We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In Langston Hughes' 'Mother to Son,' (1922), written at a time of dramatic disruption in the American economy and continued tyranny in the lives of Black people, urban and rural, the Mother pleads with the child not to give up. She tells the child that she has been 'a climbing on, reaching landings and turning corners.' Not only did the seven families chronicled in this unique study not give up, while both losing and gaining ground, they managed to sponsor a generation of children, several of whom reached the middle and upper-middle classes. Land, Promise, and Peril chronicles the actions, actors, and events that propelled legal racism and quelled it, showing how leadership and political institutions play a crucial role in shaping the pace and quality of exits from poverty. Despite great odds, some domestics, sharecroppers, tenants, and farmers and their children navigated pathways toward the middle class and beyond.
State feminism informed economic planning as seen in Tunisia’s participation in the global population movement. Tunisian legislation regarding marriage and divorce encouraged the restructuring of kin loyalties along a nuclear model, while the legalization of contraception and restrictions of family allocations encouraged small families. Tunisia domesticated the worldwide consensus stigmatizing high fertility as common among poor, rural, or racially inferior communities while using language about women’s health to gloss over coercive policies, with the UNFT and women’s press situating birth control within modern womanhood and maternal health. Working alongside foreign personnel, Tunisian doctors and administrators wrestled with the implications of racial logics and their applicability to local realities, whether medical, logistical or otherwise, often targeting rural women. The implementation of family planning resulted from a process of negotiation between men and women in the field. Rural communities refused to isolate childbearing from the social and economic contexts that informed their decisions about family life. Women’s insistence on the intersection of class and regional identities in their understanding of gender roles and family life rejected state efforts to locate modern womanhood outside family and community and challenged the limits of state control over their bodies.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.