antônio Carlos de Azevedo. 2002. “Lei de Responsabilidade Fiscal: condição insuficiente para o ajuste fiscal.” RAE–eletrônica, 1. https://rae.fgv.br/rae-eletronica/vol1-num2-2002/lei-responsabilidade-fiscal-condicao-insuficiente-para-ajuste-fiscalGoogle Scholar
Sola, Lourdes. 1988. “Choque heterodoxo e transição democrática sem ruptura.” In Sola, Lourdes (ed.), O estado da transição, 37–42. São Paulo: Vértice.Google Scholar
Sola, Lourdes. 1994. “The State, Structural Reform, and Democratization in Brazil.” In Smith, William C., Acuña, Carlos H., and Gamarra, Eduardo A. (eds.), Democracy, Markets, and Structural Reform in Latin America: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico, 151–81. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Sola, Lourdes. 1998. Idéias econômicas, decisões políticas: desenvolvimento, estabilidade e populismo. São Paulo: Edusp.Google Scholar
Sola, Lourdes and Kugelmas, Eduardo. 2002. “Estabilidade econômica e o Plano Real como construção política: statecraft, liberalização econômicae democratização.” In Sola, Lourdes, Kugelmas, Eduardo, and Whitehead, Laurence (eds.), Banco Central, autoridade política e democratização: um equilíbrio delicado, 79–110. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV.Google Scholar
Sola, Lourdes and Whitehead, Laurence. 2006. Statecrafting Monetary Authority: Democracy and Financial Order in Brazil. Oxford: Centre for Brazilian Studies.Google Scholar
Sola, Lourdes, Garman, Christopher, and Marques, Moisés. 1998. “Central Banking, Democratic Governance and Political Authority: The Case of Brazil in a Comparative Perspective.” Revista de Economia Política, 18: 106–31.Google Scholar
Souza, Amaury de. 1999. “Cardoso and the Struggle for Reform in Brazil.” Journal of Democracy, 10: 49–63.Google Scholar
Souza, Celina. 2013. “Modernisation of the State and Bureaucratic Capacity-Building in the Brazilian Federal Government.” In Vaitsman, Jeni, Ribeiro, José Mendes, and Lobato, Lenaura (eds.), Policy Analysis in Brazil, 39–54. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Souza, Maria do Carmo Campello de. 1976. Estado e partidos políticos no Brasil (1930 a 1964). São Paulo: Alfa-Omega.Google Scholar
Speck, Bruno Wilhelm. 2010. “O dinheiro e a política no Brasil.” Le Monde Diplomatique Brasil, May 4.Google Scholar
Speck, Bruno Wilhelm. 2011. “Auditing Institutions.” In Power, Timothy J. and Taylor, Matthew M. (eds.), Corruption and Democracy in Brazil: The Struggle for Accountability, 127–61. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Speck, Bruno Wilhelm. 2013. “Brazil: Crime Meets Politics.” In Casas-Zamora (ed.), Kevin, Dangerous Liaisons: Organized Crime and Political Finance, 42–75. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Speck, Bruno W. 2016a. “Influenciar as eleições ou garantir acesso aos eleitos: o dilemma das empresas que financiam campanhas eleitorais.” Novos Estudos Cebrap, 104: 38–59.Google Scholar
Speck, Bruno W. 2016b. “Game Over: duas décadas de financiamento de campanhas com doações de empresas no Brasil.” Revista de Estudios Brasileños, 3: 125–35.Google Scholar
Speck, Bruno Wilhelm and Campos, Mauro Macedo. 2014. “Incentivos para a fragmentação e a nacionalização do sistema partidário a partir do Horário Eleitoral Gratuito no Brasil.” Teoria e Pesquisa, 23: 12–40.Google Scholar
Spektor, Matias. 2018. “Troca de favor e proteção pautam relação do STF e outros Poderes.” Folha de S. Paulo, February 1.Google Scholar
Sreeharsha, Vinod. 2017. “Goldman Sachs Sees Big Potential for Fintech in Brazil.” New York Times, May 15.Google Scholar
Stallings, Barbara. 1992. “International Influence on Economic Policy: Debt, Stabilization, and Structural Reform.” In Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert R. (eds.), The Politics of Economic Adjustment, 41–88. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallings, Barbara. 2016. “Innovation, Inclusion and Institutions: East Asian Lessons for Latin America?” In Foxley, Alejandro and Stallings, Barbara (eds.), Innovation and Inclusion in Latin America: Strategies to Avoid the Middle Income Trap, 1–32. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stark, David and Bruszt, Laszlo. 1998a. “Enabling Constraints: fontes institucionais de coerência nas políticas públicas no pós-socialismo.” Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais, 13: 13–39.Google Scholar
Stark, David and Bruszt, Laszlo. 1998b. Post-Socialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stattman, Sarah L. 2013. “Governing Biofuels in Brazil: A Comparison of Ethanol and Biodiesel Policies.” Energy Policy, 61: 22–30.Google Scholar
Stauffer, Caroline and Blount, Jeb. 2015. “Eletrobras Posts 3rd-Quarter Loss on Angra 3 Nuclear Plant Impairment.” Reuters, November 13. https://news.trust.org/item/20151113035209-88tsdGoogle Scholar
