Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 4 - On Generation and Corruption II 3

  • from Part I - Introduction and Interpretative Essays
  • Edited by Panos Dimas, Universitetet i Oslo, Andrea Falcon, Concordia University, Montréal, Sean Kelsey, University of Notre Dame, Indiana
  • Book:
    Aristotle: <i>On Generation and Corruption</i> Book II
    Published online:
    10 November 2022
    Print publication:
    24 November 2022, pp 59-78

  • Summary

    In GC II 3, Aristotle gives an initial justification of three theses: (i) that there are four primary bodies; (ii) that these are earth, air, fire, and water; and (iii) that each is associated with two primary differentiae. Despite his laconic presentation, Aristotle offers an impressive variety of justifications for his main contentions: he appeals to combinatorial mathematics, to what is “in accordance with argument,” to empirical observation, and to his predecessors. I consider whether this chapter indicates that the primary bodies are not really elements; whether the “apparent simple bodies” Aristotle mentions are the primary bodies or something else; and how to understand the “fiery” and “airy” things that are not fire and air (respectively) but somehow like them. I find that the primary bodies are indeed genuine elements of sensible bodies for Aristotle; that the “apparent simple bodies” are the everyday counterparts of the elemental bodies; and that the contrast between fiery and airy things and fire and air is a contrast between the elemental bodies and their everyday counterparts.