We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is highly technical and complex and accident and error can occur due to malfunction of equipment and/or human factors.Since its first successful clinical use in 1953, incremental improvements in the heart lung machine have resulted in a decline of perfusion related accidents. Safety practices have been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of error and equipment fault and need to be constantly reviewed and their implementation should be regularly rehearsed by all members of the intraoperative team and not only by the perfusion team. Institutional protocols, compliance with instructions for use of equipment and step-by-step processes to deal with error and unforeseen events will minimize their impact.
Medication errors are believed to be a leading cause of avoidable harm to patients around the world, with an estimated cost of US$42 billion per year, worldwide. It has been estimated that 5% of all patients who are admitted to a hospital experience a medication error, and that an average hospital will have one medication error every 22.7 hours or every 19.7 admissions. Human error is inevitable, but many of these errors actually reflect failures in the design and resourcing of the system within which medications are administered to patients, and some reflect violations of safe medication practices. Medication errors are the most common of all medical errors and pose a tremendous emotional and physical cost to patients and economic burden to our health system. Clearly medication error is a major source of risk and adverse events for our patients. This chapter presents a roadmap for the rest of the book, and definitions that will be used throughout. We also discuss how medication error is measured, the methods by which it is studied, the techniques used to capture incident reports, and some of the metrics and statistics to report these errors and incidents.
Although an individual anaesthesia provider secures the patient’s airway, upstream organisational events will influence how airway management is actually performed in any institution. Decisions around equipment purchases, staff training, post-operative care arrangements and even departmental staffing will all influence how an anaesthetic is administered. While standardised equipment, and high quality protocols, guidelines and behaviours ensure better patient outcomes in the event of an airway emergency, this cannot be achieved without input from the institution to facilitate education and training for all airway team members. Organisations should learn from both critical incidents and examples of excellent practice, and have mechanisms to record airway events. Human factors (ergonomics) are a vital component of successful airway management and organisations should incorporate human factors education in their airway training programmes. Communication about patients known to have a difficult airway is vital and must be done effectively, especially when this involves communication between hospitals or even countries.
The role of the emergency medical dispatch centre (EMDC) is essential to ensure coordinated and safe prehospital care. The aim of this study was to implement an incident report (IR) system in prehospital emergency care management with a view to detecting errors occurring in this setting and guiding the implementation of safety improvement initiatives.
Methods
An ad hoc IR form for the prehospital setting was developed and implemented within the EMDC of Verona. The form included six phases (from the emergency call to hospital admission) with the relevant list of potential error modes (30 items). This descriptive observational study considered the results from 268 consecutive days between February and November 2010.
Results
During the study period, 161 error modes were detected. The majority of these errors occurred in the resource allocation and timing phase (34.2%) and in the dispatch phase (31.0%). Most of the errors were due to human factors (77.6%), and almost half of them were classified as either moderate (27.9%) or severe (19.9%). These results guided the implementation of specific corrective actions, such as the adoption of a more efficient Medical Priority Dispatch System and the development of educational initiatives targeted at both EMDC staff and the population.
Conclusions
Despite the intrinsic limits of IR methodology, results suggest how the implementation of an IR system dedicated to the emergency prehospital setting can act as a major driver for the development of a “learning organization” and improve both efficacy and safety of first aid care.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.