Stein, Ernesto, Tommasi, Mariano, Echebarría, Koldo, Lora, Eduardo, and Payne, Mark. 2006. The Politics of Policies: Economic and Social Progress in Latin America. 2006 Report. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Stein, Guilherme de Queiroz and Herrlein Júnior, Ronaldo. 2016. “Política industrial no Brasil: uma análise das estratégias propostas na experiência recente (2003–2014).” Planejamento e Políticas Públicas, 47: 251–87.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 2000. “Brazil’s Decentralized Federalism: Bringing Government Closer to the Citizens?” Daedalus, 129: 145–69.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Matthew. 2020. “Corruption as a Self-Reinforcing ‘Trap’: Implications for Reform Strategy.” World Bank Research Observer 35: 192–226.Google Scholar
Stern, Elliot. 2003. Evaluation of UNESCO Brazil’s Contribution to AIDS II. UNESCO BR/ 2005/PI/H/19, 2003. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001408/140845e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Stone, Susan, James, Messent, and Dorothee, Flaig. 2015. “Emerging Policy Issues: Localisation Barriers to Trade.” OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 180. Paris: OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfang. 2005. “Requirements for a Useful Concept of Complementarity.” Socio-Economic Review, 3: 363–6.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang and Yamamura, Kozo. (eds.). 2001. The Origins of Non-Liberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan in Comparison. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sturzenegger, Adolfo C. 1990. “Trade, Exchange Rate and Agricultural Pricing Policies in Argentina.” World Bank Comparative Studies. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Natasha B. 2008. “Theories of Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies, 41: 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugiyama, Natasha B. 2012. The Diffusion of Good Government: Social Sector Reforms in Brazil. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Surran, Carl. 2018. “Eletrobras -12% as Bolsonaro Says He Is Unwilling to Sell Power Assets.” Seeking Alpha, October 10.Google Scholar
Suzigan, Wilson and Furtado, João. 2006. “Política industrial e desenvolvimento.” Revista de Economia Política, 26: 163–85.Google Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina and Wohlforth, William C.. 2005. “Introduction: The Role of Ideas and the End of the Cold War.” Journal of Cold War Studies, 7: 3–12.Google Scholar
Tatagiba, Luciana. 2002. “Os conselhos gestores e a democratização das políticas públicas no Brasil.” In Dagnino, Evelina (ed.), Sociedade civil e espaços públicos no Brasil, 47–103. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Tavares, Martus. 2005. “Vinte anos de política fiscal no Brasil: dos fundamentos do novo regime à Lei de Responsabilidade Fiscal.” Revista de Economia e Relações Internacionais, 4: 79–101.Google Scholar
Tavares, Martus, Manoel, Álvaro, and Afonso, José Roberto. 1999. “Uma proposta para um novo regime fiscal no Brasil: o da responsabilidade fiscal.” CEPAL. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/34662Google Scholar
Taylor, Matthew M. 2005. “Citizens Against the State: The Riddle of High-Impact, Low-Functionality Courts in Brazil.” Revista de Economia Política, 25: 418–38.Google Scholar
Taylor, Matthew M. 2008. Judging Policy: Courts and Policy Reform in Democratic Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Matthew M. 2009. “Institutional Development through Policymaking: A Case Study of the Brazilian Central Bank.” World Politics, 61: 487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Matthew M. 2016. “The Unchanging Core of Brazilian State Capitalism, 1985–2015.” Paper prepared for presentation at the meetings of the Latin American Studies Association, New York City, May 27–30.Google Scholar
Taylor, Matthew M. 2017. “Corruption and Accountability in Brazil.” In Kingstone, Peter and Power, Timothy (eds.), Democratic Brazil Divided, 77–96. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Matthew M. 2019. “The Troubling Strength of Brazilian Institutions in the Face of Scandal.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 15: 59–79.Google Scholar
