Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Chapter 4 - Muslim Bans

  • Gillian Brock, University of Auckland
  • Book:
    Justice for People on the Move
    Published online:
    30 January 2020
    Print publication:
    20 February 2020, pp 64-87

  • Summary

    Chapter 4 spotlights migration policy that seeks to exclude by limiting those who practice certain religions from gaining admission to a territory. We consider: What is wrong with a ban on Muslims? Is a ban on Muslims impermissible because it violates human rights? While some think it is difficult to make such arguments directly, this chapter offers an argument that is grounded in core aspects of the practice of human rights. Drawing on core elements of the argument discussed in Chapter 3 concerning the conditions states must satisfy in order to exercise power legitimately, we see that there are important internal and contribution requirements that enacting a Muslim ban fails to meet. Indeed, a legitimate state cannot embrace a migration policy that bans Muslims from being admitted without such policies undermining the state’s claim to legitimacy.