We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
Alik Ismail-Zadeh, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany,Fabio Castelli, Università degli Studi, Florence,Dylan Jones, University of Toronto,Sabrina Sanchez, Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Germany
Abstract: In this chapter, I discuss an alternative perspective on interpreting the results of joint and constrained inversions of geophysical data. Typically such inversions are performed based on inductive reasoning (i.e. we fit a limited set of observations and conclude that the resulting model is representative of the Earth). While this has seen many successes, it is less useful when, for example, the specified relationship between different physical parameters is violated in parts of the inversion domain. I argue that in these cases a hypothesis testing perspective can help to learn more about the properties of the Earth. I present joint and constrained inversion examples that show how we can use violations of the assumptions specified in the inversion to study the subsurface. In particular I focus on the combination of gravity and magnetic data with seismic constraints in the western United States. There I see that high velocity structures in the crust are associated with relatively low density anomalies, a possible indication of the presence of melt in a strong rock matrix. The concepts, however, can be applied to other types of data and other regions and offer an extra dimension of analysis to interpret the results of geophysical inversion algorithms.
The most utilized technique for exploring the Earth's subsurface for petroleum is reflection seismology. However, a sole focus on reflection seismology often misses opportunities to integrate other geophysical techniques such as gravity, magnetic, resistivity, and other seismicity techniques, which have tended to be used in isolation and by specialist teams. There is now growing appreciation that these technologies used in combination with reflection seismology can produce more accurate images of the subsurface. This book describes how these different field techniques can be used individually and in combination with each other and with seismic reflection data. World leading experts present chapters covering different techniques and describe when, where, and how to apply them to improve petroleum exploration and production. It also explores the use of such techniques in monitoring CO2 storage reservoirs. Including case studies throughout, it will be an invaluable resource for petroleum industry professionals, advanced students, and researchers.
In Chapter 6.1 we briefly review the main instruments used in today’s ground-based geomagnetic observations, focusing on their performances and working principles (from a user’s point of view). Next, the major measurement methods and systems currently in use will be introduced, with a focus on the latest developments in the field. In Chapter 6.2 electromagnetic (EM) methods will be discussed to study the electrical conductivity structure within Earth in a wide depth range and can be measured at the Earth’s surface by magnetometers and telluric electrodes. In Chapter 6.3 a new technique based on differences in instrument responses from ground-based magnetic measurements that extracts the frequency content of the magnetic field with periods ranging from 0.1 to 100 seconds will be discussed. This method enables the study of field line oscillations using the publicly available, worldwide database of geomagnetic observatories.