Taylor, Matthew M. 2020. “Continuity through Change: Developmentalism and Neoliberalism in Democratic Brazil (1985–2018).” CLALS Working Paper No. 25; American University Center for Latin American and Latino Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Matthew M. and Buranelli, Vinicius. 2007. “Ending up in Pizza: Accountability as a Problem of Institutional Arrangement in Brazil.” Latin American Politics and Society, 49: 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Ten Theses.” 2011. Special edition. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 31: 844–6.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science, 2: 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2003. “How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis.” In Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, 208–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Clive S. 2009. “Understanding the Development and Operation of Latin American Interests, Power Groups and Interest Groups.” In McGrath, Conor (ed.), Interest Groups and Lobbying in Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia: Essays on Drug Trafficking, Chemical Manufacture, Exchange Rates, and Women’s Interests, 3–30. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Tironi, Ernesto. 2012. Interview with Tironi, business leader, university professor and former ambassador, Santiago, Chile, June 7.Google Scholar
Toye, John and Toye, Richard. 2003. “The Origins and Interpretation of the Prebisch-Singer Thesis.” History of Political Economy, 35: 437–67.Google Scholar
Transparency International. 2015. “Brazil: Beneficial Ownership Transparency.” www.transparency.org/files/content/publication/2015_BOCountryReport_Brazil.pdfGoogle Scholar
Transpetro. 2012. “Navio Celso Furtado é eleito um dos mais significativos do mundo em 2011.” March 14. www.transpetro.com.br/transpetro-institucional/noticias/navio-celso-furtado-e-eleito-um-dos-mais-significativos-do-mundo-em-2011.htmlGoogle Scholar
Trebat, Thomas J. 1983. Brazil’s State-Owned Enterprises: A Case Study of the State as Entrepreneur. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubek, David M. 2013. “Law, State, and the New Developmentalism: An Introduction.” In Trubek, David M., Garcia, Helena Alviar, Coutinho, Diogo R., and Santos, Alvaro (eds.), Law and the New Developmental State: The Brazilian Experience in Latin American Context, 3–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubek, David M., Coutinho, Diogo R., and Schapiro, Mario G.. 2013. “New State Activism and the Challenge for Law.” In Trubek, David M., Garcia, Helena A., Coutinho, Diogo R., and Santos, Alvaro (eds.), Law and the New Developmental State: The Brazilian Experience in Latin American Context, 28–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M., Garcia, Helena Alviar, Coutinho, Diogo R., and Santos, Alvaro (eds.). 2013. Law and the New Developmental State: The Brazilian Experience in Latin American Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, Kellee S. and Naughton, Barry. 2015. “Introduction: State Capitalism and the Chinese Economic Miracle.” In Naughton, Barry and Tsai, Kellee S. (eds.), State Capitalism, Institutional Adaptation and the Chinese Miracle, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 2000. “Veto Players and Institutional Analysis.” Governance, 13: 441–74.Google Scholar
United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. 2017. “United States of America v. SBM Offshore N.V., Criminal No. 17–686, Deferred Prosecution Agreement,” November 29.Google Scholar
US Trade Representative (USTR). 2013. “2013 National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers.” https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/Brazil_0.pdfGoogle Scholar
Vágvölgyi, Réka, Andra, Coldea, Dresler, Thomas, Schrader, Josef, and Hans-Christoph., Nuerk 2016. “A Review about Functional Illiteracy: Definition, Cognitive, Linguistic, and Numerical Aspects.” Frontiers in Psychology, 7: 1–13.Google Scholar
Varsano, Ricardo. 1982. “Os incentivos fiscais do imposto de renda das empresas.” Revista Brasileira de Economia, 36: 107–27.Google Scholar
Vashisth, Shivam, Singh, Govind, and Nanda, Arun. 2012. “A Comparative Study of Regulatory Trends of Pharmaceuticals in Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) countries.” Journal of Generic Medicines, 9: 128–43.Google Scholar
Vasselai, Fabrício and Mignozzetti, Umberto. 2014. “O efeito das emendas ao orçamento no comportamento parlamentar e a dimensão temporal: velhas teses, novos testes.” Dados, 57: 817–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaz Ferreira, Luciano and Morosini, Fabio Costa. 2013. “The Implementation of International Anticorruption Law in Business: Legal Control of Corruption Directed to Transnational Corporations.” Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy & International Relations, 2: 241–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veiga Filho, Lauro. 2012. “Momento crítico.” Valor Econômico, July 24.Google Scholar
