Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

3 results

  • Chapter 6 - Knave or Not?

  • from Part II - Politics
  • Edited by David O'Shaughnessy, University of Galway
  • Book:
    The Censorship of Eighteenth-Century Theatre
    Published online:
    03 August 2023
    Print publication:
    17 August 2023, pp 133-152

  • Summary

    This essay considers the impact of censorship on Holcroft’s career as a whole, not simply his experiences under the Examiner but the wider public condemnation of some of his work. Identifying Knave or Not? and He’s to Blame, both staged in early 1798, as the pivotal point in his writing career, the essay shows how the public opprobrium unfairly received by Holcroft coloured his later career. Paying careful attention to the language of the plays, in a decade when the meanings of words were under heated dispute, the essay showcases Holcroft’s political courage compared to contemporaries. It argues that Holcroft deliberately reduces comedic options in order to strengthen the force of his political principles, a move that remains underappreciated today, and paid a considerable price for his resolve not to fuel wit through displays of people’s suffering.