Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Trust and Public Health Emergency Events: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review

  • Pradeep Sopory, Julie M. Novak, Ashleigh M. Day, Stine Eckert, Lee Wilkins, Donyale R. Padgett, Jane P. Noyes, Tomas Allen, Nyka Alexander, Marsha L. Vanderford, Gaya M. Gamhewage
  • Journal:
    Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness / Volume 16 / Issue 4 / August 2022
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 June 2021, pp. 1653-1673
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • The systematic review examined the phenomenon of trust during public health emergency events. The literature reviewed was field studies done with people directly affected or likely to be affected by such events and included quantitative, qualitative, mixed-method, and case study primary studies in English (N = 38) as well as Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian, and Spanish (all non-English N = 30). Studies were mostly from high- and middle-income countries, and the event most covered was infectious disease. Findings from individual studies were first synthesized within methods and evaluated for certainty/confidence, and then synthesized across methods. The final set of 11 findings synthesized across methods identified a set of activities for enhancing trust and showed that it is a multi-faceted and dynamic concept.