We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The religion and state debate in Israel has overlooked the Palestinian-Arab religious communities and their members, focusing almost exclusively on Jewish religious institutions and norms and Jewish majority members. Because religion and state debates in many other countries are defined largely by minority religions' issues, the debate in Israel is anomalous. Michael Karayanni advances a legal matrix that explains this anomaly by referencing specific constitutional values. At the same time, he also takes a critical look at these values and presents the argument that what might be seen as liberal and multicultural is at its core just as illiberal and coercive. In making this argument, A Multicultural Entrapment suggests a set of multicultural qualifications by which one should judge whether a group based accommodation is of a multicultural nature.
The individual predicament of the Palestinian-Arabs resulting from the recognition accorded to their respective religious communities is often presented at par with that of Jewish citizens in Israel who also happen to be subject to rabbinical jurisdiction as well as that of members of Western religious minorities. This chapter argues that the Palestinian-Arab predicament is genuinely different from all these other predicaments including that of the Jewish citizens of Israel. It is different because it is much more acute in nature. That is so for two main reasons. First, ideas and mechanisms that have been suggested for relieving the predicament in Western democracies do not apply in the Israeli case because of Israel’s character as a Jewish state. This exclusion works actively as well to strengthen the religious identity of Palestinian-Arabs and thus tighten yet further the grip of Palestinian-Arab religious communities over their members. Second, in light of the long-lasting Palestinian (Arab)–Israeli conflict and the rift this conflict has created in minority-majority relations in Israel, secular forces among the Palestinian-Arabs, let alone religious ones, are reluctant to initiate reforms in the existing jurisdictional authority, which despite its obvious oppression still shows outwardly the remaining shreds of autonomy.
It is true that the accordance of jurisdictional authority to the Palestinian-Arab religious communities is a boost to their empowerment, vis-à-vis society at large or against their own members. However, identifying the religious jurisdictional power among the Palestinian-Arabs in Israel as a form of a liberal multicultural accommodation has one major normative implication. Vulnerable individual members among this community, especially women and children, become exposed to a wide variety of patriarchal religious norms and practices as prescribed by their respective religious institutions, all when such practices are legitimized in the name of liberalism and the accommodation of religious minorities. This is the individual predicament, also known in the literature on multiculturalism as the “internal minority” or “minority within the minority” problem. This chapter exposes the wide variety of norms originating in Palestinian-Arab religious jurisdiction that encroach on the individual liberty and freedom of Palestinian-Arabs. It will expose the different jurisdictional authorities – adjudicatory and prescriptive - possessed today by the Muslim, Christian, and Druze communities – a reality that originated in the Ottoman millet system.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.