Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 2 - Between Public and Private

  • from Part I - Global Governance and Politics
  • Edited by Panagiotis Delimatsis, Tilburg University, The Netherlands, Stephanie Bijlmakers, Tilburg University, The Netherlands, M. Konrad Borowicz, Tilburg University, The Netherlands
  • Book:
    The Evolution of Transnational Rule-Makers through Crises
    Published online:
    27 July 2023
    Print publication:
    10 August 2023, pp 47-65
    • Chapter
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Summary

    In the 21st century world politics is becoming increasingly multi-nodal and characterized by heterarchy, namely the predominance of cross cutting sectoral mini- and meso-hierarchies above, below and cutting across states. States are becoming “reactive states” as their capacity for “proactive” policymaking and implementation are eroded. This process is leading to an uneven spectrum of market/hierarchy or public/private de facto policymaking processes and diverse types of “capture” between a range of private actors and meso- and micro-hierarchies, institutions and processes. At the same time, global regulation is increasingly fragmented, whipsawed between transnational and subnational private special interest groups, leading to potential crises at a complex range of nodes and levels. The core of this process is the triangulation of (a) the “disaggregated state”, (b) fragmented global governance and “regime complexes” and (c) “sectoral (or functional) differentiation” in the international political economy.