We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 4 explores the role of alternative dispute resolution, specifically mediation, in CoP proceedings, the first academic piece on this topic. The use of mediation in CoP practice is increasing and there is a trend towards mediation as the primary form of ADR in civil and family justice. In analysing the role of mediation in the CoP, the chapter draws on original empirical data to explore the views of professionals working in mental capacity law. In analysing this data, emphasis is placed on the embodied benefits of flexibly resolving disputes outside of the formalities of the courtroom, as well as the challenges involved in maintaining neutrality, trustworthiness and participation without judicial oversight. The chapter concludes that mediation has an important role to play as a complementary part of the toolkit of a reimagined CoP because it has the potential to provide an improvement in procedural justice. However, the legalism present in discussions of mediation in the empirical data is also highlighted, arguing that if mediation is going to secure an improvement in access to justice, then it needs to be driven by the parties rather than notions of justice predetermined by legal professionals.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.