Chlorites from Cambrian basaltic vesicular lavas, characterized by relatively high Xc (0.81-0.98), gave temperatures of formation of 285 to 350°C (Cathelineau's empirical geothermometer). Both the Xc and temperature calculations gave results which were too high for the diagenetic conditions indicated by the interbedded shale mineralogy. The HRTEM and XRD studies indicate the absence of smectite layers in these chlorites; i.e. according to lattice images, the actual value of Xc is 1. The chlorite composition in these basaltic lavas must, therefore, be explained in relation to their whole-rock geochemistry, with which a good correlation has been found. The basaltic lavas are characterized by relatively high FeO/M ratios (3.28±1.66) and must be considered as an Fe-rich system, with similar chemical behaviour to pelitic rocks. In these cases, direct chlorite formation, without a previous smectite precursor, is a normal occurrence and the Xc calculation and empirical geothermometric calculations are inadequate.

Accessory monazite-(Ce) with an extraordinarily high proportion of the xenotime component in solid solution of 21–42 mol.% (6.5–14 wt.% Y2O3, 6–11 wt.% HREE2O3) was discovered in a retrogressed Variscan high-pressure, high-temperature granulite from the southern Bohemian Massif, Austria. The grains with the highest proportion of xenotime (XXno ~0.4) should have had a minimum formation temperature of ~1050°C, according to published monazite-xenotime miscibility gap thermometers. This high temperature is consistent with previous petrological studies on the south Bohemian granulites indicating ~1000°C/16 kbar for the peak metamorphic stage.

Detailed microprobe and modal data for a sample of layered, garnetiferous, quartzose paragneiss reveal significant differences in garnet-biotite Mg-Fe distribution coefficients (Kd) — and hence paleotemperatures — determined for leucocratic (modal Grt+Bt<25 vol.%) and mesocratic (Grt+Bt> 25 vol.%) layers. In leucocratic layers, lnKd determined from both the core and rim compositions of minerals shows a range of values that varies sympathetically with the absolute amount of garnet and biotite, and, as demonstrated in other studies, inversely with the distance separating both minerals. Due to the small size (<2 mm) of garnets, which facilitated diffusional re-equilibration during cooling from peak metamorphic temperature, lnKd does not correlate to modal Bt/Grt ratios. The largest garnets, which occur in mesocratic layers, nonetheless tend to preserve the most pronounced (retrograde) zoning patterns (i.e. rimward increase in Fe/Mg), consequently mineral core composition lnKd values correlate with grain diameter except where garnets contain abundant biotite inclusions. The highest Grt-Bt temperatures (∼700°C are recorded by: (1) the composition of relatively widely-separated (>0.3 mm) grains in highly leucocratic layers; and (2) the core compositions of relatively large (>1 mm), inclusion-free grains in mesocratic layers. More closely spaced garnets and biotites in leucocratic layers, and small grains in mesocratic layers, give a range of temperatures intermediate between Tmax and diffusional blocking temperatures (∼ 560°C) recorded by the rim compositions of contiguous grains.

Most granitic batholiths contain plutons which are composed of low-variance mineral assemblages amenable to quantification of the P– conditions that characterise emplacement. Some mineral thermometers, such as those based on two feldspars or two Fe–Ti oxides, commonly undergo subsolidus re-equilibration. Others are more robust, including hornblende–plagioclase, hornblende–clinopyroxene, pyroxene–ilmenite, pyroxene–biotite, garnet–hornblende, muscovite-biotite and garnet–biotite. The quality of their calibration is variable and a major challenge resides in the large range of liquidus to solidus crystallisation temperatures that are incompletely preserved in mineral profiles. Further, the addition of components that affect Kd relations between non-ideal solutions remains inadequately understood. Estimation of solidus and near-solidus conditions derived from exchange thermometry often yield results >700°C and above that expected for crystallisation in the presence of an H2O-rich volatile phase. These results suggest that the assumption of crystallisation on an H2O-saturated solidus may not be an accurate characterisation of some granitic rocks.

Vapour undersaturation and volatile phase composition dramatically affect solidus temperatures. Equilibria including hypersthene–biotite–sanidine–quartz, fayalite–sanidine–biotite, and annite–sanidine–magnetite (ASM) allow estimation of Estimates by the latter assemblage, however, are highly dependent on . Oxygen fugacity varies widely (from two or more log units below the QFM buffer to a few log units below the HM buffer) and can have a strong affect on mafic phase composition. Ilmenite–magnetite, quartz–ulvospinel–ilmenite–fayalite (QUILF), annite–sanidine–magnetite, biotite–almandine–muscovite–magnetite (BAMM), and titanite–magnetite–quartz (TMQ) are equilibria providing a basis for the calculation of .

Granite barometry plays a critical part in constraining tectonic history. Metaluminous granites offer a range of barometers including ferrosilite–fayalite–quartz, garnet–plagioclase–hornblende–quartz and Al-in-hornblende. The latter barometer remains at the developmental stage, but has potential when the effects of temperature are considered. Likewise, peraluminous granites often contain mineral assemblages that enable pressure determinations, including garnet–biotite–muscovite–plagioclase and muscovite–biotite–alkali–feldspar–quartz. Limiting pressures can be obtained from the presence of magmatic epidote and, for low-Ca pegmatites or aplites, the presence of subsolvus versus hypersolvus alkali feldspars.

As with all barometers, the influence of temperature, , and choice of activity model are critical factors. Foremost is the fact that batholiths are not static features. Mineral compositions imperfectly record conditions acquired during ascent and over a range of temperature and pressure and great care must be taken in properly quantifying intensive parameters.