Veiga, Pedro da Motta. 2004. “Regional and Transregional Dimensions of Brazilian Trade Policy.” In Aggarwal, Vinod K., Espach, Ralph, and Tulchin, Joseph S. (eds.), The Strategic Dynamics of Latin American Trade, 175–88. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Veiga, Pedro da Motta. 2007. “Política comercial no Brasil: características, condicionantes domésticos e policy-making.” In Jank, Marcos Sawaya and Silber, Simão David (eds.), Políticas comerciais comparadas: desempenho e modelos organizacionais, 71–162. Sao Paulo: Singular.Google Scholar
Veiga, Pedro da Motta. 2009. “Brazil’s Trade Policy: Moving Away from Old Paradigms?” In Brainard, Lael and Martinez-Diaz, Leonardo (eds.), Brazil as an Economic Superpower? Understanding Brazil’s Changing Role in the Global Economy, 113–58 . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Veiga, Pedro da Motta and Vivianne, Ventura-Dias. 2004. “Brazil: The Fine-Tuning of Trade Liberalization.” In Lengyel, Miguel F. and Ventura-Dias, Vivianne (eds.), Trade Policy Reforms in Latin America: Multilateral Rules and Domestic Institutions, 98–124. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergara, Alberto and Encinas, Daniel. 2016. “Continuity by Surprise: Explaining Institutional Stability in Contemporary Peru.” Latin American Research Review, 51: 159–80.Google Scholar
Versiani, Isabel and Amora, Dimmi. 2015. “Empréstimos subsidiados do BNDES custam R$184 bilhões à União.” Folha de S. Paulo, August 9.Google Scholar
Vianna, Herbert. 1995. Luís Inácio (300 Picaretas). Rio de Janeiro: Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC.Google Scholar
Villela, André A. 2015. “Ever Wary of Liberalism: Brazilian Foreign Trade Policy from Bretton Woods to the G-20.” In Stuenkel, Oliver and Taylor, Matthew M. (eds.), Brazil on the Global Stage: Power, Ideas, and the Liberal International Order, 163–80. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Wade, Robert. 2004 [1990]. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wade, Robert. 2018. “The Role of the State in Escaping the Middle-Income Trap: The Case for Smart Industrial Policy.” In Castro, Ana Célia and Filgueiras, Fernando (eds.), The State in the 21st Century, 181–208. Brasília: ENAP.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 2009. “Following in the Footsteps of Policy Entrepreneurs: Policy Advocates and Pro Forma Adopters.” Journal of Development Studies, 45: 572–92.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 2015. Activating Democracy in Brazil: Popular Participation, Social Justice, and Interlocking Institutions. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Daniel Wei. 2015. “Right to Health Litigation in Brazil: The Problem and the Institutional Responses.” Human Rights Law Review, 15: 617–41.Google Scholar
Wang, Daniel Wei, L., de Vasconcelos, Natalia Pires, de Oliveira, Vanessa Elias, and Terrazas, Fernanda Vargas. 2014. “Os impactos da judicialização da saúde no município de São Paulo: gasto público e organização federativa.” Revista de Administracão Pública, 48: 1191–206.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent and Rockman, Bert A. 1993. “Assessing the Effects of Institutions: When and How Do Institutions Matter?” In Kent Weaver, R and Rockman, Bert A. (eds.), Do Institutions Matter? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 2002. “Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science.” American Political Science Review, 96: 713–28.Google Scholar
Weir, Margaret and Skocpol, Theda. 1985. “State Structures and the Possibilities For ‘Keynesian’ Responses to the Great Depression in Sweden, Britain, and the United States.” In Evans, Peter, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda (eds.), Bringing the State Back In, 107–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Werneck Vianna, Luiz. 2002. A democracia e os três poderes no Brasil. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Werneck, Rogério L. Furquim. 1987. Empresas estatais e política macroeconômica. Rio de Janeiro: Campus.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1995. “Social Movements and the State: The Politics of Health Reform in Brazil.” World Development, 23: 1699–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1998. “From Leviathan to Gulliver? The Decline of the Developmental State in Brazil.” Governance, 11: 51–75.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2002. The Politics of Market Reform in Fragile Democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wiarda, Howard J. 1973. “Toward a Framework for the Study of Political Change in the Iberic-Latin Tradition: The Corporative Model.” World Politics, 25: 206–35.Google Scholar
Wiarda, Howard J. 1981. Corporatism and National Development in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wiarda, Howard J. (ed.). 2004. Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America, Revisited. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Williamson, John. 1990. “What Washington Means by Policy Reform.” In Williamson, John (ed.), Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened?, 7–20. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Williamson, John. 2002. “Did the Washington Consensus Fail?” Speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC, November 6. www.piie.com/commentary/speeches-papers/did-washington-consensus-failGoogle Scholar
