Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:21:31.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case 25 - Vertebral Body Microfractures / Bone Marrow Edema

from Subsection 3A - Typically Stable

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2018

By
Emanuele Pravatà
Edited by
Zoran Rumboldt ,
Alessandro Cianfoni  and
Abhay Varma
Zoran Rumboldt
Affiliation:
Medical University of South Carolina
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical Imaging of Spinal Trauma
A Case-Based Approach
 , pp. 54 - 55
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Provenzale, J. MR imaging of spinal trauma. Emerg Radiol 2007;13:289–297.Google Scholar
Qaiyum, M, Tyrrell, PN, McCall, IW, Cassar-Pullicino, VN. MRI detection of unsuspected vertebral injury in acute spinal trauma: incidence and significance. Skeletal Radiol 2001;30:299–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, RA, Saifuddin, A. Whole spine MRI in the assessment of acute vertebral body trauma. Skeletal Radiol 2004;33:129–135.Google ScholarPubMed
Brinckman, MA, Chau, C, Ross, JS. Marrow edema variability in acute spine fractures. Spine J 2015;15:454–460. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.09.032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakatsu, M, Hatabu, H, Itoh, H, et al. Comparison of short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) and fat-saturated (chemsat) techniques for background fat intensity suppression in cervical and thoracic MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:56–60.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×