Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 10 - Measurement and Analysis in Quantitative Critical Consciousness Research

  • from Part II - Measurement
  • Edited by Luke J. Rapa, Clemson University, South Carolina, Erin B. Godfrey, New York University
  • Book:
    Critical Consciousness
    Published online:
    20 April 2023
    Print publication:
    27 April 2023, pp 253-286

  • Summary

    This chapter focuses on the complexities of systems and selves as they pertain to critical consciousness scholarship. By systems, we mean the multiple and intersecting systems of oppression that historically and currently operate in the United States and globally. By selves, we mean individuals’ understandings of themselves and their social locations. Our chapter in organized in three sections: (1) the complexity of systems, (2) the complexity of selves, and (3) the complexity of relationships between systems and selves. Within each section, we highlight several points about complexity, share some observations about how that complexity has been addressed within quantitative critical consciousness scholarship, and make practical recommendations for quantitative research specifically (and researchers across fields and methodological orientations more generally). We suggest that attending to these complexities will enhance scholarship and contribute to the knowledge base about how to promote socially just actions in different groups of young people and in different contexts.