Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

2 results

  • 3 - Extraterritorial Attempts at Addressing Challenges to Corporate Sustainability

  • from Part I - Global Business and Fragmented Regulation
  • Edited by Beate Sjåfjell, Universitetet i Oslo, Christopher M. Bruner, University of Georgia
  • Book:
    The Cambridge Handbook of Corporate Law, Corporate Governance and Sustainability
    Published online:
    25 November 2019
    Print publication:
    12 December 2019, pp 29-42

  • Summary

    Multinational enterprises operate in an increasingly international environment and their operations are subject to a variety of rules from both hard and soft law. They take advantage of weak accountability systems and poor law enforcement in developing countries, necessitating a better understanding of the most appropriate hard-law approach to regulate them and address business sustainability challenges. Despite the division between the hard and soft legislative approaches used to address extraterritorial challenges, current efforts have been criticised primarily regarding their impact and enforceability. This chapter explores possible approaches for better extraterritorial regulation of corporate sustainability, including more detailed and extended directorial duties, together with enforcement measures driven by the state. Such efforts may direct board members’ attitudes towards more active involvement with extraterritorial corporate sustainability challenges.