We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 6 is the final empirical chapter, exploring the role of the courtroom space and design in access to justice in the CoP. The chapter starts with a critical understanding and analysis of the materiality of the court space before exploring the differences from my observations of the physical and virtual CoP. The chapter concludes with a look to the future of the CoP’s design, suggesting ways that relevant stakeholders might continue this imaginative and practical analysis process to reimagine the CoP in ways that better secure access to justice for the Person.
In a number of prominent legal programs, institutional design of the underlying processes allows speakers to shift the costs of processing their message to ill-equipped audiences. Such a design is unstable and leads to incomprehensible communications and failed legal goals. This final chapter discusses the social consequences of these institutional design problems and offers general recommendations for reform.
In a number of prominent legal programs, institutional design of the underlying processes allows speakers to shift the costs of processing their message to ill-equipped audiences. Such a design is unstable and leads to incomprehensible communications and failed legal goals. This final chapter discusses the social consequences of these institutional design problems and offers general recommendations for reform.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.