Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Chapter 10 - The Standardisation of Vowel Diacritic Spelling

  • from Part III - Case Studies
  • Marco Condorelli, University of Central Lancashire, Preston
  • Book:
    Standardising English Spelling
    Published online:
    31 March 2022
    Print publication:
    07 April 2022, pp 192-213

  • Summary

    Chapter 10 focuses on the standardisation of vowel diacritic spelling, and especially groups of graphemes indicating vowel quality and vowel quantity. Between the sixteenth and the seventeenth centuries, <ea˃ and <oa˃, indicating vowel quality, as well as <dg> and <g>, <tch> and <ch>, and <k> and <ck>, for vowel quantity, shifted from an early distribution principle to a new, modern standard. The results show a modern development that lasted throughout most of the sixteenth century, both in the two digraphs and in the consonantal alternants. By the seventeenth century, the uses of vowel diacritic spelling appear to have crystallised despite later ongoing vocalic developments in Early Modern English. The changes in the sets of graphemes investigated occurred uniformly across two generations, both at vocabulary level, encompassing high-frequency and low-frequency words concurrently, and also across most of the spelling units analysed. As for all the other case studies, my results indicate that there may have been a pragmatic agent behind the modern developments in vowel diacritic spelling.