Introduction: Research supports the role of mentors in the personal development and career advancement of medical trainees. Compared to non-mentored peers, mentored residents are nearly twice as likely to describe excellent career preparation and demonstrate objective career success. In prior research, only 65% of training programs in Canada had a mentorship program, and 40% indicated a need for more formal mentorship models. Methods: A needs assessment survey was distributed to RCPSC Emergency Medicine (EM) Program Directors across Canada regarding mentorship available to resident physicians training at their centers. Additionally, all EM resident and staff physicians involved in mentorship were surveyed on their perceptions of current models at their institutions. Both surveys were comprised of binary, open ended, and 5 point likert scale questions. Responses were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Eleven Program Directors responded to the survey. Formal mentorship programs were found in 82% of training centers, with 77% of programs instituted within the past 5 years. Half of resident/mentor pairings were based on a combination of identified career goals, participant personality traits, or resident request. Other pairing methods included perceived resident needs or attending physician request. Most meetings are face-to-face, with one program requiring mutual scheduled shifts. Residents identified that mentorship was significantly associated with benefits to career (p=0.0016) and niche (p=0.0019) development. Formal mentorship was felt to have a significant association with resident academic development (p=0.05) and lower rates of burnout (p=0.0018) by staff physicians. Staff mentors also associated a personal development benefit related to involvement in a mentorship relationship (p=0.0355). Conclusion: The majority of EM programs have adopted formal mentorship programs within the past 5 years. Residents and staff identify that mentorship relationships are associated with improved career and niche development as well as academic advancement. Future research will include a before and after study of the implementation of a formal mentorship program within the RCPSC-EM program at the University of Manitoba.

Introduction / Innovation Concept: There are numerous research studies in the medical literature, which demonstrate how the experience of a medical residency can contribute towards burnout. The escalating performance pressures and expectations during residency training have the potential to negatively impact upon physician health and clinical performance. The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to test the effectiveness of the High Performance Physician (HPP) program among General Surgery residents at the University of Manitoba with regard to burnout and clinical performance. Methods: This program was delivered over a 9-week period. All 26 residents were asked to complete the Maslach Burnout Inventory - Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). Each resident then participated as the team leader for a 15-minute trauma resuscitation simulation. Three attending physicians from Surgery & Emergency Medicine assessed resident performance and ability to manage work-based stressors. Following the simulation, each resident received a debrief interview. Once the HPP curriculum had been completed, residents took part in a second high fidelity simulation session and again completed the MBI-HSS. Curriculum, Tool, or Material: The HPP program offered through the Department of Emergency Medicine (EM), is a performance enhancement based curriculum. It is designed to equip physicians with mental skills to help optimize focus, arousal control, stress management, communication, and teamwork. Further, to utilize these skills to cope and respond more effectively to the inherent performance pressures that may present within one’s area of specialization. Conclusion: The Emotional Exhaustion domain of the MBI-HSS demonstrated a statistically significant decrease. The other domain scores were not statistically significant. Simulation domain scores did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in performance between the pre- and post-HPP curriculum simulation sessions. A summative content analysis of the interview data demonstrated that residents believed internal barriers to situational awareness were the most significant impact on performance. Further study is required to determine if differences are seen in long-term follow-up.