We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
To analyze how structural determinants and barriers within social systems shape options for dying well at home in Canada, while also shaping preferences for dying at home.
Methods
To inform a descriptive thematic analysis, 24 Canadian stakeholders were interviewed about their views, experiences, and preferences about dying at home. Participants included compassionate community advocates, palliative care professionals, volunteers, bereaved family caregivers, residents of rural and remote regions, service providers working with structurally vulnerable populations, and members of francophone, immigrant, and 2SLGBTQ+ communities.
Results
Analysis of stakeholders’ insights and experiences led to the conceptualization of several structural barriers to dying well at home: inaccessible public and community infrastructure and services, a structural gap in death literacy, social stigma and discrimination, and limited access to relational social capital.
Significance of results
Aging in Canada, as elsewhere across the globe, has increased demand for palliative care and support, especially in the home. Support for people wishing to die at home is a key public health issue. However, while Canadian policy documents normalize dying in place as ideal, it is uncertain whether these fit with the real possibilities for people nearing the end of life. Our analysis extends existing research on health equity in palliative and end-of-life care beyond a focus on service provision. Results of this analysis identify the need to expand policymakers’ structural imaginations about what it means to die well at home in Canada.
This topic relates to capital budgeting. The starting point is an explanation of why investment analysis is important in managerial economics, and the different types of investment and investment decision. Cash flow analysis and the principles involved in identifying and measuring relevant cash flows is discussed. The concept of risk and types of risk, stand-alone risk, within-firm risk and market risk, are discussed. The security market line (SML), beta coefficients and the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) are explained. The cost of capital is examined, explaining the calculation of the cost of debt, the cost of equity and the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Methods of evaluation of individual projects are discussed, with a focus on net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR). There is a discussion of the determination of the optimal capital budget for a firm, in terms of the investment opportunity schedule (IOS) and the marginal cost of capital (MCC), with the distinction between mutually exclusive projects and independent projects. Case studies include two resource-heavy situations: the HS2 rail link and 5G telecommunications.
This topic examines government policy and regulation. The starting point is the objectives of government regulation and market failure. The implications for managerial decision making are outlined. The nature of market failure and its different aspects are discussed. Externalities are discussed, and the policy implications. Public goods, and their nature and policy implications, are examined. Imperfect information and the policy implications are discussed. Transaction costs are discussed. Monopoly and the nature of market power and its consequences are examined. Strategic behaviour, such as collusion, predatory pricing and exclusive dealing, is discussed. The distinction between structural and strategic barriers to entry and their different policy implications is explained. Aspects of new technology are discussed, such as network effects and the ‘winner-takes-most’ phenomenon. Various policy approaches and their costs and benefits are examined. Case studies involve two situations in the UK where governments may have made errors of policy. A final case study relates to the global phenomenon of increasing concentration and its consequences.
As six women entered the field of Democratic presidential candidates in 2019, the political media rushed to declare 2020 a new “year of the woman.” In the Washington Post, one political commentator proclaimed that “2020 may be historic for women in more ways than one” given that four of these woman presidential candidates were already holding a U.S. Senate seat. A writer for Vox similarly hailed the “unprecedented range of solid women” seeking the nomination and urged Democrats to nominate one of them. Politico ran a piece definitively declaring that “2020 will be the year of the woman” and went on to suggest that the “Democratic primary landscape looks to be tilted to another woman presidential nominee.” The excited tone projected by the media carried an air of inevitability: after Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, despite receiving 2.8 million more popular votes than her opponent, ever more women were running for the presidency.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.