Willis, Eliza J. 1986. “The State as Banker: The Expansion of the Public Sector in Brazil.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. T. “Corporatism.” 1976. European Journal of Sociology, 17: 100–36.Google Scholar
Wiziack, Julio and Maeli, Prado. 2017. “Contrapartidas de subsídio à indústria não foram cumpridas, afirma TCU.” Folha de S. Paulo, May 29.Google Scholar
Wolford, Wendy. 2016. “The Casa and the Causa: Institutional Histories and Cultural Politics in Brazilian Land Reform.” Latin American Research Review, 51: 24–42.Google Scholar
Woo-Cumings, Meredith. 1999. “Introduction: Chalmers Johnson and the Politics of Nationalism and Development.” In Woo-Cumings, Meredith (ed.), The Developmental State, 1–31. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Stewart. 2001. “Business, Government, and Patterns of Labor Market Policy in Britain and the Federal Republic of Germany.” In Hall, Peter and Soskice, David (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, 247–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1984. “Brazil: Economic Memorandum.” A World Bank Country Study, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1987. World Development Report 1987. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2004. “Project Performance Assessment Report, Brazil—First and Second AIDS and STD Control Projects.” Report No. 28819.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2010. World Integrated Trade Solution. July 17, 2012. https://wits.worldbank.org/countrysnapshot/en/BRAGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2013. Doing Business 2014: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2016. “Retaking the Path to Inclusion, Growth, and Sustainability: Brazil Systematic Country Diagnostic.” Report No. 101431-BR.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2017a. A Fair Adjustment: Efficiency and Equity of Public Spending in Brazil (Brazil Public Expenditure Review).Google Scholar
World Bank. 2017b. “Country Partnership Framework for the Federative Republic of Brazil for the Period FY18-FY23.” Report No. 113259-BR.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2018a. FCI GP, “Policy Note: Improving the Efficiency of Credit Markets.” August.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2018b. Jobs and Growth: Brazil’s Productivity Agenda. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
World Bank. Various Years. World Development Indicators (WDI). http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicatorsGoogle Scholar
Xavier, Wlamir Gonçalves, Bandeira-de-Mello, Rodrigo, and Marcon, Rosilene. 2014. “Institutional Environment and Business Groups’ Resilience in Brazil.” Journal of Business Research, 67: 900–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, Vineeta. 2011. Political Parties, Business Groups, and Corruption in Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Augusto. 2008. “How Brazilian Judges Undermine the Rule of Law: A Critical Appraisal.” International Trade and Business Law Review, 11: 179–217.Google Scholar
Zockun, Maria Helena (ed.). 2007. “Simplificando o Brasil: propostas de reforma na relação econômica do governo com o setor privado.” Texto para Discussão 3. São Paulo: Fundação Instituto de Pesquisas Econômicas (FIPE). www.fipe.org.br/Content/downloads/publicacoes/textos/texto_03_2007.pdfGoogle Scholar
Zucco, Cesar and Lauderdale, Benjamin E.. 2011. “Distinguishing Between Influences on Brazilian Legislative Behavior.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36: 363–96.Google Scholar
Zuvanic, Laura and Mercedes, Iacoviello (with Ana Laura Rodriguez Gusta). 2010. “The Weakest Link: The Bureaucracy and Civil Service Systems in Latin America.” In Scartascini, Carlos, Stein, Ernesto, and Tommasi, Mariano (eds.), How Democracy Works: Political Institutions, Actors, and Arenas in Latin American Policymaking, 147–76. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Matthew M. Taylor, American University, Washington DC
  • Book: Decadent Developmentalism
  • Online publication: 04 November 2020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Matthew M. Taylor, American University, Washington DC
  • Book: Decadent Developmentalism
  • Online publication: 04 November 2020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Matthew M. Taylor, American University, Washington DC
  • Book: Decadent Developmentalism
  • Online publication: 04 November 2020
Available formats
×